Hi guys,
honestly I didn't read through the whole thread, but just wanted to remind
you of what we collected about binding methods in the Apache Flex Wiki:
What about including a single JS file that contains all the code of the
module into the SWC? This would even be closer to an SWF (which also
contains all code).
In Jangaroo packaging, we includ both a single, minified file for
deployment as well as the tree of non-minified JS files for development
From WebJars and Jangaroo, I have some experience with Maven artifact
packaging of Web resources, and I'd recommend to follow Christofer's advice
and bundle everything into a single artifact.
Maven *does* allow a module to produce multiple artifacts (using different
classifiers), but this is
for SWF than for JS. I'm not clear how you could generate the JS from the
AS version.
-Alex
On 12/10/13 12:13 AM, Frank Wienberg fr...@jangaroo.net wrote:
Hi,
great to hear of this new approach!
I never understood why you guys implement Flex components for HTML5 in JS
you should have a look at the Nashorn Project. It's a
JavaScript engine running natively inside the Java VM and hereby on the
Server:
https://blogs.oracle.com/thejavatutorials/entry/javaone_2013_nashorn_javascript_on
Chris
Von: Frank Wienberg fr
What about compiling AS3 to JS using FalconJx and running the result in
Node.js?
All you'd need are some ActionScript stub APIs of the corresponding
Node.js modules...
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 11:06 PM, jude flexcapaci...@gmail.com wrote:
At one time there was talk about AS3 on the server. With
Hi,
great to hear of this new approach!
I never understood why you guys implement Flex components for HTML5 in JS,
not in ActionScript. Once you have AS3 API stubs of the browser APIs
(DOM, BOM, remember my suggestions about a [Native] annotation some time
ago?), you would not be limited to
As far as I know, instanceof checks do *not* work with interfaces. That's
what is is for. is works for both classes and interfaces.
new B() instanceof A = true
new B() instanceof IA = false (or even compile error?)
new B() is A = true
new B() is IA = true
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:18 PM,
You should also have a look at StageXL http://www.stagexl.org/ (formerly
known as DartFlash), since Dart compiles to JavaScript.
It is based on the Flash DisplayList, but not an exact implementation of
the Flash API.
For JooFlash, I sometimes had a glance at their code, and their project is
still
Hi Tom,
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Tom Brazil tom.bra...@systar.com wrote:
Rather amazing work. Good job.
thanks!
However, what can be done about the massive difference in cpu utilization?
The flash version used so little cpu that it wasn't noticeable, whereas
the html5 version pegs
BTW, my question about native was wrong, you had already answered why you
use native, I MEANT to ask why you took the !native calls out
Ha, funny that was the only thing I *didn't* answer :-)
But my explanation of why use native! anyway hints at why I took it out
for some classes, so there is
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Frank Wienberg fr...@jangaroo.net wrote:
When writing the Wiki page, I tried out how Flash / mxmlc handle field
initializers (remember, there is no language spec), and to my surprise
found
out that non-static field initializer code gets evaluated *before
Mike, this is really amazing! Or just art, as you called it in a tweet.
It you continue at this pace, we'll have the Open Flash Chart demo up and
running in FalconJx by the end of next week!
Excited,
-Frank-
I am going to change that in Jangaroo and in the as-js-runtime-prototype
accordingly.
I just pushed the changes to master of as-js-runtime-prototype.
Wow. FalconJx FTW!
But this is a good start.
Definitely so!
The *only* thing I noticed (besides the missing static trace line of code
you already mentioned) is that staticMembers slipped into the members
level, while it should be a sibling of members (I mean on the same level
as members). I
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Michael Schmalle apa...@teotigraphix.comwrote:
Quoting Frank Wienberg fr...@jangaroo.net:
Wow. FalconJx FTW!
But this is a good start.
Definitely so!
The *only* thing I noticed (besides the missing static trace line of
code
you already mentioned
Sure, I didn't mean to push, always mind the DoD! :-)
Another goal to get something a bit more complex working could be FlexUnit.
For Jangaroo, we use an older
versionhttps://github.com/CoreMedia/jangaroo-libs/tree/jangaroo-3/joounit(I
think it is called 0.9) that works without test annotations
Almost there... hold on...
