Re: Removing some old modules in 3.2.0-SNAPSHOT

module. You are right, technically it is old spec but it is still used widely (mostly because it is much simple to integrate comparing to oauth2 f.e.). Thanks. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Sergey Beryozkin <sberyoz...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi CXF modul

Removing some old modules in 3.2.0-SNAPSHOT

Hi CXF module base continues to grow - a lot of modules is available, with some of these modules being obsolete and never used. I'd like to propose to drop some of these modules in 3.2.0-SNAPSHOT to make the builds faster, the workspaces smaller and new users less overwhelmed :-). Once we

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.2.3

://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cxf-fediz.git;a=commit;h=f579bd61e708a6600f90e2b09dfa1daada5e9160 Source: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1078/org/apache/cxf/fediz/fediz/1.2.3/fediz-1.2.3-source-release.zip +1 from me. Colm. -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend

Re: Cannot get cachedoutputstream to work properly for JAX-RS client

(the remote party malfunctions and does not accept the request while using chunking). -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/

Re: [DISCUSS] UI for Fediz IDP - update -

urter.ch:8040/admin/index.html (default credentials) best regards Aymen -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/

Re: Introduction

between the 3.0.X stream and 3.1.X stream? Does 3.1.X require Java 8 (or higher)? 3.0.x supports Java 6+, 3.1.x - Java 7+, master (3.2.0-SNAPSHOT) - Java 8+ Cheers, Sergey Thanks, Andy On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Sergey Beryozkin <sberyoz...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Andy Welcome,

Re: Introduction

Hi Andy Welcome, thanks for the introductions, some comments below On 17/08/16 15:56, Andy McCright wrote: Hi All, I wanted to introduce myself. My name is Andy McCright and I'll be taking over Iris Deng's role as IBM's advocate for CXF and JAX-RS. Please pass our thanks to Iris, who is

Re: build failures

/commit/96ff2ac5 [2]https://builds.apache.org/job/CXF-3.1.x/596/console Cheers, Jim -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/

Re: SearchBean

ngrats ! Sergey Thanks. Jim -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/

Re: Coding style

to use it though. Christian On 10.08.2016 12:17, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: Hi Having static imports always has Checkstyle complaining for me. I'm fine with the new tests contributed which have the static imports that pass the command line builds :-). Refactoring the existing tests - are you referring

Re: Coding style

Hi Having static imports always has Checkstyle complaining for me. I'm fine with the new tests contributed which have the static imports that pass the command line builds :-). Refactoring the existing tests - are you referring to all of CXF unit tests ? Sergey On 10/08/16 11:09, Behrang

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.3.1

+1 Thanks, Sergey On 09/08/16 09:10, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: This is a vote to release Apache CXF Fediz 1.3.1. Artifacts: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1077/ Issues Fixed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FEDIZ/fixforversion/12335480 GIT tag:

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.0.10 and 3.1.7

+1 Thanks, Sergey On 26/07/16 21:25, Daniel Kulp wrote: It’s been a long time coming, but we’re finally ready to release 3.0.10/3.1.7. We’ve resolved over 75 issues for 3.1.7 which is a LOT for a “.7” release. Staging areas: 3.1.7:

Re: AW: [DISCUSS] UI for Fediz IDP

e a pull request on github. (So it will be integrated into CXF Fediz out of the box) However, I'm not sure about the licensing aspects. (If the Apache License is compatible with the licensing options of the used technologies) best regards Aymen On 22.07.2016 09:17, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: On 22/

Re: AW: [DISCUSS] UI for Fediz IDP

9.07050302@prodyna.com] [cid:part4.02020608.04060203@prodyna.com] Since its based on bootstrap, the UI is responsive (Not all screens are working that well): [cid:part5.02070005.07010502@prodyna.com] [cid:part6.09070204.00060700@prodyna.com] best regards, Aymen -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Commun

Re: [Heads up] Design of new major version of CXF DOSGi

So what do you think? Can we use this to replace all the old config options? Christian On 07.07.2016 11:52, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: I'm not seeing this code in a WS provider either: https://github.com/apache/cxf-dosgi/blob/cxf-dosgi-ri-1.8.0/cxf-dsw/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/dosg

