congratulations David!
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please welcome David Blevins as the newest member of the Geronimo
PMC. David recently accepted the invitation to join the PMC. David
is part of the OpenEJB project that we depend on so heavily and that
is joining Apache as an Incubator project. Da
Congrats David!
On 8/23/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please welcome David Blevins as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC. David
recently accepted the
invitation to join the PMC. David is part of the OpenEJB project that we
depend on so heavily and
that is joining Apache as
Congrats, David!
--kevan
On Aug 23, 2006, at 1:41 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please welcome David Blevins as the newest member of the Geronimo
PMC. David recently accepted the invitation to join the PMC.
David is part of the OpenEJB project that we depend on so heavily
and that is joining A
congrats and welcome!On Aug 23, 2006, at 1:41 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:Please welcome David Blevins as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC. David recently accepted the invitation to join the PMC. David is part of the OpenEJB project that we depend on so heavily and that is joining Apache as an I
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please welcome David Blevins as the newest member of the Geronimo
PMC. David recently accepted the invitation to join the PMC. David
is part of the OpenEJB project that we depend on so heavily and that
is joining Apache as an Incubator project. David is also a great
men
Welcome David!!!
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> Please welcome David Blevins as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC.
> David recently accepted the invitation to join the PMC. David is part
> of the OpenEJB project that we depend on so heavily and that is joining
> Apache as an Incubator project. Davi
Please welcome David Blevins as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC. David recently accepted the
invitation to join the PMC. David is part of the OpenEJB project that we depend on so heavily and
that is joining Apache as an Incubator project. David is also a great mentor and community builde
So I've started to make these changes, but it looks like we may have to use URL's in the interface, unless anyone else has any other suggestions due to the problems dain mentioned with using URLs. Taking the EARConfigBuilder for example... ideally I'd like to push out the code that traverses throu
You will need to configure the surefire (testing) plugin to fork your
tests into a new vm and set the endorsed dir for that new vm. The
first is easy but the second will be difficult. First off the docs
for the sure fire plugin can be found here
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-suref
JBohn pointed out I had RTC as my last statement...I meant CTR
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
From a purely discussion perspective I'm in favor of a change. I'm not
sure a total shift to CTR is appropriate but I'm not particularly
opposed to it either. I don't think the development model itself is the
From a purely discussion perspective I'm in favor of a change. I'm not sure a total shift to CTR
is appropriate but I'm not particularly opposed to it either. I don't think the development model
itself is the issue. The major issue that we've been dealing with is the community dynamics and
al
One other thing I should add:
I am currently running using the provided activemq script and the main
method provided in activemq.console.Main.
A few days ago, I ran the same code using my own main method and
without the activemq script and it ran perfectly.
Any thoughts?
On 8/23/06, Sepand M <[
Hi James,
I don't, but I'm running off of an assembly build and I have
apache-activemq-4.1-incubator-SNAPSHOT.jar on the class path. I've
also confirmed that the classes not found (such as GroupPrincipal) are
in the mentioned jar.
- Sepand
On 8/23/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I do not use bootstrap. As long as the car-maven-plugin is available
from a repo, just using mvn from the top directory works! I have added
openejb2 to the default profile.
I just do checkout geronimo, checkout openejb2 and
mvn
I build specs separately if needed.
Thanks
Anita
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Blevins wrote:
>
> But the lazy consensus "cut off" you mention is something to think
> about.
That sort of model has been used before successfully. IIRC,
it was as part of the 'controversial issues are RTC' part of
CTR. In other words, rat
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-829?page=all ]
james strachan resolved AMQ-829.
Resolution: Fixed
Done - we log using INFO level logging whenever a transport fails and
reconnection starts
> use some INFO level logging in failover: trans
+1 Allow changes
Thanks
Anita
--- Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you can call it. If in the future you want a clear end date
> just tag it with a 72-hour
> completion when calling the vote. Or whatever time period is
> appropriate.
>
> Jason Dillon wrote:
> > This vote ha
Jason,
Works like a charm!
Thanks
Mark
Jason Dillon wrote:
I implemented the conditional in traditional ant fashion using targets
and . Lemme know if this works.
--jason
On Aug 22, 2006, at 8:16 PM, Mark DeLaFranier wrote:
Jason,
Under Windows Ant needs:
Instead of:
JBoss Deployer fails when uninstalling / reinstalling Service Assemblies
Key: SM-552
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-552
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Typ
I think you can call it. If in the future you want a clear end date just tag it with a 72-hour
completion when calling the vote. Or whatever time period is appropriate.
Jason Dillon wrote:
This vote has been running for 3+ days now:
+1: matt, djencks, prasad, jacek, joe, paul, chris, gianny,
-1 on adding it to 1.1.1. Put it in 1.1.2. 1.1.1 has been delayed for a few
weeks for minor changes.
Jason Dillon wrote:
On Aug 22, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Its probably not going to go into 1.1.1 unless you have it done ri
I think that the code should remain in Geronimo proper as there may be many plugin sites and this
sounds like its core to plugins and Geronimo.
