Re: 4.14 install highish error rate

On 02/02/15 02:14, Justin Mclean wrote: Re the apache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml is there any reason we're using https rater than http? Distribution of software should be done over secure channels. I can't see any reason why HTTPS over HTTP would contribute to a high install error rate, wh

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex 4.14.0 released!

Hi! Om, thanks for picking this up. I've taken your original text and reworked it a bit. Without any great objections, I'll send the following announce email my tomorrow morning: BEGIN DRAFT The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Flex

Time to switch from 11.1 to 16.0 as the default player version?

Hi, Why don't we switch the SDK default player version from 11.1 to 16.0? The installer does this already, and it seems silly not to default to the most recent - and therefor (presumably) secure - version of the player, especially given the recent worries about the FP in the popular press. Anyon

Re: Time to switch from 11.1 to 16.0 as the default player version?

On 02/02/15 10:37, Erik de Bruin wrote: Anyone needing legacy player support can easily create such an SDK from source or via the Installer. Thoughts? Is it possible to set the default per-O/S ? Linux only has an 11.x player available, which I believe is the reason for the low default value. T

Re: Time to switch from 11.1 to 16.0 as the default player version?

>> Anyone needing legacy player support can easily create such an SDK >> from source or via the Installer. >> >> Thoughts? > > Is it possible to set the default per-O/S ? Linux only has an 11.x player > available, which I believe is the reason for the low default value. > The 11.2 player is still b

Re: Time to switch from 11.1 to 16.0 as the default player version?

yes 11.2 is the latest player available on linux 11.2.202.440 on Ubuntu 14.10 On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > >> Anyone needing legacy player support can easily create such an SDK > >> from source or via the Installer. > >> > >> Thoughts? > > > > Is it possible to set the

Re: Time to switch from 11.1 to 16.0 as the default player version?

And the preferred/only way to install on Linux is using ant, the main 'build.xml', correct? Or is it using the 'installer.xml' (also on ant)? EdB On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > yes 11.2 is the latest player available on linux > 11.2.202.440 on Ubuntu 14.10 > > On Mo

Re: Time to switch from 11.1 to 16.0 as the default player version?

AFAIK installer.xml is better than build.xml (but I might be wrong, haven't re-installed flex for a long time, need AIR 5+ for mobile, and the latest available under Linux is 2.6) On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > And the preferred/only way to install on Linux is using ant,

Re: Time to switch from 11.1 to 16.0 as the default player version?

On 02/02/15 11:22, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: AFAIK installer.xml is better than build.xml The Wiki article linked from the install page has always suggested installer.xml Tom

Re: Time to switch from 11.1 to 16.0 as the default player version?

On 02/02/15 11:06, Erik de Bruin wrote: If I understand you correctly, 11.2 is the current and up to date version on Linux? Not 11.1? Yup, based on what's installed on my Ubuntu desktop, where the Flash Player comes via the normal software package installer, not by hand. This seems to be backed

Re: Time to switch from 11.1 to 16.0 as the default player version?

So, in short, from a Linux point of view: a platform dependent version definition - for Linux: FP 11.2 and AIR 2.6, for all others: 16.0 all the way - should do the trick? EdB On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Tom Chiverton wrote: > On 02/02/15 11:06, Erik de Bruin wrote: >> >> If I understand

Re: Time to switch from 11.1 to 16.0 as the default player version?

On 02/02/15 11:34, Erik de Bruin wrote: So, in short, from a Linux point of view: a platform dependent version definition - for Linux: FP 11.2 and AIR 2.6, for all others: 16.0 all the way - should do the trick? Yup, that would work. The minimum version supported by the SDK is 10.x I believe; I

Re: Time to switch from 11.1 to 16.0 as the default player version?