Re: 3.1.7?

to be pushed soon? Chuck On 7/5/16, 2:46 AM, "Sergey Beryozkin" <sberyoz...@gmail.com> wrote: As far as I know the current plan is to do a build in two weeks time, we will try get more fixes/improvements in before the build Cheers, Sergey On 05/07/16 10:30, David Karlsen wrote:

Re: [Heads up] Design of new major version of CXF DOSGi

be removed or not. Cheers, Sergey On 07/07/16 10:37, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: Hi Christian As I said in my previous email I'd like to keep the code which works for whoever uses DOSGI JAX-RS operational so lets start from it - this code should stay, why would you remove it if you don't quite understand

Re: [Heads up] Design of new major version of CXF DOSGi

we talk on skype to discuss the use cases and then sketch some examples. These will then be the barrier the new impl must pass. Christian On 07.07.2016 11:10, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: Hi Christian Having a POC is a good idea and given it let me suggest a slightly different path. I'd like to keep

Re: [Heads up] Design of new major version of CXF DOSGi

to do the same on the 2.0 syntax. If we find gaps I will add the code to 2.0 again of course. Christian 2016-07-06 21:28 GMT+02:00 Sergey Beryozkin <sberyoz...@gmail.com>: Hi Christian On 06/07/16 18:42, Christian Schneider wrote: I have removed all that code as I hope we have other me

Re: [Heads up] Design of new major version of CXF DOSGi

7-06 16:49 GMT+02:00 Sergey Beryozkin <sberyoz...@gmail.com>: Hi Christian It all looks like a fine way forward, though I do believe there was a code before which allowed setting JAX-RS providers/interceptors This line adds interceptors/features: https://github.com/apache/cxf-dosgi/blob/

Re: [Heads up] Design of new major version of CXF DOSGi

fixed so please speak up to get your use cases in. Christian -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/

Re: 3.1.7?

As far as I know the current plan is to do a build in two weeks time, we will try get more fixes/improvements in before the build Cheers, Sergey On 05/07/16 10:30, David Karlsen wrote: Is it about time to get a 3.1.7 out? -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Build Utils 3.2.1 take2

=4dbfa24b3cd27da45b4dd219e1aadd89ac5d3cba Maven artifacts: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1072 +1 from me. Christian -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/

Re: Moving CXF SwaggerFeature into its own module

Have just merged to 3.1.x. Cheers, Sergey On 04/07/16 16:32, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: Hi Andriy Romain proposed it earlier, I agree it is quite timely at this stage :-) Cheers, Sergey On 04/07/16 15:53, Andrey Redko wrote: Hey Sergey, Great idea I think, we may add even more features around

Re: Moving CXF SwaggerFeature into its own module

4, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Sergey Beryozkin <sberyoz...@gmail.com <mailto:sberyoz...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi All as part of CXF-6760 [1] I've moved the Swagger code into its own cxf-rt-rs-description-swagger module. It makes it easier for the users to choose between WADL

Moving CXF SwaggerFeature into its own module

Hi All as part of CXF-6760 [1] I've moved the Swagger code into its own cxf-rt-rs-description-swagger module. It makes it easier for the users to choose between WADL and Swagger (example, right now if only WADL is preferred then no Swagger endpoint is there but not vice versa, having Swagger

Re: Initial RxJava support in CXF

//twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>

Re: Initial RxJava support in CXF

www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> 2016-05-19 17:41 GMT+02:00 Sergey Beryozkin <sberyoz...@talend.com>: Hi Christian https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6833 Please see t

Re: Vert.x support

Sorry, *Now* that we on Java 8 trunk... On 19/05/16 16:53, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: Hi Michael Not that we on Java 8 trunk, should we continue the conversation ? Cheers, Sergey On 09/10/15 22:20, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: Sounds good :-), thanks again - as I said we can either try and align

Re: Vert.x support

Hi Michael Not that we on Java 8 trunk, should we continue the conversation ? Cheers, Sergey On 09/10/15 22:20, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: Sounds good :-), thanks again - as I said we can either try and align JAX-RS 2.1 features with Vert.x features or even have a dedicated Vert.x transport

