> On Aug 8, 2017, at 7:23 AM, Shawn McKinney wrote:
>
> If you are working with uncommitted changes but nonetheless need to synch
> with server’s latest changes, simply push your uncommitted changes, pull the
> latest, and then pop your latest changes back off the stack.
> On Aug 8, 2017, at 7:09 AM, Shawn McKinney wrote:
>
>>
>> Yes please! Once I am familiar and the Directory project has been migrated,
>> I could use it to start the wiki page we should have (analogous to the
>> current SVN page).
>>
>> I think I might be tempted to
> On Aug 7, 2017, at 5:42 PM, Brian Burch wrote:
>
>> Yes, it can get confusing if you are working with active branches
>> distributed over a large team, but otherwise quite simple to use, and there
>> are plenty of good tutorials around that show the basic usage patterns.
+1.
Colm.
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Brian Burch wrote:
> On 08/08/17 00:48, Shawn McKinney wrote:
>
>>
>> On Aug 7, 2017, at 5:31 AM, Brian Burch wrote:
>>>
>>> I am not one to leap into the dark without a plan, so it was very
>>> illuminating to
On 08/08/17 00:48, Shawn McKinney wrote:
On Aug 7, 2017, at 5:31 AM, Brian Burch wrote:
I am not one to leap into the dark without a plan, so it was very illuminating
to be told why that would not be the case for the Directory project. I hope
your explanation will prove
+1
> On Aug 7, 2017, at 5:31 AM, Brian Burch wrote:
>
> I am not one to leap into the dark without a plan, so it was very
> illuminating to be told why that would not be the case for the Directory
> project. I hope your explanation will prove to be interesting to other
>
This will probably mess up the thread, but I accidentally sent it only
to Emmanuel when I meant to reply to the list!
Sorry for shooting from the hip..
On 05/08/17 20:24, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Comments inline...
Le 05/08/2017 à 09:22, Brian Burch a écrit :
On 04/08/17 18:16, Emmanuel
Le 07/08/2017 à 09:39, Radovan Semancik a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On 08/05/2017 09:22 AM, Brian Burch wrote:
>> I've noticed all the enthusiastic +1's for this vote, so I am
>> resigned to having to adapt to yet another GIT project. All I can ask
>> is that someone writes a helpful wiki page for those
Hi,
On 08/05/2017 09:22 AM, Brian Burch wrote:
I've noticed all the enthusiastic +1's for this vote, so I am resigned
to having to adapt to yet another GIT project. All I can ask is that
someone writes a helpful wiki page for those developers who want to
hit the ground running once the trunk
+1
Thanks,
Jiajia
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Lécharny [mailto:elecha...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 4:17 PM
To: Apache Directory Developers List
Subject: [Vote] Switch to git for Apache LDAP API 2.0
Hi guys,
"It was the best *of* times,
Comments inline...
Le 05/08/2017 à 09:22, Brian Burch a écrit :
> On 04/08/17 18:16, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>>
>> "It was the best *of* times, it was the worst *of* times" (Dickens)
>>
>>
>> it's a pretty big change : switching away from SVN to git. We are using
>> svn from the
On 04/08/17 18:16, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi guys,
"It was the best *of* times, it was the worst *of* times" (Dickens)
it's a pretty big change : switching away from SVN to git. We are using
svn from the very beginning, so to speak 14 years, and it's probablu
time to use a more efficient
+1
On 08/04/2017 10:16 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
>
> "It was the best *of* times, it was the worst *of* times" (Dickens)
>
>
> it's a pretty big change : switching away from SVN to git. We are using
> svn from the very beginning, so to speak 14 years, and it's probablu
> time
+1
... but only because I cannot give +100 :-)
--
Radovan Semancik
Software Architect
evolveum.com
On 08/04/2017 10:16 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi guys,
"It was the best *of* times, it was the worst *of* times" (Dickens)
it's a pretty big change : switching away from SVN to git.
+1, good move
> On Aug 4, 2017, at 7:47 AM, Lucas Theisen wrote:
>
> +1, I did once use git-svn to convert a local copy a couple years back... It
> was super slow but worked eventually...
>
> On Aug 4, 2017 8:40 AM, "SHAWN E SMITH" wrote:
> +1
>
>
tory.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 8:40:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Vote] Switch to git for Apache LDAP API 2.0
+1
"The programmer … works only slightly removed from pure thought-stuff.
He builds his castles in the air, from air, creating by exertion of the
imagination."
— Fred
+1, I did once use git-svn to convert a local copy a couple years back...
It was super slow but worked eventually...
On Aug 4, 2017 8:40 AM, "SHAWN E SMITH" wrote:
+1
"The programmer … works only slightly removed from pure thought-stuff.
He builds his castles in the air, from
+1
"The programmer … works only slightly removed from pure thought-stuff.
He builds his castles in the air, from air, creating by exertion of the
imagination."
— Fred Brooks
Shawn Smith
Director of Software Engineering
Enterprise Infrastructure and Operations
Penn State University
814-321-5227
Le 04/08/2017 à 11:51, Zheng, Kai a écrit :
> +1.
>
> Is there any tool to convert and remain the commit history? If there is any
> downside, this probably is one if we can’t keep the logs.
logs will be kept. AFAICT The ASF infra has tools to convert a SVN repo
to a Git repo.
--
Emmanuel
dev@directory.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [Vote] Switch to git for Apache LDAP API 2.0
+1, most of the projects at Apache I'm involved with now have switched to git.
Colm.
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny
<elecha...@gmail.com<mailto:elecha...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi guys,
+1, most of the projects at Apache I'm involved with now have switched to
git.
Colm.
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
>
> "It was the best *of* times, it was the worst *of* times" (Dickens)
>
>
> it's a pretty big change : switching
22 matches
Mail list logo