On 02/02/15 11:18, Erik de Bruin wrote: And the preferred/only way to install on Linux There are Linux machines out there with AIR on, and it's possible to get the (older) run times and SDK running on modern Linux, it's just a total pain, and Adobe won't support it. So I'm not sure we should e

RE: Time to switch from 11.1 to 16.0 as the default player version?

+1 I like the idea of defaulting to newest version. Feels like we should always push the latest of the dependencies when we can. -Mark -Original Message- From: Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl] Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 5:38 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Time to swi

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex 4.14.0 released!

On Feb 2, 2015 2:26 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: > > Hi! > > Om, thanks for picking this up. > > I've taken your original text and reworked it a bit. Without any great > objections, I'll send the following announce email my tomorrow > morning: Welcome back! It's all yours :-) Thanks, Om > >

New inkscape 0.91!

They have finally released the new Inkscape version [1] and can download it here [2]. This version now supports save as (one way) in FXG format, html 5 canvas, and some updates to the optimized svg file format. Looks like steps in the right direction. Has anyone run into any major issues with

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-tlf #326

Anybody know how to get the GeneralFunctionTests to run first? When I run the tests in the debugger they are not running first. Thanks, -Alex On 2/1/15, 10:54 PM, "flex.ci.bui...@gmail.com" wrote: >See > >

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-tlf #326

Alex, The simplest way to run only GeneralFunctionTests is to add this class to MinimalTestsSuite.as and change in build.properties minimalTests to true. Piotr 2015-02-02 16:03 GMT+01:00 Alex Har

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-tlf #326

I did run GeneralFunctionsTests by itself and it passed, so really, I’m interested in having it run as part of the full suite but still run early to see if other tests are messing it up and make it easier to debug if it still fails. It looked like FlexUnit supported some “order” attribute but m

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-tlf #326

I remember that we have tried to achieve some order once for some case but it didn't work. However this is the link which could help: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/FlexUnit+Order Maybe we should add "Order" tag to every TestCase class to have ordering. Piotr 2015-02-02 16:16 G

Re: Time to switch from 11.1 to 16.0 as the default player version?

IIRC, 11.1 is the only/latest version for which Adobe has promised support for Flex. Also, IIRC, some customers don’t like being forced to go to the latest. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t switch, but just more data for you to consider. -Alex On 2/2/15, 3:58 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" wrote: >+1

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex 4.14.0 released!

Looks pretty good to me, one question: On 2/2/15, 2:23 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >- New FlatSpark skins and components Was there actually a new component? -Alex

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-tlf #326

Yeah, that’s the link I was using. Actually, I think I read it wrong so maybe this next commit will work. From: Piotr Zarzycki mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> Date: Monday, February 2, 2015 at 7:20 AM To: Alex Harui mailto:aha...@adobe.com>> Cc: "dev@flex.apache.org

Re: Time to switch from 11.1 to 16.0 as the default player version?

On 02/02/15 15:25, Alex Harui wrote: IIRC, 11.1 is the only/latest version for which Adobe has promised support for Flex. Also, IIRC, some customers don’t like being forced to go to the latest. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t switch, but just more data for you to consider. I read the "Adobe r

Re: Time to switch from 11.1 to 16.0 as the default player version?

On 2/2/15, 7:40 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote: >On 02/02/15 15:25, Alex Harui wrote: >> IIRC, 11.1 is the only/latest version for which Adobe has promised >>support >> for Flex. Also, IIRC, some customers don’t like being forced to go to >>the >> latest. >> >> That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t switch

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-tlf #326

Yep - You should add TestCase order inside every test classes. Piotr 2015-02-02 16:39 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > Yeah, that’s the link I was using. Actually, I think I read it wrong so > maybe this next commit will work. > > From: Piotr Zarzycki > Date: Monday, February 2, 2015 at 7:20 AM > >

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex 4.14.0 released!

