On Jul 21, 2009, at 9:23 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Maybe we can create a mashup of the proposals to cover the following:
Session 1 - Geronimo 2.2 topics (current user community)
Administering Geronimo
Custom Server Assemblies
Securing Apps
On Jul 22, 2009, at 6:58 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I think this is a good division of topics.
I wonder if it would be more interesting to cover the various
clustering stuff we have in 2.2 rather than the security stuff.
I've talked about security a couple of times before and it has a
On Jul 21, 2009, at 5:56 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
Adding a apache-snapshot as plugin repository could resolve this
problem.
pluginRepositories
pluginRepository
idapache-snapshots/id
nameApache Snapshots Repository/name
On Jul 21, 2009, at 9:23 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Maybe we can create a mashup of the proposals to cover the following:
Session 1 - Geronimo 2.2 topics (current user community)
Administering Geronimo
Custom Server Assemblies
Securing Apps
On Jul 20, 2009, at 11:42 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
I would like to welcome Delos aboard, as he recently accepted the
Geronimo PMC invitation to become a committer. His account was
created last week (delos), so you should start seeing some commits
from him as soon as we finish granting him
On Jul 20, 2009, at 9:33 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 07/20/2009 09:18 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Just wondering what happens to the proposals submitted through
conference web site.
They can be used too if Geronimo decides to do so.
Vamsi,
You should post your proposal(s) here,
So, just to be a little bit more clear. I'm going to give this call
for papers a little more time. Hoping that Vamsi will respond with his
proposal. We've had a few last minute proposals. Given that part of
the time was the weekend, want to be sure that everyone has a
chance... Heck, I may
Thanks everyone! Lots of good topics there. I think they are all
deserving.
I'll start a discussion thread to finalize the content.
--kevan
I had an IRC chat with Emmanuel Lecharny from Apache Directory. We
decided that Geronimo would use the 3 afternoon talks and Directory
will hold the two morning talks.
IIUC, this means we'll have the following time slots:
2:30-3:20 Session 1
3:20-4:00 Break
4:00-4:50 Session 2
Looking at these proposals, my thoughts are pulled towards where is
Geronimo going? Even though, we're busy finalizing a 2.2 release, I'd
like to see a good portion of our session focused on where we're
taking Geronimo. Hopefully, we'd already have a lot of actual
implementation to discuss
On Jul 18, 2009, at 4:13 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I'm thinking I will branch 2.2 off of trunk sunday or monday unless
there are convincing arguments against it. I think we need to stop
adding features :-)
No objections, here...
--kevan
On Jul 17, 2009, at 9:23 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
I ran into build problems like the automated 2.1 build, as I didn't
build the new Tomcat artifacts locally and the snapshot resolution
seems to be broken due to using unique timestamps for the deployed
artifacts
K. Sigh. I'll have a
: Kevan Miller
We need to upgrade our branches/2.1 to use Tomcat 6.0.20. As we do this, we
should move to the new Geronimo External generated version. Rather than create
a new private repo version.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment
On Jul 16, 2009, at 2:33 AM, Jack Cai wrote:
Is Geronimo performance tuning a good topic to cover? I guess we
don't have some nice materials on this topic currently?
Sure. All good potential topics. We don't have to list all potential
topics.
Thanks for the feedback, all.
--kevan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-4751:
--
Assignee: Kevan Miller
Upgrade 2.1.x to Tomcat 6.0.20
This years ApacheCon US Conference (Oakland, CA, USA - Nov 2 to 6
2009) will include a 1/2 day Geronimo Track. This is a call for
session proposals. Please have submissions in by Monday 12 Noon EDT.
We need to finalize the session contents early next week.
Apache Geronimo is a lightweight,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-4751.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.5
Committed updates. Builds and all testsuite
, Kevan Miller
kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 15, 2009, at 4:59 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
+1 to a 2.1.5 release with Tomcat 6.0.20, which contains several
security fixes.
