Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.0 - RC7

Hi, > I'm not sure what "Latest SDK" means. Is that the nightly? Did you > install it into Documents/ApacheFlexDevelopGit? Latest develop branch. > What were you running when you got this error? Ant on some build.xml? > Which one? ant in the air_for_ant directory. > Crap. I guess I did not u

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.0 - RC7

On 3/14/14 10:05 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >Sorry but is -1 (binding) and the issues look serious to me. > >Try to compile with several SDKs - all produced errors. > >Latest SDK: I'm not sure what "Latest SDK" means. Is that the nightly? Did you install it into Documents/ApacheFlexDev

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.0 - RC7

Hi, Sorry but is -1 (binding) and the issues look serious to me. Try to compile with several SDKs - all produced errors. Latest SDK: Error: Inconsistant linkage in /Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlexDevelopGit/frameworks/libs/air/airglobal.swc(flash.utils:ByteArray, flash.utils:Compressio

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.0 - RC7

+1 Binding Everything checks out. Flex SDK and FlexJS install fine. Thanks, Om On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:02 PM, piotr.zarzycki wrote: > +1 > > Installation of Flex SDK 4.12 without any problems. > Windows 7 64Bit > > Piotr > > > > - > Flex/Air developer. > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > -- >

RE: Release Process

Ok thnaks -Message d'origine- De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com] Envoyé : samedi 15 mars 2014 00:12 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Release Process Hi, > You mean 4.12.1 would be in the "release4.12.0" git branch ? Yes. > Or create a new release4.12.1 git branch ?

Re: Release Process

Hi, > You mean 4.12.1 would be in the "release4.12.0" git branch ? Yes. > Or create a new release4.12.1 git branch ? You could but no real need as current 4.12 is frozen as it was released. > They are not referenced in the WIKI. Which script are useful? Sorry it was the build directory not the i

RE: Release Process

>If you wait a few weeks you may want to decide which changes you pull into the >the 4.12 branch. You mean 4.12.1 would be in the "release4.12.0" git branch ? Or create a new release4.12.1 git branch ? [ I need to read again the doc on git branching] >also take a look in the IDE directory I've

Re: Team page - move empty people down the bottom

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Michelle had some artwork for her headshot but no description. Should her > artwork be kept in this new format? Does she remain in the bottom half? > > I dont think it was her artwork. It seems to be one of the generic 'staff' pics that we h

Re: Team page - move empty people down the bottom

Michelle had some artwork for her headshot but no description. Should her artwork be kept in this new format? Does she remain in the bottom half? Maurice makes a good point. There are less active folks who've contributed a picture, and more active people who haven't. Yes, it wasn't that hard t

Re: Team page - move empty people down the bottom

New version with your proposition on staging. Piotr - Flex/Air developer. piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Team-page-move-empty-people-down-the-bottom-tp35726p35830.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mai

RE: Team page - move empty people down the bottom

Ok Maybe no picture will motivate people to add it. Justin Yes this is good idea. I will add links to maailing list and jira in the text. - Flex/Air developer. piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Team-page-move-em

Re: Release Process

Hi, If you wait a few weeks you may want to decide which changes you pull into the the 4.12 branch. In that case you'll need to get Erik to switch the mustella tests over to the 4.12 branch unless you want everything from the release branch. > My concern is that a "regular" release is packaged

RE: Team page - move empty people down the bottom

Piotr, I won't fight/argue for this. If the people who already gave their feedback are ok to go live, then I am ok too. Maurice -Message d'origine- De : piotr.zarzycki [mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com] Envoyé : vendredi 14 mars 2014 23:11 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : RE: Team pag

RE: Team page - move empty people down the bottom

Ok we have got couple of different thoughts. We could wait for other's ideas/approval and eventually vote for pictures or not. Piotr - Flex/Air developer. piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Team-page-move-empty-pe

Re: Team page - move empty people down the bottom

Hi, > However, something bothers me: it creates a discrimination between > committers that have a picture and a comment, and those that don't have it. They can easily add themselves if they want or just add info if they don't want to put a photo up. Thanks, Justin

