FYI.
I haven't been following the release discussion closely, but just wanted to let
you all know that AIR 3.8 is currently broken:
https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bug&id=3603433
http://forums.adobe.com/message/5569366#5569366
Now I understand this doesn't affect the Flex SDK, however
We can't. you can only feed buildbot the svn commit number. When we push
the full site, we can test it then. Once the full site is been pushed, we
can make smaller changes that should go in near-realtime.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With the CMS how you sele
Hi,
With the CMS how you selectively publish a single file? I's like to publish the
installer 3.0 config file to see if the changes I made work.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> It's 5.30am here in the bay area. I am still going in and out of sleep :-)
I'll give it a go - if you could double check it in a couple of hours that
would be a great help.
It's almost 7am here, site goes live at 10am.
Justin
Om,
If you can take care of it sometime between 8am and 9am Pacific, that would
rock. Statistically, we should have a great majority of the DISTs
populated with this release by then. I'll start running the update to the
website around 8:30 pacific (it will take about 30 minutes because it has
to
It's 5.30am here in the bay area. I am still going in and out of sleep :-)
When exactly did you want me to make the updates to the config files?
Thanks,
Om
On Aug 6, 2013 5:43 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Has the installer config 3.0 been updated to point to the actual released
> > s
Hi,
> Has the installer config 3.0 been updated to point to the actual released
> sdk urls?
>
> Also, config 2.0 needs to have the version and url of installer updated so
> that auto update kicks in.
No I don't believe so. Any chance you could do this as your more familiar with
how that works,
Has the installer config 3.0 been updated to point to the actual released
sdk urls?
Also, config 2.0 needs to have the version and url of installer updated so
that auto update kicks in.
Please take a few minutes to download the installer and run it through to
the end before making the announcemen
Sounds good. I'll re-adjust everything for noon EDT, 10AM Mountain (your
local time). The website will go live about 5 minutes before the blog post.
-Nick
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > What time works best?
> Midday works fro me, should generate a bit more b
Hi,
> What time works best?
Midday works fro me, should generate a bit more buzz on twitter etc as well.
That way we can also fix any issues, respond to any tweets/blog comments etc
etc promptly as opposed if we released at midnight.
> I hesitate to much earlier than noon... I'm still seeing ab
What time works best? I have no issues coordinating it for John -- it's
been a while since he's been able to announce a Flex release at his show.
I hesitate to much earlier than noon... I'm still seeing about 1/4 of the
dist sites missing files at 7am EDT.
-Nick
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:13 AM,
Hi,
> I've armed the blog and website to go live tomorrow night (8/7/2013) at
> midnight EDT. Unless I hear otherwise, things should be ready to go :)
Any chance you could make it midday? I was going to get John to make an
announcement about the release tomorrow morning at 360 stack.
The web s
I've armed the blog and website to go live tomorrow night (8/7/2013) at
midnight EDT. Unless I hear otherwise, things should be ready to go :)
Thanks for all the hard work team!
-Nick
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The 4.10 release has just been committed to SV
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:00 AM, aYo ~ wrote:
> One combined should suffice I believe.
>
Agreed.
Update: Installer badge now supports sdk-installer-config-3.0.xml and hence
Apache Flex 4.10.0.
I will upload the new installerBadge.swf file to this page once we are
ready to go live.
Thanks,
Om
One combined should suffice I believe.
aYo
www.ayobinitie.com
mrbinitie.blogspot.com
On 5 Aug 2013 18:46, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The 4.10 release has just been committed to SVN, once 24 hours have passed
> I send out the official email announcement.
>
> Do we want two announcements one
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The 4.10 release has just been committed to SVN, once 24 hours have passed
> I send out the official email announcement.
>
> Do we want two announcements one for the installer and one for the SDK or
> do we just have have a combined o
Hi,
The 4.10 release has just been committed to SVN, once 24 hours have passed I
send out the official email announcement.
Do we want two announcements one for the installer and one for the SDK or do we
just have have a combined one?
Other than the installer config needing to be updated to po
Thank you, Justin, for your patience and perseverance!
