+1Eric JohnsonPrinciple Technical Writer | FuseSource Corp.emjohn...@fusesource.com|fusesource.comoffice: (781) 280-4174skype: finnmccumial | twitter: @finnmccumialblog:http://documentingit.blogspot.com/On Apr 25, 2012, at 7:52 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:On 24/04/12 19:30, Daniel Kulp wrote:Just
I think 2) is sufficient. Most people will be looking for the Javadocs for the latest version of the one of the supported releases. I'm all for more information versus less information, but keeping every version of the Javadocs on the Web site starts getting to the point of diminishing
+1 to removing the http binding. It is time to retire it.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
What do you think of dropping a couple of modules for 2.5:
- both rt-bindings-local and rt-bindings-object seem to do the same thing, I
recall there
+1 to clearing out some of the cruft.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
I was kind of poking around to see how some other projects handle feature
requests for things likely not to ever be implemented as we're a similar
situations. We have a bunch of JIRA's
You could look at:
http://fusesource.com/docs/framework/2.4/bind_trans/SoapOverJms.html
http://fusesource.com/docs/framework/2.4/bind_trans/FUSECXFJMS.html
http://fusesource.com/docs/framework/2.4/jaxws/SoapOverJmsJava.html
They all have plenty of examples on using the various JMS options for
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the very quick response. Sorry, I've been a little swamped.
My best attempt at answers follows.
On 4/5/11 7:45 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Monday 04 April 2011 5:32:49 PM Eric Johnson wrote:
I've a question for the CXF developers. To quickly introduce myself, I'm
the last working draft -
mostly to clarify the assertions, and fix some oversights - it would
actually be useful to know about CXF with respect to our latest working
copy, and its assertions [5], and that either or both will do.
Can anyone comment?
Thanks!
-Eric Johnson
[1] http://www.w3
+1 to the antbuild idea.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Glen Mazza glen.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds good. My WSDL-first tutorial shows how Ant can be used
(http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/entry/web_service_tutorial), I can
incorporate that into a new CXF sample (I've been meaning to rip out
I think 2 is a better option for a general audience. Not everyone will
want to use Maven and leaving a few Ant ready examples in place will
help non-Maven users see how to set up their environment.
From a maintenance perspective getting rid of the samples-lib folder
and any Ant build scripts that
+1
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
thanks, Sergey
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
We've resolved over 50 issues since 2.3.2. Thus, we really should get
2.3.3 out, especially since 2.3.2 contained an
For many of the major decisions this sort of discussion is done on the
mailing list and archived.
On Saturday, February 19, 2011, Christian Schneider
ch...@die-schneider.net wrote:
Am 19.02.2011 14:47, schrieb Glen Mazza:
On 2/19/2011 8:24 AM, Christian Schneider wrote:
The second thing
I agree with Dan and Glenn. Commercial support makes CXF stronger and
provides a way for active committers (and some inactive one as well)
to earn a living while doing what they love doing.
Letting companies put up some marketing blurb on the support page
and/or on a dedicated Commercial Offering
at 10:52 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric, I am still trying to decide if you are serious or just fooling around.
I thought we clarified this in private. Public is fine too. Comments inline.
If I come across as upset, I am!
Hadrian
On Feb 3, 2011, at 10:14 AM, Eric
everyone can claim he is right and the others are wrong.
Of course we should also refer to any rules that the Apache organization
has for such statements that apply to all projects.
Christian
Am 03.02.2011 16:14, schrieb Eric Johnson:
Since there are now at least three decent size companies
+1
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Christian Schneider
ch...@die-schneider.net wrote:
+1
Christian
Am 18.01.2011 05:26, schrieb Daniel Kulp:
We've had a busy 8 weeks or so despite the holidays. We've managed to
fix over 75 JIRA issues since 2.3.1 which is quite remarkable . This also
+1
On Thursday, December 2, 2010, Freeman Fang freeman.f...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Regards
Freeman
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
In the last 2 years, Colm has logged 11 issues with CXF. Every single one
of
them came with a patch file to fix the
+1
On Tuesday, November 16, 2010, Jeff Genender jgenen...@savoirtech.com wrote:
+1
Jeff
On Nov 16, 2010, at 3:35 PM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi
I'd like to initiate a vote for Łukasz Moreń to become a CXF committer.
You may recall that Łukasz came forward and proposed to have OAuth
Is the IDL-WSDL maven plug-in still called idltowsdl or has it been
changed to idl2wsdl to keep it in line with the command line tool?
I think Robert's idea is solid overall. The command line tools should
have good help text and the Apache hosted docs should be presented in
a uniform manner.
However, we cannot ask outside entities to conform to our standards.
Corporate tech writing departments all have their own sets of
I updated the page to change IONA to Progress and add a list of CXF's features.
Is there any other information people would like to see on the page?
-Original Message-
From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargul...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 2:47 PM
To:
I know I should remember the answer to this, but I'm suffering from a
senior moment
Does the updated JMS configuration change the WSDL extensions for
specifying the JMS endpoint in WSDL?
-
Eric Johnson
Principal Technical Writer
MII-KS, FUSE
Progress Software Corporation
-Original
21 matches
Mail list logo