Re: Team page - move empty people down the bottom

Hi, http://flex.staging.apache.org/about-people.html is looking good. Some very minor things: - I'd change the text "Apache Flex is a project run by professionals and volunteers alike." to just "Apache Flex is a project run by volunteers". IMO no need for the distinction and you can be both. -

RE: Release Process

>All we have to do is have somebody package up a release and put it to a vote. >No different than a "regular" release... I am willing to give it a try for the next point release ( in a few weeks maybe). My concern is that a "regular" release is packaged by the release manager (thanks Justin)

RE: Team page - move empty people down the bottom

Yes I see your point. That's why maybe we should leave those empty pictures and It's minimize those impression I think so... WDYT? P.S. Thanks :D - Flex/Air developer. piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Team-pag

Re: Team page - move empty people down the bottom

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Maurice Amsellem < maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote: > The new organization is more balanced, from a visual standpoint, and > that's the main good point about it. > > However, something bothers me: it creates a discrimination between > committers that have a pic

RE: Team page - move empty people down the bottom

The new organization is more balanced, from a visual standpoint, and that's the main good point about it. However, something bothers me: it creates a discrimination between committers that have a picture and a comment, and those that don't have it. In most cases, it also corresponds to the cur

Re: Team page - move empty people down the bottom

On the staging without pictures. :) Piotr - Flex/Air developer. piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Team-page-move-empty-people-down-the-bottom-tp35726p35819.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list

Re: Release Process

All we have to do is have somebody package up a release and put it to a vote. No different than a "regular" release... -Nick On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Maurice Amsellem < maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote: > That's the point. > Actually I don't care about having betas or not. > My conce

Re: Release Process

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Maurice Amsellem < maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote: > That's the point. > Actually I don't care about having betas or not. > My concern is that we know (and it happened) people discover bugs just > after the release, and I think it's too long to wait another 6 m

RE: Release Process

That's the point. Actually I don't care about having betas or not. My concern is that we know (and it happened) people discover bugs just after the release, and I think it's too long to wait another 6 months for the next release. It's a good idea to make a point release, but it happened only for

Re: Team page - move empty people down the bottom

Ohh...Sorry I forgot remove the pictures. :) - Flex/Air developer. piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Team-page-move-empty-people-down-the-bottom-tp35726p35815.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing lis

Re: Team page - move empty people down the bottom

Result of Team page reorganization is on the staging. Please check it out guys. Piotr - Flex/Air developer. piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Team-page-move-empty-people-down-the-bottom-tp35726p35814.html Sent fr

Re: Release Process

Hi, You can have alpha and beta releases under Apache but I don't think it would help. If we do find a serious bug we can always fix it and make a point release eg 4.12.1 easily enough. Justin

Delete Picture using CameraUI class

I need to use the CameraUI class call to take a picture. But the picture is of members check stubs which is sensitive information, so I don't want to stored that image on the device itself. However android saves all images using the the cameraUI class. Is any way to prevent android from saving the

Re: print issues FLEX-23252 and FLEX-13628 was [REQUEST] tutorial....

It looks to me that the Label's width is not tied to the explicitWidth of the renderer at measure time, only at layout time. You can try binding label's width to "{explicitWidth - 14}". If you think the binding is too slow, then override the explicitWidth setter and set the Label's width then.

Re: print issues FLEX-23252 and FLEX-13628 was [REQUEST] tutorial....

This is my ItemRenderer code: http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"; xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark" xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx"

Re: print issues FLEX-23252 and FLEX-13628 was [REQUEST] tutorial....

What does your renderer code look like? If the height of the Label cannot be completely determined from the explicitWidth of the renderer, then measuredHeight will not compute correctly. -Alex From: Marcus Fritze mailto:marcus.fri...@googlemail.com>> Reply-To: "dev@flex.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.0 - RC7

Each RC had enough code changes to make me want folks to at least run the dmg/exe. If you can run the installer on your next potty break, that would be much appreciated. -Alex On 3/14/14 10:51 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >I assumed my vote got carried over. > >Thanks, >Om >On Mar 14, 2014

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.0 - RC7

I assumed my vote got carried over. Thanks, Om On Mar 14, 2014 10:35 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: > Why don't you cary over the votes from the previous RCs (like Justin does > with the SDK releases) and see what the tally is then? > > EdB > > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Alex Harui wrot