EdB
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Binding votes:
> +1 Erik de Bruin
> +1 Alex Harui
> +1 Justin Mclean
>
> Non binding votes:
> +1 Swen van Zanten
> +1 Mark Kessler
> +1 aYo
> +1 Carlos Rovira
>
> There wer
Hi,
Binding votes:
+1 Erik de Bruin
+1 Alex Harui
+1 Justin Mclean
Non binding votes:
+1 Swen van Zanten
+1 Mark Kessler
+1 aYo
+1 Carlos Rovira
There were no +0 or -1 votes and a total of 7 +1 votes, 3 of which were binding.
So this will in now official 4.10 Apache Flex release!
Thanks to eve
Hi,
+1 (binding)
- Tested on OSX 10.7.5
- MD5 and signed package OK
- readme, release_notes, notice, license etc all fine
- Can compile from source package
- SDK can be used in Flash Builder (with know issue noted in release notes)
- Could use SDK in mobile, desktop and browser application
Thank
Hi,
The 72 hours are almost up (12 or so hours to go), I'd like to see a few more
+1 votes from the PMC in there.
Thanks,
Justin
quot;Mark Kessler" wrote:
>
> >+1
> >
> >OS: Win7 64bit
> >Flex SDK: 4.10
> >FP: 11.8
> >
> >Successfully built SDK.
> >Used SDK to built simple apps successfully.
> >
> >
> >-Mark
> >
> >
> >
> >
essfully.
>
>
>-Mark
>
>
>
>On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Justin Mclean
>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a Apache Flex 4.10.0 release candidate 4. Please see the
>> RELEASE_NOTES and the README.
>>
>> There are only a few minor differ
>
>On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Justin Mclean
>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a Apache Flex 4.10.0 release candidate 4. Please see the
>> RELEASE_NOTES and the README.
>>
>> There are only a few minor differences from RC3, which are:
>> - Fixed FL
Hi,
> If I recall correctly, it's version 10.1
Close the minimum is 10.2. This is in the README.
The 4.10 SDK wont compile with 10.1 but it may be possible to get it working on
10.1 with a little work.
Thanks.
Justin
;FP: 11.8
>
>Successfully built SDK.
>Used SDK to built simple apps successfully.
>
>
>-Mark
>
>
>
>On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Justin Mclean
>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a Apache Flex 4.10.0 release candidate 4. Please see the
>> RELEA
If I recall correctly, it's version 10.1
EdB
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Jagan Langa Sami Durai
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> correct me if my understanding is wrong. Developer may prefer any latest
> flash player while compiling and releasing. But my question is. what is the
> minimum flash player ve
Hi,
correct me if my understanding is wrong. Developer may prefer any latest
flash player while compiling and releasing. But my question is. what is the
minimum flash player version supported by 4.10.0 sdk?
*
Regards,
S. Jagan Langa* *|* *Team Lead*
*Sybrant Technologies Pvt Ltd*
*--
On Aug 2, 2013 2:24 AM, "Jagan Langa Sami Durai"
wrote:
>
> hi
>
> I have installed the rc4 sdk with the latest sdk installer. I noticed
that,
> by default, min. player version is marked as 11.8 in the flex-config.xml.
> is it supposed to point 11.8 or its an error?
>
>
>
>11.8
>
This w
hi
I have installed the rc4 sdk with the latest sdk installer. I noticed that,
by default, min. player version is marked as 11.8 in the flex-config.xml.
is it supposed to point 11.8 or its an error?
11.8
*
Regards,
S. Jagan Langa* *|* *Team Lead*
*Sybrant Technologies Pvt Ltd*
*
+1
OS: Win7 64bit
Flex SDK: 4.10
FP: 11.8
Successfully built SDK.
Used SDK to built simple apps successfully.
-Mark
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a Apache Flex 4.10.0 release candidate 4. Please see the
> RELEASE_NOTES and the README.
&
On 8/1/2013 2:47 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
As time marches on, this method of "fixing" DV will become more and more
its looking more & more like 4.9.1 was the last SDK version where that "trick"
worked. 4.10.0 RC3 shows black/grey screen instead of the DV no matter how many
times i stan
tests pass
> - ant framework-rsls + IDE script run fine
> - resulting SDK imports ok in FB and compiles various projects fine
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a Apache Flex 4.10.0 relea
HI,
> default="4.10.0 RC3" />
Sorry about that - just fixing.
