Hi,
-1 to this having numbers as node names is IMO asking for trouble and putting
an v in front of it is just a hack. There's certainly no need to repeat the
version information twice.
Why not just do this as the id already contains the version?
version id=4.11.0 ...
Justin
On 17/01/2014,
Hi Om,
Thanks for the update, it sounds good :-)
Unfortunately and as I said before, for many reasons, I'm not in a position
where I can help at the moment, the only way to me to do something for the
project is when I reach some issues myself and fix them as I did yesterday.
Thanks,
Frédéric
Ok, I got your point, the only thing I'm thinking about could be to introduce a
new first level helper command which would set a boolean value to apply this
escapes, does it make sense ?
Or may be just add undocumented command line option.
hum, what do you mean, something like fdb -ide ?
Frédéric THOMAS
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:29:32 +0400
From: alexander.doros...@jetbrains.com
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: FDB vs FB debugging ?
Ok, I got your point, the only thing I'm thinking about could be to
introduce a new
Yes, something like fdb -escaped-var-values.
If enabled then there's no need in start/end markers (like
IDEA-ESCAPE-START/IDEA-ESCAPE-END), as var values are always
escaped. Implementation of escape() method is there in my StringUtil class.
On 17.01.2014 14:33, Frédéric THOMAS wrote:
hum,
Sounds good to me, I'll just rename IDEA- to IDE- :-) and maybe keep -ide
instead of -escaped-var-values if we need something else applied for IDEs later.
Any other thoughts ?
Thanks,
Frédéric THOMAS
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:44:12 +0400
From: alexander.doros...@jetbrains.com
To:
The only drawback of doing this is that some static methods in ExpressionCache
that are currently static should become instance methods, consuming a little
bit more of memory, the difference is low because I can't see any cases where
one has 1000s debugging sessions opened in the same time, so,
As I said I think there's no need in XXX-START/XXX-END markers at all.
IDE that passed -ide param treats all var values as escaped.
On 17.01.2014 14:59, Frédéric THOMAS wrote:
Sounds good to me, I'll just rename IDEA- to IDE- :-) and maybe keep -ide
instead of -escaped-var-values if we need
On 1/17/14 12:09 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
-1 to this having numbers as node names is IMO asking for trouble and
putting an v in front of it is just a hack. There's certainly no need
to repeat the version information twice.
Why not just do this as the id already
Justin, are you doing a Flex talk at ApacheCon? If so, will you cover
FlexJS as well?
-Alex
Hi,
Ant's xmlproperty task doesn't seem to like repeated tag names.
This help?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16356605/ant-xmlproperty-task-what-happens-when-there-is-more-than-one-tag-with-the-same
Justin
Hi,
Justin, are you doing a Flex talk at ApacheCon? If so, will you cover FlexJS
as well?
As much as I would like to go given it's proximity to 360Flex, the fact it's on
the other side of the world, the cost and that I'm speaking/attending 4
conferences back to back in May I'm not sure I'm
Ah good to know, but I don't want to deal with a comma separated list in
Ant either. I think we're better off sticking with unique tags names.
We could add a version attribute like this:
version4.9.1 id=4.9.1 version=4.9.1 path=... file=... /
version4.10.0 id=4.10.0 version=4.10.0 path=...
Do you know if speakerss get their entry fee comp'd?
I have mixed opinions about whether Flex must be at ApacheCon. What do
other's think?
On 1/17/14 12:29 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
Justin, are you doing a Flex talk at ApacheCon? If so, will you cover
FlexJS as
On Jan 17, 2014, at 2:01 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
Do you know if speakerss get their entry fee comp'd?
I have mixed opinions about whether Flex must be at ApacheCon. What do
other's think?
On 1/17/14 12:29 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hey Alex,
To
Hi,
Do you know if speakerss get their entry fee comp'd?
Yes but travel and hotel are not covered. [1] Well that what I assume as the
call for paper link on [2] takes you to that page. At previously ApacheCons
that wasn't always the case.
For me it travel + hotel is the larger cost. Apache
Hey everyone,
I'm not sure why this is not working, and i'd like to understand why I get
the compile error. I just keep looking at the code and thinking it should
be okay. I'm basically trying to set a Boolean via a inline check. Here
are some variables to give you an idea of the initialized
What happens if you use || instead of |
On 1/17/14 3:24 PM, Chris Martin windo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey everyone,
I'm not sure why this is not working, and i'd like to understand why I get
the compile error. I just keep looking at the code and thinking it should
be okay. I'm basically trying
Oh wow, you mean it will work if I use the OR operator? /facepalm.
Completely missed that mistake. Thanks Alex. Obviously works just fine.
Can't believe I missed that this whole time.
Chris
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
What happens if you use ||
19 matches
Mail list logo
