Hi,
When i am building the trunk using Maven 2 I am getting the following error.
Also even though the build is failing it says build successful. I get
this when I run bootstrap assemble. The preceding steps all showed
build successful
Downloading: http://people.apache.org/repo/m1-snapshot-repos
Chris,
I agree that with Ajax sufficient functionality can be provided in a webapp.
My primary argument for a rich client would be as I have said before
that a webapp requires a running server. And what should be done if
there are problems in the configuration which prevents that the server
star
I think this idea can be explored but we should give the current
initiative to include Ajax functionality to the console a shot first.
There’s no doubt that rich clients have their advantages over web apps
(performance and sophisticated widgets to name a few) but I think we
have a potential in
The WS-I BP 1.1 mandates faults elements to be unqualified.
See [1] for more informations. The corrected schema for
SOAP is available at [2].
I'd like to follow the directive in the JBI spec saying that
SOAP must stay on the binding side and should be
considered as a protocol. I do understand t
On 9/15/06, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jacek,
This use seems completely appropriate to me. Bill is supplying a
patch against some code that he cant commit against himself. Where
else could he put the patch? Among other advantages, using jira
gives him the opportunity to explic
On 9/19/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This report is for the last two months (let's say August - September):
*Community*
- Voted in 1 new committer which brings us to 32 committers
- Voted in 7 new PMC members. PMC currently at 19 members
- Community voted to return to CTR from
Add a Certification Authority (CA) portlet to Geronimo console
--
Key: GERONIMO-2413
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2413
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: New Featur
Guys,
Whilst using the soap support to integrate a legacy component into
servicemix I noticed that the SOAP 1.1 fault support does not appear to
strictly support the 1.1 fault specification as outlined in the fault schema
available at http://ftp.ibiblio.org/xml/books/xmljava/chapters/apb.html.
Giv
On Sep 18, 2006, at 1:43 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I think it is a bad idea to force every change to have a JIRA issue
created (or associated). This will only lead to forcing people to
add a bunch of junk to JIRA.
-1 to forcing each change to have a JIRA... common sense should
dictate whi
Current ErrorHandler implementation used by ValidateComponent is not thread safe
Key: SM-582
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-582
Project: ServiceMix
Hi everyone,
We have a board report due and it appears that the RoUS is a tad busy
at the moment. I pulled the following from STATUS and added my
recollections and musings. Please add your comments to this thread
and I'll happily roll them up into a big bushel of information to the
boar
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-912?page=comments#action_36973 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-912:
---
remaining problem fixed up in 447635
> ActiveMQ support for SSL authentication and authorization
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-912?page=comments#action_36972 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-912:
---
but having them in the jaas modules helps us test the login modules.. so fine.
lets leave it there. I can live with requirin
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-912?page=comments#action_36971 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-912:
---
Now that I think about it... I think callback handlers should be in the
ActiveMQ space. Handlers are ment to be implemented
Hi,I'm working on Ode (incubated project of a WS-BPEL implementation) and we'd like to put up a decent site based on our Confluence space (we already have a setup on cwiki.apache.org
). It seems that, even if it isn't already your official site yet, you've already been through a lot with this so I
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-912?page=comments#action_36970 ]
Sepand Mavandadi commented on AMQ-912:
--
Great to see you liked it =)
One thing I've noticed, I moved
activemq-core/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/security/J
Nevermind, I think we can hold off... got it working on windows by preceding C:/ with / :)On Sep 18, 2006, at 4:42 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:Sachin Patel wrote: Currently the sharedlib support does not allow individual absolute jar entries to be specified. What are people's thoughts on allowing this? I
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-912?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-912.
---
Fix Version/s: 4.1
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks for the great patch. Just need to fix a few compile issues caused by
recent chanages on trunk.
commited to
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2412?page=all ]
Jeff Genender closed GERONIMO-2412.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed
> add testng to gcache
>
>
> Key: GERONIMO-2412
> URL: http://issues.apac
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2412?page=comments#action_12435589
]
Jeff Genender commented on GERONIMO-2412:
-
Patch applied. Thanks. I had to add the apache snapshot repos to the pom to
get teh testng stuff to work.
