Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi *,
Again: OOo is for the users. Manufacturers of labels with a significant
coverage in a given country/region are free to send in their label
fromats (as e.g. Herma did).
The file is officecfg/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/Labels.xcu -
with the schema definit
Hi *,
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 04:29:59PM -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 22:10 +0100, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
> > [...]
> > If I understand you right, you thought Avery to be supported more than
> > other brands in the label wizard.
> >
> > As Christian pointed out, t
On 1/21/07, Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
> No. What I am saying is that we have sponsors who support OOo directly.
> I feel that their products should take precedence over other
> manufacturers who are not contributing or sponsoring. SO the idea is
> taht if
G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
No. What I am saying is that we have sponsors who support OOo directly.
I feel that their products should take precedence over other
manufacturers who are not contributing or sponsoring. SO the idea is
taht if these latter entities wish to continue to receive the cur
Hi Gerry,
G. Roderick Singleton schrieb:
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 22:10 +0100, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
[...] So there is no specific support for Avery IMHO (and this
doesn't have to do anything with OOo's origin as StarOffice).
Of course this list should include WorldLabel and its label formats
-
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 22:10 +0100, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
> Hi Gerry, all,
>
> let's try to come back to the original question - personal differences
> don't need to be expressed on-list IMHO.
>
> I removed the whole discussion because the informations have been more
> or less hidden by the ne
sequoyah, steve00 and tanhvnguyen_it,
As our newest members, let me say, "Welcome to you".
As you have joined our merry little group today, I encourage you to
subscribe to dev@documentation.openoffice.org mailing list (low volume)
then take a pass through the task list http://tinyurl.com/ohdbn
Hi Gerry, all,
let's try to come back to the original question - personal differences
don't need to be expressed on-list IMHO.
I removed the whole discussion because the informations have been more
or less hidden by the negative feelings.
If I understand you right, you thought Avery to be s
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 18:53 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 10:23:50AM -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 09:09 +0100, Laurent Godard wrote:
> > > HI christian
> > >
> > > > Adding additional ones is not a problem, but saying that Avery is
> >
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 10:23:50AM -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 09:09 +0100, Laurent Godard wrote:
> > HI christian
> >
> > > Adding additional ones is not a problem, but saying that Avery is
> > > "supported" or gets some additional benefits just is plain wrong.
> >
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 09:09 +0100, Laurent Godard wrote:
> HI christian
>
> > Adding additional ones is not a problem, but saying that Avery is
> > "supported" or gets some additional benefits just is plain wrong.
> >
>
> +1 , you're totally right
> And it benefits OOo in fact, as it is straightf
HI christian
Adding additional ones is not a problem, but saying that Avery is
"supported" or gets some additional benefits just is plain wrong.
+1 , you're totally right
And it benefits OOo in fact, as it is straightforward for end-users
Laurent
--
Laurent Godard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Ingé
12 matches
Mail list logo
