Re: [Maven][Installer][Flex][FlexJS] Legal Stuff

On Apr 15, 2016 5:17 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > > Hi, > > > Are you asking Alex to reveal what he discussed internally? > > Up to him. For change like this I like to see someone from Adobe Legal send to the dev or private list requesting the changes to be made. That

Re: [Maven][Installer][Flex][FlexJS] Legal Stuff

Hi, > Are you asking Alex to reveal what he discussed internally? Up to him. For change like this I like to see someone from Adobe Legal send to the dev or private list requesting the changes to be made. That way we have a clear email trail. I’m guessing that probably won’t happen. Meh /

Re: [Maven][Installer][Flex][FlexJS] Legal Stuff

Are you asking Alex to reveal what he discussed internally? I don't think that is quite right. The way I see it, it was Alex with his Adobe hat on making this post on the Apache Flex dev list. It doesn't get more transparent that that. Thanks, Om On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Justin Mclean

Re: [Maven][Installer][Flex][FlexJS] Legal Stuff

Hi, > Why is it odd? He is an Adobe employee. He has made a public request on the > dev list. It’s unclear what the changes will be or even why they need to be made. Remember if it’s not on the list it didn’t happen. The PMC and perhaps Apache legal may also have something to say about

Re: [FlexJS]ByteArray and Dictionary

HI, > https://github.com/WeaveTeam/Weave/blob/develop/WeaveJS/src/weavejs/util/StringView.as#L25 > > Thanks. Certainly show that caution needs to taken when only looking at the top level license.

Re: [Maven][Installer][Flex][FlexJS] Legal Stuff

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > It turns out that the new people in place at Adobe want us to make > changes to the text used in the > > Installer and other scripts that ask the user to accept Adobe licenses > > Can you give a bit more

Re: [FlexJS]ByteArray and Dictionary

https://github.com/WeaveTeam/Weave/blob/develop/WeaveJS/src/weavejs/util/StringView.as#L25 On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > The Mozilla StringView project is LGPL 3.0 so we would have to ask if > they > > can change the license or swap

Re: [Maven][Installer][Flex][FlexJS] Legal Stuff

Hi, > It turns out that the new people in place at Adobe want us to make changes to > the text used in the > Installer and other scripts that ask the user to accept Adobe licenses Can you give a bit more information on what changes they have requested? (on @private if needed) It seems a little

Re: [FlexJS]ByteArray and Dictionary

Hi, > The Mozilla StringView project is LGPL 3.0 so we would have to ask if they > can change the license or swap it out with something else. Just out of interest were is that documented? I took a quick look and it looks like MPL. [1] MPL os category B not category X so could be included in

[Maven][Installer][Flex][FlexJS] Legal Stuff

Hi, It has been many years since the Installer was first released and lots of things and people have changed at Adobe. It turns out that the new people in place at Adobe want us to make changes to the text used in the Installer and other scripts that ask the user to accept Adobe licenses before

Re: [FlexJS]ByteArray and Dictionary

On 4/15/16, 11:43 AM, "Andy Dufilie" wrote: >The Mozilla StringView project is LGPL 3.0 so we would have to ask if they >can change the license or swap it out with something else. Hmm. Sounds like work. I took a quick look at amf.js a while back. For FlexJS, since

Re: [FlexJS]ByteArray and Dictionary

The Mozilla StringView project is LGPL 3.0 so we would have to ask if they can change the license or swap it out with something else. On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Andy Dufilie wrote: > I'm fine with that. It also uses StringView by Mozilla, ported to AS from > JS: >

Re: Easy way to convert a property to a style

On 4/15/16, 10:09 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >> >> FWIW, overuse of visible and includeInLayout together has been one of >>the >> most common performance killer I've seen in large applications. > >What

Re: [FlexJS]ByteArray and Dictionary

I'm fine with that. It also uses StringView by Mozilla, ported to AS from JS: https://github.com/WeaveTeam/Weave/blob/develop/WeaveJS/src/weavejs/util/StringView.as If you tell me where it should go in Flex, I can clean it up and put it there. On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Alex Harui

RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Easy way to convert a property to a style

Sidebar... What's your opinion of embedding assets in styles and assigning them? -Mark -Original Message- From: omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of OmPrakash Muppirala Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 1:09 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Easy

Re: Easy way to convert a property to a style

On Apr 15, 2016 9:35 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > > On 4/15/16, 12:56 AM, "jude" wrote: > > >thanks, I was concerned if there was anything special or if it was about > >the metadata. > > There might be some metadata involved, but I don't think so. > >

Re: Easy way to convert a property to a style

On 4/15/16, 12:56 AM, "jude" wrote: >thanks, I was concerned if there was anything special or if it was about >the metadata. There might be some metadata involved, but I don't think so. > >I might add patches for these and maybe a visibleInLayout property that >sets

Re: [FlexJS] First Jenkins job for the new Maven FlexJS

Cool! On 4/15/16, 6:24 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Hi, > > >today I setup a first build Job on the ASF build machines to build >Falcon, FalconJX and the eterns. I also configured the Maven site >generation. The output can be seen here: >

Re: Easy way to convert a property to a style

On Apr 15, 2016 12:56 AM, "jude" wrote: > > thanks, I was concerned if there was anything special or if it was about > the metadata. > > I might add patches for these and maybe a visibleInLayout property that > sets both the visible and includeInLayout at the same time.

