Using the 1.0.3GA TCK level
stand-alone = 244
incontainer = 258 (these are required for certification)
-Donald
On 11/20/10 3:03 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> I'm seeing a strange problem in geronimo when I run the bean validation tck
> where trying to determine the annotations on some test
+1
Donald
On 11/11/10 2:04 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> This is a bug-fix release that will be used for the Geronimo server
> 2.2.1 and 2.1.7 releases. The following Jiras included in this update.
>
> GERONIMO-5649 txmanager could try to replace dead XAResources in commit
> and rollback tasks
>
+1
Donald
On 11/9/10 7:31 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> This is a bug fix release to fix a problem with the JASPI OSGi
> integration:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5656
>
> The components up for vote are:
>
> org/apache/geronimo/components/geronimo-jaspi/1.1.1/geronimo-jaspi
+1
Donald
On 11/9/10 7:13 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> This is a bug fix release to fix a couple of problems EL spec
> implementation.
>
> The components up for vote are:
>
> org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-el_2.2_spec/1.0.1/geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0.1-source-release.zip
>
> org/apache/geroni
+1
Donald
On 11/9/10 6:50 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> This is a bug fix release to fix a small spec compliance issue
>
> The components up for vote are:
>
> org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec/1.0.2/geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0.2-source-release.zip
>
> org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronim
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12912997#action_12912997
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-5617:
Do you have precision settings set
Is the below really needed in the NOTICE file?
+This product includes software developed by
+The Object Management Group.
+
+Copyright (c) 1999-2000 Object Management Group. Unlimited rights to
+duplicate and use this code are hereby granted provided that this
+copyright notice is included.
+
+Thi
+1 Built from source and staged artifacts look good.
-Donald
On 9/13/10 8:34 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> This is a bug fix release to fix a couple of problems with the EJB
> embedded container support.
>
> The components up for vote are:
>
> org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec/1.0
+1 Could build from source and staged jars look good.
-Donald
On 9/14/10 7:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> This is a bug fix release to fix a problem with the javamail smtp
> provider including the BCC recipients as a header in sent messages. The
> JIRA in question is
>
> https://issues.apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12908877#action_12908877
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-5228:
Do we just need to update our Spec
Or is it simply that not everyone has updated their .subversion/config
with suggested values (to handle eol-style and autoprops) or that we're
missing svn props from some of our files?
-Donald
On 9/10/10 5:11 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> In addition to the bad shell scripts in 2.1.6, I ran across
Right, one area in the doc that needs updating...
For Apache BVal, take a look at -
bval-jsr303/src/main/java/org/apache/bval/jsr303/ConfigurationImpl.java
Which can hold the constraint mappings as InputStreams and has
public ValidatorFactory buildValidatorFactory()
You can get a Validator w
Congrats Rex!
-Donald
On 9/7/10 9:00 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> Please join us in congratulating as a new member of the Geronimo PMC.
> In addition to serving as a release manager for the Geronimo 2.1.5
> server release, Rex also has demonstrated a clear commitment to
> Geronimo in numerous o
Please join us in congratulating Forrest as a new member of the Geronimo
PMC. In addition to all his work on Samples, Forrest also has
demonstrated a clear commitment to Geronimo in numerous other areas.
We're very glad that he has accepted our invitation to join us in
providing oversight of the
Please join us in congratulating Delos as a new member of the Geronimo
PMC. In addition to all his work on GEP and Samples, Delos also has
demonstrated a clear commitment to Geronimo in numerous other areas.
We're very glad that he has accepted our invitation to join us in
providing oversight of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12905625#action_12905625
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-5553:
Reply to the 8/30 questions a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12903635#action_12903635
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-5553:
Thanks Lin. I missed that.
