priv...@couchdb.apache.org, dev@couchdb.apache.org,
> woh...@apache.org
> Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2019 1:51:20 PM
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Proposed Bylaws changes
> As a user I would tend to find this safeguard reassuring.
> For example, when developments such as the FDB branc
he.org
Cc : dev@couchdb.apache.org
Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed Bylaws changes
And yet we have evidence from other ASF projects that this is not
always the case.
All I am trying to do is have a backstop against that from happening
here.
But if no one wants it, then fine, I give up.
-Joan
age -
> > From: "Garren Smith"
> > To: "priv...@couchdb.apache.org Private" ,
> > "Joan Touzet"
> > Cc: "CouchDB Developers"
> > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2019 2:56:04 AM
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed Bylaws c
uchdb.apache.org
> Cc: "priv...@couchdb.apache.org Private"
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2019 1:57:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed Bylaws changes
>
> https://apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#hats
>
> INDIVIDUALS COMPOSE THE ASF
> All of th
?
-Joan
- Original Message -
> From: "Garren Smith"
> To: "priv...@couchdb.apache.org Private" , "Joan
> Touzet"
> Cc: "CouchDB Developers"
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2019 2:56:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed Bylaws
that point
>> is moot, because the PMC would already be stacked in that direction.
>> This would protect the community from the negative effects of that
>> happening.
>>
>> -Joan
>>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "R
s moot, because the PMC would already be stacked in that direction.
> This would protect the community from the negative effects of that
> happening.
>
> -Joan
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Robert Samuel Newson"
> > To: "Joan Touzet&qu
munity from the negative effects of that
happening.
-Joan
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Samuel Newson"
> To: "Joan Touzet"
> Cc: "CouchDB Developers" , "CouchDB PMC"
>
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2019 4:46:35 PM
> Subj
--- Original Message -
>> From: "Robert Samuel Newson"
>> To: "CouchDB PMC"
>> Cc: "Joan Touzet" , "CouchDB Developers"
>>
>> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2019 4:26:31 PM
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed Bylaws
straightforward.
Why not put in this "backstop?"
-Joan
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Samuel Newson"
> To: "CouchDB PMC"
> Cc: "Joan Touzet" , "CouchDB Developers"
>
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2019 4:26:31 PM
> Subject:
I am +1 on the RFC’s and -1 on the "not directly affiliated with the proposer's
employer” item.
B.
> On 13 Feb 2019, at 11:13, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> Sounds fantastic, thanks too for the additional context! I’d love for us to
> lead the way here (yet again).
>
> Best
> Jan
> —
>
>> On 12.
Sounds fantastic, thanks too for the additional context! I’d love for us to
lead the way here (yet again).
Best
Jan
—
> On 12. Feb 2019, at 20:15, Joan Touzet wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> There appears to be general consensus on the RFC process, with no
> objections to the proposal itself.
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
