[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16036121#comment-16036121
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on DELTASPIKE-1070:
-
Commit
John D. Ament created DELTASPIKE-1264:
-
Summary: Remove portions of BeanProvider/BeanManagerProvider
Key: DELTASPIKE-1264
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1264
Project:
John D. Ament created DELTASPIKE-1263:
-
Summary: Remove BeanBuilder
Key: DELTASPIKE-1263
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1263
Project: DeltaSpike
Issue Type:
John D. Ament created DELTASPIKE-1260:
-
Summary: Remove Servlet Module
Key: DELTASPIKE-1260
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1260
Project: DeltaSpike
Issue Type:
John D. Ament created DELTASPIKE-1261:
-
Summary: Remove BeanVal Module
Key: DELTASPIKE-1261
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1261
Project: DeltaSpike
Issue Type:
I agree with Thomas. While always minimal, if we can trim our internal
libraries and make them a bit more user friendly, it will simplify how
users leverage our modules (e.g. maybe we don't have a core module
anymore). This means better module isolation. If Mark brings config to
Geronimo via MP
IMO we should try to do a cut in 2.0 and do a big cleanup (1.x should be in
maintenance to support < JavaEE8):
- Drop bval module and the servlet module. AFAIR the injection support is
already in JavaEE 8.
- We can also try to remove some core APIs (BeanManagerProvider)
- Cleanup the JSF Module
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16036004#comment-16036004
]
Jan Matèrne commented on DELTASPIKE-1252:
-
Thumbs up. You could close the issue. ;)
>
imo there's not a lot we should drop, because users might need those parts
e.g. for applications based on the micro-profile.
maybe it's just a matter of documenting an useful combination of ee8 + ds
and/or to highlight which parts of ds are covered by ee8.
@ds2:
maybe we should mainly take the
basically +1
we can do some cleanup (like removing features + modules which are
available in JavaEE8)
BUT - many user won't use JavaEE8 until next year as the AS' are not ready.
So IMO it's not necessary now.
I will currently start to do some internal cleanup on the Data Module e.g.
2017-06-03
@romain: +1
regards,
gerhard
2017-06-03 16:19 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
> Hi
>
> Any strong feature from cdi 2 we need? If so +1 otherwise -1
>
> Le 3 juin 2017 16:07, "John D. Ament" a écrit :
>
> > Hey guys
> >
> > I'm not sure there's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Andraschko updated DELTASPIKE-1070:
--
Fix Version/s: 1.8.1
> Refactor RepositoryComponent/s
>
Hi
Any strong feature from cdi 2 we need? If so +1 otherwise -1
Le 3 juin 2017 16:07, "John D. Ament" a écrit :
> Hey guys
>
> I'm not sure there's much more for us to do in 1.x as far as feature goes,
> but I could be wrong. I do think we should start to ramp up work
>
I've updated the website (not published) as well, but need to add to news.
Javadocs are there now as well.
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 7:33 AM Gerhard Petracek
wrote:
> short addition:
>
> it looks like all release steps after the (git) push are missing (see [1]).
>
> regards,
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder deltaspike-site-staging
while building . Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/deltaspike-site-staging/builds/167
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-cms-slave
Build Reason: The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16035971#comment-16035971
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on DELTASPIKE-1252:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek resolved DELTASPIKE-1259.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> upgraded version numbers
>
>
hi thomas,
thx for the heads-up!
we discussed it in the irc-channel already...
i've pushed the fix, but we also have to upload the files for the
download-page,...
regards,
gerhard
2017-06-03 12:57 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko :
> Hi Mark,
>
> is everything ok with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16035947#comment-16035947
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on DELTASPIKE-1259:
-
Commit
Gerhard Petracek created DELTASPIKE-1259:
Summary: upgraded version numbers
Key: DELTASPIKE-1259
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1259
Project: DeltaSpike
Issue
Hi Mark,
is everything ok with the current builds?
I did a fresh checkout today i cant build anymore:
The build could not read 1 project -> [Help 1]
The project
org.apache.deltaspike.modules:deltaspike-data-module-test-java8:1.8.0-SNAPSHOT
21 matches
Mail list logo