The best way is to raise a JIRA issue at
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM
and attach your patch if you have one.
On 9/18/06, Axel Irriger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello everybody,
I altered the FilePoller component so add support for a minimum age option.
I need this functionality,
Bruce, these dependencies are already added and deployed but they
conflict with the existing ones shipped with JBoss.
I have already seen that problem but had no time to understand
how to tweak the JBoss classloader to workaround that.
Jboss ships commons-http v2.x and ServiceMix uses v3.0.
Unfor
It seems that even though the artifacts for geronimo 1.1 (1.1.1 hasn't
made it out there yet) are on ibiblio (thanks Matt), the maven2 metadata
for the still hasn't been updated for this.
I'm specifically talking about the the metadata for artifacts such as:
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/ger
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-912?page=comments#action_36968 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-912:
---
Hi Kelly,
Yep I got the same results with xbean. The error was not too friendly to
figure out what was going wrong so I ope
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-53?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino closed XBEAN-53.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in trunk revision 447551
> "java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 0" thrown from XBeanMojo
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-53?page=comments#action_12435570 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on XBEAN-53:
Also noticed that xbean will only process the first java class defined in the
source file. It should process all java class
"java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 0" thrown from XBeanMojo
---
Key: XBEAN-53
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-53
Project: XBean
Issue Type: Bug
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2412?page=all ]
Bill Dudney updated GERONIMO-2412:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-2412-bdudney.patch
apply at root of gcache
> add testng to gcache
>
>
> Key: GERONIMO-2412
>
add testng to gcache
Key: GERONIMO-2412
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2412
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Reporter: Bill Dudney
A
I've been wanting to take a look at our classloader structure for a
while, now. Also, OSGI seems to be popping up a bunch, lately. So,
with 1.1.1 TCK completed, I'm going to spend some time reading up on
OSGI and looking at adding OSGI support to Geronimo.
I'm just getting started, so can't
I think it is a bad idea to force every change to have a JIRA issue
created (or associated). This will only lead to forcing people to
add a bunch of junk to JIRA.
-1 to forcing each change to have a JIRA... common sense should
dictate which changes need JIRA issues and which do not.
JIRA
Sachin Patel wrote:
Currently the sharedlib support does not allow individual absolute jar
entries to be specified. What are people's thoughts on allowing this?
I personally don't have a problem with support both directories for jars
and/or specific jar references in sharedlib.
In the ecl
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> +1
>
> Jacek
>
> On 9/18/06, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As we move back towards CTR, can we please adopt the practice of using
>> a JIRA for every code change we make, however small the code change
>> may be.
>>
I hope with the exception of the sandbo
+1
Jacek
On 9/18/06, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As we move back towards CTR, can we please adopt the practice of using
a JIRA for every code change we make, however small the code change
may be.
Since we have assumed the responsibility of providing good
documentation/discussion
Hello everybody,
I altered the FilePoller component so add support for a minimum age option.
I need this functionality, as the component does read all files, which
occur in a source directory, even if they are not fully written (for
example by a component, which does "append" to files).
How shal
Currently the sharedlib support does not allow individual absolute jar entries to be specified. What are people's thoughts on allowing this? In the eclipse tooling, I'd like to support projects that have external jar entries to be deployed in-place to the shared library. I implemented an alternat
On 9/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
bsnyder wrote:
>
>> I followed this discussion but did not yet get: What shall be hosted at
>> the
>> codehouse project site? Just some few components? Or shall it be a
>> growing,
>> open collection of components? Or something completely
On 9/18/06, Eric Dofonsou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've found the following issue with the way servicemix works in JBOS.
I'am building endpoints that use the ervicemix-http component.
For this to work I need to add these two files to the
$JBOSS_HOME/server/default/lib folder :
1- geronimo-
Please raise a JIRA and attach your patch.
Thanks for looking at this issue.
On 9/18/06, Eric Dofonsou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've found the following issue with the way servicemix works in JBOS.