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Michael Schmalle apa...@teotigraphix.comwrote:
Hmm..
Now that I looked back at the wiki you are using Object.defineProperty()
but you don't use that in your charts code. You wrapped it with AS3.class_
correct? Is that what you plan
Okay, I just pushed to the as-js-runtime-prototype repository (I just
noticed I didn't update the Github pages yet, so please do not use the
online version but pull).
All JavaScript files are updated to the latest and greatest code layout.
Because now I know you'll notice every detail, anyway, I
Ok, I know git pretty well but, this makes no sense to me, what does but
pull mean when I see no updated source code?
Ooops, sorry, I pushed not to master, but to a branch called less-files.
I just merged that branch into master, so you should now see the updated
sources there.
-Frank-
Mike, too bad our different time zones slow down communication so much...
Ah yes, this is about the [Native] annotation we discussed in this other
thread.
Jangaroo needs the ActionScript API of all the built-in classes (JavaScript
globals), so when using String, it actually parses String.as and
Hi Mike,
great to hear you are well again and have some time to spend on the AMD
approach!
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Michael Schmalle
apa...@teotigraphix.comwrote:
Frank,
I am starting on this and you have confused me starting off. The wiki
entry under the header of Implementation
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Michael Schmalle apa...@teotigraphix.comwrote:
Oh yeah,
As far as the AS3 output you have in the graph example, that will not be
possible with the current incarnation with Falcon. Unfortunately, the the
parser does not keep the whitespace tokens or really any
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Om bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
Dart is supported only on IE9+
I can understand this decision. Implementing high-level language features
in a JS version that does not even allow get/set functions or
non-enumerable custom properties really is a pain.
But to be
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Roland Zwaga rol...@stackandheap.comwrote:
We have 2 camps now, performance vs debugging features.
I believe you are incorrect. The debugging features are only relevant when
compiling in debug mode.
Every camp here agrees that release mode should output
To give an impression of how you could switch between different debug
levels and also to see how the AMD approach compares to the goog
approach, I re-compiled Erik's VanillaSDK demo with Jangaroo 3 to
AMD-style JavaScript output. This is the output format Mike Schmalle will
be implementing as an
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
It seems you needed to make changes to VanillaSDK to make it work with
Jangaroo. What alternative for the 'goog' UI framework will you be
using on the AMD side?
The only change to VanillaSDK is that I removed the
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Daniel Wasilewski devudes...@gmail.comwrote:
I do understand that Frank might have personal interest in getting Flex
close to Jangaroo for compatibility purposes, or maybe I am wrong and this
just came from experience building that very tool.
Dan, to put that
Hi Alain,
for Jangaroo, I answered this question here:
http://markmail.org/message/bwjwc7sxfbertu7f
For Flex / FalconJx, it seems nobody was extremely fond of the idea to have
to keep all the white-space and take care of generating JS code in the
exact line of the source AS code. So we have to
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
Alain,
In my view all development, including debugging, is done in AS. The JS
output, like bytecode, should just work.
EdB
This won't work for us (Jangaroo/Ext AS users). In our development
workflow, JS/HTML5 is the
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
Mike,
I was aleady afraid we were boring, or worse, bothering the community.
I apologize for my part in it. Like you I'm more of a tool maker, as
you know well. I do get distracted when I get the impression that my
Great!
Thanks you said finished, as there are still some TODO sections on the
Wiki page. I hope to get rid of them tomorrow, but my days are full of
meetings *sigh*. But as said before, the main concepts are now settled
(esp. compilation units), so don't wait for me!
Do you need more recipe-like
Okay, so now I guess I am really finished with my brain-dump into the Wiki
page :-)
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Alain Ekambi jazzmatad...@gmail.comwrote:
@Roland
For the SDK it s surely not a problem since it s all Apache.
But anyone using the Apache Flex SDK to write an ExtJS application will
need a commercial license from Sencha or will have to open source the code.
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
Please take a look at the proof of concept (both the intermediate and
release code) before making these kinds of statements.
I'd like to, but you admitted yourself that it has quite an initial
overhead to set up.