0 for moving to Genesis 2.0, since we have yet to publish a server
release with it
Ya. I was thinking that we
On Jul 15, 2009, at 3:50 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Jay -- many thanks for trying out the patch and committing it.
I think the last artifact in our svn repo is the dojo 0.4.3. I
can't find it released anywhere but the source code is in a handy
svn repo. I cooked up a modification of our
On Jul 14, 2009, at 10:59 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Sorry ... I think you should just consider the lack of comments to
be silent approval :-).
I was, just giving people a reminder...
I really am fine with it just as it is worded. However, here are
some other thoughts.
- Do we need to
On Jul 15, 2009, at 12:43 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Of course this would be much much better but I thought that we'd
investigated this and Joe Leong said it would be a lot of work and
no one volunteered to do it?
Right. I don't really know how much work is involved. And nobody
All,
I started thinking about updating branches/2.1 to use the new 6.0.20
Tomcat that we're building.
This would include updating genesis version, and probably a few
additional changes. I'd like to keep changes to a minimum. However,
think it would be good to use the new Tomcat generation
On Jul 15, 2009, at 4:59 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
+1 to a 2.1.5 release with Tomcat 6.0.20, which contains several
security fixes.
0 for moving to Genesis 2.0, since we have yet to publish a server
release with it
Ya. I was thinking that we might want it for new Nexus repository
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12730860#action_12730860
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-4081:
Please open a new Jira
Comments, anybody? I'm hoping to get started with this tomorrow...
--kevan
On Jul 13, 2009, at 5:53 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
There will be a Geronimo Track at ApacheCon US '09. We will be
sharing a full day with the Directory Project. This means that we'll
have 2 to 3 50 minute time
Hi Dan,
On Jul 13, 2009, at 11:26 AM, Dan Becker wrote:
I've been implementing an Aspect Oriented Programming (AOP)
profiling and timing system on some of my web application code. I've
been able to Load Time Weave (LTW) my application code using plain
Apache Tomcat by placing the
All,
There will be a Geronimo Track at ApacheCon US '09. We will be sharing
a full day with the Directory Project. This means that we'll have 2 to
3 50 minute time slots. We have some flexibility on how we format
these time slots. So, IIUC, we can sub-divide these time slots, if we
Many thanks to Jay McHugh for generating this Quarter's Board report
-- http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2009-07+-+July
I've made some editorial updates. Any updates need to be in by
Monday morning.
--kevan
On Jul 12, 2009, at 11:19 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Many thanks to Jay McHugh for generating this Quarter's Board report
-- http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2009-07+-+July
I've made some editorial updates. Any updates need to be in by
Monday
On Jul 9, 2009, at 5:59 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jul 9, 2009, at 2:44 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote:
Hey David,
I'm starting to take a look at it today.
They have a 1.3.1 version out - any objections to me switching the
patch
to use it?
Not at all -- I just thought I'd start small since
On Jul 3, 2009, at 5:29 AM, George Frink wrote:
We needed a fully functional Netbeans plugin for an ongoing project.
As a result, I've adapted the Netbeans plugin to Netbeans 6.7 and am
adding functionality/testing apace.
It strikes me as too much code to gracefully list in an email.
On Jul 3, 2009, at 5:29 AM, George Frink wrote:
We needed a fully functional Netbeans plugin for an ongoing project.
As a result, I've adapted the Netbeans plugin to Netbeans 6.7 and am
adding functionality/testing apace.
