Try maven 2.0.4.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 5/25/06, emicalc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello,
I'm starting to use the latest snapshot
(incubating-servicemix-3.0-20060523.071937-3);
which version of maven have I use? 1.0.2 or 2.0 ?
thank's emilio
--
View this message in context:
XBean is a generic POJO based container/server/kernel which has
nothing directly to do with J2EE per se - though it should be a vital
component in the implementation of future Geronimo 2.x releases IMHO.
Consequently XBean has many use cases for folks not using J2EE such as
for Spring JBI folks
I XBean large enough to become a standalone project given that it has broader applicability outside
of Geronimo? From what I know now other projects to Geronimo that use XBean are ActiveMQ, OpenEJB
and XFire. As you indicated below Geronimo would then be one more consumer on the previous list.
On 5/25/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I XBean large enough to become a standalone project given that it has broader
applicability outside
of Geronimo?
I'd say so yes. Its got quite a few active committers, a reasonably
sized codebase with quite a few different modules. Sure XBean
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2054?page=all ]
Kevan Miller reopened GERONIMO-2054:
Need to merge into trunk
http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/j2ee/web-1.0 name spaces are not upgraded
by Upgrade1_0To1_1
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2059?page=comments#action_12413247
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-2059:
Need to merge changes into trunk
dependencies in etc/project.properties need to be updated to use the
appropriate
On May 25, 2006, at 1:49 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On May 24, 2006, at 8:38 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
It looks like the mailing lists are not working, yet, however.
They should be working, you just need to use @openejb.codehaus.org
instead of @openejb.org.
OK. Thanks. It seems we must
I think there is no difference using activemq between jboss and webshpere.
you can run activemq stand alone.
There is No need for websphere to communicate with activemq.
It is your java code to communicate with activemq.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Strachan wrote:
So I was wondering; maybe we should create mailing lists for XBean and
then it becomes effectively a new subproject with its own identity.
Given the slow release cycles of Geronimo, XBean could end up being
the cool
Hi,
The new trunk is trying to download 1.1-SNAPSHOT.jars!
Thanks
Anita
Starting the reactor...
Our processing order:
build:start:
new:
new0:
Starting the reactor...
Our processing order:
new00:
Starting the reactor...
Our processing order:
Geronimo :: Activation
Geronimo :: ActiveMQ
Now that we have a new 1.2 trunk, we can go ahead migrating the build
to m2 (again).
A recap:
1. The build in the old trunk was migrated to m2. It can be found here
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/branches/dead-1.2/
2. The old migration JIRA was under the JIRA G-851.
I agree with both of you. I agree with James that XBean is getting
close to needing it's own mailing list (I don't think it is there
yet, but I can see what prompted the request). I with Ken that when
XBean gets to the point of needing a separate mailing list it should
start the
inline..
--- Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that we have a new 1.2 trunk, we can go ahead migrating the build
to m2 (again).
A recap:
1. The build in the old trunk was migrated to m2. It can be found
here
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/branches/dead-1.2/
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-723?page=comments#action_36209 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-723:
---
I don't think the broker needs to generate an advisory message for a time out.
The timeout can be implemented in the client side API.
Stomp client is not removed from the broker on client disconnect
Key: AMQ-724
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-724
Project: ActiveMQ
Type: Bug
Components: Transport
Versions:
Anita, that is okay with me.
So we shall continue to use the old JIRA G-851.
You now seem to have a uber patch, one each for the modules and
configs. This, I believe, will contain the different patches that we
submitted for the individual modules and configs.
You may attach those modules.patch
Hi folks,
The vote for the 4.0 release has been open since the 16th. Time to
close it out. The VOTE has passed with 10 committer +1's and 1
non-committer +1.
+1 James Strachan
+1 Hiram Chirino
+1 Rob Davies
+1 Guillaume Nodet
+1 Jonas Lim
+1 Bruce Snyder
+1 John Sisson
+1 Dain Sundstrom
+1
inline..
--- Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anita, that is okay with me.
So we shall continue to use the old JIRA G-851.
