Hi,
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 1:55 PM Hen wrote:
>
>
> (including Huxing)
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 10:55 PM Hen wrote:
>>
>>
>> Give substack a few days to reply and then nudge them on Twitter:
>> https://twitter.com/substack or their email (listed on https://substack.net/
>> ).
I tried to s
please help me merge
https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/pull/3750
thank you
merged.
Thanks,
-Ian.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 4:07 PM jialin niu
wrote:
> please help me merge
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/pull/3750
> thank you
>
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 1:45 PM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > These dependencies are all development time dependencies, which can be
> > found in "devDependencies" section of package.json file.
>
> Anyone who compiles the source will get these and be unaware of them, that
> seems a lit
Hi,
> It shows the node-forge module has contains GPL license, but looking
> into the license file, it is actually dual licensed with GPL (Category
> X) and BSD-3 clause (Category A). So I think it is fine.
Yep that is fine, for anything dual licensed you can take the most permissive
license.
T
Hi,
I haven't had time to check yet, but I noticed that the tag for 2.7.1
has been deleted and re-created, is there anything wrong with this
candidate?
If that it true, it is better to cancel this vote first.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 1:26 PM Mercy wrote:
>
> Hello Dubbo Community,
>
> This is a c
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:44 AM Ian Luo wrote:
>
> Huxing,
>
> We should make it very clear in the announcement email that we will
> guarantee the backward compatibility in 2.6.x release.
Sounds reasonable, I will add it.
>
> Thanks,
> -Ian.
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:12 AM Huxing Zhang
This release will be cancel because Github tag attaches the wrong source
code, I will renew a vote.
Kind regards,
Mercy Ma
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 1:26 PM Mercy wrote:
> Hello Dubbo Community,
>
> This is a call for the vote to release Apache Dubbo Spring Boot Project
> (Incubating) version 2.7
Hello Dubbo Community,
This is a call for the vote to release Apache Dubbo Spring Boot Project
(Incubating) version 2.7.1 (RC1)
The release candidates
2.7.1:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/dubbo/spring-boot-project/2.7.1
The staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/r
hi Ian,
I am so sorry to make the mistake. I just wanted to submit a pr, but it make a
mistaken operation of creating a branch. I will be more careful when trying to
submit a pr.
-- Original --
From: Ian Luo
Date: Tue,Mar 26,2019 5:45 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: n
Hi,
I vote with:
+1 release the software
Are release files in correct location? Yes
Do release files have the word incubating in their name? Yes
Are the digital signature and hashes correct? Yes
Does DISCLAIMER file exist? Yes
Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists? Yes
Is the LICENSE a
Hi,
I have deleted the branch. And I remember why this happened. At the beginning,
I tried to revert the pr 3688, so I click the "revert" button of github. And
the github should created a branch on the main repo, but I didn't find it. And
then I didn't want to revert the pr, so I closed the reve
I see. It's fine, let's watch out for each other and avoid of accidental
mistake :)
Regards,
-Ian.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 1:20 AM Taosheng, Wei
wrote:
> Hi,
> I have deleted the branch. And I remember why this happened. At the
> beginning, I tried to revert the pr 3688, so I click the "revert"
-1,
Minor issues, please fix in the next release:
> - There are lots of .flattened-pom.xml in source release, which does
> not exist in Github tag. For example:
> Only in
> apache-dubbo-spring-boot-project-incubating-2.7.1-source-release/dubbo-spring-boot-actuator:
> .flattened-pom.xml
I think w
I also vote -1, a lot of *.flattened-pom.xml* files should be removed from
source code, they are useless, thus I will vote again.
Kind regards,
Mercy Ma
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:27 AM Ian Luo wrote:
> -1,
>
> Minor issues, please fix in the next release:
> > - There are lots of .flattened-pom
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:56 AM Huxing Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 1:55 PM Hen wrote:
> >
> >
> > (including Huxing)
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 10:55 PM Hen wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Give substack a few days to reply and then nudge them on Twitter:
> https://twitter.com/sub
Hi,
> * the test file would not be in the download for Apache Dubbo (and
> presumably other typical use cases)?
It not in the download it’s only shows up when you instal the software. Users
would install via npm to get the dependancies.
> * the test file would not be in Apache Dubbo source cont
-1
We should remove those *.flattened-pom.xml files, though it’s not a
functionality flaw, it does confuses users who would rely on sources directly.
Jun
> On Mar 28, 2019, at 12:46 PM, Mercy Ma wrote:
>
> I also vote -1, a lot of *.flattened-pom.xml* files should be removed from
> source cod
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 1:49 PM Hen wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:56 AM Huxing Zhang wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 1:55 PM Hen wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > (including Huxing)
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 10:55 PM Hen wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Give substack a few
Adding some links.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 2:08 PM Huxing Zhang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 1:49 PM Hen wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:56 AM Huxing Zhang wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 1:55 PM Hen wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > (includ
Hi, Taosheng
For the exact PR[1] that is related to this accident branch, I think it should
be reconsidered, I am not sure if the changes in it are right, I will take a
look at it later.
I noticed you merged it by yourself, since there is no sign suggests that it’s
an emergency patch or in so
Hello Dubbo Community,
This is a call for the vote to release Apache Dubbo Spring Boot Project
(Incubating) version 2.7.1 (RC2)
The release candidates
2.7.1:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/dubbo/spring-boot-project/2.7.1
The staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/r
hi jun,
I have concerned the inappropriate of merging one's pr by one's self. I will
not do it like this. About this pr, welcome to review it. If it's wrong, please
tell me to fix it or would you please to fix it. Thank you!
Taosheng
-- Original --
From: jun
Hi,
I noticed the CI tasks for some PRs and branches from several of our projects
are waiting to be scheduled, for a really long time. I guess there’re some
problems with the Travis system. Please notice that for some minor changes that
I am sure will work fine, I will merge them directly witho
24 matches
Mail list logo