On 3 Jun 2011, at 11:09, Robert Dionne wrote:
> Chris,
>
> This is an excellent idea. Currently the entire suite of browser tests are
> also run from the command line, where we overload the CouchDB definition and
> use couchjs. We could break the suite out with a subset staying in
> share/ww
Chris,
This is an excellent idea. Currently the entire suite of browser tests are
also run from the command line, where we overload the CouchDB definition and
use couchjs. We could break the suite out with a subset staying in
share/www/script/test to be used as you suggest, and the lion's sh
I agree, the browser tests should move to the command line, and a
small subset (30 seconds tops) of tests should be in the browser
(useful for debugging proxy config, installation, spidermonkey
version, or whatever. I'd rather not block 1.1 on rewriting the test
suite, even though I agree the brows
On 2 Jun 2011, at 14:38, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> I've seen this in the past occasionally, where the test suite does
> a _restart and then waits forever for CouchDB to come back. The
> Erlang console will show the regular startup procedure output, but
> then it just waits there for requests. I have
On 2 Jun 2011, at 15:13, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
>>
>> On 2 Jun 2011, at 09:38, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
>>
>>> @nslater when "it hangs" is there anything of note happening in the
>>> erlang logs/shell ? Throw us a bone!
>>
>> Nope, nothing.
>>
>
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> On 2 Jun 2011, at 09:38, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
>
>> @nslater when "it hangs" is there anything of note happening in the
>> erlang logs/shell ? Throw us a bone!
>
> Nope, nothing.
>
>
If Chrome passed fine I'm guessing the error is in the br
On 2 Jun 2011, at 09:38, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> @nslater when "it hangs" is there anything of note happening in the
> erlang logs/shell ? Throw us a bone!
Nope, nothing.
mostly for fun, I did more testing than our standard procedure to even
begin each round of this releasel
+1
Mac OS X 10.6.7, erlang R14B03, firefox 4.0.1
digests and sigs verified.
make check and Futon all clear (have to clear cache, though).
As part of preparing for round 3 I ran all the abov
Hi Peter,
thanks for cheering from the sidelines, you vote is most welcome :)
Here's a link that should get you up to speed with the
procedure and tell you what is expected or not:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
Let us know if you have any questions :)
Cheers
Jan
--
On 2 Jun
Top posting to Bob's top posting, same for me. FF 4.0.1 has been fine
on R14B01 / 03 also, when I remember to clear cache. Chrome also seems
to be fine & I've had no issues with safari current mac version either
but not tested either systematically.
@nslater when "it hangs" is there anything of no
well, i view myself as neither an active player nor a sidelined player but
an eager first row fan in this community that looks forward to the advances
in this couch 'game'.
With minimal understanding of what would/wouldn't make a good release, my
vote should have marginal weight.
To quote, the st
On 1 Jun 2011, at 23:43, Peter Nolan wrote:
> /me votes 'present'.
FYI, this vote will not be counted, if that is what you intended.
You need to provide an Apache style vote.
Preferably with a reason!
:)
/me votes 'present'.
I'll note that I exclusively use firefox 4.0.1 and the test suite
passes reliably in it of R14B01/02/03 (now that the replication bug is
fixed).
B.
On 1 June 2011 21:55, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> Just tangentially FYI:
>
> From the collected test suite reports, I compiled this list of reports by
>
Just tangentially FYI:
From the collected test suite reports, I compiled this list of reports by
success or failure per browser and version:
http://friendpaste.com/6GBZiLCVRF3t4JcLFqLKQ9
Cheers
Jan
--
On 1 Jun 2011, at 22:48, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:28, Randall Leeds
On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:28, Randall Leeds wrote:
> FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox.
> Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old
> versions of the test scripts cached.
I tried this and it hangs on replicate_db forever.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 13:29, Paul Davis wrote:
> What version of FF? 3.5 or newer?
>
4.0.1
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Randall Leeds wrote:
>> FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox.
>> Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old
>> versions of the
On May 30, 2011, at 6:25 PM, Robert Newson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
>
> Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;
>
> 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
> 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).
>
>
What version of FF? 3.5 or newer?
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Randall Leeds wrote:
> FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox.
> Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old
> versions of the test scripts cached.
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 13:19, Jan Lehna
FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox.
Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old
versions of the test scripts cached.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 13:19, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:47, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, No
On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:47, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>>
>> On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote
to +1
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>>> Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to
>>> +1 now.
>>>
>>> I am also suggesting that we change our re
On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>> Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to
>> +1 now.
>>
>> I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome.
>>
>> Firefox 4 seems to
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to
> +1 now.
>
> I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome.
>
> Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it.
Also, our documented te
Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to +1
now.