But,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12903442#action_12903442
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-5553:
OK, so this dual personality is re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12903400#action_12903400
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-5553:
In geronimo-transformer,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12903393#action_12903393
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-5553:
I checked with Jeremy on the Ope
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods reassigned GERONIMO-5553:
--
Assignee: Rick McGuire (was: Donald Woods)
Both of these are registering
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12903001#action_12903001
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-5553:
Agree, the Javaagent code should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12902980#action_12902980
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-5553:
I decompiled
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods reassigned GERONIMO-5553:
--
Assignee: Donald Woods
> Fail to enchance entities on Geron
We need connector, TranQL and RAs for OpenJPA
-Donald
On 8/20/10 2:29 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
> Ok, regarding tranql RAs, the derby ones are pulled in by
> system-database. The other RAs are pulled in as part of the
> db-connectors plugin which is part of the eba-tomcat plugin group.
>
> I thin
Sounds right. Thanks for looking at this.
-Donald
On 8/23/10 2:37 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
> Ok, thanks, I'll take your recommendation and keep both. :)
>
> I just removed the webservices-common and webservices-builder.
>
> We still need geronimo-webservices module since it is used by
> geronimo-to
+1
Both artifact source passed rat:check, built from source, contain
LICENSE/NOTICE files in the jars and have signatures.
-Donald
On 8/18/10 7:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> These are bug fix releases to fix problems in the common annotation and
> jaxb spec bundles.
>
> The common annotations
t;
> Thanks,
>
> Lin
>
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>> Moving to dev@ list since we're discussing the public ASL 2.0 licensed
>> TCKS
>>
>>
>> Yep, but nothing in the wiki yet for the public TCKs
>>
>&
Moving to dev@ list since we're discussing the public ASL 2.0 licensed
TCKS
Yep, but nothing in the wiki yet for the public TCKs
Just build the top level projects first, which builds some integration
artifacts:
cd geronimo/tck/branches/3.0/
mvn clean install
Then run either BVAL or J
Will file locking work across all OS and filesystem combinations
reliably? Wondering about Windows/exFAT and Unix/NFS shares
Another way is to use *.pid files to hold the server process id or
something like *.rmi or *.jmx files to denote the ports that servers are
listening on.
Maybe buildin
+1 source-release passed rat:check and was able to build it on Mac with
Maven 2.2.1 and 1.6.0_20.
-Donald
On 8/10/10 10:42 PM, Delos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is the second try for releasing maven-plugins 1.1 used by GEP. I
> have created the buildable source distribution for it.
>
> As part
The BVAL and JCDI builds have now been updated to allow extracting
Geronimo assemblies into the target directory for automated testing.
mvn test -Pincontainer,geronimo-assembly -DassemblyId=tomcat7-javaee6
Note, that the assemblyIds are different from the ones defined in the
parent server POM, as
he
WARs that are used are created under target/jsr303-artifacts.
-Donald
>
> Please see more comments in line.
>
> Lin
>
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>> It looks like the same general setup as the BVAL tck, in that it uses
>> the suref
nject TCK
> seems to only support the standalone mode. So the question is, is it
> enough to just run the atinject TCK in standalone mode or do we have
> to write some extra code to ensure it runs in in-container mode with
> Geronimo?
>
> Jarek
>
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 a
It looks like the same general setup as the BVAL tck, in that it uses
the surefire plugin and a suiteXmlFiles which is either provided in the
downloaded TCK files or provided locally (which I don't think we can use
the open web beans overrides unless we have TCK challenges approved by
Oracle.)
You
For the Bean Validation TCK, I compared the content that gets downloaded
from the JBoss maven repo to the 1.0.3 content provided from Oracle and
they were identical. Not sure what that means for final JEE6
certification, but I don't see how they can tell from the logs which set
of artifacts were u
Agree to drop the 72 hour wait, as once the signed NDA is on file there
should be no further delays required.
-Donald
On 8/11/10 8:07 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> All,
> Our policy for granting access to the Geronimo TCK test harness is described
> here --
> https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/gero
Seeing a deployment failure on Tomcat assemblies when trying to run the
stand-alone BVAL TCK and was wondering if it was related to the below
changes, since a NPE is occurring in MergeHelper.java now?
