[jira] Updated: (FELIX-1103) PermissionAdmin service can't handle java.ioFilePermission for "<<>>"

2009-04-29 Thread Ulf Dittmer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ulf Dittmer updated FELIX-1103: --- Description: The PermissionAdmin service does not handle java.io.FilePermissions correctly that use

[jira] Commented: (FELIX-1102) Make gshell-core really independant of the MainService

2009-04-29 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704469#action_12704469 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on FELIX-1102: Yes, it fixes this issue, mostly by making

[jira] Closed: (FELIX-1035) deadlock observed while using fileinstall to monitor multiple directories

2009-04-29 Thread Sahoo (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sahoo closed FELIX-1035. It took some time to test, but the fix seems to have fixed the deadlock. So, I am closing this issue. > deadlock obse

Re: [VOTE] Release Felix SCR version 1.0.8

2009-04-29 Thread Stuart McCulloch
2009/4/29 Felix Meschberger > Hi, > > We solved 12 issues in this release: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310100&styleName=Html&version=12313413 > > There are no outstanding issues. > > Staging repository: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositor

[jira] Created: (FELIX-1108) Bug in Feature.getDependencies

2009-04-29 Thread Alin Dreghiciu (JIRA)
Bug in Feature.getDependencies -- Key: FELIX-1108 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1108 Project: Felix Issue Type: Bug Components: Karaf Reporter: Alin Dreghiciu Another thi

[jira] Created: (FELIX-1107) Make org.apache.servicemix.kernel.gshell.features dependency on org.apache.servicemix.kernel.filemonitor optional

2009-04-29 Thread Alin Dreghiciu (JIRA)
Make org.apache.servicemix.kernel.gshell.features dependency on org.apache.servicemix.kernel.filemonitor optional - Key: FELIX-1107 URL: https://issues

[jira] Created: (FELIX-1106) Minimum default properties

2009-04-29 Thread Alin Dreghiciu (JIRA)
Minimum default properties -- Key: FELIX-1106 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1106 Project: Felix Issue Type: Improvement Components: Karaf Reporter: Alin Dreghiciu P

[jira] Created: (FELIX-1105) Make Thread in LocalConsole not a daemon thread

2009-04-29 Thread Alin Dreghiciu (JIRA)
Make Thread in LocalConsole not a daemon thread --- Key: FELIX-1105 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1105 Project: Felix Issue Type: Improvement Components: Karaf

[jira] Commented: (FELIX-1102) Make gshell-core really independant of the MainService

2009-04-29 Thread Alin Dreghiciu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704388#action_12704388 ] Alin Dreghiciu commented on FELIX-1102: --- Juts to be sure. Is this issue solving what

Re: [VOTE] Release Felix SCR version 1.0.8

2009-04-29 Thread Alin Dreghiciu
+1 (not binding) On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 12 issues in this release: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310100&styleName=Html&version=12313413 > > There are no outstanding issues. > > Staging repository: > >

[jira] Created: (FELIX-1104) Allow osgi/stop command to specify more than one bundle per command entry.

2009-04-29 Thread Jamie goodyear (JIRA)
Allow osgi/stop command to specify more than one bundle per command entry. -- Key: FELIX-1104 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1104 Project: Felix Issue

[jira] Updated: (FELIX-1103) PermissionAdmin service can't handle java.ioFilePermission for "<<>>"

2009-04-29 Thread Ulf Dittmer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ulf Dittmer updated FELIX-1103: --- Description: The PermissionAdmin service does not handle java.io.FilePermissions correctly that use

[jira] Updated: (FELIX-1103) PermissionAdmin service can't handle java.ioFilePermission for "<<>>"

2009-04-29 Thread Ulf Dittmer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ulf Dittmer updated FELIX-1103: --- Description: The PermissionAdmin service does not handle java.io.FilePermissions correctly tha

[jira] Created: (FELIX-1103) PermissionAdmin service can't handle java.ioFilePermission for "<<>>"

2009-04-29 Thread Ulf Dittmer (JIRA)
PermissionAdmin service can't handle java.ioFilePermission for "<<>>" Key: FELIX-1103 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1103 Project: Felix Issue

[jira] Updated: (FELIX-1103) PermissionAdmin service can't handle java.ioFilePermission for "<<>>"

2009-04-29 Thread Ulf Dittmer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ulf Dittmer updated FELIX-1103: --- Description: The PermissionAdmin service does not handle java.io.FilePermissions correctly that use

Re: [Karaf] Switching to blueprint ...

2009-04-29 Thread Chris Custine
I think moving to blueprint is great particularly if the r4.2 spec release is imminent. It seems like it should be getting close since it has moved to "public draft" recently, but I am not sure if there is an ETA. I'm sure someone here is plugged in to that process ;-) Chris -- Chris Custine FU

[jira] Created: (FELIX-1102) Make gshell-core really independant of the MainService

2009-04-29 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
Make gshell-core really independant of the MainService -- Key: FELIX-1102 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1102 Project: Felix Issue Type: Improvement Components:

[jira] Resolved: (FELIX-1102) Make gshell-core really independant of the MainService

2009-04-29 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guillaume Nodet resolved FELIX-1102. Resolution: Fixed Sending gshell-core/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/kernel/gs

Re: [Karaf] Switching to blueprint ...