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I'm not convinced.
First, i'm not sure it will make it in 1.1.1, and then, we would not be
able
to easily release new versions
+1 for CTR which I believe is accurately summarized in its most common
manifestation by Kevan's #1.
Joe
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Aug 22, 2006, at 7:02 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Apache Geronimo has been operating mostly under the
Review-T
On 8/23/06, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think we can officially end this
thread now since all parties are very pleased with the end result ;-)
I personally am. Thanks for your patience!
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.net.pl
On 8/22/06, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The best practices/guidelines should not be strict dogma -- common
sense should prevail. It's communication that's important, not
process.
The statements above are what should really prevail from this
conversation. I agree with this sentiment
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> On 8/23/06, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I hope this is not taken negatively...as it is not meant that way...
>
> Come on, Jeff. Nothing's going to be taken this way. Try it out and be
> prepared to fail :P
>
Well...sometimes we need to be careful how
On 8/23/06, Rakesh Midha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think you are right about configId, but as far as I understand the
configId's are replaced by moduleId in 1.1 versions of xsd's. In 1.0 it is
still configId's which means no change in geronimo-config-1.0.xsd.
Now question is where is geronimo
On 8/16/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think we should move the top-level trunk, tags and branches to
server/*. This will make the top-level of our repository more
consistent.
I seem to have missed it. Here's my +1 for purely historical purposes.
(sorry Jason for having you kep
Using svn switch --relocate should work...On 8/23/06, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jason, is there a way I can retarget my local trees as I have pending changes?On Aug 23, 2006, at 1:59 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Just a brief reminder... in about 24 hours trunk, branches and tags will be mo
Jason, is there a way I can retarget my local trees as I have pending changes?On Aug 23, 2006, at 1:59 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:Just a brief reminder... in about 24 hours trunk, branches and tags will be moved to: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server--jason -sachin
On 8/23/06, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I hope this is not taken negatively...as it is not meant that way...
Come on, Jeff. Nothing's going to be taken this way. Try it out and be
prepared to fail :P
I think it is worth talking about, especially when we think bootstrap
will go a
On 8/23/06, Jerome Camilleri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
My boss (Christophe Loridan) and me (Camilleri Jérôme) sign agreement
(CCLA and CLA) and send them to Apache Fondation the last week.
Great stuff! :)
So now, how submit the Cimero code to the serviceMix project ?
Could you raise
Hi James,
>We're not keeping it there :).
>The Destination objects are like URL classes; they can be attached to
>messages or held in client's RAM - the broker can't really go around
>every JVM and make sure they don't happen to have a reference to a non
>existent destination lying around
>Th
It sounds like your server is sending a response to a client which has
already disconnected.
On 8/23/06, ahamad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi James,
Thanks for giveing me the idea, I create request/responce client for AMQ
according to the link which is refered by you. but at the sever(rece
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Aug 11, 2006, at 12:40 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Rick,
I believe what you really want to do is to use the endorsed
directory. This allows you to override the vm implementation of
endorsed specification such as corba
(https://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/stand
On 8/23/06, Naveen Rawat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi James,
Thanks for the response,
> >
> > * - It has been said that a temporary queue vanishes along with the
> > creating client. But I am getting this unwanted privilge of having it
> even
> > after my client ends. How it could be possibl
Hi James,
Thanks for giveing me the idea, I create request/responce client for AMQ
according to the link which is refered by you. but at the sever(receiver)
side it gives the following error on the broker side whenever
producer.send(request.getJMSReplyTo(), response) statement comes..
INFO S
on solaris you cannot easily kill a slave broker when using JDBC Master Slave
-
Key: AMQ-893
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-893
Project: ActiveMQ
Hi James,
Thanks for the response,
> >
> > * - It has been said that a temporary queue vanishes along with the
> > creating client. But I am getting this unwanted privilge of having it
> even
> > after my client ends. How it could be possible?
>
> The Destination object doesn't disappear but y
I'm working on replacing the sun orb usage with Yoko (a sub-item of Java
5 ready).
Rick
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
Aaron started a thread back a ways about the 1.2 release. I know that
there has been discussion, interest and some action in getting it on
the table. At this point I'm not exa
Do you have the activemq-jaas.jar on your classpath?
On 8/23/06, Sepand M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I can't seem to get JAAS working.
I've defined the login.config as shown on the site, but I get the
following error once a connection comes in (the exception is thrown
when lc.login is calle
On 8/23/06, ahamad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi James,
>
>On 8/23/06, ahamad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi James,
>> I wants to know the openwire API.
>Which language? (See the createTemporaryQueue() in CMS or NMS)
I am working on CMS, So pls tell me how to use temporary queue?
I don't think we need these excludes anymore.
Its nice to see the server startup with no icky warnings :-)
--jason
On Aug 22, 2006, at 6:53 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
And why are they excluded ? Because those files were not being
installed in G v1.1 either.
Cheers
Prasad
On 8/22/06, Prasad
101 - 143 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
