On 9/30/10 5:32 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Just to clarify (since I think I may have generated too much excitement around
this)... :-)
My thought are more around "fixing" the current ExtensionManagerBus to get all
the features working properly with the extension mechanism that is currently
in place
I is still *excited*
On Sep 29, 2010, at 3:32 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> Just to clarify (since I think I may have generated too much excitement
> around
> this)... :-)
>
> My thought are more around "fixing" the current ExtensionManagerBus to get
> all
> the features working properly with
I really like the osgi concept of services. So I think we could simply
register services for e.g. the bindings and transports in osgi.
For non osgi environments we could create a simple service registry that
serves the same purpose. Camel has the concept of a registry that can be
implemented usi
Just to clarify (since I think I may have generated too much excitement around
this)... :-)
My thought are more around "fixing" the current ExtensionManagerBus to get all
the features working properly with the extension mechanism that is currently
in place. When that works, creating a new im
+1 for an osgibus!
- Original Message -
From: Johan Edstrom [mailto:seij...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 01:19 PM
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fun with the survey
+1 on an osgibus, that would be great.
On Sep 28, 2010, at 8:10 PM, Willem Jiang wrote:
> On 9/29/
On Wednesday 29 September 2010 11:51:04 am Andrew Dinn wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Thanks for the explanation. I have a few comments inline.
>
> On 09/29/2010 02:54 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > 1) JAX-WS async client callbacks. We need to correlate the incoming
> > message with the outgoing request so w
+1 on an osgibus, that would be great.
On Sep 28, 2010, at 8:10 PM, Willem Jiang wrote:
> On 9/29/10 4:06 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>> On Monday 27 September 2010 9:44:25 pm Benson Margulies wrote:
>>> It looks like our close and personal relationship with Spring
>>> continues to really inconvenienc
Hi Dan,
Thanks for the explanation. I have a few comments inline.
On 09/29/2010 02:54 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
1) JAX-WS async client callbacks. We need to correlate the incoming message
with the outgoing request so we can figure out which call back object to call.
This correlation could potent
On Wednesday 29 September 2010 4:53:25 am Andrew Dinn wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> I am afraid I have much shallower knowledge of the CXF code than
> Alessio so I hope you will forgive me asking a rather simple-minded
> question. Could you explain why CXF needs to perform correlation of
> outgoing reques
Hi Dan,
I am afraid I have much shallower knowledge of the CXF code than
Alessio so I hope you will forgive me asking a rather simple-minded
question. Could you explain why CXF needs to perform correlation of
outgoing requests and incoming responses?
regards,
Andrew Dinn
---
On 0
Hi Alessio,
On 09/29/2010 10:24 AM, Alessio Soldano wrote:
I actually had a brief chat about this with Dan yesterday. The main
reason seems to be in WS-RM needs, but I still need to look at the
details (to understand what actually needs to be copied from one
exchange to the other). Besides that,
Hi Andrew,
I actually had a brief chat about this with Dan yesterday. The main
reason seems to be in WS-RM needs, but I still need to look at the
details (to understand what actually needs to be copied from one
exchange to the other). Besides that, there're probably other
requirements related
12 matches
Mail list logo