There are: - ButtonIcon - TextInputIcon EdB On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Looks pretty good to me, one question: > > On 2/2/15, 2:23 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: > > >>- New FlatSpark skins and components > > Was there actually a new component? > > -Alex > -- Ix Multi

Re: Time to switch from 11.1 to 16.0 as the default player version?

>>> IIRC, 11.1 is the only/latest version for which Adobe has promised >>>support >>I read the "Adobe runtime support of Flex" section on >>http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flex/whitepapers/roadmap.html >>and it says (to my mind) that Adobe doesn't support any version of >>Apache Flex on any version of

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2

Hi, If no one else volunteers, I'm prepared to manage this release as well. EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers to support FlexJS

i like flashdevelop support the flexjs. but the fd developers,will make long long time 2 do this. but the fd support the custom command line. and the fd support the ant also. so somebody,can code a command line example. or ant example? -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-devel

Re: 4.14 install highish error rate

HI, > I can't see any reason why HTTPS over HTTP would contribute to a high install > error rate, when the issue is the Apache mirrors being broken ? Don't think we're using the mirror for that file? HTTPS could fail when HTTP works for a number of reasons and it the only https call we make (as

Re: Time to switch from 11.1 to 16.0 as the default player version?

Hi, May want to consider 13 as that's the extended support release. [1] Justin 1. http://blogs.adobe.com/flashplayer/2014/03/upcoming-changes-to-flash-players-extended-support-release.html

Re: Time to switch from 11.1 to 16.0 as the default player version?

Hi, > IIRC, 11.1 is the only/latest version for which Adobe has promised support > for Flex. Also, IIRC, some customers don’t like being forced to go to the > latest. There been several posts from users about this - so as long as this is done in a way that doesn't force them to upgrade then tha

Re: 4.14 install highish error rate

I am in Canada. I get all the little progress squares lit up green except the last one, and that one goes red and I have failed again. But the folder I specified is chock-full of Flex, so I don't know if I am done and the installer is failing, or there is one last thing to get... On Mon, Feb 2, 20

Re: 4.14 install highish error rate

Hi, > I am in Canada. I get all the little progress squares lit up green except > the last one, and that one goes red and I have failed again. But the folder > I specified is chock-full of Flex, so I don't know if I am done and the > installer is failing, or there is one last thing to get... Insi

Re: 4.14 install highish error rate

oh, rats: it worked this time! On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > I am in Canada. I get all the little progress squares lit up green except > > the last one, and that one goes red and I have failed again. But the > folder > > I specified is chock-full of Flex, so I

Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers to support FlexJS

Hi, in the examples folder are ant scripts that build the various examples. Some examples might be broken so use DataBindingTest as a reference. -Alex On 2/2/15, 9:20 AM, "lizhi" wrote: >i like flashdevelop support the flexjs. >but the fd developers,will make long long time 2 do this. > >but t

Re: [FlexJS] Installation Error!

Did you try the FlexJS option that says (with Jburg)? -Alex From: Peter Kreinz mailto:pe...@screenworker.de>> Reply-To: "dev@flex.apache.org" mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>> Date: Monday, February 2, 2015 at 1:01 PM To: "dev@flex.apache.org"

Re: Time to switch from 11.1 to 16.0 as the default player version?

On 2/2/15, 9:06 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: > >Also, again, it is really easy to switch FP/AIR versions using the >Installer and the build scripts, so no forcing is going on. IMO, that will only remain true if we don’t introduce the usage of an API that doesn’t exist on older players. Having th

RE: [FlexJS] Installation Error!

I can confirm this happens in the latest version of the installer (v3.2) as well. It looks like it's failing here "Downloading project/jburg/jburg-1.10.1.tar.gz from: http://downloads.sourceforge.net"; Looking through Charles, the response value from sourceforge when requesting "jburg-1.10.1.tar.

Re: [FlexJS] Installation Error!