Justin
+1 (binding)
On my Mac:
- hash and sig check out
- SDK builds
- checkintests pass
- ant framework-rsls + IDE script run fine
- resulting SDK imports ok in FB and compiles various projects fine
EdB
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a Apache Fl
Ah, I see (some of) it:
Need to change the 'default' attribute as well...
EdB
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, wrote:
> True, but there are no options for the choice of flashplayer, so the
> installer cannot proceed
>
>
>
> aYo
> www.ayobinitie.com
> mrbinitie.blogspot.com
>
>
>
> From: J
True, but there are no options for the choice of flashplayer, so the installer
cannot proceed
aYo
www.ayobinitie.com
mrbinitie.blogspot.com
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Thursday, 1 August 2013 11:46
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Hi,
> Now RC4 is online, can you please point the Installer
Same here... typo?
EdB
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Swen van Zanten wrote:
> It doesn't work the way it should anymore..
> flash player is not chooseable and the installer does not automatically fill
> in the sdk.
>
> Regards,
>
> SWEN VAN ZANTEN
> Hoofdstraat 160
> 2171 BL, Sassenheim
>
Thank you, kind sir.
;-)
EdB
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Now RC4 is online, can you please point the Installer to it so people
>> have easy access?
>
> Done.
>
> Justin
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. w
It doesn't work the way it should anymore..
flash player is not chooseable and the installer does not automatically fill in
the sdk.
Regards,
SWEN VAN ZANTEN
Hoofdstraat 160
2171 BL, Sassenheim
Op 1 aug. 2013, om 12:46 heeft Justin Mclean het
volgende geschreven:
> Hi,
>
>> Now RC4 is onli
Hi,
> Now RC4 is online, can you please point the Installer to it so people
> have easy access?
Done.
Justin
Hi,
Now RC4 is online, can you please point the Installer to it so people
have easy access?
EdB
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Place all discussion about Apache Flex 4.10.0 RC 4 here. Any questions you
> have, issues you run into etc etc
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
Hi,
This is a Apache Flex 4.10.0 release candidate 4. Please see the RELEASE_NOTES
and the README.
There are only a few minor differences from RC3, which are:
- Fixed FLEX-32599 Stop RTE when scrolled horizontally + cleaned up
spacing/readability.
- Fixed FLEX-33632 Moved initialization of
Hi,
Place all discussion about Apache Flex 4.10.0 RC 4 here. Any questions you
have, issues you run into etc etc
Thanks,
Justin
Om,
No blog post. A google plus user posted that tid bit on the Apache Flex
Community page (
https://plus.google.com/104408486838026884935/posts/17vGFEevkZM). I don't
know of any side affects yet, as i haven't moved off of Flex 4.6 yet. But
when i do (planning for this next dev cycle to move to
As time marches on, this method of "fixing" DV will become more and more
broken. FP version changes and SDK changes will not be realized and will
cause issues -- from crashes to bad code. I've already run across some
major issues trying to use the new DataGrid with the hacked DV setup...
The tim
On 7/31/2013 11:59 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Chris Martin wrote:
Thanks for the note! I learnt that nugget in this thread. Is this
document somewhere on a blog post, etc.? If not I will add a note about
this on our wiki. Any known side effects of doing t
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Chris Martin wrote:
> > It is really up to Adobe to figure out if they want to honor their
> > user base's desire to continue using FB 4.6. DV does not work with
> Apache
> > Flex in any case.
>
> Om,
>
> Just a heads up, Design View does work with Apache Fle
> It is really up to Adobe to figure out if they want to honor their
> user base's desire to continue using FB 4.6. DV does not work with
Apache
> Flex in any case.
Om,
Just a heads up, Design View does work with Apache Flex 4.9.1. But you
have to modify the sdk's flex-sdk-description.xml f
On 7/30/13 4:49 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> It is still using bad code, but the change allows 4.10 to work.
>So 4*100+10*10 + 0 == 500 is going to be treated the same as 5.0.0 (5*100
>+ 0 + 0 = 500), 4.10.1 (say we need to patch it) = 501 which will end up
>with a higher version than t
Hi,
> It is still using bad code, but the change allows 4.10 to work.
So 4*100+10*10 + 0 == 500 is going to be treated the same as 5.0.0 (5*100 + 0 +
0 = 500), 4.10.1 (say we need to patch it) = 501 which will end up with a
higher version than than 5.0.0. 100% sure this is just not going to caus
On 7/30/13 4:23 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Also even with that patch to FB we would still have to change the RC
>version number form 4.10.0 to something else right for it to work in a
>patched version of FB? It sill using major*100+minor*10 to compare
>versions right?
