Hi,
Thanks for voting. What platform did you compile it on?
- and this is where the reason for the half vote comes in: I've never
worked with FlexUnit, so I can't test the functionality of the package...
Did the unit tests passed when you did an ant package? FlexUnit uses FlexUnit
to test
Moving this to [DISCUSS] to keep thread clean.
EdB
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.comwrote:
Hi,
Thanks for voting. What platform did you compile it on?
- and this is where the reason for the half vote comes in: I've never
worked with FlexUnit, so
I'm on OS X (10.9.2)
I've just ran 'ant package' and it failed with this error:
Basedir
/Users/erik/Desktop/apache-flex-flexunit-4.2.0-4.12.0-src/FlexUnit4Test
does not exist
Guess the other half of my vote isn't earned yet by this release, as a
matter of fact - if it's not me doing stuff wrong
Hi,
I've just ran 'ant package' and it failed with this error:
Basedir
/Users/erik/Desktop/apache-flex-flexunit-4.2.0-4.12.0-src/FlexUnit4Test
does not exist
Yes true - the tests are not bundled with the source package it assumed that
you you want to package it for a release you get all
Just made a clone of the repo and ran 'ant thirdparty-downloads' in the
FlexUnit4 dir, then 'ant' on the root dir, before trying 'ant package'...
Which failed:
The provided 'swf' property value points to a remote location. Please set
localTrusted = false or change the location of your swf to a
Hi,
Not sure how to fix this. Any clues?
Did you checkout the 4.2.0 release branch or the develop branch? While the
REAME says develop the RC has not been merged into develop yet.
All of those ant command should be run from the top level directory (and none
in FlexUnit4 sub directory) but
Hi,
JFYI - merged RC4 into develop so people don't get confused where they should
check out code from, but if you're testing the release you should really check
out from the RC4 tag.
Thanks,
Justin
Didn't make the slightest difference. Just switched to 'release4.2.0'
branch and ran all three ant targets again (as described above). The
'package' task still fails with:
The provided 'swf' property value points to a remote location. Please set
localTrusted = false or change the location of
All of those ant command should be run from the top level directory (and
none in FlexUnit4 sub directory) but you can get away with just an ant
clean and ant package.
When I run the 'ant thirdparty-downloads' task from the top level directory
(as the README seems to indicate) it gives me
Running 'ant package' a second time, with nothing changed etc. etc.
SUCCEEDS, weirdly enough... Your choice: I'll gladly change my vote to +1
as the code seems to work as advertised, eventually ;-)
EdB
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
All of those
Hi,
BUILD FAILED
Target thirdparty-download does not exist in the project FlexUnit4.
It's thirdparty-downloads not thirdparty-download.
Also, when I run 'ant clean' in the top level dir, I get a whole bunch of
this error.
Looks like you don't have ant contrib set up as part of ant and
Hi,
[compc] Error: PermGen space
What are you ANT_OPTS / JAVA_OPTS / version of Java you are using?
Thanks,
Justin
Changing my vote to:
+1 (binding)
See [DISCUSS] for details.
EdB
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
+0.5 (binding)
- sigs good
- docs look good, although my legalese is a bit rusty
- build OK
- and this is where the reason for the half vote comes
Hi,
That's being a bit to literal with the rules, IMO. It would be nonsense to
release source that doesn't do anything useful - or worse, throw exceptions
all over the place - upon compilation.
JFYI just doing ant will make something useful that you can use.
As I did get a successful
+1 (binding)
Package builds, README and other docs look reasonable. checksums are good.
No apparent changes in functionality when using IntelliJ from previous
version.
Built on Win8.1/x64
-Nick
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
Changing my vote to:
This is good information.
To keep things simple for the time being, the JS side pretty much has
everything wrapped in its own div with a couple of exceptions, I think.
The display mode is always block. We pretty much want the developer to
have control over position just as they do with Flex.
JFYI just doing ant will make something useful that you can use.
If I were to take your word for that, you might as well vote for me ;-)
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
+1 (binding)
Mac OSX 10.8, java 7, FP 11.1, Air 3.4
Source kit signatures ok
Source kit builds
Notice files ok
Rat report ok
On 4/10/14 6:13 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski nicho...@spoon.as wrote:
+1 (binding)
Package builds, README and other docs look reasonable. checksums are
good.
No apparent
+1(Binding)
Tested on cadre of existing tests on a large project.
Mike
Don't count this a second time, but forgot these details:
Windows 7 sp1/x64, java 7, FP 11.6.602.168, Air 4.0.0.1390
-Original Message-
From: Michael A. Labriola [mailto:labri...@digitalprimates.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 3:33 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE]
Hi guys,
We were just discussing some interesing things and I thought I'd share the
parts that I think could be interesting for our projects.