You now seem to have a uber patch, one each for the modules and
configs. This, I believe, will contain the different patches that we
submitted for the
My 2 cents, If we switch over BigG as outlined in the Jan 29th email
from Dain [1] in the next few months(?)/year(?), then we should just
move XBean outside of BigG as a separate project.
thanks,
dims
[1] http://marc2.theaimsgroup.com/?l=geronimo-devm=113856069605418w=2
On 5/25/06, Dain
Hi folks,
* We Will Need a Branch *
Now that we are close to getting past the 4.0 release, I wanted to
bring up the topic of how to do bug fix maintenance for it. I think
that the 4.0.1 release should stay focused on only including bug
fixes. Already, I think a few too many changes have been
If you're interested in possibly being a speaker
at the ApacheCon conference in Austin Texas, US
in October 2006, read the attached message. Note
that the deadline for submissions is only a month
away!
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer,
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 05:49:34PM -0400, toby cabot wrote:
Hi folks,
I checked out a fresh copy of the 1.1 branch and tried to build. It
gets as far as:
Based on suggestions (thanks!) from several folks on the list I
updated from subversion, blew away my .maven directory, and lept back
Anita,
I'm unable to apply your modules.patch using TortoiseSVN on XP.
I first get a pop-up which says, {g_path}/modules/tomcat/pom.xml has
no URL. It then tries to retrieve version 0 of file. That fails and
it says, patching not possible
Am I doing anything wrong here ?
Cheers
Prasad
On
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mohammed Nour wrote:
I am new to *Geronimo*, but I really want to help and contribute. I
consulted *dblevins *cause I am more interested in *OpenEJB*, and from
*Geronimo* dev-list I knew that Geronimo console
Hi Tony,
So we can replicate the problem, are you building Geronimo and OpenEJB
or just building Geronimo and downloading OpenEJB dependencies.
I built Geronimo rev 409303 ok yesterday (with OpenEJB checked out at
rev 2658 via maven m:fresh-checkout command)
Thanks,
John
toby cabot
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1492?page=all ]
Paul McMahan updated GERONIMO-1492:
---
Attachment: GERONIMO-1492.diff
annotated-grep-output.txt
I ran the following command in branches/1.1 to find all occurrences of
I was able to apply the same patch on linux. Wonder why not on windows ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 5/25/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anita,
I'm unable to apply your modules.patch using TortoiseSVN on XP.
I first get a pop-up which says, {g_path}/modules/tomcat/pom.xml has
no URL. It
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1492?page=all ]
Paul McMahan updated GERONIMO-1492:
---
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Many org/apache/geronimo configIds still live in source tree
Hi John,
On 5/25/06, John Sisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi folks,
The vote for the 4.0 release has been open since the 16th. Time to
close it out. The VOTE has passed with 10 committer +1's and 1
non-committer +1.
+1 James Strachan
+1 Hiram Chirino
+1 Rob
I am attaching a patch for 1.2. I finally built 'modules' with M1 on
the trunk(The PluginInstallerTest failed). This patch builds, but I had
to skip tests. See pom.xml in modules. Jetty module can not find needed
jars. What version changes were made recently?
Thanks
Anita
--- Prasad Kashyap
Did you forget to attach the patch or did you mean you were going to attach it ?
Here's the latest top level pom.xml with the version changes.
Cheers
Prasad
On 5/25/06, anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am attaching a patch for 1.2. I finally built 'modules' with M1 on
the
I am guessing this is because the svn:eol-style is property is not set
to native for the pom.xml file and that the patch was originally created
on a *NIX box?
Can *everyone* please check that you have svn set up as discussed in the
document :
Thank you John.
Anita, the asm dependency in axis-builder/pom.xml needs version
element. Before you regenerate the patch the next time, can you please
set your svn as per John's instructions in the wiki page ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 5/25/06, John Sisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am guessing this
John,
Thanks for your help.
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 09:51:25AM +1000, John Sisson wrote:
So we can replicate the problem, are you building Geronimo and OpenEJB
or just building Geronimo and downloading OpenEJB dependencies.
I built Geronimo rev 409303 ok yesterday (with OpenEJB checked out
34 matches
Mail list logo