It strikes me as too much code to gracefully list in an email.
issues)
Affects Versions: 2.1.4, 2.1.5, 2.2
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 2.1.5, 2.2
I've seen some log files, where it appeared that all log information was not
being written to the log file, before the server shutdown. I suspect that data
is not being flushed to disk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-4726:
--
Assignee: Kevan Miller
Explicitly shutdown logging during shutdown
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-4726.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Call LogManager.shutdown() during Log4jService.doStop(). Hopefully
On Jul 2, 2009, at 5:41 PM, ke...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kevan
Date: Thu Jul 2 21:41:08 2009
New Revision: 790742
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=790742view=rev
Log:
GERONIMO-4685 Merge of Tomcat patches from 6.0.18 to 6.0.20. This
includes revision numbers 784303 and 784304. Does
I was investigating a problem and happened to notice that our XSS/XSRF
filters are triggering the creation of Session objects. I then noticed
that they are creating a session when I hit an arbitrary url (I'm
expecting a 404). This is plain wrong, IMO. This was on 2.1.4, but I
would assume
On Jun 30, 2009, at 10:09 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
To catch XSS/XSRF attacks, the code is run as the first item in the
filter chain before the web app's servlet is ever reached. The
session has to be created before the request gets to the webapp, so
we can register the session id and a
On Jun 30, 2009, at 10:26 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
I tried some random URIs and always received a 404 back in my tests.
This could be a problem with the filter on the welcome application.
It currently has a context-root of / and the filter is registered
with a URL pattern of /*.
OK, that
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 2.1.4, 2.2
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 2.1.5, 2.2
The XSS/XSRF filters are causing session objects to be created for unknown
urls. For instance, a request
On Jun 30, 2009, at 1:06 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Thanks for the input Donald and Rex. So it sounds like we all agree
that we should remove the filter from welcome.
Kevan,
Did you want to remove this or would you like me to make the change?
Did you already create a JIRA for this?
Just
On Jun 30, 2009, at 12:00 AM, David Blevins (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Blevins closed XBEAN-133.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
Assignee:
On Jun 27, 2009, at 2:09 AM, Ivan wrote:
We will move from SVN to Git for Geronimo?
No. SVN remains the version control system used to maintain our
codebase. These are GIT mirrors of this SVN repository. You can
continue to use SVN, unchanged. However, those interested can start to
use
A search of emails shows that our last successful automated build of
trunk was on May 26th. I know that there have been increasing
frustration with these recent build issues. We seem to be closing in
on getting these issues resolved. I built last night. I built
successfully, last night,
On Jun 23, 2009, at 10:26 PM, Forrest_Xia wrote:
Hi folks,
I would like to take the ownership of releasing a new G samples
release for
G 2.2 server. Please let me know your thoughts about it.
I wouldn't phrase it in terms of ownership. However, any
contributions you can provide would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-4685:
--
Assignee: Kevan Miller (was: David Jencks)
Build our own tomcat
: Improvement
Affects Versions: 2.0.x, 2.2.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Assignee: Tim McConnell
Fix For: 2.2.0
I've had several users comment to me that application development with GEP is
not as fast as it should be. Basic scenario is create an application
On Jun 19, 2009, at 2:31 AM, Jack Cai wrote:
Looks like this is going be a piece of non-trivial work. Considering
that we are going for a 2.2 release, should we re-evaluate whether
this feature should be in 2.2? My gut feeling is no. We should
really stablize the code and resovle TCK
On Jun 5, 2009, at 3:00 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jun 3, 2009, at 10:35 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jun 2, 2009, at 6:46 PM, David Jencks wrote:
snip
I played with something like this on the plane today. it might
not take more that a couple days to get _something_ working
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718520#action_12718520
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-578:
---
IIRC, we didn't
My belated +1. I reviewed source, build, and generated binaries. Then
never got around to sending this note.
--kevan
On Jun 11, 2009, at 9:06 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Vote has passed with 4 binding +1 votes from
djencks
dwoods
jaydm
rickmcguire
and no other votes.
On Jun 8, 2009, at 5:28 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jun 8, 2009, at 1:49 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Dave,
Are you able to build Genesis ok?
My build fails with:
[INFO] Compiling 4 source files to /Users/kevan/geronimo/genesis/
trunk/genesis-maven-plugin/target/classes
[INFO
Yay. I fixed my problem...