I'am building endpoints that use the ervicemix-http component.
For this to work I need to a
On 9/15/06, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jason Dillon wrote:
> Um, but does openwire handle discovery, failover, master/slave... ?
Discovery done through the mcast openwire transport ;-) We will reuse it:
Discovery is simple enough..
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/a
I've found the following issue with the way servicemix works in JBOS.
I'am building endpoints that use the ervicemix-http component.
For this to work I need to add these two files to the
$JBOSS_HOME/server/default/lib folder :
1- geronimo-j2ee-management_1.0_spec-1.0.1.jar
2- commons-httpclie
As we move back towards CTR, can we please adopt the practice of using
a JIRA for every code change we make, however small the code change
may be.
Since we have assumed the responsibility of providing good
documentation/discussion with all code changes, a JIRA provides that
crucial link between a
On Sep 18, 2006, at 11:17 AM, Paul McMahan wrote:
I agree that readability is a huge factor in code quality and is a key
to its survival. But I tend to disagree that a commit should be
rejected based on this criteria alone. IMHO the low bar for committing
to trunk should be that it compiles, d
On 9/18/06, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd certainly want to see issues resolved via discussion. We can
certainly try that, initially.
However, I think we should acknowledge that if the code isn't
commented at commit (or very soon afterwards), the code will most
likely never be com
There's currently some momentum towards adding more AJAX functionality
to the console which may address some of your concerns. I would
really like to get your feedback on GERONIMO-2333. I'm excited about
seeing more functionality like this in the console. Do you think this
is a good direction fo
On Sep 18, 2006, at 11:17 AM, Paul McMahan wrote:
I agree that readability is a huge factor in code quality and is a key
to its survival. But I tend to disagree that a commit should be
rejected based on this criteria alone. IMHO the low bar for committing
to trunk should be that it compiles, d
Kevan Miller wrote:
> In my experience, the probability of good comments being added to code
> post the initial commit is extremely low. If you think it would be good
> to document more, how do you see that happening?
Be a nudge ;-) Your comments to Gianny about having a bit more doc for
the c
On Sep 17, 2006, at 4:45 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
I am not supportive of forcing javadoc, and I would not like to make
that a reason for veto. If folks aren't following guidelines to good
coding practices and the code is illegible, then I think we can help
mentor following generally accepted p
Congrats!!!
Cheers!
Hernan
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here is the final vote summary:
We received 11 +1 votes (9 from PMC members). Thanks to the non-PMC
folks for taking the time to evaluate and support the release !
I have pushed the binaries out
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-912?page=comments#action_36967 ]
Kelly Campbell commented on AMQ-912:
Hi Sepand,
After I apply the latest patch, there's a build failure in the Qdox stuff when
I run mvn package. What did you
The week has begun with quite a few build errors.
specs:
--
Four specs have moved up to Java 1.5. They are
interceptor, EJB 3.0, JPA1.0, and Annotation.
So invoking a single bootstrap command with jdk 1.4 as default fails.
openejb2:
-
Missing:
1) org.apache.geronimo.specs:g
Thanks Matt, and congratulations!!
Paul
On 9/18/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here is the final vote summary:
We received 11 +1 votes (9 from PMC members). Thanks to the non-PMC
folks for taking the time to evaluate and support the
Congratulations Matt!!
VamsiOn 9/18/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1Here is the final vote summary:We received 11 +1 votes (9 from PMC members). Thanks to the non-PMCfolks for taking the time to evaluate and support the release !
I have pus
Thank you Matt.Great job!!
Joe
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here is the final vote summary:
We received 11 +1 votes (9 from PMC members). Thanks to the non-PMC
folks for taking the time to evaluate and support the release !
I have pushed th
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2248?page=comments#action_12435496
]
Jeff Genender commented on GERONIMO-2248:
-
+1 from mecool stuff.
