Hi,
Original-Nachricht
Von: Rafaella Braconi rafaella.brac...@sun.com
We need to know if we should roll back the changes listed
above that were introduced with m57 (this does not apply
to the relevant content changes, just the changes
listed above).
I agree with
Hi Louis,
Louis Suarez-Potts schrieb:
André S. corrected it (some scorching involved--we both cite the same
issue, too) [0] and we returned to status quo ante. Except that I
think that there needs to be copyright info that is better than what
we have now but that we cannot retroactively
Hi Louis,
Louis Suarez-Potts schrieb:
That seems good to me, too... But I'd rather not allow for even the
possibility of proprietary licenses on the wiki, which the wording
suggested seems to permit, as does our current wording. Ie, I want
open licenses.
whatever is meant by proprietary
Hi Jonathon,
Jonathon Blake schrieb:
For Drew, Louis,etc:
My suggestion would be:
* Close down the wiki for a couple of weeks;
* Add a script that requires a specific licence (or one of a set of
licences) to be used for all material submitted;
* Delete all existing content from the wiki;
*
Hi,
Frank Peters schrieb:
Correct. But again - this situation is caused by the way, the wiki
started. As it started without licensing resctrictions, only the
Copyright is relevant.
The wiki copyright page states
Copyright 1999-2007 by the contributing authors and Sun Microsystems,
Inc.
Hi,
G. Roderick Singleton schrieb:
Please see http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/faq-licensing.html
I think this will answer your question.
No -this does not answer any question. The wiki has been established
without any licensing restrictions. Louis added refernce to LGPL and
the OOo site
Hi,
G. Roderick Singleton schrieb:
Further, as a member of the CC I recommend that you implement the
changes necessary so that the documentation project can use material
generated on the wiki.
I cannot heal things that have been missed whe the wiki started. So I
cannot apply any licensing
Hi Frank, *
Frank Peters schrieb:
Interesting discussion, and necessary, too. We need to look
at how we can make the wiki usable for documentation purposes
either by changing the licensing of the wiki or the docs.
I see no reason to change the licensing at the wiki, as there is no
explicit
Hi Frank,
Original-Nachricht
Von: Frank Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [documentation-dev] Collab Website publishing
is there any way to publish content without collab.net rendering the
top and menu stuff aound it?
Yes. Just use
Hi,
G. Roderick Singleton schrieb:
...
I have been experimenting because no one seems to know more than we do.
So, on FC5, the following happens if you have the quickstarter enabled:
1. On startup with no qs and the feature enabled, OOo starts
normally
2. The qs is inserted
Hi,
Sophie Gautier schrieb:
...[including setup guides in installer]
This could be done, but we need to stick with the development
process here and rise our voice at the good time before the freeze.
This is just how it is done for the .gsi files on IZ and we could
follow the same process.
Hi,
...
- Talking about other projects: do we also go through
the developer projects to harvest what they write?
Hmm - I don't think this is necessary in general. As you wrote in one of
your other posts, the IT language is english. So when it is technical
documentation, then I
Hi Scott,
Scott Carr schrieb:
I would like to get some ideas for templates. So what Templates would
you like to see in OOo?
well .. germanophone project did it the other way (ask, what people like
to contribute) and made a bundle for download.
Maybe not the eye-catching templates, but
Hi,
..
btw .. for testing snapshots Sun release engineering provides
snapshots
that install as OOo-dev .. and could be installed as separate version
without any problems.
ANd that is what should have been continued during the rc cycle. It was
not and users paniced. Hence the issue.
As said
Hi,
G. Roderick Singleton schrieb:
...
whereas I think he meant
Run d:\OOo202rc4\program\soffice.exe This will set the
configuration to
User configulations of 2.0.2rc4 are made at
C:\Document and
Hi,
Willy Sudiarto Raharjo schrieb:
so, should it be deleted or just leave it as it is ?
the sad thing about cvs is, that you cannot delete a directory. (It's a
technical limitation).
André
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hi Thjomas, all,
nothing to say about your observer status .. but if you are looking for
something to help with ... afair the english install guide is still
missing a Solaris section. Maybe you could translate the section of the
german guide to english?
(I could point you to the files, but
Hi,
G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
Welcome aboard. You should have your Observer status by now. I do hope
you can help us here as well as OOoAuthors with docs we can publish in
English. Hopefully your German works will be reflected on
de.openoffice.org so German speakers can get to them from
Hi,
Please explain what this change has not been passed through means,?
Bearing in mind that:
i) It was discussed in the Community Council Meetings;
ii) It was approved by the Community Council meetings;
iii) Daniel said in a Community Council meeting that OOoAuthors was
going to use a dual
19 matches
Mail list logo