It is still using
Hi,
Also even with that patch to FB we would still have to change the RC version
number form 4.10.0 to something else right for it to work in a patched version
of FB? It sill using major*100+minor*10 to compare versions right?
Justin
Hi,
> I don't think 4.6 is all that important. If we fix 4.7, the latest
> versions of the SDK and Flash Builder are good to go.
Good we have a solution for 4.7 but given that this is really a perception
issue (the actual problem has a very simple workaround ie edit and fix the
generated code)
On 7/30/13 12:09 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>Thanks for digging into this issue and finding a solution.
>My thoughts/concerns on this:
>
> - It is really up to Adobe to figure out if they want to honor their
> user base's desire to continue using FB 4.6. DV does not work with
>Apache
Thanks for digging into this issue and finding a solution.
My thoughts/concerns on this:
- It is really up to Adobe to figure out if they want to honor their
user base's desire to continue using FB 4.6. DV does not work with Apache
Flex in any case.
- Will the fix for FB 4.7 work with
I don't think 4.6 is all that important. If we fix 4.7, the latest
versions of the SDK and Flash Builder are good to go. Everyone else
needs to update or live with the workaround.
EdB
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 7/30/13 11:35 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>
>>Can
On 7/30/13 11:35 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>Can you give us odds on how likely that "if ever" is? If it's likely
>that Adobe will release this as a fix, I'd be willing to release the
>SDK in expectation of that event. If not, I'll keep pushing for a
>solution we can create and distribute ourse
Can you give us odds on how likely that "if ever" is? If it's likely
that Adobe will release this as a fix, I'd be willing to release the
SDK in expectation of that event. If not, I'll keep pushing for a
solution we can create and distribute ourselves.
Thanks,
EdB
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:14
Your right :)
Regards,
SWEN VAN ZANTEN
Hoofdstraat 160
2171 BL, Sassenheim
Op 30 jul. 2013, om 19:15 heeft Alex Harui het volgende
geschreven:
>
>
> On 7/30/13 1:48 AM, "Swen van Zanten" wrote:
>
>> It works great.
>> Project compiles without errors
>>
>> mac osx 10.8.4
>>
>> I'll will
On 7/30/13 1:48 AM, "Swen van Zanten" wrote:
>It works great.
>Project compiles without errors
>
>mac osx 10.8.4
>
>I'll will try FB 4.6 on my win7 later
I'm pretty sure it won't work there. Unfortunately the class I changed
was refactored between 4.6 and 4.7.
-Alex
On 7/29/13 11:48 PM, "Paul Hastings" wrote:
>
>just in case you don't already know, this issue shows up in FB4.6 & SDK
>4.10.0
>as well.
Yes, I'm aware, but it is a bundle of work to try to fix up 4.6 and I'm
not sure how well that will go over with Adobe management since only 4.7
"officially
It works great.
Project compiles without errors
mac osx 10.8.4
I'll will try FB 4.6 on my win7 later
Regards,
SWEN VAN ZANTEN
Hoofdstraat 160
2171 BL, Sassenheim
Op 30 jul. 2013, om 08:57 heeft Erik de Bruin het volgende
geschreven:
> Same here:
>
> Permission error on the download and the
The file downloads fine.
The new jar does the trick, I get a nice, clean new project, no errors.
Thanks!
EdB
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> OK, I think I've fixed the permissions. Let me know if you have a problem
> using it.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 7/30/13 12:23 AM, "Alex H
OK, I think I've fixed the permissions. Let me know if you have a problem
using it.
-Alex
On 7/30/13 12:23 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>OK, my bad on the folder name. Updated the readme.
>
>Anybody know what permission I would have to change to allow the jar to be
>downloaded?
>
>
>On 7/29/13 11:
Eric could you try to clean the workspace cache[1] or eventually try a new
workspace?
I can't confirm if it would solve the problem because I'm moved to IntelliJ.
[1] {workspace}/.metadata/.plugins/com.adobe.flexbuilder.codemodel
On 30 July 2013 07:57, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Same here:
>
> Pe
OK, my bad on the folder name. Updated the readme.
