Hi Ravi,
You can set it via the GERONIMO_OPTS property i.e.
SET GERONIMO_OPTS=-Xmx256m and it will be set in the VM.
However since your system has only 512M of RAM it may be better to
turn off modules that you are not using like say openejb and activemq
if u dont use ejb and jms and so on. You ca
Gianny Damour wrote:
Hello Peter,
This is great news for Liferay developers!
IMHO, one of the pain points with Liferay development is the time it
takes to build, pack and deploy a WAR to Liferay. Even if Liferay is
not so bad on this front when compared with other portals, a typical
build-de
You can follow the steps to set the max heap size for Geronimo:
1. Open cmd in Windows or terminal in Linux
2. cd %GERONIMO_HOM%\bin
3. run bellow command to set environment variable:
For Windows: set JAVA_OPTS=-Xmx256m
For Linux: export JAVA_OPTS=-Xmx256m
4. Then you can start Geronimo vi
After rebuilding the server I too faced the same problem and on further
inspection I could make out the problem was because the patch GERONIMO-4081
Accessibility issues (at revision: 675083) has surrounded text by
tags, which have a float:left property set in pluto.css which I suppose is
causing t
Admin Console portlets layout messed up after accessibility changes
---
Key: GERONIMO-4204
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4204
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type:
On Jul 14, 2008, at 1:47 AM, ravi naik wrote:
hi kevan..
thanks for reply...
but how to increase heap size of geronimo
i am having 512 mb ram...
How are you starting Geronimo?
'set JAVA_OPTS=-Xmx192m'
and
'geronimo run'
Is one option...
--kevan
thankx...
Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECT
Thanks Manu, it worked like a charm and it saves a lot of hassle.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 2:59 AM, Manu George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Shrey,
> I also faced this issue recently. My understanding is
> that all the DWR calls go through the
> org.apache.geronimo.console.servlet.C
Query Dynamic Information from Server using JMX
---
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-434
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-434
Project: Geronimo-Devtools
Issue Type: Sub-task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sainath Chowdary updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-434:
--
Attachment: jmx-dynamicserverinfo.patch
For example, to get a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sainath Chowdary updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-434:
--
Assignee: Tim McConnell (was: Sainath Chowdary)
Descri
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shiva Kumar H R reassigned GERONIMODEVTOOLS-434:
Assignee: Shiva Kumar H R (was: Tim McConnell)
> Query D
Geronimo Revision: 676460 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080714/build-2100.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080714/unit-test
unable to build samples on windows platoform due to Filename too long
-
Key: GERONIMO-4205
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4205
Project: Geronimo
Issue T
On Jul 10, 2008, at 10:48 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
It seems that once per day one of the automatic trunk builds deadlocks
in the following way (this only happens with the Jetty assembly):
Is anybody else seeing this too? We've had similar problems like
this before...
I've not seen a deadlock
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12613331#action_12613331
]
Ashish Jain commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-275:
--
Moving ahead with th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1261#action_1261
]
B.J. Reed commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-426:
Thanks Ted, I got a fres
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12613339#action_12613339
]
Ted Kirby commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-275:
I just noticed this old
The consensus is that we should release samples for 2.1.2 and not for
the prior releases. Hence, the issue that was identified for a 2.1.2
Server release regarding samples will be resolved by releasing the
samples specifically for the 2.1.2 server (and therefore there are no
compatibility is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12613345#action_12613345
]
Ted Kirby commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-275:
http://www.apache.org/di
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sainath Chowdary updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-434:
--
Attachment: jmx-dynamicquery-modified.patch
This patch correc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sainath Chowdary updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-434:
--
Attachment: jmxquery-sampleoutput.txt
"jmxquery-sampleoutput.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12613355#action_12613355
]
Ted Kirby commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-275:
With Tim's help, I just
Run geronimo embedded
-
Key: GERONIMO-4206
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4206
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: kernel
my late +1
Jay
Rick McGuire wrote:
This is a vote for a combined release of javamail spec and the javamail
provider (+ the uber jar). The provider changes have depedencies on the
spec changes, so these need to be released at the same time. Geronimo
will need the updated uber jar for the 2.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-3665.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed changes to trunk (revision 67) and branches/2.1 (revision
Rick,
Please send a [RESULT] note, if this vote has concluded.