Re: Cxf-wsn slow consume message

thanks -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/

Re: CXF Repository Build

-plugin still sucks in my opinion. I hope the indexes will support mvn style urls at some points then this will go away. If it creates to much trouble we can disable it. Christian On 27.04.2016 11:52, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: Hi All CXF Repository Build (on 3.2.0-SNAPSHOT master) is downloading 3.2.0

CXF Repository Build

Hi All CXF Repository Build (on 3.2.0-SNAPSHOT master) is downloading 3.2.0-SNAPSHOTS for all the modules, though the master has just been built and the snapshots are available locally, has someone observed it too ? Cheers, Sergey

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF DOSGi 1.8.0

://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1070 +1 from me. Christian -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/

Re: Fediz OIDC documentation

demos in the CXF distro: jax_rs/basic_oidc and jax_rs/big_query where Google is acting as OIDC server Cheers, Sergey On 29/03/16 11:23, Iurii Smyrnov wrote: Hi CXF developers (Sergey Beryozkin, Jan Bernhardt, Colm O hEigeartaigh and other guys who's working on Apache Fediz OIDC development), We

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.3.0

=e2b96849ced74ea1519871f6a68a6448e3f1ba98 Maven Artifacts: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1069/ +1 from me. Colm. -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/

Re: Using Interceptors on JAX-RS 2.0 Client

ode on our side. Thanks, Eirik. On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Sergey Beryozkin <sberyoz...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Eirik I totally forgot, I looked at the code and realized I did something there to support CXF Features - the fact the interceptors are added per request is the unfortu

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.1.6/3.0.9

+1 Cheers, Sergey On 23/03/16 23:48, Daniel Kulp wrote: It’s been awhile since the last set of releases and we’ve fixed over 45 JIRA’s (some of which may be needed for the Fediz release) so I’d like to get this out. Staging areas: 3.0.9:

Re: Using Interceptors on JAX-RS 2.0 Client

, "Sergey Beryozkin" <sberyoz...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi It is not possible to register CXF specific Feature or Interceptor with JAX-RS 2.0 Client API. When you do "client.register(new MyLoggingFeature())", assuming it is CXF Feature, then it will be currently ignored.

Re: MessageBodyReader/Writer cache

list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/

Re: Using Interceptors on JAX-RS 2.0 Client

Hi It is not possible to register CXF specific Feature or Interceptor with JAX-RS 2.0 Client API. When you do "client.register(new MyLoggingFeature())", assuming it is CXF Feature, then it will be currently ignored. I wonder if it might make sense to create some JAX-RS 2.0 FeatureWrapper

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Build Utils 3.2.0

from me. Colm. -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/

Re: cxf git commit: make checkstyle happy

ImplicitService implicitService) { this.implicitService = implicitService; } - } +} -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/

Re: cxf git commit: [CXF-6814]:ClientRequestFilter should be added with descending order of priority

orityComparator(ClientRequestFilter.class, false)); Collections.sort(clientResponseFilters, new BindingPriorityComparator(ClientResponseFilter.class, false)); -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/

Re: [Discuss] Provider API for DOSGi and move core of CXF-DOSGi to Aries

d by both so providers could run in both implementations. Johannes even proposed that such an API could be part of a future remote services spec. What do you think? Christian -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/

Re: [HEADUP] the http-undertow transport

Hi Freeman Just curious, what is the difference between Netty and Undertow CXF transports ? Thanks, Sergey On 26/02/16 04:03, Freeman Fang wrote: Hi Team, I just push commit to master to add cxf http-undertow transport. This is pretty much like how the cxf http-jetty transport works but

Re: Thread safety with ClientImpl

org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.client.WebClient(s) as it is one of the reasons currently making org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.client.spec.ClientImpl not thread safe. Thanks, Peter -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/

Re: Fwd: Timeouts not being used?

d J. M. Karlsen - http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidkarlsen -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.2.2

nd.com -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.1.5/3.0.8

+1 Thanks, Sergey On 02/02/16 21:28, Daniel Kulp wrote: It’s been 3 months since the last patch releases so we really need to get these out. Staging areas: 3.1.5 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1059/ 3.0.8

Re: Version 1 NewCookie is not compliant with RFC 2109

, there will be an issue. +1 for this change. Iris Ding -- View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Version-1-NewCookie-is-not-compliant-with-RFC-2109-tp5764367p5764500.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http