Anybody know what permission I would have to change to allow the jar to be
downloaded?
On 7/29/13 11:57 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>Same here:
>
>Permission error on the download and the FB 4.7 location seems to be
>"eclipse/plugins/com.adobe
I'm with Erik here too, fix it in develop + branch both issues.
On 30 July 2013 07:57, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Same here:
>
> Permission error on the download and the FB 4.7 location seems to be
> "eclipse/plugins/com.adobe.flexbuilder.codemodel_4.7.0.349722"
>
> ???
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul
Same here:
Permission error on the download and the FB 4.7 location seems to be
"eclipse/plugins/com.adobe.flexbuilder.codemodel_4.7.0.349722"
???
EdB
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:50 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> Same here. Getting a "*Server Problem**Unknown server error.* Try again or
> c
Same here. Getting a "*Server Problem**Unknown server error.* Try again or
contact the server administrator."
Also, the folder in my FB installation
is eclipse\plugins\com.adobe.flexbuilder.codemodel_4.7.0.349722
This is on Windows 7, FB 4.7 64-bit
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:22 PM,
On 7/30/2013 1:04 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
Can a few folks try it so we know it works? I think it will only work
with FlashBuilder 4.7 (and not 4.6). Then we'll discuss what to do next.
just in case you don't already know, this issue shows up in FB4.6 & SDK 4.10.0
as well.
I have tried downloading the file.. but the browser says I have no permission..
Also in your readme the folder that is pointed to is:
eclipse/plugins/com.adobe.flash.codemodel_4.7.0.349722
But on my machine it is:
eclipse/plugins/com.adobe.flexbuilder.codemodel_4.7.0.349722
Regards,
SWEN VAN ZA
Even later update on the "New Project" issue:
I think I have successfully patched a jar in FlashBuilder to get around
this problem.
The patched jar and a readme is up on
http://people.apache.org/~aharui/FlashBuilder/
Can a few folks try it so we know it works? I think it will only work
with Fla
Latest update on the "New Project" issue:
I think I've found the offending code for real this time. There is code
for a version check that checks that the Flex version is less than 5.0.0
by doing:
major * 100 + minor * 10 + micro
This means that we don't have the option to change to Apa
>I am hoping we're going to release something other than RC3 which means we
>have a few more days before we would release. Here's my latest update on the
>3 issues:
>
>1) ResourceModule via FlashVars: Yes it affects a small population of the
>total Flex SWFs in the world, but at least two of f
I'd say 'release' AND 'develop', that way the fixes will be run
through Mustella and the build machine as well as made part of the
release. The 'release' branch doesn't get automatically tested or
build.
EdB
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 7/28/13 10:50 PM, "Justin
On 7/28/13 10:50 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>>If so, I will check them into the release4.10 branch sometime tomorrow
>> after Europe has had a chance to weigh in on this thread.
>Why not check in so people can review? That how the system works, commit
>then review.
I was hoping there would be co
+1 on the fix and reverting. Thank you Alex for figuring those out.
I think we should actively prevent the 'New Project' issue from
occurring. All we need to do is change the version number to something
with only single digits. That really couldn't be simpler, could it?
5.0 has my vote.
This is n
Hi,
> OK, do we have consensus on taking both the resource module fix and
> reverting Ilist?
I'm not sure enough people have expressed an option on either issue for
consensus to be reached.
> If so, I will check them into the release4.10 branch sometime tomorrow
> after Europe has had a chance t
On 7/28/13 9:44 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> What day do you get in the airplane?
>Thursday your time.
OK, do we have consensus on taking both the resource module fix and
reverting Ilist?
If so, I will check them into the release4.10 branch sometime tomorrow
after Europe has had a chanc
Hi,
> What day do you get in the airplane?
Thursday your time.
Justin
On 7/28/13 9:15 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> I am hoping we're going to release something other than RC3 which means
>>we
>> have a few more days before we would release.
>
>2 day + 3 days (to vote) = 5 day minimum when means a minimal of over a
>week since the vote passed. Do you reall
Hi,
> I am hoping we're going to release something other than RC3 which means we
> have a few more days before we would release.
2 day + 3 days (to vote) = 5 day minimum when means a minimal of over a week
since the vote passed. Do you really think we should delay that long?
