/2009/07/using-soap-faults-and-exceptions-in-java-jaxws-web-services.html
Cheers,
Rio
PS: I'm closing CXF-4600 as won't fix.
On 12/03/2012 04:15 PM, Richard Opalka wrote:
Hello CXF folks,
after googling, reading the specs. blogs whole day
I have few additional findings.
I was playing
Clarification,
was thinking little bit about it during the weekend.
On 11/30/2012 03:20 PM, Richard Opalka wrote:
Forgot to mention that this is related to CXF-4600 :(
Follow up (thinking CXF way and for a while ignoring previous post):
The sources we're going to talk about are located
why CXF isn't using generated 'exception' beans for JAXB
de/serialization WSDL generation
but instead operate directly on top of exception objects? I know CXF is
passing TCK, but isn't it violating JAXWS spec.?
Most probably TCK tests doesn't cover this issue :(
Cheers,
--
Richard Opalka
Principal
definition should never be generated --
!--xs:complexType name=AdaptedExceptionCA
xs:sequence/
/xs:complexType--
WDYT?
PS1: Just thinking loud :)
PS2: Attached are generated WSDL sources.
On 11/30/2012 02:53 PM, Richard Opalka wrote:
Hi CXF folks,
Below is copy/paste from JAXWS 2.2
Hi Sergey,
On 11/26/2012 04:58 PM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi Richard
On 26/11/12 15:05, Richard Opalka wrote:
Hi Sergey,
On 11/26/2012 02:57 PM, Richard Opalka wrote:
Hi Sergey,
On 11/26/2012 01:31 PM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi Richard
On 26/11/12 12:29, Richard Opalka wrote:
Hi
guidelines (is not lenient
like e.g. Jakarta Tomcat).
The last issue that I identified with Servlet3ContinuationProvider is
the isNew flag has incorrect initial value - it should be *true*.
Cheers,
Rio
--
Richard Opalka
Principal Software Engineer
JBoss, by Red Hat
Cell: +420 731 186 942
Hi Sergey,
On 11/26/2012 01:21 PM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi Richard
On 26/11/12 12:15, Richard Opalka wrote:
Dear CXF developers,
I'm analyzing our recent CXF continuation related failures in CI
and I identified the following problem:
SVN commit id: 1409193
introduced
Hi Sergey,
On 11/26/2012 01:31 PM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi Richard
On 26/11/12 12:29, Richard Opalka wrote:
Hi Sergey,
On 11/26/2012 01:21 PM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi Richard
On 26/11/12 12:15, Richard Opalka wrote:
Dear CXF developers,
I'm analyzing our recent CXF
Hi Sergey,
On 11/26/2012 02:57 PM, Richard Opalka wrote:
Hi Sergey,
On 11/26/2012 01:31 PM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi Richard
On 26/11/12 12:29, Richard Opalka wrote:
Hi Sergey,
On 11/26/2012 01:21 PM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi Richard
On 26/11/12 12:15, Richard Opalka wrote:
Dear
to change the check
style configuration file.
[1]http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1341332view=rev
On Wed Apr 25 02:42:14 2012, dk...@apache.org wrote:
--
Richard Opalka
JBoss, by Red Hat
Cell: +420 731 186 942
to WARNING so you can proceed. If they do change it, leave as is.
Dan
On Wednesday 04 August 2010 7:33:21 am Richard Opalka wrote:
Forwarding to Daniel for his opinions on this topic.
Rio
Original Message
Subject:Re: [jbossws-dev] CXF-2926
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11
Forwarding to Daniel for his opinions on this topic.
Rio
Original Message
Subject:Re: [jbossws-dev] CXF-2926
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:37:38 +0200
From: Alessio Soldano asold...@redhat.com
To: Richard Opalka ropa...@redhat.com
CC: Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz
Hi Eoghan,
see in lined comments below:
Richard
Eoghan Glynn wrote:
Hi Richard,
Apologies for the delay in replying.
NP
Please see my comments in-line.
2009/6/15 Richard Opalka ropa...@redhat.com:
what's the current state of CXF WS-RM?
See below.
I'm asking because
OK, will do ;)
Richard
Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Mon June 15 2009 9:39:51 am Richard Opalka wrote:
What's the current status of this issue Daniel?
Should I create JIRA issue or is there already one?
Create a JIRA (and attach a patch ;-) )!
Dan
Richard
Richard Opalka wrote
in CXF WS-RM implementation?
* Is current CXF WS-RM implementation tightly coupled with Endpoint?
* Is there some API for client side when receiving undelivered
messages? Where I could find it?
* Is there some detailed architecture documentation about CXF WS-RM?
Thanks,
Richard
--
Richard Opalka
someplace for the name of the ServiceImpl
class to instantiate. If set, use reflection to create the ServiceImpl thing
if set.
Anyway, those are my immediate thoughts.
Dan
On Mon May 25 2009 9:21:35 am Richard Opalka wrote:
Hi CXF Team,
We've spent some time with CXF source
be invoked as well.
Dan
On Wed June 3 2009 2:11:22 am Richard Opalka wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Yes, I know about solution 1) you suggested. However I don't like
it.
It's hacky and could cause a lot of troubles to our customers.
Thus I'd like to go the way to modify CXF code base.
Before I'll
If you have feedback, questions or would like to get involved in the CXF
project please join the mailing lists and let us know your thoughts.
The Apache CXF Team
http://cxf.apache.org/
--
Richard Opalka
JBoss Software Engineer
Mail: ropa...@redhat.com
Mobile: +420 731 186 942
aforementioned ugly hack?
JBossWS Team
PS: We're looking forward for your suggestions ;)
--
B.Sc. Richard Opalka
Senior Software Engineer
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
Mobile: +420 731 186 942
Mail: ropa...@redhat.com
--
B.Sc. Richard Opalka
Senior Software Engineer
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
Mobile: +420 731 186 942
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
20 matches
Mail list logo