2009-04-29 Thread Toni Menzel
ok, we will have a solution tracked with this item: http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXEXAM-79 On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Clement Escoffier < clement.escoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 29.04.2009, at 09:08, Toni Menzel wrote: > > The "separate VM" is a followup of our default Pax Runner b

[jira] Assigned: (FELIX-1099) Switch from spring-dm integration tests to pax-exam

2009-04-29 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guillaume Nodet reassigned FELIX-1099: -- Assignee: Guillaume Nodet > Switch from spring-dm integration tests to pax-exam > -

[jira] Updated: (FELIX-1101) framework.security can't be built or run against Felix 1.6

2009-04-29 Thread Ulf Dittmer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ulf Dittmer updated FELIX-1101: --- Description: The org.apache.felix.framework.SecurityActivator and org.apache.felix.framework.Securit

[jira] Updated: (FELIX-1101) framework.security can't be built or run against Felix 1.6

2009-04-29 Thread Ulf Dittmer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ulf Dittmer updated FELIX-1101: --- Description: The org.apache.felix.framework.SecurityActivator and org.apache.felix.framework.Security

[jira] Created: (FELIX-1101) framework.security can't be built or run against Felix 1.6

2009-04-29 Thread Ulf Dittmer (JIRA)
framework.security can't be built or run against Felix 1.6 -- Key: FELIX-1101 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1101 Project: Felix Issue Type: Bug Components:

Re: [VOTE] Release Felix SCR version 1.0.8

2009-04-29 Thread Clement Escoffier
Hi, +1 However, I have several minor issues: There is a typo in the license summary of the notice file (BSD LicenCe [was license previously in the file]) KXML and OSGi copyright year should be updated The KXML License file has some difference from the one from the KXML web site The Apache s

[jira] Created: (FELIX-1100) Cat Command fails to display ?wsdl files

2009-04-29 Thread Edell Nolan (JIRA)
Cat Command fails to display ?wsdl files - Key: FELIX-1100 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1100 Project: Felix Issue Type: Bug Components: Karaf Reporter: Edell

Re: [VOTE] Release Felix SCR version 1.0.8

2009-04-29 Thread Pierre De Rop
+1 (non binding vote) /pierre Felix Meschberger wrote: Hi, We solved 12 issues in this release: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310100&styleName=Html&version=12313413 There are no outstanding issues. Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content

Re: [VOTE] Felix 1.6.1 framework and main subproject releases

2009-04-29 Thread Toni Menzel
+1 On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote: > +1 > > -> richard > > > > On 4/26/09 5:48 PM, Karl Pauls wrote: > >> I would like to call a vote on the framework and main 1.6.1 subproject >> releases. >> >> The source and binary release archives, signature files, SHA and MD5 >> mess

Re: [VOTE] Release Felix SCR version 1.0.8

2009-04-29 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
+1 Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Felix SCR version 1.0.8

2009-04-29 Thread Felix Meschberger
+1 Regards Felix Felix Meschberger schrieb: > Hi, > > We solved 12 issues in this release: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310100&styleName=Html&version=12313413 > > There are no outstanding issues. > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/co

[VOTE] Release Felix SCR version 1.0.8

2009-04-29 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi, We solved 12 issues in this release: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310100&styleName=Html&version=12313413 There are no outstanding issues. Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/felix-staging-005/org/apache/felix/org.apache

[jira] Closed: (FELIX-1053) SCR: Bound Service Replacement regression ?

2009-04-29 Thread Pierre De Rop (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pierre De Rop closed FELIX-1053. > SCR: Bound Service Replacement regression ? > --- > >

[jira] Closed: (FELIX-993) Reference target filters not handled correctly

2009-04-29 Thread Felix Meschberger (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Felix Meschberger closed FELIX-993. --- Resolution: Fixed WIth the modifications applied as per FELIX-1053, this issue should also be

[jira] Resolved: (FELIX-1053) SCR: Bound Service Replacement regression ?

2009-04-29 Thread Felix Meschberger (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Felix Meschberger resolved FELIX-1053. -- Resolution: Fixed The committed fix is reported to work by Pierre De Rop (Thanks). So I

Re: [Karaf] Switching to blueprint ...

2009-04-29 Thread Clement Escoffier
On 29.04.2009, at 09:08, Toni Menzel wrote: The "separate VM" is a followup of our default Pax Runner based TestContainer implementation. As such, there can be (many) different TestContainer implementations. Its just a matter of convinience you lose when not using the pax runner richness. If

Re: [Karaf] Switching to blueprint ...

2009-04-29 Thread Toni Menzel
The "separate VM" is a followup of our default Pax Runner based TestContainer implementation. As such, there can be (many) different TestContainer implementations. Its just a matter of convinience you lose when not using the pax runner richness. If there is demand for a "native" felix testcontainer

Re: [Karaf] Switching to blueprint ...

2009-04-29 Thread Guillaume Nodet
Cool. Just one question though. How difficult would it be to run the tests in the same JVM in an isolated classloader ? It would make debugging way easier than having to hack the test to add the necessary jvm option for remote debugging. 2009/4/29 Alin Dreghiciu : > About tests, afaik iPojo wil