> Applications portlets: List Parent and Child components against each component
>
I agree that readability is a huge factor in code quality and is a key
to its survival. But I tend to disagree that a commit should be
rejected based on this criteria alone. IMHO the low bar for committing
to trunk should be that it compiles, does no harm, and has undergone
adequate discussion wi
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2409?page=comments#action_12435495
]
Jeff Genender commented on GERONIMO-2409:
-
+1...looks good to me
> Provide config/module aliasing ability
> --
>
>
Geronimo - Monday, September 18, 2006
4 Patches in RTC
[GERONIMO-2015] Let's replace JKS to PKCS12 key store type
- Assignee: Unassigned
- Reporter: Nikolay Chugunov
- Created: Fri May 12 14:54:17 PDT 2006
- Updated: Sun Sep 10 11:08:59 PDT 2006
- Votes: 0
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-525?page=comments#action_36966 ]
Michal commented on SM-525:
---
I have concern about thread-safety for this extension.
I have tried this new component and there is one problem -
AggregatingErrorHandler accu
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2409?page=comments#action_12435490
]
Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-2409:
Not sure if voting still matters ... but here's my +1
> Provide config/module aliasing ability
> -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here is the final vote summary:
We received 11 +1 votes (9 from PMC members). Thanks to the non-PMC
folks for taking the time to evaluate and support the release !
I have pushed the binaries out and will update the website later today.
Thanks t
In Geronimo 1.1, you can use a gbean-ref to map the J2EEServer into
the web application's JNDI space. From the J2EEServer, you can
navigate to a list of resource adapters (J2EE Connectors), and I think
there's a way to check which connection factory interface they
implement (you'd want javax.sql.
Cool,
Not sure where that came from but now that its gone its all good.
TTFN,
-bd-
On Sep 17, 2006, at 6:47 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Ahh...never mind. I removed it and there are no dependencies ;-)
Jeff
Jeff Genender wrote:
Hey Bill,
I noticed that the pom in openwire now includes a dep
Hi All,
I want get the list of database connections deployed in the Geronimo
from a web application. Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Lasantha Ranaweera
CAR, WAR and EAR artifacts are missing NOTICE and LICENSE files.
Key: GERONIMO-2411
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2411
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2411?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-2411:
Affects Version/s: 1.1
1.0
1.1.1
1.1.2
1.1.x
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2329?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-2329:
Affects Version/s: (was: 1.1.x)
> Remote-deploy failures between Windows and Linux machines
> ---
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2372?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-2372.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Build failure on branches/1.1.1
> ---
>
> Key: GERONIMO-2372
> URL: htt
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2313?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-2313.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Subject not propagated correctly between web app and ejb
>
>
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2329?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-2329:
Affects Version/s: 1.1.x
1.2
(was: 1.0)
(was: 1.1)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2307?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-2307:
Description:
Geronimo redistributes the Sun J2EE schema files for deployment descriptors etc
but doesn't appear to include anything in the global li
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2307?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-2307:
Description:
Geronimo redistributes the Sun J2EE schema files for deployment descriptors etc
but doesn't appear to include anything in the global li
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2308?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-2308.
---
Resolution: Fixed
All updates complete
> All Geronimo JARs should include a NOTICE.txt file in addition to the
> LICENSE.txt file
> -
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2308?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-2308:
Description:
Currently Geronimo jars (e.g. the JARs for each application/module) do not
contain a NOTICE.txt file under the META-INF directory.
The
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2308?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-2308:
Description:
Currently Geronimo jars (e.g. the JARs for each application/module) do not
contain a NOTICE.txt file under the META-INF directory.
The
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1492?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-1492.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Many "org/apache/geronimo" configIds still live in source tree
> --
>
>
David Jencks wrote:
Now I've reviewed this a bit more and have some minor comments:
1. I think you should include the yoko jars only in j2ee-corba (or
openejb) and client-corba configurations, not also j2ee-server and
client configurations. We might need to split more of openejb into a
corba
It looks like your machine is running out of resources (probably
sockets / file descriptors).
There's no real reason to use a new connection for each thread - just
create one connection and share it for your 500 threads.
On 9/13/06, Viali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I confiugre and xml file fo
78 matches
Mail list logo