2010-08-10 17:19:09,565 WARN [TomcatModuleBuilder] Web application .
does not c
ontain a WEB-INF
Just noticed the following autoexport logging when trying to run an
autoexport of the OpenJPA space -
[Fri Aug 06 14:51:10 EDT 2010] Exporting: - null
[key=OPENEJBGMOxSITEOPENEJBx30=GMOxDEV]
where when exporting a single space you would expect to see -
[Fri Aug 06 14:51:54 EDT 2010] Exporting:
+1 Passed rat:check, built tag with 1.6.0_20, jar contains required
License/Notice files.
-Donald
On 7/27/10 10:15 AM, Delos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Hope you're not surprised at this voting. Actually, I have discussed it
> with Kevan and Donald.
>
> As part of GEP, maven-eclipsepde-plugin helps
+1 Was able to build the tag and the jars looked like they have the
required License/Notice files.
-Donald
On 7/23/10 7:28 AM, Delos wrote:
> This voting is for mavenized tomcat 6.0.29. Following what we did to
> tomcat 6.0.20, we are using a forked copy of tomcat derived from the
> tomcat 6.0.
On 7/21/10 12:04 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Ok, it sounds like more people prefer to move these tcks into a public
> svn location.
>
> So I guess we should create a
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/tck repo and move the tcks
> over. There should be no problem with moving the following m
As of r966020, the OpenJPA trunk (2.1.0-SNAPSHOT) now has the following
long sought after improvements -
OPENJPA-1732 LogFactory adapter for SLF4J
Now, the SLF4J API can be used by setting openjpa.Log=slf4j and
including the required slf4-api and backend adapter on the classpath.
OPENJPA-1735 Mar
Note - this will cause a build failure until someone has a chance to
look at the geronimo-jetty code -
[INFO] Compilation failure
/Users/drwoods/geronimo/server-trunk/plugins/jetty8/geronimo-jetty8/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/jetty8/WebAppContextWrapper.java:[229,21]
cannot find symbol
symbo
I see this as a common use case, where users want to build their own
assemblies, but want ONE place to change the Geronimo version they are
using (as using import doesn't resolve this for every
case anymore.) Heck, we even use this method for our TCK builds.
-Donald
On 7/14/10 12:31 PM, Dav
+1 Was able to build all 6 from their tags and each passed rat:check.
Note: The version on woodstox has an extra "_1" and should be listed as
woodstox-4.0.6_1.
-Donald
On 7/13/10 10:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> To allow the Geronimo trunk release to upgrade the some of the
> components used
You could also set it as a property in the pom, like -
${project.build.outputDirectory}
which allows users to override it either in settings.xml or on the
command line. In your case, you could define a profile in settings.xml
that sets geronimoHome for your specific machine and then ena
That's the expected behavior, in that ${project.version} is the current
module's version and not that of it's parent. If you need the parent's
version, then yes, we need a property like geronimoVersion.
-Donald
On 7/13/10 10:56 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I suggest we stop using ${project.v
+1 Was able to build the tag on Win7 (but not Mac as with GEP 3.0.0)
and rat:check returned some hits that can be ignored (can we backport
the excludes list from trunk to ignore all of the .* Eclipse files?)
-Donald
On 7/8/10 10:12 AM, Delos wrote:
> Hi all, Please review and vote on the releas
+1 Was able to build the tag on my Mac w/ 1.6.0_20 and it passed mvn
rat:check.
-Donald
On 7/1/10 1:29 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> A release candidate for Geronimo Samples 3.0-M1 has been created and
> staged. This release includes these samples which works with Geronimo
> 3.0-M1:
>
+1 Was able to build the tag on Win7, use the built update site to
install GEP into a clean Eclipse 3.5.2 using Java 1.6.0 and start/stop a
Geronimo 3.0-M1 Tomcat assembly.
Some thoughts - I don't like how we add a new Download menu in the
Eclipse IDE, considering the Download Servers option is a
+1 Sounds like needed updates.