New OAuthDataProvider methods on the trunkk/3.1.x

Hi I had to update OAuthDataProvider interface and add two methods for listing the access and refresh tokens associated with a given OAuth2 client. Also, AuthorizationCodeDataProvider which extends OAuthDataProvider has a new method for listing the pending code grants associated with a given

Re: Fixing up bean validation in OSGi

Hi Benson On 11/12/15 16:19, Benson Margulies wrote: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6706 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6705 The changes I've committed for CXF-6705 make it possible to use bean validation, but ... 1: only with hibernate 2: only with extra code to obtain

Re: Feedback of my Phd work in CXF project

in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Feedback-of-my-Phd-work-in-CXF-project-tp5763765p5763787.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/

Re: Feedback of my Phd work in CXF project

es to change in a issue. -- View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Feedback-of-my-Phd-work-in-CXF-project-tp5763765p5763780.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/

Re: Drop support for Jetty 8?

Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/

Re: [1/5] cxf git commit: Minor change

them. I will restore them though. Colm. On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Sergey Beryozkin <sberyoz...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Colm, Why did you remove AbstractJoseConsumer/Producer ? Not only JWT tokens can be signed/encrypted Can you please restore those ? Thanks, Sergey On 04/11/15

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.18/3.0.7/3.1.4

=55292609edc928dbfc47c8511157159b41fffcd2 Vote will be open for 72h. -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/

Re: Vert.x support

iginal Message- From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sberyoz...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 9, 2015 10:25 PM To: dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: Re: Vert.x support Hi On 09/10/15 21:18, Canning, Charles wrote: Micheal, I cant answer the CXF portion, but i wanted to clarify one of your points. If y

Re: Vert.x support

, Michael Putters wrote: I guess I will wait a bit longer then ;-) One last bit of info, I suppose the easiest way to describe my goal would be: https://github.com/englishtown/vertx-jersey but for CXF So, see you all in few weeks. -Original Message- From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sberyoz

Re: [VOTE]Apache CXF 3.1.3

: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1055/ Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Here is my +1. -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF XJC Utils 3.0.5

+1 Sergey On 01/09/15 17:11, Jeff Genender wrote: +1 Jeff On Sep 1, 2015, at 10:10 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: This is a vote to release Apache CXF XJC Utils 3.0.5. This release just fixes a couple of bugs I ran in to when porting Fediz to use the XJC DV plugin

Re: cxf git commit: [CXF-6557] add a CORS filter for swagger2 samples

Hi Aki Benson added CrossOriginResourceSharingFilter to CXF awhile back, it is quite advanced, handles simple and pre-flight requests, can be configured directly or it can check the annotations on the resource methods. Only FYI (in case you'll need to do more fine-grained CORS control),

Re: Missing dependency for method public void org.apache.cxf ...

Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/

Re: Can't Get Jackson jaxrs:providers Working!!!

.547215.n5.nabble.com/Can-t-Get-Jackson-jaxrs-providers-Working-tp5760269p5760277.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/

Re: CXF + Karaf 4: how to access the CXFNonSpringServlet

Hi The default HTTP transport creates a /cxf context, without it it is up to the custom application how to control the context name, does /test-uri respond, etc ? Sergey On 14/08/15 10:31, jrevillard wrote: Last but not least, my enpoints are registered:Best,Jerome -- View this message

Re: CXF + Karaf 4: how to access the CXFNonSpringServlet

of displaying the service output. Best, Jerome Le 14/08/2015 13:16, Sergey Beryozkin a écrit : Hi The default HTTP transport creates a /cxf context, without it it is up to the custom application how to control the context name, does /test-uri respond, etc ? Sergey On 14/08/15 10:31, jrevillard

Re: CXF + Karaf 4: how to access the CXFNonSpringServlet

HTTPTransportFactory but calling the default constructor which therefore create a new DestinationRegistryImpl. This later is then filled with the endpoints instead of the one that I instantiated. I still don't know who instantiat it and why. Best, Jerome Le 14/08/2015 14:31, Sergey Beryozkin

