Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

I was able to build without turning off RAT. Last night I think I fixed the last issue in the RAT scan on the source package. You can't run RAT on the repo yet. -Alex On 8/15/16, 10:28 AM, "piotrz" wrote: >I've also build with skipped RAT falcon and flexjs using

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

I've also build with skipped RAT falcon and flexjs using maven without the problem. - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Just-got-my-first-FlexJS-talk-accepted-tp54302p54502.html Sent from the

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

OK, Does anybody else have any issues? I've unpacked the Ant-generated packages for flex-falcon and flex-asjs and run Maven and the maven build completes successfully on my Mac. If no other issues, we could start a vote mid-week. -Alex On 8/14/16, 12:41 PM, "Harbs"

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

Thanks for the links. Openfl had the simplest implementation. There’s only so many ways you can write the solution to the same math problem… ;-) For the most part, I used the logic in that code, but I did not use it exactly. I just committed my changes. I improved the Matrix class to make the

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

Hi, > I’m rewriting the functions in Matrix (and removing Vector3D as we’re not > actually using it). If the original is GPL licensed then this may not be enough [1][2][3][4] Justin 1. https://s.apache.org/rewriting-code 2.

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

Hi, > I’m rewriting the functions in Matrix (and removing Vector3D as we’re not > actually using it). Why rewrite when you could just use an Apache license compatible version? i.e. from a recent version of Shumway (rather than the older GPL/MPL version). [1] It's currently TypeScript but

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

I’m rewriting the functions in Matrix (and removing Vector3D as we’re not actually using it). I should be able to commit my changes on Monday. On Aug 12, 2016, at 10:19 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: >> 8) Matrix.as and Vector3D.as

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

Uber question: are we voting on the packages generated by the Ant script, or did Chris finish the packaging via Maven? My answers below are about the Ant script. On 8/12/16, 12:19 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> 1) Is there CreateJS-licensed source in the source

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

Hi, > 1) Is there CreateJS-licensed source in the source package? EaselJS and TweenJS are part of the CreateJS project so that’s probably a yes. Either way there's no harm in mentioning it. > 3) License for svg.js. This file comes from > https://code.google.com/archive/p/closureidl/ where

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

I've made some updates to the falconjx release packages. A reminder: only the flex-asjs and falconjx packages are up for release. The falcon-only packages are not. Culling and consolidating from the links, I think the list of issues is: 1) Is there CreateJS-licensed source in the source

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

Hi, > I did not end up using that code. I used code from the Closure library which > is Apache 2 licensed. Which we were already using right. If so nothing more would need to be added to LICENSE or NOTICE (as it’s already there) so that’s one off the list. Thanks, Justin

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

I did not end up using that code. I used code from the Closure library which is Apache 2 licensed. On Aug 3, 2016, at 1:50 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > or encode/decode UTF8

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

On 8/2/16, 4:37 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >What is a good location for testing out the 0.7 binary? I want to test >out >the npm installer. Nightly build?

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

What is a good location for testing out the 0.7 binary? I want to test out the npm installer. Thanks, Om On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > There's a couple of licensing/policy issues outstanding AFAIK [1][2][3], > also Im not sure if the

Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

Hi, There's a couple of licensing/policy issues outstanding AFAIK [1][2][3], also Im not sure if the issues with FlatUI [3] or encode/decode UTF8 [4] have been resolved or the possible GPL/MPL licensing issue [6] Is there anything else I’ve missed? Thanks, Justin