Just we aware that
On 7/28/13 7:57 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>I really think that it is not fair for us to delay the release just
>because
>of this FB bug.
I am hoping we're going to release something other than RC3 which means we
have a few more days before we would release. Here's my latest update on
the
On Jul 28, 2013 7:37 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Hi Justin, what say Adobe about this?
> Been no official response from Adobe but I wouldn't really expect one, we
have to submit a bug in there bug base and it may or may not get fixed at
some time in the future. I can't see them fixing
Hi,
> Hi Justin, what say Adobe about this?
Been no official response from Adobe but I wouldn't really expect one, we have
to submit a bug in there bug base and it may or may not get fixed at some time
in the future. I can't see them fixing it and releasing a patch in under a
month. Pure specu
Hi Justin, what say Adobe about this?
Franklin Garzón
Regional Development Manager
MCITP Microsoft SQLServer
*Si el hombre dejara de aprender entonces dejaría de existir*
094496862
> From: jus...@classsoftware.com
> Subject: Apache Flex 4.10.0 Release
> Date: Mon, 29 Ju
Hi,
So far the only consensus (from those who have been vocal) is not to release
the voted on RC3 but:
- We don't seem to have a solution the the Flash Builder version issue other
than changing version number to single digits.
- The code for the release module issues hasn't been checked in.
Are
Can you please add this information to the JIRA ticket?
Thanks,
EdB
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Jagan Langa Sami Durai
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following is the ANT script snippet used to build my app. I have marked the
> locale = "" because we tend to load them at run time. since our applicati
Ah, I see you just did that. Please ignore me ;-)
EdB
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Can you please add this information to the JIRA ticket?
>
> Thanks,
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Jagan Langa Sami Durai
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Following is the AN
Hi,
Following is the ANT script snippet used to build my app. I have marked the
locale = "" because we tend to load them at run time. since our application
support multi-language and the language is decided at the time user log's
in. red color highlights might give you guys a clue to corner the is
Yes, Alex is looking into it... He left a comment on the JIRA ticket
asking for a test case and the compiler settings used. Can you provide
that, please?
EdB
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Jagan Langa Sami Durai
wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> Any plan to fix this issue [1] in this release?
>
>
> [1] htt
Hi
Any plan to fix this issue [1] in this release?
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33632
*
Regards,
S. Jagan Langa* *|* *Team Lead*
*Sybrant Technologies Pvt Ltd*
*
*
Mobile: +91 98430 50897
Skype: seesamjagan
-
And wow!
You called it a minute before my email. I guess officially we have a
release now. So a possible fix for the RSL thing goes into an point
update, if it checks out to be a regression?
EdB
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> I don't see Alex's vote anywhere yet... I
I don't see Alex's vote anywhere yet... In the discuss thread he
announced was going to check on FLEX-33632. I agree with him that if
it checks out that it is indeed an issue, it would be a regression
serious enough to warrant immediate fixing.
Just to be sure, I'll hold the release by changing my
Hi,
Binding votes:
+1 Erik de Bruin
+1 Justin Mclean
+1 Cyrill Zadra
+1 Nicholas Kwiatkowski
Non binding votes:
+1 Carlos Rovira
+1 Jose Barragan
+1 Swen van Zanten
+1 Mark Kessler
There were no +0 or -1 votes and a total of 8 +1 votes, 4 of which were binding.
So baring any major issues this w
Hi,
72 hours are just about up - final chance for anyone have any objections for
this becoming a release.
Thanks,
Justin
My vote is pending the investigation of FLEX-33632. Source kit built and
Mustella passed locally for the main suite, mobile and AIR on Windows with
11.7 and Mac with 11.1
Hopefully the bug author was not setting compiler arguments correctly and
we are simply catching that situation now. But we d
script to work.
> >
> > Apps compile well with IntelliJ 11.3, 12.0 and 12.1.4
> > I didn't get a chance to review the README with a fine-tooth comb. I
> hope
> > to do that this afternoon if I get out of work before 9pm, but if not
> I'll
> > assume it
+1
OS: Windows 7
IDE: FlashDevelop (just to be different)
FP: 11.8
Air: 3.7
Successfully compiled sdk
successfully compiled test applications.
-Mark
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:45 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a Apache Flex 4.10.0 Release Candidate 3. Pleas
1 - 100 of 200 matches
Mail list logo
