Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

2016-11-04 Thread Christofer Dutz
t there were symlinks for Mac. Maybe it doesn't matter for what > >we use it for. > > > >Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone > > > >-- Original message-- > >From: OmPrakash Muppirala > >Date: Thu, Nov 3

Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

2016-11-03 Thread Alex Harui
ilto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> Date: Thursday, November 3, 2016 at 2:11 PM To: Alex Harui mailto:aha...@adobe.com>> Cc: "dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>" mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>> Subject: Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

Re: New Flex SDK release

2016-11-03 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I'd like to get FLEX-34880 done for this release. If I work on it in > the weekend, would it be too late, you think? That will be fine, it will be a little while before we make a release candidate and vote on it. Thanks, Justin

Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

2016-11-03 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
>Date: Thu, Nov 3, 2016 11:31 AM > >To: dev@flex.apache.org; > >Subject:Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release) > > > >Interestingly, I was able to simply unzip the .dmg file and inspect its > >contents. It simply has a folder called AIR SDK: &

Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

2016-11-03 Thread Alex Harui
om: OmPrakash Muppirala >Date: Thu, Nov 3, 2016 11:31 AM >To: dev@flex.apache.org; >Subject:Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release) > >Interestingly, I was able to simply unzip the .dmg file and inspect its >contents. It simply has a folder called AIR SDK

Re: New Flex SDK release

2016-11-03 Thread Mihai Chira
> If there are any issues you want to see fixed in this release please add them > to this subtask [2] in the release JIRA. I'd like to get FLEX-34880 done for this release. If I work on it in the weekend, would it be too late, you think?

Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

2016-11-03 Thread Alex Harui
d (was Re: New Flex SDK release) Interestingly, I was able to simply unzip the .dmg file and inspect its contents. It simply has a folder called AIR SDK: https://snag.gy/i8gNmu.jpg Also of interest is the fact that I have been using only the .zip files in the NPM FlexJS installer. That seems to

Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

2016-11-03 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
TE smartphone > > > > > > -- Original message-- > > > *From: *OmPrakash Muppirala > > > *Date: *Thu, Nov 3, 2016 10:10 AM > > > *To: *dev@flex.apache.org; > > > *Subject:*Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK > release)

Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

2016-11-03 Thread Josh Tynjala
y not be the latest. > > > > Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone > > > > -- Original message-- > > *From: *OmPrakash Muppirala > > *Date: *Thu, Nov 3, 2016 10:10 AM > > *To: *dev@flex.apache.org; > > *Subject:*Re: Installe

Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

2016-11-03 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
and tar will go away or may not be the latest. > > Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone > > -- Original message-- > *From: *OmPrakash Muppirala > *Date: *Thu, Nov 3, 2016 10:10 AM > *To: *dev@flex.apache.org; > *Subject:*Re: Installer.xml changes nee

Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

2016-11-03 Thread Alex Harui
dev@flex.apache.org; Subject:Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release) I still see the zip file available here https://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashruntimes/air/AdobeAIRSDK.zip On Nov 3, 2016 9:54 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > On 11/3/16, 9:35 AM

Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

2016-11-03 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
And I still see the adl.exe inside the zip file: https://snag.gy/uSrbL5.jpg On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 10:10 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > I still see the zip file available here > > https://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashruntimes/ > air/AdobeAIRSDK.zip > > On Nov 3, 2016 9:54 AM, "Alex

Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

2016-11-03 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I still see the zip file available here https://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashruntimes/air/AdobeAIRSDK.zip On Nov 3, 2016 9:54 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > On 11/3/16, 9:35 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > wrote: > > >I can take this work up. Depending on

Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

2016-11-03 Thread Alex Harui
On 11/3/16, 9:35 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >I can take this work up. Depending on how much work this would take and >amy available bandwidth, this could take a while. > >Do you know what exactly needs to be done here? Don't know for sure. My guess would

Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

2016-11-03 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I can take this work up. Depending on how much work this would take and amy available bandwidth, this could take a while. Do you know what exactly needs to be done here? Thanks, Om On Nov 3, 2016 8:54 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > Hi, > > The Adobe AIR SDK 24 is available in beta form at [1] and

Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

2016-11-03 Thread Alex Harui
Hi, The Adobe AIR SDK 24 is available in beta form at [1] and is incompatible with our installers (both for regular Flex as well as FlexJS). So, our users currently will not be able to use the Installer or Ant to set up with Adobe AIR 24 or later. I have created JIRA issues FLEX-35166 and FLEX-3

Re: New Flex SDK release

2016-11-03 Thread Alex Harui
On 11/3/16, 1:12 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> One thing I would really be dleighted about, would be, if we could get >>rid of the patched libraries used in the sdk. >> However I don’t have any idea what sideeffects this would have. > >Way back I did look into doing so but was going to b

Re: New Flex SDK release

2016-11-03 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > This is the modified AwesomeUtils.as [1] which includes the update to > FontAwesome 4.7 and the MIT licence header that replaces the Apache license > header. Looks good to me. > Should I commit it to the 4.16.0 branch? Yep when ever you have time to do so that would be great. Thanks, Jus

Re: New Flex SDK release

2016-11-03 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi Justin, Guess I would opt to work on that path, but I’m not going to put up with the build. So probably the path would be to migrate the FlexSDK to be buildable with maven and as soon as I have a stable system with good test coverage, to start cleaning this up. But at the moment I don’t know

