I like @Fabian Hueske 's proposal, currently design the
template is pretty good idea. Because the template is convenient for
contributors to follow the norms to community contributions. About
templates, I think we also need an JIRA description template,
In particular, in the case of current JIRA
Hi Piotr,
Thanks for your replies and suggestions!
For my rough idea of skip index list, I agree with your concerns of performance
for non-broadcast case and complicated implementation. Although I think this
idea seems more unified in semantics for "emit", "broadcastEmit" and
"randomEmit"
Hi,
I'm slightly prefer the bot option. The bot can post the review template
automatically. But I do agree that we can start with a low-tech solution
and add a bot later if find it helpful.
Best, Hequn
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:17 AM Jin Sun wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 7:51 PM
Gary Yao created FLINK-10586:
Summary: Running {{RestServerEndpointITCase}} may cause Kernel
Panic
Key: FLINK-10586
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10586
Project: Flink
Issue
Dear community,
this is the weekly community update thread #42. Please post any news and
updates you want to share with the community to this thread.
# Discussion about Flink SQL integration with Hive
Xuefu started a discussion about how to integrate Flink SQL with the Hive
ecosystem [1]. If
Gary Yao created FLINK-10585:
Summary: RestServerEndpoint responds with wrong Content-Type in
Integration Test.
Key: FLINK-10585
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10585
Project: Flink
Kostas Kloudas created FLINK-10583:
--
Summary: Add support for state retention to the Processing Time
versioned joins.
Key: FLINK-10583
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10583
Project:
Kostas Kloudas created FLINK-10584:
--
Summary: Add support for state retention to the Event Time
versioned joins.
Key: FLINK-10584
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10584
Project:
Till Rohrmann created FLINK-10582:
-
Summary: Make REST executor thread priority configurable
Key: FLINK-10582
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10582
Project: Flink
Issue
Piotr Nowojski created FLINK-10581:
--
Summary: YarnConfigurationITCase.testFlinkContainerMemory test
instability
Key: FLINK-10581
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10581
Project: Flink
Hi,
Regarding the second idea with skip index list, I would guess it might have bad
performance impact in non broadcasting cases or would seriously complicate our
Buffer implementation. Also it would make reading/data copying/slicing and
other big chunk byte operations much more costly.
Chesnay Schepler created FLINK-10580:
Summary: EventTimeWindowCheckpointingITCase fails on travis
Key: FLINK-10580
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10580
Project: Flink
Chesnay Schepler created FLINK-10579:
Summary: Remove unused deploysettings.xml
Key: FLINK-10579
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10579
Project: Flink
Issue Type:
Hello everyone,
To improve performance we have changed some parts of the code:
* Previously the same threads used to poll PubSub we're used to actually
run the flink pipeline, this caused some issues in the PubSub SDK. We've
changed this so that the PubSub threads are only used to poll PubSub and
You now have contributor permissions.
On 17.10.2018 10:45, winifred.wenhui.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I would like to contribute to Flink. Could someone assign contributor
permissions to me?
My JIRA's username is "winipanda"
Willing to contribute to Flink!
Thanks,
Winifred
Hello,
I would like to contribute to Flink. Could someone assign contributor
permissions to me?
My JIRA's username is "winipanda"
Willing to contribute to Flink!
Thanks,
Winifred
winifred.wenhui.t...@gmail.com
Alright, I will cut the release branches now.
On 17.10.2018 10:06, Till Rohrmann wrote:
I would be ok with Aljoscha's proposal to not revert FLINK-10354. Thus, the
release branches should be good to create a first RC for 1.5.5 and 1.6.2
Cheers,
Till
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:24 AM Till
I would be ok with Aljoscha's proposal to not revert FLINK-10354. Thus, the
release branches should be good to create a first RC for 1.5.5 and 1.6.2
Cheers,
Till
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:24 AM Till Rohrmann wrote:
> My concern was that it changes Flink's behaviour in a non trivial way
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
