OK, I reproduced it in a simple case.
StandardFlowComposer extends FlowComposerBase which references
FactoryComposer which extends StandardFlowComposer
This is totally allowed, but the order of files passed to GCC isn't
correct. I will work on a fix.
-Alex
On 3/13/17, 3:06 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
Hi Tim,
That sounds really interesting. So I assume by "Flash API" and CreateJS
that you are mostly replicating the Sprite/DisplayObject APIs? There is a
separate effort that I think is biased towards Stage3D that is called
SpriteFlexJS.
Anyway, before I go grabbing your repo and trying to get
Looks ok to me.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 3/13/17, 8:50 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski"
wrote:
>Forgot to include those in the batch. If it looks good, I will set
>everything to publish at 10am EDT tomorrow.
>
>-Nick
>
>On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> Hi Nick,
>>
>> Shouldn' these p
Forgot to include those in the batch. If it looks good, I will set
everything to publish at 10am EDT tomorrow.
-Nick
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> Shouldn' these pages be reflecting the update?
>
> http://flex.staging.apache.org/download-binaries.html
> http
Hi all,
I've been working on wrapping the existing create JS support in Flex JS in
an API structure which is identical to the Flash API - the hope is that
eventually this will make it easy to port legacy FLash projects to Flex JS.
I've managed to get some basic support for graphical shapes and lo
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Clint M wrote:
> might be best to make this a new thread
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Gary Yang wrote:
>
> > I am curious, what do you guys think about Flash Player and Flash
> > Platform's situation today? is it better or worse than expected 5/6 years
>
might be best to make this a new thread
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Gary Yang wrote:
> I am curious, what do you guys think about Flash Player and Flash
> Platform's situation today? is it better or worse than expected 5/6 years
> ago?
>
>
On 3/13/2017 6:05 PM, Gary Yang wrote:
I am curious, what do you guys think about Flash Player and Flash
Platform's situation today? is it better or worse than expected 5/6 years
ago?
Flash Platform's situation is lots better today than I would have
guessed it would be 5 years ago. It isn'
For complex applications Flex is still by far the most productive way to build
cross-platform & web enabled apps. Our team has tried everything out there,
and so far nothing beats our productivity with Flex, though a few JS frameworks
(React/Vue) are showing some promise, but the performance is
Yes. Remove circulars is on.
I will send you a dropbox link privately.
Harbs
> On Mar 13, 2017, at 11:42 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> I would definitely have remove-circulars on, since GCC definitely hates
> circulars. Then, in theory, the new code is telling GCC exactly which
> order to visit t
I am curious, what do you guys think about Flash Player and Flash
Platform's situation today? is it better or worse than expected 5/6 years
ago?
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I'm not really paying much attention to webasm. Got too much to do right
> now.
>
> Volunteers ar
I'm not really paying much attention to webasm. Got too much to do right
now.
Volunteers are welcome to make Flex->WebASM happen. The compiler is set
up to have alternate emitters, but I'm wondering if it will be faster to
leverage a different tool. We currently use Google Closure Compiler for
HMTL needed more than 5 years, let's give WebASM 10.
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Jason Taylor wrote:
> So I'm sure many of you are aware that FireFox just added support for Web
> Assembly, Chrome should have it in the next release, and IE will be adding
> it shortly as well. Performance m
I would definitely have remove-circulars on, since GCC definitely hates
circulars. Then, in theory, the new code is telling GCC exactly which
order to visit the files so that we can compute namespaces correctly by
removing circulars.
So, if -remove-circulars is on, then can you package up the ent
I got rid of circulars which was causing the two SubParagraphGroupElementBase
errors, but the StandardFlowComposer error seems wrong to me. (Of course I
could be missing something…)
> On Mar 13, 2017, at 10:28 PM, Harbs wrote:
>
> I’m getting these three errors with remove-circulars enabled.
>
So I'm sure many of you are aware that FireFox just added support for Web
Assembly, Chrome should have it in the next release, and IE will be adding it
shortly as well. Performance measurements on WebASM vs HTMl are increadibe,
and WebASM appears to be even way more performant than Flash (in a
I’m getting these three errors with remove-circulars enabled.
[java] Mar 13, 2017 10:17:00 PM
com.google.javascript.jscomp.LoggerErrorManager println
[java] SEVERE:
/Users/harbs/Documents/git/PrintUI/printui-flexjs/text_engine/test/HelloWorldTLF/bin/js-debug/org/apache/flex/textLayout/
I pulle the latest commit and the error went away.
I’m looking to see if the output is better.
> On Mar 13, 2017, at 9:57 PM, Harbs wrote:
>
> I just tried and got this error:
>
> [java] Compiling file:
> /Users/harbs/Documents/git/PrintUI/printui-flexjs/text_engine/test/HelloWorldTLF/bin
I just tried and got this error:
[java] Compiling file:
/Users/harbs/Documents/git/PrintUI/printui-flexjs/text_engine/test/HelloWorldTLF/bin/js-debug/HelloWorldTLF.js
[java] HelloWorldTLF as: [HelloWorldTLF,
org.apache.flex.textLayout.container.ContainerController, NaN,
org.apache.fle
Hi Nick,
Shouldn' these pages be reflecting the update?
http://flex.staging.apache.org/download-binaries.html
http://flex.staging.apache.org/download-source.html
-Alex
On 3/13/17, 12:06 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski"
wrote:
>Looks like the installer is updated (per Alex), and everything else is
>
Looks like the installer is updated (per Alex), and everything else is
ready to go.
Are we good to publish and announce?
-Nick
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:54 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> It didn't seem like Nick updated the installer, so I made the changes I
> think we need.
>
> On 3/12/17, 2:48 PM,
Hi Carlos,
I just get back to this one, cause I would like to go to some direction.
What was the problem:
Most components in MDL need to be refreshed in some way by library.
Initially I thought that we should add such ability by Bead (UpgradeElement)
- which decrease unneeded refresh by library.
So I just pushed some changes in flex-falcon that might help. Give it a
try and let me know...
-Alex
On 3/10/17, 10:45 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Ah crud. Nevermind. I didn't have remove-circulars in the failing case.
>
>Still pondering...
>-Alex
>
>On 3/10/17, 4:17 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
