close : [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4

2011-05-29 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
Hi, i'm now closing the vote for shared-1.0.0-M4, we got 5 +1, one +0, no -1. +1 Pierre-Arnaud, Stefan, Felix, Kiran Emmanuel +0 : Alex I'll releasing the packages this morning, and announce it tomorrow. Thanks guys ! -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com

Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4

2011-05-26 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
On 5/26/11 7:59 AM, Felix Knecht wrote: I don't know if it matters, but parent pom indicates that Java 1.5 is needed [1] and the the artifacts to be released seem to be compiled with Java 1.6 (at least the included MANIFEST.MF files are indicating so). If it doesn't matters we should at

Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4

2011-05-26 Thread Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
Hi Felix, I think this is a bug in Maven's manifest generator which takes the value of the java version used to execute Maven (Build-Jdk: ${java.version}) and not the version indicated to the Maven compiler plugin (as stated in the Directory's project pom). See links [1], [2] and [3]. I've

Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4

2011-05-26 Thread Felix Knecht
Hi Pierre-Arnaud It helps :-) Thanks for explanations. Didn't knew you can also look it up in a compiled class. Regards Felix On 05/26/2011 10:38 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote: Hi Felix, I think this is a bug in Maven's manifest generator which takes the value of the java version used

Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4

2011-05-26 Thread Alex Karasulu
+1 Sent from my iPhone On May 26, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Felix Knecht fel...@apache.org wrote: I don't know if it matters, but parent pom indicates that Java 1.5 is needed [1] and the the artifacts to be released seem to be compiled with Java 1.6 (at least the included MANIFEST.MF files are

Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4

2011-05-26 Thread Alex Karasulu
İ think we're doing ourselves a big disservice by sticking to J6. Sent from my iPhone On May 26, 2011, at 10:04 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote: On 5/26/11 7:59 AM, Felix Knecht wrote: I don't know if it matters, but parent pom indicates that Java 1.5 is needed [1] and

Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4

2011-05-25 Thread Kiran Ayyagari
[X] +1 Release Shared 1.0.0-M4 thanks Emmanuel On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, This is a vote for the forth milestone release on our way to a Shared and LDAP API 1.0. Many fixes have been injected, and some major refactoring have been done,

Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4

2011-05-25 Thread Alex Karasulu
0+ - supportive but no time or muscle to help presently. Hopefully I can lend a hand here in a couple weeks. Regards and thanks to everyone doing a great job in this area. Alex On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Kiran Ayyagari kayyag...@apache.orgwrote: [X] +1 Release Shared 1.0.0-M4 thanks

Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4

2011-05-25 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
On 5/25/11 2:48 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote: Hi Emmanuel, On 24 mai 2011, at 21:28, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: Hi, This is a vote for the forth milestone release on our way to a Shared and LDAP API 1.0. Many fixes have been injected, and some major refactoring have been done, including

Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4

2011-05-25 Thread Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
On 25 mai 2011, at 14:52, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: On 5/25/11 2:48 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote: Hi Emmanuel, On 24 mai 2011, at 21:28, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: Hi, This is a vote for the forth milestone release on our way to a Shared and LDAP API 1.0. Many fixes have been

Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4

2011-05-25 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
On 5/25/11 3:10 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote: On 25 mai 2011, at 14:52, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: On 5/25/11 2:48 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote: Hi Emmanuel, On 24 mai 2011, at 21:28, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: Hi, This is a vote for the forth milestone release on our way to a Shared

Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4

2011-05-25 Thread Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
On 25 mai 2011, at 15:13, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: On 5/25/11 3:10 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote: On 25 mai 2011, at 14:52, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: On 5/25/11 2:48 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote: Hi Emmanuel, On 24 mai 2011, at 21:28, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: Hi, This is a

Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4

2011-05-25 Thread Stefan Seelmann
+1 Nice job, guys! On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, This is a vote for the forth milestone release on our way to a Shared and LDAP API 1.0. Many fixes have been injected, and some major refactoring have been done, including making the API

Re: [VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4

2011-05-25 Thread Felix Knecht
I don't know if it matters, but parent pom indicates that Java 1.5 is needed [1] and the the artifacts to be released seem to be compiled with Java 1.6 (at least the included MANIFEST.MF files are indicating so). If it doesn't matters we should at least think about prerequisiting Java 1.6 for

[VOTE] Release of Shared 1.0.0-M4

2011-05-24 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
Hi, This is a vote for the forth milestone release on our way to a Shared and LDAP API 1.0. Many fixes have been injected, and some major refactoring have been done, including making the API OSGi compatible. The SVN tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/shared/tags/1.0.0-M4 The source