-Donald
On 7/9/10 4:37 AM, Delos wrote:
> As part of GEP, maven-eclipsepde-plugin helps to convert eclipse plugins
> to maven dependencies and add them into artifact dependency list. So
> without it, GEP can't be compiled successfully. The plugin is in version
>
On 7/1/10 10:39 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
> -1
>
> Could not build on MacOSX, as the referenced file no longer exists -
> file=/technology/epp/downloads/release/helios/R/eclipse-jee-helios-macosx-carbon.tar.gz
>
>
> Looks like we need to use the following 32bit
-1
Could not build on MacOSX, as the referenced file no longer exists -
file=/technology/epp/downloads/release/helios/R/eclipse-jee-helios-macosx-carbon.tar.gz
Looks like we need to use the following 32bit Mac download instead in
eclipse/build.xml -
Also, I had to specify specific mi
One file failed the "mvn rat:check" -
geronimo-samples-archetype/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/sample-war/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/geronimo-web.xml
which is missing the ASL header
-Donald
On 6/30/10 3:05 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> A release candidate for Geronimo Samples
Has the voting finished? I didn't see a [RESULTS] reply yet...
-Donald
On 6/23/10 5:24 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.6 has been created and staged.
> This version is the same as the previous release candidate except for an
> upgrade to the spring framework dep
Done. I added both ids to the geronimo-committers group in Confluence.
-Donald
On 6/29/10 4:34 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am doing samples release and will need to update the "Apache Geronimo"
> confluence project to add some news. But my two confluence IDs(xiaming
> and forres...@gmai
No vote, just a discussion point -
Since this was created from a 3.0-M1 branch, I don't agree with keeping
all of the sample source in the release, when only a subset is being
built and released. Seems that this will only confuse users who want to
build the Samples from source.
-Donald
On
+1
Was able to build the tag and start the Tomcat JEE5 server.
-Donald
On 6/23/10 5:24 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.6 has been created and staged.
> This version is the same as the previous release candidate except for an
> upgrade to the spring framework depe
OK, then we should create a 3.0-M1 branch for the Samples and start
removing ones that will not work.
-Donald
On 6/23/10 9:08 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Donald Woods <mailto:dwo...@apache.org>> wrote:
>
> We should create
We should create the required datasource plugins for the Aries Blog,
along with plugin wrappers for Blog and AriesTrade to make it easier to
install.
We also have some patches over in OpenJPA for Daytrader to use the new
JPA 2.0 Criteria API, but not sure how we want to integrate those yet...
As
+1 Was able to build the tag and start the JEE5 Tomcat assembly.
A few minor issues, but nothing requiring another release:
- Copyright dates in Welcome app and Console not updated to 2010
- Welcome App shows an Embedded Tomcat @VERSION@
- RELEASE_NOTES.txt was the only RAT failure
-Donald
On
Believe you meant Kevan Miller and Donald Woods... :-)
-Donald
On 6/18/10 7:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Voting for the
> release were
>
> Rick McGuire
> Jarek Gawor
> Kevan Woods
> Donald Wood
> Joe Bohn
>
OK, just found GERONIMO-5369 and it turns out not to be an issue, so
lets stay with SE 5 for 2.2.
-Donald
On 6/17/10 12:26 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jun 17, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>> On 6/17/2010 11:20 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
>>> I'd be
0, at 11:33 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>> On 6/17/2010 11:20 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
>>> I'd be fine with requiring Java SE 6 for 2.2.1 and follow-on releases.
>>>
>>
>> Is that even allowed by the Java EE 5 certification rules?
>
> Yes, but I
t; On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Bill Stoddard <mailto:wgstodd...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On 6/14/10 10:01 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
>
> #1-3 are good usability improvements.
>
> Can we use Dojo for #4-6? Seems hover help would be the best
>
I'd be fine with requiring Java SE 6 for 2.2.1 and follow-on releases.
-Donald
On 6/16/10 10:40 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> We should change the 2.2 build JDK from 6 to 5 because we can't start
> the server with jdk 5 if we build 2.2 branch with jdk 6. See [1] for
> more background.