I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome.
Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it.
On 1 Jun 2011, at 19:21, Paul Davis wrote:
> This usually indicates that something broked on the server. I've only
> seen it in corner cases where I segfault in a NIF or similar. Did you
> check if couch was still running?
Couch was running, and the tests afterwards all passed.
>> auth_cache fa
On 1 Jun 2011, at 19:19, Robert Dionne wrote:
> Does "make check" run with all the etaps passing?
>
>> Everything else looks okay though.
Yep. :)
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Reinstalled Erlang and the weird SSL problems went away.
>
> Unit tests fail for me.
>
> -
>
> replicator_db
> error
> 3001ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> rev_stemming
> error
> 7ms
> Run with debugger
> • Excep
Noah,
Does "make check" run with all the etaps passing?
Bob
On Jun 1, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Reinstalled Erlang and the weird SSL problems went away.
>
> Unit tests fail for me.
>
> -
>
> replicator_db
> error
> 3001ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
Reinstalled Erlang and the weird SSL problems went away.
Unit tests fail for me.
-
replicator_db
error
3001ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised: {}
rev_stemming
error
7ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised: {}
rewrite
error
10ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised
OS X 10.6.7, Erlang R14B03
+1
* signatures: ok
* make check: ok
* browser test suite: Firefox 4.0.1 & Safari 5.0.5: ok
Great work!
On 31.05.2011, at 00:25, Robert Newson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
>
> Two further issues have be
On 31 May 2011, at 17:51, Sam Bisbee wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>
>> On 31 May 2011, at 17:30, Sam Bisbee wrote:
>>
>>> Howdy,
>>>
>>> The release looks great - awesome job * on all the work!
>>>
>>> Ubuntu 10.10 with erlang 1:13.b.3-dfsg-2ubuntu3:
>>>
>
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> On 31 May 2011, at 17:30, Sam Bisbee wrote:
>
>> Howdy,
>>
>> The release looks great - awesome job * on all the work!
>>
>> Ubuntu 10.10 with erlang 1:13.b.3-dfsg-2ubuntu3:
>>
>> - SHA passes
>> - `make check` passes all tests
>> - All
On 31 May 2011, at 17:30, Sam Bisbee wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> The release looks great - awesome job * on all the work!
>
> Ubuntu 10.10 with erlang 1:13.b.3-dfsg-2ubuntu3:
>
> - SHA passes
> - `make check` passes all tests
> - All Futon tests pass in Chromium 10 and Firefox 3.6.16, though
> Fire
Howdy,
The release looks great - awesome job * on all the work!
Ubuntu 10.10 with erlang 1:13.b.3-dfsg-2ubuntu3:
- SHA passes
- `make check` passes all tests
- All Futon tests pass in Chromium 10 and Firefox 3.6.16, though
Firefox still doesn't like losing focus when running tests (keeps
h
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 15:23, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> What Jan said!
> This release has been a real saga and you are awesome!!
+1.
(I've tried the release and make check passes for me. I don't think
any of the browsers I run are supported for the Futon tests, so I'm
skipping those -- but most
On 31 May 2011 20:55, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> I want to second the others' gratitude for your help pushing 1.1.0 out.
What Jan said!
This release has been a real saga and you are awesome!!
A+
Dave
Verified, +1
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Robert Dionne
wrote:
> +1
>
> OS X 10.6
> Erlang 14B01
> All tests pass
>
>
>
> On May 30, 2011, at 6:25 PM, Robert Newson wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
>>
>> Two further issues have
+1
OS X 10.6
Erlang 14B01
All tests pass
On May 30, 2011, at 6:25 PM, Robert Newson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
>
> Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;
>
> 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
> 2) Release tar
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Robert Newson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
>
> Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;
>
> 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
> 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).
>
>
Hi Robert,
I want to second the others' gratitude for your help pushing 1.1.0 out.
On 31 May 2011, at 00:25, Robert Newson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
>
> Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;
>
> 1) Compatibility
On 31 May 2011 10:25, Robert Newson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
>
> Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;
>
> 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
> 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).
>
> We encourag
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Robert Newson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
>
> Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;
>
> 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
> 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).
>
>
+1 here. Motions pass on latest OS X.
On May 30, 2011, at 8:09 PM, Randall Leeds wrote:
> * Signature OK
> * MD5 OK
> * SHA1 OK
> * Make check OK
> * Futon OK
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 15:25, Robert Newson wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0
* Signature OK
* MD5 OK
* SHA1 OK
* Make check OK
* Futon OK
+1
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 15:25, Robert Newson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
>
> Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;
>
> 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B0
Hello,
I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;
1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).
We encourage the whole community to download and test these release art
46 matches
Mail list logo