Re: CXF + Karaf 4: how to access the CXFNonSpringServlet

, Sergey Beryozkin a écrit : Hi, no, no idea why your approach does not work. I'd choose at any time the CXFBlueprintServlet path, but it is only my opinion Cheers, Sergey On 14/08/15 13:24, Jérôme Revillard wrote: Thanks Sergey, I would really like to be be able to fix my issue because it seems

Re: CXF + Karaf 4: how to access the CXFNonSpringServlet

of doing what I want to achieve even if it's a bit more complex. Would you have an idea ? Best, Jerome Le 14/08/2015 13:49, Sergey Beryozkin a écrit : Hi I did try disabling the default servlet in one of the demos. But I used CXFBlueprintServlet instead and registered the bundle as a war bundle

Re: reduce CXF dependencies for JAXRS?

Hi Romain Yes, as Dan mentioned, a major refactoring has been done in CXF 3.1.x. I'd say having xmlschema and woodstox dependencies is not a major problem. JAX-RS servers do not need the JAX-RS client implementation, though not yet the other way around, but now that we have client and server

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.2.1

=12313420version=12332051 Git tag: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cxf-fediz.git;a=commit;h=97ea63580759503576da76b1fb91aa20113664ae +1 from me. Colm. -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.0.6 and 3.1.2

+1 Sergey On 28/07/15 21:13, Daniel Kulp wrote: This is a vote to release 3.0.6 and 3.1.2. We’ve fixed over 40 issues for 3.1.2. Staging areas: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1049/ https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1051/ Tags:

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.17

+1 Thanks, Sergey On 27/07/15 22:26, Alessio Soldano wrote: This is a vote to release 2.7.17. It’s been over 2 months since the last release and we’ve fixed more than 18 issues. Staging area: 2.7.17: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1048/ Tag: 2.7.17:

Re: Build fix

Hi Jim, thanks for taking care of it, my fault, I'll look into it today Sergey On 23/07/15 06:37, Jim Ma wrote: Hi, I've fixed this compilation error by directly changing these methods to public: https://builds.apache.org/job/CXF-Trunk-JDK17/891/consoleFull If this is something wrong, please

Re: Build fix

I'll keep those methods public for now, they add a bit of a 'noise' given that typed JWE and JWS variants are available, but the fact JwtToken deals with base JoseHeaders is a bit of problem that needs to be addressed separately Sergey On 23/07/15 10:06, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: Hi Jim, thanks

Re: [VOTE]xjc-utils 3.0.4

+1 On 09/07/15 22:40, Daniel Kulp wrote: This is a vote for the XJC-Utils 3.0.4. This is mostly to release the extra fixes we need for the bug986 plugin required to get the jetty/netty settings properly parsed in blueprint. However, it also includes two fixes from users. Staging repo:

Re: What is required to contribute bug fixes

Hi, All you need to do is to create an account with Apache JIRA, login, open a CXF JIRA issue and attach a patch Thanks. Sergey

Re: [VOTE] Apache DOSGi 1.7.0 Release

+1 Cheers, Sergey On 03/07/15 15:12, Christian Schneider wrote: The Apache CXF DOSGi sub project implements the OSGi Remote Services and Remote Services Admin Service specifications [1] which provide a distributed computing model based around OSGi Services. This release works on Apache Karaf 3

Re: Apache Camel Routing and Apache CXF Rest with Proxy

-- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/ Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com

Re: CXF work with mutual auth

Hi Please ask such questions on the users list, FYI, on the client side you can experiment with JAX-RS 2.0 Client API or configure CXF HttpConduit directly, see HttpConduit info: http://cxf.apache.org/docs/client-http-transport-including-ssl-support.html on the server you can get TlsSessionInfo

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.1.1

-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cxf.git;a=tag;h=f0d82d6f37105d1e2c97a459fb7fe41d98e1e401 Here is my +1. Vote will be open for 72 hours -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/ Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com

Re: KMIP Support in CXF (ReST SOAP)

for the last 5 years where KMIP was used to address/test a stack of HSMs, the Yes, it is more widespread that XKMS. Dennis -Original Message- From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sberyoz...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 11:59 AM To: dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: Re: KMIP Support in CXF (ReST