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Michael Schmalle
apa...@teotigraphix.comwrote:
Quoting Frank Wienberg fr...@jangaroo.net:
I'm looking forward to seeing the Falcon implementation of your
AMD/RequireJS ideas and it's output, so we can compare the various
suggested approaches
That being said, I think both Erik and I got the ball rolling. It is not
as if we are just talking theory here. We both have a working demo
everybody can look at, and have both posted our arguments. Maybe we should
just start a new thread to get this to a decision.
But I don't want to force a
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
I think I can now pinpoint the difference to RequireJS: It is in the
existence of deps.js.
deps.js says it's generated, and seems to be the extracted dependencies
of
all the other JS files, right? Aha, so this is
Erik, its really amazing to witness your progress!
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
On 1/25/13 10:11 AM, Frank Pepermans frankp...@hotmail.com wrote:
I concur, this is huge news for the future of Flex! Congrats to making
this
possible!
About the
Hi Roland,
thank you for bringing up this point, I think it is crucial for the success
of Apache Flex / JS!
I Erik's latest thread, we just discussed the different approaches to come
up with a JS-enabled component library for Flex.
I mentioned that we already have an ActionScript-API for Ext JS
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Roland Zwaga rol...@stackandheap.comwrote:
I'm really glad to read about this, if you read the [ASJS] Integration
with existing JS libraries and components
you will see that I was actually talking about exactly what you're
describing.
Yeah, you sure saw
A colleague just pointed me at a Flash-to-HTML5 conversion service:
https://www.pixelplant.com/
The online version has serious limits (e.g. only allows 50k ActionScript,
so no Flex apps!), but you can try out simple things. It seems to support
AS3.
Does anybody know (technical) details about
With ASJS/FalconJS and FalconJx, we have different approaches to generate
JavaScript from ActionScript to make Flex applications run directly in any
browser. If I am not mistaken, we do not yet have the Flash core library
available (DisplayList etc.). Bernd Paradies, the original author of
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
If you'd be interested, I'd contribute JooFlash to FalconJx (or FalconJs;
should not really make a difference, as it is ActionScript code). My
employer CoreMedia signed a CCLA, so there shouldn't be a legal problem.
Besides ActionScript and MXML, there is a third source file format for
which mxmlc can produce code: properties files.
Thus, for FalconJx, like for MXML, we have to decide which way to go: either
1. let Falcon generate the temporary ActionScript class and compile that
to JavaScript, or
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Michael Schmalle
apa...@teotigraphix.comwrote:
Frank,
Let me be direct, do you want to start working on AMD output?
Not necessarily right now. Still seems like a steep learning curve for me.
IMO you should definitely finish up the Wiki stuff so it clear
PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
On 1/21/13 12:01 AM, Frank Wienberg fr...@jangaroo.net wrote:
Besides ActionScript and MXML, there is a third source file format for
which mxmlc can produce code: properties files.
Thus, for FalconJx, like for MXML, we have to decide which way to go
curious because I have a WebAudio project I
am going to be starting and I want to know how I would hook the compiler up
to it's build system. Ideas?
Mike
Quoting Frank Wienberg fr...@jangaroo.net:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Michael Schmalle
apa...@teotigraphix.com**wrote:
Frank
Hi Michael, hi Erik,
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Michael Schmalle
apa...@teotigraphix.comwrote:
As Erik has said, he made a stub for this already and we can start
writting it once I actually understand somethings.
One thing I need to get clear, are you asking the output to be like
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Michael Schmalle
apa...@teotigraphix.comwrote:
I think what my plan is, is to tell you I'm not going to ignore you, I'm
focused on MXML just so I can get it into the flow. After I get it
committed I will try and see what is going on with the code you wrote.
After some time off, I just became aware of this discussion, and it has
already become quite longish, so please forgive me if I missed or
misunderstood some arguments.
That said, my understanding of MXML is that it is just another (for some
use cases more convenient) syntax to write an
Hi folks,
I have been rather quiet for a while, but that's because I have been busy
implementing JavaScript code generation according to the Runtime prototype
I posted some weeks ago. However, I started off implementing this in the
Jangaroo compiler, not in Falcon. I am far quicker implementing
52 matches
Mail list logo
