Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

2017-09-20 Thread Alex Harui
Well, it isn't official until the board approves, hopefully tomorrow. I updated the board resolution, and modified the board report and added "Apache Royale will take responsibility for what is now Apache FlexJS and related repos." I also updated the PODLINGNAMESEARCH JIRA issue. https://issues.a

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

2017-09-20 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Carlos, If you will need any help and my time allows let me know. :) Piotr On Wed, Sep 20, 2017, 09:29 Carlos Rovira wrote: > Thanks Piotr, just see the results and very happy to see that Royale was > the most voted. Now is time to work the brand to make us shine. > > :) > > Carlos > > 2017-09

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

2017-09-20 Thread Carlos Rovira
Thanks Piotr, just see the results and very happy to see that Royale was the most voted. Now is time to work the brand to make us shine. :) Carlos 2017-09-20 9:00 GMT+02:00 Harbs : > Thanks Piotr. > > Looks like we’re now Royale. :-) > > Harbs > > > On Sep 20, 2017, at 12:51 AM, Piotr Zarzycki

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

2017-09-20 Thread Harbs
Thanks Piotr. Looks like we’re now Royale. :-) Harbs > On Sep 20, 2017, at 12:51 AM, Piotr Zarzycki > wrote: > > I will end voting tomorrow 09/19/2017 6:00 - 7:00 UTC Time. > > Thanks, > Piotr > > 2017-09-19 23:15 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > >> Justin voted. >> >> Now we have Royale and Limb

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

2017-09-19 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
I'm sorry I meant 09/20/2017. 2017-09-19 23:51 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki : > I will end voting tomorrow 09/19/2017 6:00 - 7:00 UTC Time. > > Thanks, > Piotr > > 2017-09-19 23:15 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > >> Justin voted. >> >> Now we have Royale and Limber tied again with 13 points. >> Beads has 11

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

2017-09-19 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
I will end voting tomorrow 09/19/2017 6:00 - 7:00 UTC Time. Thanks, Piotr 2017-09-19 23:15 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > Justin voted. > > Now we have Royale and Limber tied again with 13 points. > Beads has 11, Braids as 10. Arise has 9. > > Royale has been mentioned on 7 out of 12 votes. > Limber o

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

2017-09-19 Thread Alex Harui
Justin voted. Now we have Royale and Limber tied again with 13 points. Beads has 11, Braids as 10. Arise has 9. Royale has been mentioned on 7 out of 12 votes. Limber on 6 out of 12. Limber still has the most first-place votes with 3. Royale and Beads have 2. Thanks, -Alex On 9/19/17, 1:11 PM

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

2017-09-19 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Alex, about your question in the other thread if I would help in logo and website work: I commented that I need to be "connected" and "inspired" with the new name, since is a huge task and effort just in the same way I was when I contributed to MDL UI set. I didn't want to comment too much abo

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

2017-09-19 Thread Alex Harui
Piotr changed his vote. It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at 13. Arise is now third at 9 points. Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8. Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes. Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they aren

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

2017-09-19 Thread Alex Harui
Dave changed his abstention to a vote. That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each. Beads now has 11. Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes. Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times. -Alex On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >Erik changed his vote. That put Limb

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

2017-09-19 Thread Alex Harui
Erik changed his vote. That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13 vs 12. However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an adult site. Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes. Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now. Boja and Royale have been mentioned 5 times, Beads 4 times. -Alex O

[DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

2017-09-19 Thread Alex Harui
I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for Gmail. I changed it again. You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone can move Bend enough to make a difference. You could actually increase the vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja. -Alex On 9/19/17,