Re: New Flex SDK release

2016-11-03 Thread OK
33347.n4.nabble.com/New-Flex-SDK-release-tp56153p56195.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: New Flex SDK release

2016-11-03 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Should I replace the Apache license header by the MIT one or should I add > the MIT header under the Apache license header? Generally the changes have to be extensive to change the header on a file, translation from one language to another generaly doesn’t count. I’m not a lawyer but look

Re: New Flex SDK release

2016-11-03 Thread OK
347.n4.nabble.com/New-Flex-SDK-release-tp56153p56193.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: New Flex SDK release

2016-11-03 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I'm also not a layer and I don't want to trigger another license disucssion > here but is it not enough to just add the MIT license text as additional > header to the affected files including the required copyright info? Yes that an option (and given as one on legal discuss). Given the git

Re: New Flex SDK release

2016-11-03 Thread OK
w this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/New-Flex-SDK-release-tp56153p56191.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: New Flex SDK release

2016-11-03 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > One thing I would really be dleighted about, would be, if we could get rid of > the patched libraries used in the sdk. > However I don’t have any idea what sideeffects this would have. Way back I did look into doing so but was going to be a lot of work for Bartik as Adobe made a large nu

Re: New Flex SDK release

2016-11-03 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, And it turns out this is a know outstanding issue (for a while) and other people have the same issue :-( [1] Justin 1. https://github.com/FortAwesome/Font-Awesome/issues/5281

Re: New Flex SDK release

2016-11-03 Thread Christofer Dutz
One thing I would really be dleighted about, would be, if we could get rid of the patched libraries used in the sdk. However I don’t have any idea what sideeffects this would have. Chris Am 03.11.16, 08:53 schrieb "Justin Mclean" : Hi, > Should we also take care of license issues

Re: New Flex SDK release

2016-11-03 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Should we also take care of license issues cause we grab [2] and create a > new file of it [3]? [2] is MIT licensed so IMO it wouldn’t hurt it add a pointer of that MIT to our LICENSE file. That way all bases are covered. There is an issue here (similar with certain other 3rd parties) in

Re: New Flex SDK release

2016-11-03 Thread OK
flex-sdk/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/flatspark/src/flatspark/utils/AwesomeUtils.as -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/New-Flex-SDK-release-tp56153p56185.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Icon fonts (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

2016-11-03 Thread Fabrice Montfort
Hi guys, Material icons (https://material.io/icons/) is available under Apache License. It can be a serious alternative to Font Awesome. Hope it helps. Regards, Fabrice Montfort 2016-11-03 11:08 GMT+04:00 Harbs : > In morre general terms: > > While we obviously cannot include content with inc

Icon fonts (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

2016-11-03 Thread Harbs
In morre general terms: While we obviously cannot include content with incompatible licenses, I do think we should make it easy for users who want to use such content with FlexJS. For example, if a user has a license to Font Awesome Pro, it should be easy to do something to their config and jus

Re: New Flex SDK release

2016-11-03 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > There will be still a community Version... Is this also incompatible with > Apache? The 4.7 community version is under a variety of license of which the code and font are under a compatible license [1]. Their documentation isn’t under a compatible license. Hopefully this will be the sa

Re: New Flex SDK release

2016-11-02 Thread OK
es! Thanks, Olaf -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/New-Flex-SDK-release-tp56153p56181.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: New Flex SDK release

2016-11-02 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I would update FontAwesome to the latest release so we have one more minor > change… You want to take care of [1]. I also noticed this the other week [2] which has raised almost $500,000! Sadly the license isn’t likely to be compatible with Apache. Thanks, Justin 1. https://issues.apach

New Flex SDK release

2016-11-02 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, We’ve just starting on making a new Flex SDK release. You can follow the progress in this JIRA [1] If there are any issues you want to see fixed in this release please add them to this subtask [2] in the release JIRA. Please remember that Flex is run my volunteers, and a lot of effort

Re: New Flex SDK release

2016-11-02 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I created a JIRA to track the progress here [1]. If anyone want to help out please assign themselves one of the sub tasks. Thanks, Justin 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-35146

Re: New Flex SDK release

2016-11-02 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Are you thinking of this as a 4.16 or 4.15.1? I was thinking 4.16 but it doesn't really matter. Justin

Re: New Flex SDK release

2016-11-02 Thread OK
Justin Mclean wrote > Hi, > It’s been quite a while (10 months!) since we’ve made a new Flex SDK > release, and there's a number of changes and fixes that have been made in > develop. > If no-one else want to be the release manager I’ll put my hand up for the > role. >

Re: New Flex SDK release

2016-11-02 Thread Alex Harui
On 11/1/16, 4:02 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >It’s been quite a while (10 months!) since we’ve made a new Flex SDK >release, and there's a number of changes and fixes that have been made in >develop. Are you thinking of this as a 4.16 or 4.15.1? -Alex

New Flex SDK release

2016-11-01 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, It’s been quite a while (10 months!) since we’ve made a new Flex SDK release, and there's a number of changes and fixes that have been made in develop. If no-one else want to be the release manager I’ll put my hand up for the role. Thanks, Justin