Re: [FlexJS]ByteArray and Dictionary

On 4/15/16, 6:57 AM, "Andy Dufilie" wrote: >I've ported a JavaScript ByteArray implementation to ActionScript and >fixed >several bugs here: >https://github.com/WeaveTeam/Weave/blob/develop/WeaveJS/src/weavejs/util/J >SByteArray.as >(original:

Re: [FlexJS]ByteArray and Dictionary

On 4/15/16, 8:18 AM, "Harbs" wrote: >Sure. Unless you implement toByteArray and fromByteArray… ;-) > >FWIW, I’m starting on porting my AS classes in my production app for use >with FlexJS and trying to solve the missing pieces as I go along. I'm not quite sure what

Re: [FlexJS]ByteArray and Dictionary

Sure. Unless you implement toByteArray and fromByteArray… ;-) FWIW, I’m starting on porting my AS classes in my production app for use with FlexJS and trying to solve the missing pieces as I go along. On Apr 15, 2016, at 6:07 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > I have started the port

Re: [FlexJS]ByteArray and Dictionary

I have started the port of UIDUtil in the Spark branch. It doesn't have to use ByteArray and Dictionary. -Alex On 4/15/16, 12:54 AM, "Harbs" wrote: >These are two features used a lot in Flash apps which do not have a >simple mapping in Javascript. Has anyone done any

Re: [FlexJS]ByteArray and Dictionary

I've ported a JavaScript ByteArray implementation to ActionScript and fixed several bugs here: https://github.com/WeaveTeam/Weave/blob/develop/WeaveJS/src/weavejs/util/JSByteArray.as (original: https://github.com/jamesward/JSAMF/blob/master/web/web/amf.js) It does not have any write functionality

Re: [FlexJS]ByteArray and Dictionary

I’d be happy to help you through the process. You would need to sign an ICLA, and we’d have to agree to accept the code (but I can’t imagine why not). https://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt Harbs On Apr 15, 2016, at 11:21 AM, lizhi wrote: > donate it maybe not bad > > > > --

Re: [FlexJS]ByteArray and Dictionary

donate it maybe not bad -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ByteArray-and-Dictionary-tp52374p52382.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [FlexJS]ByteArray and Dictionary

I would probably use the Javascript Map[1] by default, and fallback to a ployfill using Arrays for older browsers (if necessary). [1]https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Map On Apr 15, 2016, at 10:55 AM, lizhi wrote: > and this is a >

Re: [FlexJS]ByteArray and Dictionary

Sure. But if you donate it, we can include it in FlexJS as a native part of it. On Apr 15, 2016, at 10:52 AM, lizhi wrote: > all code are mit listener,free to use. > > > > -- > View this message in context: >

Re: [FlexJS]ByteArray and Dictionary

and this is a https://github.com/matrix3d/spriteflexjs/blob/master/src/flash/__native/ObjectMap.as. but i do not know how map[key] but and map.get(key); -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ByteArray-and-Dictionary-tp52374p52379.html

Re: [FlexJS]ByteArray and Dictionary

all code are mit listener,free to use. -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-ByteArray-and-Dictionary-tp52374p52378.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [FlexJS]ByteArray and Dictionary

Yes. You are right: https://github.com/matrix3d/spriteflexjs/blob/master/src/flash/utils/ByteArray.as https://github.com/matrix3d/spriteflexjs/blob/master/src/flash/utils/Dictionary.as The ByteArray implementation looks pretty complete, but the Dictionary implementation assumes that keys are

Re: [FlexJS]ByteArray and Dictionary

I vaguely remember itzhi had converted a lot of the Flash classes to JavaScript in his Github repo to get startling transpiled. on mobile so I don't have links. On Apr 15, 2016 2:54 AM, "Harbs" wrote: > These are two features used a lot in Flash apps which do not have a

Re: Easy way to convert a property to a style

thanks, I was concerned if there was anything special or if it was about the metadata. I might add patches for these and maybe a visibleInLayout property that sets both the visible and includeInLayout at the same time. On Apr 14, 2016 11:20 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: On

[FlexJS]ByteArray and Dictionary

These are two features used a lot in Flash apps which do not have a simple mapping in Javascript. Has anyone done any work on this front yet? I was about to add UIDUtil to FlexJS core, but I realized it uses both of these. Harbs

AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] Status on Maven migration

If you are doing anything ... use the feature/maven-migration-test branch as this is the one with the checked in movement changes. I found out that I could merge in changes form develop even if the structure has changed, so this is what I'm currently working on. Chris

Re: AW: AW: [FlexJS] Status on Maven migration

On 4/14/16, 10:44 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >In the cleanup script I simply removed all non Maven related stuff. What >I could do, was to have my IntelliJ to generate an ant build from the >Maven build. Eventually that would get rid of some of the problems if the