Hi,
a few points and questions:
*I am planning to use a common ID for all partitions. I checked Hbase
partition and it uses UUID as the ID. Is it ok to use this for all
partitions?
*It seems that I need to move txn and log package implementations to
core-shared because of the recent reorg.
On 11/2/11 9:12 AM, Selcuk AYA wrote:
Hi,
a few points and questions:
*I am planning to use a common ID for all partitions. I checked Hbase
partition and it uses UUID as the ID. Is it ok to use this for all
partitions?
Yes. This should have been done a long time ago.
*It seems that I need to
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/2/11 9:12 AM, Selcuk AYA wrote:
Hi,
a few points and questions:
*I am planning to use a common ID for all partitions. I checked Hbase
partition and it uses UUID as the ID. Is it ok to use this for all
On 11/2/11 10:10 AM, Selcuk AYA wrote:
* When preparing txn log edits, I will need to log Modification and
Attribute objects and keep them in memory for a while. Is it necessary
to clone these objects while doing the logging at partition nexus
level? In other words, will they be modified after
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Selcuk AYA ayasel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
a few points and questions:
*I am planning to use a common ID for all partitions. I checked Hbase
partition and it uses UUID as the ID. Is it ok to use this for all
partitions?
This great and something we wanted to
Hello everyone,
My name is Kevin and I am writing to ask a question about access to
ApacheDS 2.0.0-M2. Currently I have a bunch of users set up and the
apacheds is used to authenticate the users on my website. My question
is about accessing the apacheds. On my Apache Directory Studio, I can
login
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSHARED-122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Knecht updated DIRSHARED-122:
---
Attachment: sign.patch
maven-gpg-plugin signs attached artifacts. By default
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-60?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot closed DIRAPI-60.
Resolution: Not A Problem
Actually, I was totally wrong and the LdapApiService is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-59?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot closed DIRAPI-59.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed at revision 1196630.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSHARED-122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13142421#comment-13142421
]
Felix Knecht commented on DIRSHARED-122:
IMO it does, you need to have a look
Hi guys,
I had a bit of time and I reviewed the interceptors today. And I had an
idea which may be interesting to discuss.
First, here is a table where all the interceptors operation are listed,
and for each interceptor, I listed the operation they are processing :
11 matches
Mail list logo