Hmm. 3.2 should be using the latest ant_on_air which has a hack that tries to compensate for SourceForge. If you have time can you try to debug it and see if the hack needs revising? It is in org.apache.flex.ant.tags.Get.as Thanks, -ALex From: Neil Madsen mailto:li...@cranialinteractive.com

Re: [FlexJS] Installation Error!

Yes, thank you. it worked (with Jburg). Can you please add a note here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Using+FlexJS+with+Adobe+Flash+Builder -Peter- Version 3.1.0 (mac) Using Locale: de_DE Ermitteln von mirror URL über CGI-Skript erfolgreich. AIR version 16.0 Flash Player v

Re: 4.14 install highish error rate

Hi, > Looking at the OSMF issue in a little more detail it looks to be location > related with 75% of the errors occurring in Russia. Anyone confirm? BTW - this has also been reported by a user on twitter: https://twitter.com/slava_ra/status/562137369990946816 Justin

sdk 4.14.0 100% install failures

did i jump the gun on trying to install 4.14.0? using 3.1 installer, getting 100% failures trying to install 4.14 sdk. the log shows: Version 3.1.0 (windows) Using Locale: en_US Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI. AIR version 16.0 Flash Player version 16.0 Unable to load https://

Re: sdk 4.14.0 100% install failures

Hi, > did i jump the gun on trying to install 4.14.0? > > using 3.1 installer, getting 100% failures trying to install 4.14 sdk. > > the log shows: > > Version 3.1.0 (windows) > Using Locale: en_US > Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI. > AIR version 16.0 > Flash Player version 16.

Re: sdk 4.14.0 100% install failures

On 2/3/2015 11:05 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: i can however reach apache-flex-sdk-installer-config.xml URL w/a browser. not sure what to make of this. Out of interest can you get to it via both https and htttp? both work fine from a browser. Perhaps hitting some limit with the number of https

Re: sdk 4.14.0 100% install failures

i should also report that this installer version installs 4.13.0 a-ok.

Re: sdk 4.14.0 100% install failures

Paul, Can you watch it run using a network monitor? And give us more info on when that error appears? I just ran the installer and it worked fine. I think if you start the Installer, at some point before it gets to the licensing checkboxes, it should request that file (https://www.apache.org/di

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Flex SDK 4.14.0 is released

The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Flex SDK 4.14.0! The 4.14.0 update has over 50 bug fixes and adds the following features: - iOS 7+ and Android 4.x+ mobile theme support https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/7AAIAw - New FlatSpark skins and components

Re: sdk 4.14.0 100% install failures

On 2/3/2015 1:52 PM, Alex Harui wrote: Paul, Can you watch it run using a network monitor? And give us more info on when that error appears? I just ran the installer and it worked fine. give me a bit to get one installed. I think if you start the Installer, at some point before it gets to

Re: sdk 4.14.0 100% install failures

On 2/2/15, 11:09 PM, "Paul Hastings" wrote: > >> I think if you start the Installer, at some point before it gets to the >> licensing checkboxes, it should request that file >> >>(https://www.apache.org/dist/flex/4.14.0/binaries/apache-flex-sdk-install >>er >> -config.xml) in order to determine

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Flex SDK 4.14.0 is released

Help! I can't seem to send the announce email to 'annou...@apache.org' :-( Gmail won't let me send emails as 'erikdebr...@apache.org' - claiming those need to be send using an 'apache.org' SMTP server - and I can't find a way in the apache infrastructure to send emails... What do I do? EdB O

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Flex SDK 4.14.0 is released

Gmail->Sessings->Accounts->Send as Ensure you have account like this: Erik de Bruin Mail is sent through: mail-relay.apache.org Secured connection on port 465 using SSL On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > Help! > > I ca

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Flex SDK 4.14.0 is released

Yeah, I tried the 'Send as', but: "You must send through apache.org SMTP servers when you send as erikdebr...@apache.org. However, this functionality is not available for your account. Please contact your domain administrator for more information." Since I'm on a Google Apps for Business account