Sounds right. Thanks for looking at this. -Donald
On 8/23/10 2:37 PM, Lin Sun wrote: > Ok, thanks, I'll take your recommendation and keep both. :) > > I just removed the webservices-common and webservices-builder. > > We still need geronimo-webservices module since it is used by > geronimo-tomcat whenever user requests to retrieve to see the wsdl via > http and the work is delegated to the geronimo-webservices. > > So in additional to the base web profile, I think we added the > following support: > > javamail > connector > javaee management/deployment > jaspic (currently in) > jacc > > Did the above sound right to people? > > Lin > > > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Rick McGuire <rick...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 8/20/2010 4:36 PM, Lin Sun wrote: >>> >>> It seems hard to remove javamail given openejb depends on it. At >>> least for the javamail schema for JNDI, which is used by the >>> openejb-client. >>> >>> Also, I don't quite understand this comment in G roomt pom.xml - >>> >>> <!-- Use >>> org.apache.geronimo.javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail >>> uber jar containing both the spec and the providers in order >>> that >>> users can actually use mail without advanced degrees in >>> geronimo >>> classloading. DO NOT add or replace this with >>> org.apache.geronimo.specs/geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec --> >>> <dependency> >>> <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.javamail</groupId> >>> <artifactId>geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail</artifactId> >>> <version>1.8.1</version> >>> </dependency> >>> >>> This seems to indicate that it is recommended to have java mail spec >>> and impl together as dependency, instead of just using the spec jar. >> >> The uber jar is required in order for the Geronimo mail component to work >> correctly, since it configures the various transport implementations. If >> that is removed, it might be possible to revert to just the spec jar, but I >> think I'd recommend against it because it makes it more difficult to >> incrementally add the full javamail support back in. >> >> Rick >> >>> Lin >>> >>>> 1. whether we keep jaspi and javamail in web profile assembly? I >>>> personally would say no, but open to opinions. >> >> >
