avoid introducing such new configurations unless we
have to.
Best
Yun Tang
From: Yuan Mei
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 11:53
To: dev
Cc: ro...@apache.org
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [DISCUSS ] Make state.backend.incremental as true by
default
Hey Lihe Ma,
1. I do not
t; >> > > How about naming the newly in-memory state-backend, which supports
> > >> > > incremental checkpoint, as HeapStateBackend . And let the default
> > >> > > state-backend still stay as HashMapStateBackend.
> > >> > > By doing so, we
er state.backend.incremental could be
> >> set
> >> > > as true safely, which is so widely accepted according to the
> replies in
> >> > > this thread.
> >> > > 2) your newly in-memory state-backend could also be merged and users
> >> who
> >> > > w
n
>> > the
>> > > future if the feature of incremental checkpoint is stable. What do you
>> > > think?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Best,
>> > > Lihe Ma
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
&g
exan...@ververica.com>:
> > > >
> > > >+1
> > > >
> > > >From my experience, it is actually hard to come up with use cases
> > > >where
> > > >incremental checkpoints should explicitly not be enabled with the
> > >
; >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 在 2022-06-15 21:03:31，"Feifan Wang" 写道：
> > >Thanks for bringing this up.
> > >Strongly +1
> > >
> &g
t;
> >——
> >Name: Feifan Wang
> >Email: zoltar9...@163.com
> >
> >
> > Replied Message
> >| From | Yuan Mei |
> >| Date | 06/15/2022 11:41 |
> >| To | dev ,
> > |
> >| Subject | Re: [DISCUSS ] Make state.backend.
Thanks for bringing this up.
Strongly +1
——
Name: Feifan Wang
Email: zoltar9...@163.com
Replied Message
| From | Yuan Mei |
| Date | 06/15/2022 11:41 |
| To | dev ,
|
| Subject | Re: [DISCUSS ] Make state.backend.incremental as true by default |
Thanks for bringing
t; considering some corner cases, all agreed on enabling the
> > incremental
> > > > > > checkpoint as default.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > Jing
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 12:17 PM Yun Tang
> &g
> > Best regards,
> > > > > Jing
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 12:17 PM Yun Tang
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Strongly +1 for making incremental checkpoints as default. Many
t; > > > > Strongly +1 for making incremental checkpoints as default. Many
> users
> > > > have
> > > > > ever been asking why this configuration is not enabled by default.
> > > > >
> > > > > BTW, from my knowledge, not
; > > >
> > > > > BTW, from my knowledge, nothing would happen for
> HashMapStateBackend,
> > > > > which does not support incremental checkpoint yet, when enabling
> > > > > incremental checkpoints.
> > > > >
> > > &g
Hi,
Just want to let you know that your email is not shown in the main
discussion thread. I am not really sure why this is happening. You might
want to check if it works with the subject starting with "Re" instead of
"RE", which is the only difference I found.
Best regards,
Jing
On Mon, Jun 13,
Strongly +1
On 2022/06/13 09:59:17 Lihe Ma wrote:
> Hi, Everyone,
>
> I would like to open a discussion on setting incremental checkpoint as
default behavior.
>
> Currently, the configuration of state.backend.incremental is set as false
by default. Incremental checkpoint has been adopted widely in
kend,
> > > > which does not support incremental checkpoint yet, when enabling
> > > > incremental checkpoints.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best
> > > > Yun Tang
> > > >
> > >
happen for HashMapStateBackend,
> > > which does not support incremental checkpoint yet, when enabling
> > > incremental checkpoints.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best
> > > Yun Tang
> > >
> > > From: Martijn Visser
> > >
t; ____
> > From: Martijn Visser
> > Sent: Monday, June 13, 2022 18:05
> > To: dev@flink.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS ] Make state.backend.incremental as true by default
> >
> > Hi Lihe,
> >
> > What happens if we enable
point yet, when enabling
> incremental checkpoints.
>
>
> Best
> Yun Tang
>
> From: Martijn Visser
> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2022 18:05
> To: dev@flink.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS ] Make state.backend.incremental as true by defau
checkpoints.
Best
Yun Tang
From: Martijn Visser
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2022 18:05
To: dev@flink.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS ] Make state.backend.incremental as true by default
Hi Lihe,
What happens if we enable incremental checkpoints by default while the used
Hi Lihe,
What happens if we enable incremental checkpoints by default while the used
memory backend is HashMapStateBackend, which doesn't support incremental
checkpoints?
Best regards,
Martijn
Op ma 13 jun. 2022 om 11:59 schreef Lihe Ma :
> Hi, Everyone,
>
> I would like to open a discussion o
20 matches
Mail list logo