On Jul 8, 2008, at 9:21 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
This is a vote for a combined release of javamail spec and the
javamail provider (+ the uber jar). The provider changes have
depedencies on the spec changes, so these need to be rel
Ted Kirby wrote:
From our server release download pages, I see no reference to the
license under which the server is released. There is a link to
release notes, but it does not mention the information either. The
legal information is collected in the LICENSE and NOTICE files.
Shouldn't we prov
Hmmm, I did...but without noticing that when I selected my original
email for a Reply, it only sent it to me! Here's the one I thought I
sent last Friday.
The vote for releasing the new javamail version has passed with 6 +1
votes, and no 0 or -1 votes. Voting in favor were
Dan Becker
Joe B
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ted Kirby wrote:
>>>
>>> From our server release download pages, I see no reference to the
>>
>> license under which the server is released. There is a link to
>> release notes, but it does not mention the information either.
David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 10, 2008, at 1:17 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
If I build Geronimo trunk using the latest OpenEjb snapshots
(published around 6/27-28) things build fine. However, if I grab
OpenEjb trunk and build it locally (to get the latest image) I get
build failures (NoClassDefFoundE
Provide a LoginModule which can be used to add user or group principals via
configuration
-
Key: GERONIMO-4207
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4207
Eliminate individual sample references from Geronimo Welcome Page
-
Key: GERONIMO-4208
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4208
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Joe Bohn wrote:
The Geronimo welcome page (http://localhost:8080/) has long included
links under a header of Geronimo Examples.
Under this header are the following 3 links:
- Servlet Examples
- JSP Examples
- LDAP Demo
- Additional Samples
I'd like to remove the first 3 links and rename the l
Heh. Done that before...
For the record, there were also +1 votes (possibly belated) in the
vote thread from:
Jay McHugh
Jason Warner
Davanum Srinivas
Guillaume Nodet
--kevan
On Jul 14, 2008, at 3:10 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Hmmm, I did...but without noticing that when I selected my original
FWIW, I did a quick check with CXF 2.0.7 and hit some issues with the
TCK tests under Geronimo. There must be some Geronimo changes necessary
for this upgrade. We'll hold-off upgrading to 2.0.7 for 2.1.2 unless
someone has a chance to look into the tck issues before out branch.
Joe
Joe Boh
Just a reminder that we're still planning to branch for a Geronimo 2.1.2
release a week from today (7/21). Please plan to have any fixes
integrated by that time or notify the list if there is a concern with
the branch date.
The only outstanding required item prior to the branch that I am awar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12613453#action_12613453
]
Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-4099:
I verified tck results with rev. 674565 and did
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-4205:
--
Attachment: G4205new.zip
Here's a proposed patch to workaround this issue. Basically rename
custome
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12613459#action_12613459
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-4207:
Committed module. Should add some doc t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12613459#action_12613459
]
kevan edited comment on GERONIMO-4207 at 7/14/08 2:34 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-4207:
--
Assignee: Kevan Miller
> Provide a LoginModule which can be used to add user or grou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-4099.
--
Resolution: Fixed
apparently causes no tck problems.
> Calling isUserInRole wipes out run-a
Was 2.0.6 OK or did it have the same TCK issues?
Dan
On Jul 14, 2008, at 4:21 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
FWIW, I did a quick check with CXF 2.0.7 and hit some issues with
the TCK tests under Geronimo. There must be some Geronimo changes
necessary for this upgrade. We'll hold-off upgrading to 2
2.0.6 is fine ... I only noticed the problems with 2.0.7. Something
must have changed that requires comparable Geronimo changes.
Joe
Daniel Kulp wrote:
Was 2.0.6 OK or did it have the same TCK issues?
Dan
On Jul 14, 2008, at 4:21 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
FWIW, I did a quick check with CXF
Now the GEP provides rich funnctionalities to edit geronimo deployment plan,
such as geronimo-web.xml, but it doesn't link deployment plan and deployment
descriptor. For example, adding a EJB reference in the geronimo-web.xml
Deployment editor only changes deployment plan, it doesn't add a ejb-
I very much agree with YunFeng that we should provide a mechanism to link
deployment plan and deployment descriptor. Even at present the GEP
deployment plan wizards are not able to get information from deployment
descriptor (like security roles, ejb-ref, resource-ref etc) or when
respective annotat
46 matches
Mail list logo