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.0 - RC7

Why don't you cary over the votes from the previous RCs (like Justin does with the SDK releases) and see what the tally is then? EdB On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > 72 hours is passed and we have: > > 1 +1 binding vote (Erik) > 1 +0 binding vote (Maurice) > 1 +1 non-bind

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.0 - RC7

72 hours is passed and we have: 1 +1 binding vote (Erik) 1 +0 binding vote (Maurice) 1 +1 non-binding vote Piotr I think I wore everyone out with the prior 6 RCs. I was getting ready to cast my +1 vote when I discovered that the source kit unintentionally includes the local.properties file I was

print issues FLEX-23252 and FLEX-13628 was [REQUEST] tutorial....

Thanks for your question. I attached a image to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-13628 In the AdvancedDataGridBaseEx.as Line 3056 the item.getExplicitOrMeasuredHeight() is every time 20. So when you look at my example image, the Label in the ItemRenderer has 2 lines. But the calculat

Re: [REQUEST] A tutorial on how to fix bugs for the Flex SDK

What is wrong with the label height calculation? On 3/14/14 9:17 AM, "Marcus Fritze" wrote: > >Am 13.03.2014 um 20:40 schrieb Alex Harui : >> >> And if you are using an IDE like IntelliJ or FB, then the easiest path >>is >> to use monkey-patching. Create a test project, point the source-path t

Re: [REQUEST] A tutorial on how to fix bugs for the Flex SDK

Am 13.03.2014 um 20:40 schrieb Alex Harui : > > And if you are using an IDE like IntelliJ or FB, then the easiest path is > to use monkey-patching. Create a test project, point the source-path to > include the modified AdvancedDataGridBaseEx.as and see if it works. Thanks, this is working very

Re: Release Process

On 3/14/14 6:01 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote: >So could we envisage to have "beta" releases , like most software >vendors, or is it against Apache way ? I don't think it is strictly prohibited by Apache Policy, but I don't think it will help. If we call it a beta, folks may not try it. For su

Release Process

Hi, I have < lived > two releases of Apache Flex as a team member (4.11 and 4.12) and noticed that whatever the level of testing we make before delivering, we always have issues and regressions after the delivery So could we envisage to have "beta" releases , like most software vendors, or is

Re: Top 5 highest demands on Flex

Om, Lets figure out a way to work on this together. -Nick On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:26 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > Creating mobile skins for iOS7 and Android 4+ is on my list of things to > do. > > It is a lot of work, but conceptually not very hard to do. > > If there are more volunteer

RE: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile - Build # 587 - Still Failing!

Yeah 1px could do it. Lol :P -Mark -Original Message- From: Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 2:34 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: RE: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile - Build # 587 - Still Failing! Thanks. A few pixels difference in th

RE: Top 5 highest demands on Flex - Design View

Hi Darkstone, Radii8 -> Yeah. I was also impressed with the export to Flex, HTML & Android, I also did not expect that. I wonder if companies like IntelliJ, etc. would collaborate with Radii8 or Radii8 to collaborate with the Apache Flex Team. Design View seems to be an on-going request. If we wa

RE: Top 5 highest demands on Flex - Design View

Hi Sugan, After I've played with these three Design View Tools, the only one seems promising is http://www.radii8.com/demo/ . Although the flex components of that demo provides are incomplete, I'm impressed that it can export flex to html and android on the fly, I got say I did not expect that! I'

Re: New Flex MaskedTextInput Spark Component

Hi Carlos, I got this issue on my draft version of MaskedTextInput: https://github.com/RIAstar/MaskedTextInputFx/issues/2 I redirected the poster to the Apache Flex experimental component, but I think his issue might apply to your component as well. Did you think of RTL text support? Cheers, Max

RE: Top 5 highest demands on Flex - Design View

Hi, Check out the video demo of using Radi8 - Design View. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rx5W0t64VuY&feature=player_embedded Regards, Sugan -Original Message- From: Sugan Naicker [mailto:su...@dev-x.co.za] Sent: 14 March 2014 08:37 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Cc: darkst...@163.com Su