Re: Performance Enhancement for CXF jaxrs

in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Performance-Enhancement-for-CXF-jaxrs-tp5757703p5757878.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/ Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com

Re: KMIP Support in CXF (ReST SOAP)

of such customization need. *Best Regards,* *Yossi Cohen* -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/ Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com

Re: Performance Enhancement for CXF jaxrs

Hi Iris Thanks for initiating this thread, lets start with reviewing what can we do for optimizing the resource method selection. Which composite key you propose for mapping a given request to a given resource method ? Request URI + HTTP verb + ? I think it will probably not work with sub

Re: MessageBodyReader and MessageBodyWritter should follow different sorting rule

the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/ Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com

Re: cxf git commit: CXF-6360: Integration with Apache HTrace

Hi Andriy Great stuff, thanks for starting this work. I'm actually not sure we need a tracing-core module at all. Can we have a TracerContext in rt/management and save on introducing one more module ? Thanks, Sergey On 18/05/15 19:25, r...@apache.org wrote: Repository: cxf Updated Branches:

Re: cxf git commit: CXF-6360: Integration with Apache HTrace

). Not sure yet but we can discuss it... Thanks, Sergey On 18/05/15 21:03, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: Hi Andriy Great stuff, thanks for starting this work. I'm actually not sure we need a tracing-core module at all. Can we have a TracerContext in rt/management and save on introducing one more module

Re: cxf git commit: Fix the blueprint test

Hi Dan - nice one , I'm feeling a bit embarrassed about my copy and paste test 'enhancement' :-) Will have a look at some basic generalization of the ns handler registrations Thanks, Sergey On 15/05/15 17:31, dk...@apache.org wrote: Repository: cxf Updated Branches: refs/heads/master

Re: atom support in CXF

list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sergey Beryozkin Talend Community Coders http://coders.talend.com/ Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com

Re: 3.1.0 regression from 3.0.4

://www.tomitribe.com 2015-05-06 10:54 GMT+02:00 Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.com: Hi Romain Looks like you have a very nice set of tests which is impressive :-) That was a 'side-effect' of getting a spec requirement enforced. It is about section 4.2.6, java.lang.Boolean , java.lang.Character

Re: 3.1.0 regression from 3.0.4

Hi Romain Looks like you have a very nice set of tests which is impressive :-) That was a 'side-effect' of getting a spec requirement enforced. It is about section 4.2.6, java.lang.Boolean , java.lang.Character , java.lang.Number Only for text/plain Personally I think it is too restrictive

Re: [jaxrs] client builder and generics

Hi Thanks for spotting it - probably a result of the copy and paste, added a fixed as part of CXF-6393, added a Jackson test Cheers, Sergey On 06/05/15 13:46, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hi when using async client jaxrs api like: .get(new InvocationCallbackCollectionFoo() { ... } the

Re: 3.1.0 regression from 3.0.4

/rmannibucau | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau | Tomitriber http://www.tomitribe.com 2015-05-06 17:07 GMT+02:00 Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.com: I think it is fine now, have a look at the source please... Thanks, Sergey On 06/05/15 16:00, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hmm, doesn't

Re: 3.1.0 regression from 3.0.4

2015-05-06 17:20 GMT+02:00 Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.com: If you set the custom property I've referred to then the runtime will prefer that to a static Consumes/Produces. It is a CXF specific feature Sergey On 06/05/15 16:15, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: how https://git-wip-us.apache.org

Re: 3.1.0 regression from 3.0.4

Hi, On 06/05/15 10:19, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: 2015-05-06 11:13 GMT+02:00 Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.com: Sure, having it configurable would be one option, will take care of it. Another option is to register a custom provider. yes this is more or less the same since you redefine

Re: 3.1.0 regression from 3.0.4

/rmannibucau | Blog http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau | Tomitriber http://www.tomitribe.com 2015-05-06 16:56 GMT+02:00 Sergey Beryozkin sberyoz...@gmail.com: Hi, On 06/05/15 10:19, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.1.0

+1 Thanks, Sergey On 01/05/15 18:30, Daniel Kulp wrote: It’s been a year since the 3.0.0 release and we’ve made a bunch of significant improvements. We really need to get this out. :-) This also include the latest cxf-build-utils which allows CXF to import into the latest Eclipse

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >