+1 for Jetty
Gianny
Erik Daughtrey wrote:
The installer should make either Tomcat or Jetty the default selection. The
operator can always override and select the other.
Vote:
[ ] Make Jetty the default Web Container install selection
[ ] Make Tomcat the default web container install se
Hiya, I think we need to decide if we are going to keep using
Confluence or not. And if we are which instance we are going to use,
and then shutdown the other.
I've already imported the GERONIMO space that Atlassian is hosting
twice, and already more changes have gone into that instance, s
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1307?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-1307:
Fix Version: 1.1
(was: 1.0)
> JMX connector doesn't shut down cleanly
> ---
>
> Key
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1307?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom reopened GERONIMO-1307:
-
Reopening to remember to track down the root cause in 1.1.
> JMX connector doesn't shut down cleanly
> ---
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1307?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-1307:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Updated JMXRemoting to catch the IOException at shutdown.
> JMX connector doesn't shut down cleanly
> ---
Thats a great idea...
Kinda like Google's "I'm feeling lucky" ;-)
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MMS-Smtp-Program: Maca
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MMS-Smtp-Program: Macallan-Mail-Solution; Version 4.6.0.1
X-MMS-Smtp-Auth: Authenticated As [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-M
david,
yes started working now. It was my mistake, didn't set CORBA & SSL flags
in JVM :)
thanks
akshay
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 13:12 -0800, David Jencks wrote:
> Unfortunately I can't give you any advice except to trace through the
> code to try to figure out what is going wrong. Are you fair
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1317?page=all ]
Donald Woods reassigned GERONIMO-1317:
--
Assign To: (was: Donald Woods)
> Integration of the "new" maven goals with existing goals
> -
Looking at the original proposal for geronimo makes me lean towards Tomcat.
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/geronimo-proposal.html
But from a more practical standpoint it's clear that Jetty has a long history of active involvement in the project.[ X ] Make Jetty the default Web Container insta
Then lets agree to disagree. We should probably take this offline if it
needs to be discussed further. This is kind of off-topic.
Jeff
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Sorry Jeff, I have to disagree. If you asked me whether you should
use Tomcat or Jetty, I really couldn't give you an informed answer.
Sounds great to me, but I'm probably not going to have a ton of time
to work on this in the immediate future on account of getting 1.0 out
the door and so on. I'd love to at least talk at ApacheCon and lay
the groundwork for moving forward with Pluto 1.1 for the next Geronimo
version.
Thanks,
The Pluto team is preparing to release pluto-1.1-ALPHA. In addition to
simplifying the container to be much easier to embed and customize, we
have added support for runtime portlet deployment. I understand that
this is something that you guys might be interested in.
I have begun looking at y
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1317?page=all ]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-1317:
---
Attachment: maven.xml
project.properties
Copies of updated maven.xml and project.properties, for easy testing before
integrating the c
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1317?page=all ]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-1317:
---
Attachment: Geronimo-1317.patch
Patch including all updates needed for Rev=355316 of Tag=1.0.
> Integration of the "new" maven goals with existing goa
Sorry Jeff, I have to disagree. If you asked me whether you should
use Tomcat or Jetty, I really couldn't give you an informed answer.
About the best I could say is "they both work fine in Geronimo, they
do a couple things like virtual hosting slightly differently, and the
Jetty team is actively
Integration of the "new" maven goals with existing goals
Key: GERONIMO-1317
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1317
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: buildsystem
Versions: 1.0, 1.1
+1 for jetty
david jencks
On Dec 8, 2005, at 10:08 AM, Erik Daughtrey wrote:
The installer should make either Tomcat or Jetty the default
selection. The
operator can always override and select the other.
Vote:
[ ] Make Jetty the default Web Container install selection
[ ] Make Tomcat the
+1 for Jetty
-Brian
On Dec 8, 2005, at 6:10 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Ok then based on this...
I hope that this group takes into the account of all votes,
including those that use the app server, our community and users.
If we cannot be neutral, then minimally we should let the users
de
Thanks!! That pointed me to a gnome process going crazy. It's going through
now.
-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 5:09 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build/test failure in Timer
this happens sometimes, these t
Ok then based on this...
I hope that this group takes into the account of all votes, including
those that use the app server, our community and users. If we cannot be
neutral, then minimally we should let the users decide what they want as
a default container. If everyone wants Jetty as a de
Erin Mulder wrote:
Jeff Genender wrote:
So you think your average Geronimo user will have no idea what a web
container is?
It's possible.
I asked "average" user...not whether its possible. The average user
will probably be a developer...who has done some degree of background on
the tech
+1 for Apache Tomcat
Erik Daughtrey wrote:
The installer should make either Tomcat or Jetty the default selection. The
operator can always override and select the other.
Vote:
[ ] Make Jetty the default Web Container install selection
[ X ] Make Apache Tomcat the default web container inst
Just so this list isn't lost, this is the output of a grep I did for
"1.0-SNAPSHOT" in our current tree.
Aaron
applications/demo/src/webapp/WEB-INF/geronimo-web.xml:
configId="geronimo/security-demo/1.0-SNAPSHOT/car"
applications/demo/src/webapp/WEB-INF/geronimo-web.xml:
parentId="geronimo
I have changed my mind, please ignore my previous vote.
My vote is now:
[ X ] Make Jetty the default Web Container install selection
My initial concerns were with users not familiar with Jetty (e.g. Tomcat users)
and the lack of Geronimo documentation on Jetty. I chatted to Greg W on IRC
and
--- Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greg
>
> I've modified the list below to add what we would
> like to present in
> Geronimo.
>
> Jeff and/or Anita,
> Do you think we can get comparable information from
> tomcat? We would
> also need to know how to enable, disable, and reset
> thes
Jeff Genender wrote:
> So you think your average Geronimo user will have no idea what a web
> container is?
It's possible.
There are a lot of experienced J2EE developers out there who have only
ever used full commercial stacks. Asking them to choose between two web
containers is like asking them
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1312?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-1312:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed by making the MavenConfigStore able to install configurations. This area
should be revisited when we have more time.
I als
Jeff Genender wrote:
Joe Bohn wrote:
I agree with Aaron with regard to usability. Users don't want to
have to make any decisions on the first install (especially when they
first pick it up for evaluation). My mom doesn't install anything on
her computer unless she can click, click, clic
The plan dependencies and imports and includes are added by the
packaging plugin from the dependencies in the project.xml.
true
turns into import (parent)
true
turns into dependency
this happens sometimes, these tests are slightly indeterminate due to
the timer. For me they usually pass if I run them again without a lot
of other work going on on my machine.
thanks
david jencks
On Dec 8, 2005, at 3:07 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks in
Back online now. Thanks, Aaron!
-David
On Dec 7, 2005, at 10:58 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Aaron,
The Chariot boxes chef, timmy, and jimmy can't be reached. I
checked the gbuild logs and it seems the three of them disappeared
just after 8:45pm PST.
Any ideas?
-David
-0
As I have often said, in the long run the user should not care if they
are using jetty or tomcat and it was a mistake for us to expose
implementation detail as we have.
I have always preferred the web tier to be just called "web"
and then in future the developers will have the option to chan
Joe Bohn wrote:
I agree with Aaron with regard to usability. Users don't want to have
to make any decisions on the first install (especially when they first
pick it up for evaluation). My mom doesn't install anything on her
computer unless she can click, click, click and get it working.
Aaron Mulder wrote:
I hate to say it, but from a usability perspective, I think we need to
have a default. Otherwise, when installing Geronimo, the first thing
the user has to do is make a decision that most users really have no
basis for making. Granted a Wiki link would help, but I think we
Create JMS destination pretty darn broken
-
Key: GERONIMO-1316
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1316
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: ActiveMQ, console, management
Versions: 1.0-M5
Repor
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1292?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1292:
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in revision 355267
> Connector Portlet: List connectors in Web Server management page throws
> exception
> ---
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1217?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1217:
---
Fix Version: 1.0
Assign To: Aaron Mulder
This will be fixed by adding activemq-core and activemq-gbean as dependencies
of the console configurai
I may have phrased the original issue badly. The installer has both Jetty and
Tomcat as options to install on the main pack selection page. It was decided
that because of the complexity of installing two web containers that we
should not install both, but allow the operator to select one or th
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1043?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1043:
Fix Version: 1.0
Resolution: Invalid
Assign To: Aaron Mulder
That portlet has been removed
> Portlet error in All Realms
> -
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-886?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-886:
---
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Assign To: Aaron Mulder
No longer seeing this behavior, but the demo app has been restructured anyway.
> Demo ap
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1274?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1274:
Fix Version: 1.0
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Aaron Mulder
Caused by crappy hardcoded lookups on ObjectNames and stuff in a static
i
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1225?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1225:
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Aaron Mulder
Patch applied in revision 355267 -- thanks!
> The recently added "Common Console Actions" on wel
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1272?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1272:
Fix Version: 1.0
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Aaron Mulder (was: Vamsavardhana Reddy)
Patch applied in revision 355267 -- thanks!
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1207?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1207:
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Aaron Mulder
Fixed in revision 355267. The change is pretty much:
Previously, calling a "stop" function (dep
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1128?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1128:
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in revision 355267
> Derby Log Viewer performance problem
>
>
> Key: GERO
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1128?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-1128:
---
Fix Version: 1.0
(was: 1.1)
Version: 1.0-M5
(was: 1.0)
Assign To: Aaron Mulder (was: Donald Woo
I'd also prefer the choice too be left to the user
+1
-bd-
On Dec 8, 2005, at 4:30 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
This is obviously a hot topic and I hope that as a Geronimo PMC and
user community we are not forced to have to show preference of one
over the other. There is obviously some person
I hate to say it, but from a usability perspective, I think we need to
have a default. Otherwise, when installing Geronimo, the first thing
the user has to do is make a decision that most users really have no
basis for making. Granted a Wiki link would help, but I think we need
to provide a "0-de
Also if one container is in some way better than another today, that may
not be the case in the future. Once we have a default, it will be hard
to change in the future. Not having a default also provides a fair
playing field for those who are contributing to the project and
encourages competi
Dave,
Thanks for noticing ;-)
Dave Colasurdo wrote:
I see that WADI has recently been integrated into Geronimo.
Great Job!!!
Can someone please provide a quick high level description of what
is/isn't available from WADI in Geronimo v1?
Tomcat clustering
Yes
Jetty clustering
Yes
Load
+1 Tomcat
On Dec 8, 2005, at 3:47 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
For 1.0, I'd like to see Jetty, reflecting the initial
participation and work that the Jetty community did when we got
started over two years ago.
geir
On Dec 8, 2005, at 1:08 PM, Erik Daughtrey wrote:
The installer should
+1 - I don't think we should make the decision for the user.
It would be even better if the installer in a "Choose Your Web
Container" page, provided a URL or link to a page on the Wiki that
provided information that would help them make an informed decision.
See related ideas in http://issu
Document Jetty GBeans
-
Key: GERONIMO-1315
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1315
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Components: web
Versions: 1.0
Reporter: John Sisson
Fix For: 1.0
Need GBeans documentatio
This is obviously a hot topic and I hope that as a Geronimo PMC and user
community we are not forced to have to show preference of one over the
other. There is obviously some personal preferences on both sides and
we are a great open source project because we do not have to get behind
one *or*
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1314?page=all ]
John Sisson updated GERONIMO-1314:
--
Description:
Currently a lot of users probably choose to use Tomcat because it has had more
visibility and there isn't much Geronimo documentation about
Provide documentation that helps users make an informed decision as whether to
use Tomcat or Jetty Web Container
Key: GERONIMO-1314
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira
Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks in advanced
At revision 355260 in the geronimo 1.0 branch
...
test:test:
[junit] Running
org.apache.geronimo.timer.jdbc.DerbyJDBCWorkerPersistenceTest
[junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 6.123 sec
[junit] Running
org.apache.
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 02:47:34PM -0700, Jeff Genender wrote:
> Its encouraged that the community vote here too. Although not binding,
> it should be taken into account.
Thanks!
> >>[X] Make Jetty the default Web Container install selection
Jetty's worked out well, let's keep going.
The current console builds in config/ don't include enough ActiveMQ
libraries on their class path. I can add the 2 ActiveMQ libraries as
elements in the console EAR deployment plans for
console-tomcat and console-jetty, but that doesn't seem to be the way
it's handled right now. Somehow now I th
For 1.0, I'd like to see Jetty, reflecting the initial participation
and work that the Jetty community did when we got started over two
years ago.
geir
On Dec 8, 2005, at 1:08 PM, Erik Daughtrey wrote:
The installer should make either Tomcat or Jetty the default
selection. The
operator
> [ x ] Make Jetty the default Web Container install selection
Non binding, but I like Jetty. Besides, given how close to a release
it is, it seems sensible to stick with it.
- Brett
[ x ] Make Jetty the default Web Container install selection
[ ] Make Tomcat the default web container install selection
Regards,
Alan
[x] Make Jetty the default Web Container install selection
Jetty's been with us for two years. If it was my project, I'd be
pretty disappointed to get dumped the day before the first supported
release. Being an optional component is not exactly the thanks I
would expect.
-David
On Dec
Erik Daughtrey wrote:
The installer should make either Tomcat or Jetty the default selection. The
operator can always override and select the other.
Vote:
[ ] Make Jetty the default Web Container install selection
[ X ] Make Tomcat the default web container install selection
(this is
[ x ] Make Jetty the default Web Container install selection
Simon
--
http://bordet.blogspot.com
[ X ] Make Tomcat the default web container install selection
( Tomcat is the container that users in my environment prefer, probably
not for technical reasons though ).
Would be nice if in the future we could provide some feature and
performance comparisons between the two to help users make
[ ] Make Jetty the default Web Container install selection
[X] Make Tomcat the default web container install selection
Thanks
Srinath
> Erik Daughtrey wrote:
>
> >The installer should make either Tomcat or Jetty the default selection. The
> >operator can always override and select the other.
>
>From a user's point of view, as long as I have a choice, I'm happy - but if
my vote does count for anything, here is my vote.
[X] Make Tomcat the default web container install selection
- Chris
-Original Message-
From: Erik Daughtrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 0
That did it. thx.
On 12/8/05 4:55 PM, "Erik Daughtrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sachin,
>
> Try regenerating the plugins.
>
> cd plugins/geronimo-assembly-plugin
> maven -o
> cd ../geronimo-izpack-plugin
> maven -o
>
> On Thursday 08 December 2005 15:54, Sachin Patel wrote:
>> I'm cons
Erik Daughtrey wrote:
The installer should make either Tomcat or Jetty the default selection. The
operator can always override and select the other.
Vote:
[ ] Make Jetty the default Web Container install selection
[X] Make Tomcat the default web container install selection
Regards,
St
Sachin,
Try regenerating the plugins.
cd plugins/geronimo-assembly-plugin
maven -o
cd ../geronimo-izpack-plugin
maven -o
On Thursday 08 December 2005 15:54, Sachin Patel wrote:
> I'm constantly failing during this goal. Any ideas?
>
> izpack:izpack-installer-build:
> [echo] IZPack insta
[ ] Make Jetty the default Web Container install selection
[ X ] Make Tomcat the default web container install selection
My vote may not count, but I like Tomcat :)
Regards,
Rajith Attapattu.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Genender [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 08,
This is a good point...
Its encouraged that the community vote here too. Although not binding,
it should be taken into account.
Jeff
Kevan Miller wrote:
Been waiting for this one... ;-)
+1 for Tomcat. I think the decision should be based on what our users want
and I've heard more interest
Erik Daughtrey wrote:
[ X] Make Tomcat the default web container install selection
As much as I love Jetty I love* Jeff, too, so how I could vote
differently ;)
[*] Don't get carried away, though, Jeff ;)
Jacek
Um, I can't tell from your response which one you are voting for...
--jason
On Dec 8, 2005, at 1:24 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Erik Daughtrey wrote:
The installer should make either Tomcat or Jetty the default
selection. The operator can always override and select the other.
Vote:
[ ] M
On Dec 8, 2005, at 10:08 AM, Erik Daughtrey wrote:
The installer should make either Tomcat or Jetty the default
selection. The
operator can always override and select the other.
Vote:
[X] Make Jetty the default Web Container install selection
Regards,
Hiram
[ ] Make Tomcat the defaul
Erik Daughtrey wrote:
The installer should make either Tomcat or Jetty the default selection. The
operator can always override and select the other.
Vote:
[ ] Make Jetty the default Web Container install selection
+1
[ ] Make Tomcat the default web container install selection
We may r
[X] go for it
Regards,
Hiram
On Dec 5, 2005, at 10:31 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Lets build version 1.0 of our specs right now, get them in an
accessible repo, use them for the tck, and when it passes push them
to m1 and m2 non-snapshot repos. We will make a best-effort
attempt to have m1 g
+1 for Jetty
Web containers are commodity - both pass the compliance test, so
users should not care which us used (other than brand awareness issues).
I think Jetty is best for geronimo because the Jetty developers are
prepared to more actively support Geronimo and we have tried to be
very re
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1164?page=all ]
Jakob Færch updated GERONIMO-1164:
--
Attachment: adventurebuilder1.0.3-geronimo-deployment-plans.zip
---
[echo] Distributing Adventure Builder OPC Application
[java] 22:11:03,101
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
[*Q1]
Would you like me to send you the plans I have developed - I guess the
repository would be better off with these than with the ones currently
there.
Send them to the list or better yet attach to the JIRA issue -
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1164
Been waiting for this one... ;-)
+1 for Tomcat. I think the decision should be based on what our users want and I've heard more interest expressed for Tomcat.
--kevanOn 12/8/05, Erik Daughtrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
The installer should make either Tomcat or Jetty the default selection. Th
I'm constantly failing during this goal. Any ideas?
izpack:izpack-installer-build:
[echo] IZPack installer build is running.
[echo] IZPack Version is 3.8.0
[java]
[java] .:: IzPack - Version 3.8.0 ::.
[java]
[java] < compiler specifications version : 1.0 >
[java]
[ x ] Make Jetty the default Web Container install selection
cheers all
Jan
Erik Daughtrey wrote:
> The installer should make either Tomcat or Jetty the default selection. The
> operator can always override and select the other.
> Vote:
> [ ] Make Jetty the default Web Container install sele
[ X ] Make Tomcat the default web container install selection
On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 13:08 -0500, Erik Daughtrey wrote:
> The installer should make either Tomcat or Jetty the default selection. The
> operator can always override and select the other.
> Vote:
> [ ] Make Jetty the default Web Co
+1 for Jetty -- we've gotten great support from the Jetty team
Aaron
On 12/8/05, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Opps, click the wrong button.
>
> +1 for Jetty, it would be consistent with the previous default package.
>
> Cheers!
> Hernan
>
> Hernan Cunico wrote:
> >
> >
> > Erik Daug
On 12/8/05, Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Just as an FYI, I believe Bruce and/or Jeff are doing a tutorial onGeronimo over the weekend, and I'm doing a talk on "J2EE Developmentwith Apache Geronimo" on Wedensday morning. So it would be nice to
focus the BOF on things other than basic i
I see that WADI has recently been integrated into Geronimo.
Great Job!!!
Can someone please provide a quick high level description of what
is/isn't available from WADI in Geronimo v1?
Tomcat clustering
Jetty clustering
Load Balancing
HttpSession failover
-file based
-database
-mem to mem (one
Here are the current samples that I am aware of...
- servlets-examples predeployed in geronimo
- jsp-examples predeployed in geronimo
Additional samples at:
http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/Samples
http://opensource2.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/Samples+for+Apache+Geronimo
The
Opps, click the wrong button.
+1 for Jetty, it would be consistent with the previous default package.
Cheers!
Hernan
Hernan Cunico wrote:
Erik Daughtrey wrote:
The installer should make either Tomcat or Jetty the default
selection. The operator can always override and select the other. V
Erik Daughtrey wrote:
The installer should make either Tomcat or Jetty the default selection. The
operator can always override and select the other.
Vote:
[ X] Make Jetty the default Web Container install selection
[ ] Make Tomcat the default web container install selection
We may run o
As much as I Looovvve Jetty...I have to vote for the work I did ;-)
[ x ] Make Tomcat the default web container install selection
Erik Daughtrey wrote:
The installer should make either Tomcat or Jetty the default selection. The
operator can always override and select the other.
Vote:
[ ] M
The installer should make either Tomcat or Jetty the default selection. The
operator can always override and select the other.
Vote:
[ ] Make Jetty the default Web Container install selection
[ ] Make Tomcat the default web container install selection
We may run out of time before the vote
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1313?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-1313:
--
Resolution: Fixed
fixed in 1.0 branch
Sending1.0/assemblies/j2ee-installer/src/var/config/config.xml
Sending1.0/assemblies/j2ee-jett
On Dec 8, 2005, at 6:45 AM, Jakob Færch (Trifork) wrote:
Jakob Færch (Trifork) wrote:
Nevertheless, when starting the server, none of the web service
endpoint beans are able to start. As an example, for the
CreditCardEndpointBean the following appears in the log:
13:06:11,032 DEBUG [GBeanSi
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1313?page=comments#action_12359743
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-1313:
fixed in head:
Sendingassemblies/j2ee-installer/src/var/config/config.xml
Sendingassemblies/j2ee-jetty-serv
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1207?page=comments#action_12359740
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-1207:
Let me clarify/take that back. I want the methods currently in
ConfigurationManager to work the way they do now unless th
openejb builder listener attribute has bad object name
--
Key: GERONIMO-1313
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1313
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Versions: 1.0
Reporter: David Jencks
Assi
Just as an FYI, I believe Bruce and/or Jeff are doing a tutorial on
Geronimo over the weekend, and I'm doing a talk on "J2EE Development
with Apache Geronimo" on Wedensday morning. So it would be nice to
focus the BOF on things other than basic installation and J2EE
development.
I could do a ligh
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
