[Flex JS] Adobe flash builder 4.7 gives "Internal error" when trying to create Flex JS projec

Hi, I am trying to create Flex JS project in Adobe flash builder 4.7. It gives "An internal build error has occured. See the error log for more information". Error in error log states : "Uncaught exception in compiler com.adobe.flexbuilder.project". Also it's not generating any file in bin-debug

Re: [Flex JS] Adobe flash builder 4.7 gives "Internal error" when trying to create Flex JS projec

Hi Muhammad, Did you use this [1] instruction to setup project. You can also try Moonshine IDE [2] which guide you step by step to setup FlexJS project. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Using+FlexJS+with+Adobe+Flash+Builder [2] http://moonshine-ide.com/ Thanks, Piotr 2017-0

Re: [Flex JS] Adobe flash builder 4.7 gives "Internal error" when trying to create Flex JS projec

piotrz, Thank you for your reply. I followed the steps mentioned in the first link you mentioned. But no success. Let me try moonshine ide, it might work for me. Regards -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: Kotlinjs has solved the circular dependency problem. Flexjs, do you have any plans?

Maybe. I thought we'd fixed that. Again, prepare a small test case so we can take a look. -Alex On 8/30/17, 10:49 PM, "lizhi" wrote: >if the code not have class,just function will get this error? > > > > >- >spriteflexjs.com >-- >Sent from: >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com

Re: Kotlinjs has solved the circular dependency problem. Flexjs, do you have any plans?

> Maybe. I thought we'd fixed that. Yes. We have. > On Aug 31, 2017, at 5:38 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > Maybe. I thought we'd fixed that. Again, prepare a small test case so we > can take a look. > > -Alex > > On 8/30/17, 10:49 PM, "lizhi" wrote: > >> if the code not have class,just funct

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

I want to throw in the name FenixJS for the fork. Its a play on the words Flex + Phoenix. You know what that means :-) Thanks, Om

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

Eh, I like the idea but you would then pretty much just use the rise from ashes word, because when I first read it I had no idea what it was, my dyslexia thought it was like Feline or Kleenex. (don't ask why I see an L) :) Mike On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 4:55 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > I wa

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

I forgot to mention that I am all for this fork. I have a couple projects that I want to use this with and then I can work on the compiler for my projects. Interestingly Web Assembly could be a target, I am naive as what it is detail wise, not enough research but compiling to something native woul

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

I am for this fork. I hope to maybe be added to the project after things get settled. Cheers and good luck! Chris -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

OK, if we're throwing names out there, here is one: BendJS EdB On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:55 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > I want to throw in the name FenixJS for the fork. > Its a play on the words Flex + Phoenix. You know what that means :-) > > Thanks, > Om > -- Ix Multimedia Soft

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

Well, Phoenix is already a thing: http://phoenixframework.org/ Not sure about trademark issues… > On Aug 31, 2017, at 11:55 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala > wrote: > > I want to throw in the name FenixJS for the fork. > Its a play on the words Flex + Phoenix. You know

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

That's a conflict. We would want a nonconflicting name that will not confuse our users. Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 31, 2017, at 2:25 PM, Harbs wrote: > > Well, Phoenix is already a thing: > http://phoenixframework.org/ > > Not sure about trademark issues… > >

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

Hehe looks like this is a thing already: https://phoenix.apache.org/ Oh well, never mind :-( On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > That's a conflict. We would want a nonconflicting name that will not > confuse our users. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Aug 31, 2017, at 2:25 PM,

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

I think the name thing should be in a separate thread. Mike On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > That's a conflict. We would want a nonconflicting name that will not > confuse our users. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Aug 31, 2017, at 2:25 PM, Harbs wrote: > > > > Well, Phoe

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

Let's wait for the VOTE thread and focus on Fork. Agree with Michael that talking about the name should be in a separate thread. Piotr 2017-08-31 23:39 GMT+02:00 Michael Schmalle : > I think the name thing should be in a separate thread. > > Mike > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Dave Fisher

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

I think this is a very good idea, thanks for proposing a fork I'l be voting +1 to this C. 2017-08-31 23:43 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki : > Let's wait for the VOTE thread and focus on Fork. > > Agree with Michael that talking about the name should be in a separate > thread. > > Piotr > > 2017-08-31

Re: Kotlinjs has solved the circular dependency problem. Flexjs, do you have any plans?

//testBug.as package { import flash.utils.setTimeout; public class TestBug { public function TestBug() { setTimeout(function():void{}, 100); }

Re: Kotlinjs has solved the circular dependency problem. Flexjs, do you have any plans?

I pushed a fix for this NPE. The nightly build should be done in about 40 minutes. -Alex On 8/31/17, 7:11 PM, "lizhi" wrote: >//testBug.as >package >{ > import flash.utils.setTimeout; > public class TestBug > { > > public function TestBug() >

Re: Kotlinjs has solved the circular dependency problem. Flexjs, do you have any plans?

nice.bug the only class ,do not have setTimeout,also get error. package { public class TestBug { public function TestBug() { } } } - spriteflexjs.com -- Sen

Re: Kotlinjs has solved the circular dependency problem. Flexjs, do you have any plans?

What error did you get? On 8/31/17, 10:17 PM, "lizhi" wrote: >nice.bug the only class ,do not have setTimeout,also get error. >package >{ > public class TestBug > { > > public function TestBug() > { > >

Re: Kotlinjs has solved the circular dependency problem. Flexjs, do you have any plans?

the same. D:\proj\git\spriteflexjs\test>D:\sdk\flexjs9_new/js/bin/mxmlc -targets=JSFlex -js-output-optimization=skipAsCoercions -remove-circulars -external-library-path="D:\sdk\flexjs9_new\js\libs\js.swc" -compiler.source-path=../src src\TestBug.as -define=CONFIG::as_only,false -define=CONFIG::js_o

[VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

Hi folks, Here is the vote thread. Please vote on whether to submit the proposal below to the board. Please use +1 for yes, -1 for no, and if you want, any number in-between per [1]. Only PMC member votes will be used to determine the results, but we are more than happy to hear from non-PMC mem