Re: Packaging javax.xml.ws as jakarta.xml.ws

2020-01-28 Thread David Blevins
> On Dec 11, 2019, at 2:53 PM, David Blevins wrote: > >> On Dec 9, 2019, at 4:56 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: >> >>> On Dec 8, 2019, at 9:17 PM, Jim Ma wrote: >>> If both JAXB and JAX-WS changes, should cxf community join the effort to >>> contribute and drive the jax-ws spec thing ? >> >> Well,

Re: Packaging javax.xml.ws as jakarta.xml.ws

2019-12-11 Thread David Blevins
> On Dec 9, 2019, at 4:56 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> On Dec 8, 2019, at 9:17 PM, Jim Ma wrote: >> If both JAXB and JAX-WS changes, should cxf community join the effort to >> contribute and drive the jax-ws spec thing ? > > Well, the issue is whom in the community CAN contribute and drive it.

Re: Packaging javax.xml.ws as jakarta.xml.ws

2019-12-09 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
If anyone wants to follow the conversation, the mailing is public and the archives are here: https://www.eclipse.org/lists/jakartaee-platform-dev/. There was some discussion about JAXB and JAXWS not being included in Jakarta EE 9, which was a concern for me as I see these as widely used and I feel

Re: Packaging javax.xml.ws as jakarta.xml.ws

2019-12-09 Thread Daniel Kulp
> On Dec 8, 2019, at 9:17 PM, Jim Ma wrote: > If both JAXB and JAX-WS changes, should cxf community join the effort to > contribute and drive the jax-ws spec thing ? Well, the issue is whom in the community CAN contribute and drive it. With Jakarta moving to Eclipse, it has also become “pay

Re: Packaging javax.xml.ws as jakarta.xml.ws

2019-12-06 Thread David Karlsen
A new major version where just the package names changes? There are no good solutions to this. Oracle screwed this one majorly up. fre. 6. des. 2019, 16:49 skrev Daniel Kulp : > > Interesting discussion… I'm honestly not sure how I feel about it. > > On one hand, it would be nice to be able to

Re: Packaging javax.xml.ws as jakarta.xml.ws

2019-12-06 Thread Daniel Kulp
Interesting discussion… I'm honestly not sure how I feel about it. On one hand, it would be nice to be able to enhance the specs in the future. On the other hand, there hasn’t been an enhancement or any plans for an enhancement for several years. Thus, it could end up being a lot of

Re: Packaging javax.xml.ws as jakarta.xml.ws

2019-12-05 Thread Jim Ma
If we have to rename package for JAX-RS, JSONB , JSONP in CXF , then why not for JAX-WS in a major version ? If we leave it behind, we'll lose chance to evolve JAX-WS api in the future. On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 2:35 PM David Blevins wrote: > Thanks for the feedback, Romain. > > So everyone has

Re: Packaging javax.xml.ws as jakarta.xml.ws

2019-11-26 Thread David Blevins
Thanks for the feedback, Romain. So everyone has context JAX-RS, JSONB, JSONP all will be renamed and therefore CXF will not be able to escape the impact. Everything Romain mentions will happen regardless. The question really is, when this change happens for JAX-RS, JSONB, JSONP and we

Re: Packaging javax.xml.ws as jakarta.xml.ws

2019-11-26 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi David, Guess enhnacements will go in jaxrs (better router etc) On packages, no change is the only viable option for end users (javaagent, maven plugins, sed, etc dont work in enough envs, break the portability ee had been after for years and requires actual work and validation - qa time) so

Packaging javax.xml.ws as jakarta.xml.ws

2019-11-26 Thread David Blevins
There is a discussion and vote going on the Jakarta EE side of the fence as to if the following APIs should be moved from javax into jakarta namespaces. - JAXB (javax.xml.bind -> jakarta.xml.bind) - JAX-WS (javax.xml.ws -> jakarta.xml.ws) What "move" means is these APIs would be able to