>
> Jarek,
>
On 6/15/10 11:33 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
> Here's my +1 as well ... but I did notice a few strange things that I
> don't think have been pointed out yet:
>
> Perhaps the most annoying thing is that we aren't including the tranql
> connector rars in server images as with previous releases. I guess t
Is this on the public repos yet? The 3.0 server build just failed for a
web profile TCK run.
-Donald
On 6/12/10 11:40 PM, ga...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: gawor
> Date: Sun Jun 13 03:40:04 2010
> New Revision: 954158
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=954158&view=rev
> Log:
> use
#1-3 are good usability improvements.
Can we use Dojo for #4-6? Seems hover help would be the best option, as
adding an example beside/below every field could require a lot of screen
area and doesn't cover the cases for links (like
Start/Stop/Restart/Delete). Also, the portlet help page shou
ed
> with Maven-2.2.1 as well as Maven-3.0-beta1. I am using Sun JDK
> 1.6.0_20. Which version of Sun JDK and Maven have you used to build the
> tag?
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Donald Woods <mailto:dwo...@apache.org>> wrote:
>
> +1 as I think the b
+1 as I think the below issues are acceptable for a milestone release.
Was able to build the tag and start the Tomcat Java EE 6 server.
-Donald
On 6/10/10 4:29 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> +0.5
>
> M1 is affected by GERONIMO-5336. All services will most likely bind to
> the local loopback device
+1
Built both artifacts from source.
Jars contained correct looking License/Notice files.
RAT returned some hits, but they were not new files and were mostly for
provider and test files. Can we get some excludes added for future
releases?
-Donald
On 6/11/10 6:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> This
On 6/10/10 11:22 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jun 9, 2010, at 7:48 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>
>> Now that I have the initial web profile assemblies created and hooked
>> into our TCK harness, I'd like to circle back around on this.
>>
>> Personally,
But we're going to instruct existing 2.1.x users to copy it over the
existing jars in the server repository, right? Or are we going to
instruct them to create an artifact-alias entry to map all usage to the
new one (which may not work in all cases)?
-Donald
On 6/10/10 9:10 AM, Rick McGuire
It can go either way. Most of the time, we expect plugin providers to
update their CAR builds to add in the new server releases (see
geronimo/plugins/openjpa2/). Ideally, the Samples would be released
with every server release, but we have never done that in the past, but
it is something we need
with missing console, monitoring
agent, clustering, which will probably make those assemblies grow
from the current 65MB to more like 80MB.
-Donald
On 6/8/10 3:17 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> I remember we had some discussion about dropping the minimal assemblies
> from the 3.0 builds
the same
> commit, are you sure that plugins/j2ee/geronimo-naming-builder got recompiled
> before these errors?
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Jun 8, 2010, at 12:30 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>
>> I'm seeing compile failures after pulling in the below changes...
I'm seeing compile failures after pulling in the below changes
/Users/drwoods/geronimo/server-trunk/plugins/connector-1_6/geronimo-connector-builder-1_6/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/connector/deployment/AdminObjectRefBuilder.java:[232,58]
cannot find symbol
symbol : method isSetReference
I remember we had some discussion about dropping the minimal assemblies
from the 3.0 builds awhile back, but can't find where a decision was
made, so here goes...
Option 1 - We upgrade the minimal assemblies to support EBA apps by
using the eba-* instead of wab-* plugingroups, so all of our base
I'm not sure what's up. I replaced the autoexport template with the one
from the 3.0 docs and it's still showing the wrong topNav content
-Donald
On 5/31/10 1:19 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> When I load our 2.1 or 2.2 Wiki information, I'm getting a Tuscany logo (e.g.
> https://cwiki.apache.
+1 Build worked. Only rat failure was for an empty file -
catalina/src/main/resources/org/apache/ServerInfo.properties
-Donald
On 5/24/10 2:21 AM, Ivan wrote:
> Please vote for Geronimo Customized Tomcat 7.0.0.1
> a. Recently, Tomcat community has begun their vote for Tomcat 7 RC 3, so
> curr
On 5/26/10 11:32 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> I've done a quick pass through the 3.0-M1 release notes, but I need a
> little help to get this updated for creating a release candidate. This
> is the first time I've done of these, so I have a few questions on how
> this gets pulled together.
>
> 1)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870757#action_12870757
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-5343:
How would we preserve plugin overr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870756#action_12870756
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-5337:
How would we preserve plugin overr
+1 Focusing on Aries and Web Profile sound like the right priorities.
-Donald
On 5/21/10 6:07 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> Jarek Gawor brought to my attention that the web services support in 3.0
> has not yet gotten any testing or attention. While it builds, it is in
> a state where it doesn't r
On 5/19/10 4:28 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On May 19, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>
>> Good summary Lin.
>>
>> In the OpenJPA community, we've been telling users for awhile now not to
>> use the runtime enhancement, as it has known deficiencies
Looks like there were really only 4 services files that had rat:check
failures, even though it gave a count of 867.
So, here's my +1.
-Donald
On 5/19/10 4:28 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Do we need to publish everything? I was able to build the source, but
> there were some rat:che
Do we need to publish everything? I was able to build the source, but
there were some rat:check failures in some modules (like container)...
-Donald
On 5/17/10 9:30 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> Please vote for the geronimo openejb 3.1.3.0 release
>
> This is a version of openejb based on revisio
Good summary Lin.
In the OpenJPA community, we've been telling users for awhile now not to
use the runtime enhancement, as it has known deficiencies, and should
only be used for quick prototyping and never in production.
If we need to continue supporting this in Geronimo (for the developer
scenar
Original Message
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Derby 10.6.1.0 released
Date: 19 May 2010 15:53:28 -
From: rhille...@apache.org
To: annou...@apache.org
The Apache Derby project is pleased to announce release 10.6.1.0. In
addition to introducing many new features, this release f
+1 Was able to build.
-Donald
On 5/14/10 10:36 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> Please vote for the geronimo xbean 3.7 release
>
> The major changes to this release are:
> - xbean-blueprint subproject to provide support for Aries blueprint
> component assembly
> - xbean-bundleutils subproject to pro
Space is created and the autoexport template updated -
https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC30/
-Donald
On 5/11/10 4:51 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Yep, that was my thoughts too.
>
> Just kicked of a "Copy Space" of GMOxDOC22 to GMOxDOC30.
>
>
> -Donald
>
2.1 docs to 2.2 by
> hand.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On May 11, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>
>> Do you want an empty space or one that is based on a copy of the 2.2 docs?
>>
>>
>> -Donald
>>
>>
>> On 5/10/10 11:
Cool. We've noticed some problems with using BV in JEE app servers, in
that OpenJPA needs to discover the entities to enhance before a BV
provider loads them, otherwise we don't have a change to do our Serp
byte code enhancing. Don't remember the exact details right now, but
Albert on the Open
Do you want an empty space or one that is based on a copy of the 2.2 docs?
-Donald
On 5/10/10 11:43 PM, chi runhua wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> I believe we could start creating document plan for Geronimo 3.0. First
> of all, we might need to create a new wiki space for G3.0.
>
> According to instr
+1
-Donald
On 5/5/10 7:31 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> Please vote for the geronimo-jaspi 1.1 component.
>
> The major changes to this release are:
> - packaged as an osgi bundle
> - fairly non-functional classloading in 1.0 replaced by Rick's
> ProviderLocator that actually works in osgi.
> - d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12865771#action_12865771
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-5274:
Looks good. Thanks.
> Dep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-4946:
---
Summary: Create stand-alone OpenJPA2 plugins for 2.1.3+ and 2.2+ servers
(was: Add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-4946:
---
Fix Version/s: Wish List
(was: 2.2.1)
Please do not associate to a
1 - 100 of 3039 matches
Mail list logo
