On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 18:53 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 10:23:50AM -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 09:09 +0100, Laurent Godard wrote: > > > HI christian > > > > > > > Adding additional ones is not a problem, but saying that Avery is > > > > "supported" or gets some additional benefits just is plain wrong. > > > > > > +1 , you're totally right > > > And it benefits OOo in fact, as it is straightforward for end-users > > > > Thanks Laurent. I posed the question because I see that Avery is getting > > support from our community for free. I think this is not a good thing > > for our community. That these "templates" are a relic from StarDiv days > > is not an excuse. > > Read what has been written and stop this FUD. You should know better, > really. >
If you do not wish to discuss, leave things alone. You are the most negative person when it comes to new ideas. > And don't jump in a discussion with an accusation. This just is bad > style. > You mean like you have done. > > At the doc project we have been forced to create a cross-reference for > > other manufacturers such as Worldlabel.com which sponsored the > > template/clipart contest can be used with OOo. This I find strange. > > Get your facts straight and then come back. Read my first answer as a > start. > You answer was no no answer nor was it particularly useful. I would be nice if you bothered to read what was written. -- G. Roderick Singleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OpenOffice.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