1. There seems to be a mechanism for improved GitHub PullRequest
integration:
2. It seems to be possible to setup Jenkins Agents that are flagged
in a way that they can be used exclusively by a given Build Job. This would
allow us to setup Build Agennts on some of our private machines and have
them used by the official Jenkins
That sounds very interesting. Can
Hi,
JFYI just doing ant will make something useful that you can use.
If I were to take your word for that, you might as well vote for me ;-)
:-) Just pointing it out.
If you take an existing FlexUnit project and replace the flexunit*.swc (usually
in libs directory) with the ones produced
Hi,
This is vote for the initial (0.0.1) release of the FalconJX (and Falcon)
compilers. I am not proposing a separate Falcon-only release package at
this time. The only purpose of the FalconJX packages are to serve as
upstream packages for the FlexJS release.
The release candidate can be
Hi,
This is vote for the initial (0.0.1) release of Apache FlexJS.
The release candidate can be found here;
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/flexjs/0.0.1/rc1/
Before voting please review the section,What are the ASF requirements on
approving a release?, at:
Please place all discussion in this thread.
Thanks,
-Alex
Please place all discussion in this thread.
Thanks,
-Alex
Do we know if this version number - 0.0.1 is okay to be used with FB 4.7?
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
Please place all discussion in this thread.
Thanks,
-Alex
BTW, those of you who have contacted the other IDE vendors (IntelliJ,
FDT), it might be time to contact them again. Enough has changed in the
packaging of FlexJS that it has a better chance of working and it should
be easier to react to assumptions they are making.
On 4/10/14 2:43 PM, Alex Harui
On 4/10/14 2:46 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
Do we know if this version number - 0.0.1 is okay to be used with FB 4.7?
Yes. I found out that FB is actually using a 4.x number in the version
tag in the descriptor and doesn't try to parse the version in the
description.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
BTW, those of you who have contacted the other IDE vendors (IntelliJ,
FDT), it might be time to contact them again. Enough has changed in the
packaging of FlexJS that it has a better chance of working and it should
be easier
On 4/10/14 2:59 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
BTW, those of you who have contacted the other IDE vendors (IntelliJ,
FDT), it might be time to contact them again. Enough has changed in the
packaging of
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
On 4/10/14 2:46 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
Do we know if this version number - 0.0.1 is okay to be used with FB 4.7?
Yes. I found out that FB is actually using a 4.x number in the version
tag in
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
On 4/10/14 2:59 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
BTW, those of you who have contacted the other IDE vendors (IntelliJ,
FDT), it
I don't see FlexJS 0.0.1 as one of the options when I open the Installer
3.0 RC7. Can you please add it so that we can invite the IDE folks to try
it?
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:09 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
bigosma...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Alex Harui
I'm hopeful we'll approve a FlexJS soon and folks wanting to use an
installer for FlexJS need to use InstallApacheFlex 3.0 which has enough
votes to release, but because it will cause a locale issue with 4.12.0,
we've agreed to delay officially releasing the Installer until 4.12.1 is
released.
I
On 4/10/14 3:07 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
On 4/10/14 2:46 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
Do we know if this version number - 0.0.1 is okay to be used with FB
4.7?
Yes. I
Yup, forgot to commit it. Should be there now.
On 4/10/14 3:19 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't see FlexJS 0.0.1 as one of the options when I open the Installer
3.0 RC7. Can you please add it so that we can invite the IDE folks to try
it?
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, Apr
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
Yup, forgot to commit it. Should be there now.
Looks good! I have notified the IntelliJ, FDT and FlashDevelop teams.
Hopefully they will participate in this RC testing.
Thanks,
Om
On 4/10/14 3:19 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
Hi,
I would definitely like to get FlexJS out soon so we can generate some
buzz and hopefully get a few more folks to join us at 360|Flex.
+1 to that.
So:
1) Should we close the vote on Installer 3.0 and post it to the release
server and just not announce it
If it's a release you need to
On 4/10/14 4:19 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
I would definitely like to get FlexJS out soon so we can generate some
buzz and hopefully get a few more folks to join us at 360|Flex.
+1 to that.
So:
1) Should we close the vote on Installer 3.0 and post it to the
Hi,
Do we have to announce it at the moment we push the bits to dist/release?
24 hours to give time for the mirrors to catch up - if you don't announce it it
not really a release IMO.
Seems like more work. We'd have to have a separate app id and then we'd
have two out there to support.
On 4/10/14 4:56 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
I can look at FLEX-34132 if you want.
That's been fixed.
OK, I'm confused. I thought the list you provided was bugs that needed to
be fixed. Whatever is in the repo is going to be 4.12.1. I think we
should re-add the
Hi,
OK, I'm confused. I thought the list you provided was bugs that needed to
be fixed.
It was the list of thinks fixed since 4.12 that we should consider putting in
4.12. I'm not aware of any other issues that MUST be fixed in 4.12 - I think
there may of been an IOS7 issue?
Whatever is
44 matches
Mail list logo