Some time ago (and I can't exactly remember why), I created a symbolic
link for a tools.jar in my Java 6 installation. E.g.:
/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.6.0/lib/
tools.jar - /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/
On Jun 8, 2009, at 2:58 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I've been playing around with genesis to get it releasable and the
jaspi spec jar. Jetty needs the latter for their incipient IP
review so we need to get it out quickly.
It looks like the site plugin is totally broken
On Jun 8, 2009, at 4:06 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jun 8, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jun 8, 2009, at 2:58 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I've been playing around with genesis to get it releasable and the
jaspi spec jar. Jetty needs the latter for their incipient IP
review so
Dave,
Are you able to build Genesis ok?
My build fails with:
[INFO] Compiling 4 source files to /Users/kevan/geronimo/genesis/trunk/
genesis-maven-plugin/target/classes
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
On Jun 2, 2009, at 6:46 PM, David Jencks wrote:
snip
I played with something like this on the plane today. it might
not take more that a couple days to get _something_ working that
interprets server.xml files. It turns out there's no schema for
tomcat configurations so it may be an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12715542#action_12715542
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-575:
---
Might help
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12715220#action_12715220
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-575:
---
I'm not sure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12715258#action_12715258
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-575:
---
That might help
: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 2.1.4, 2.1.5, 2.2
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 2.1.5, 2.2
Deployment of the OpenSSO war (see https://opensso.dev.java.net/public/use/ for
download) will result in a WSDL generation failed error.
OpenSSO has also identified
: eclipse-plugin
Affects Versions: 2.2.0
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Assignee: Tim McConnell
Fix For: 2.0.x, 2.2.0
As far as I can tell, if a Web project does not include a
WEB-INF/geronimo-web.xml, GEP will not deploy a WAR to a geronimo server.
GEP
Affects Versions: 2.1.5, 2.2
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 2.2
I think it would be useful to include the display-name for deployed wars in the
Web App WARs portlet. I'd even think about re-ordering the columns a bit.
--
This message
: Improvement
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: deployment
Affects Versions: 2.1.4
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 2.2
Currently, we'll print a warning message, if we don't find a
WEB-INF/geronimo-web.xml file (and a deployment plan
On May 27, 2009, at 5:20 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Using a combination of bits and pieces of this and that I've gotten
the servlet profile of the jaspi tck to work with the jetty7
integration. So, I think we can release the spec jar. This will be
needed so jetty7 can release their jaspi
: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 2.1.4, 2.2
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 2.1.5, 2.2
Per the specs, a WAR without a WEB-INF/web.xml is a valid WAR file. However,
it's also an indication of a poorly formatted WAR. It seems like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12712833#action_12712833
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-565:
---
I was talking
: XBean
Issue Type: Bug
Components: finder
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 3.5
Deployment of an opensso.war file is failing in Geronimo with the following:
java.lang.Exception: Could not load
1/0/org/apache/xml/resolver/tools/ResolvingXMLReader.class
)
Components: documentation
Affects Versions: 2.1.4, 2.2
Reporter: Kevan Miller
Fix For: 2.1.5
User reported that after reading
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC21/deployment-plans.html they were not sure what
an external deployment plan was. It was not clear
-- all would seem like potential talk candidates.
I'm going to plan on signing us up, later today. Will happily work on
the planning... How do others feel?
--kevan
On Apr 21, 2009, at 6:16 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
This never made it over to our dev list. What are the communities
thoughts
On Apr 22, 2009, at 2:50 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Apr 15, 2009, at 10:42 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Apr 15, 2009, at 10:33 PM, Jack Cai wrote:
I agree that a 2.2 release would be nice to do to push out things
already in trunk, before our users wait for too long. :-)
I'm reviewing
ApacheCon Planning Team,
The Apache Geonimo project would like to plan a 1/2 day session on
Java EE, OSGi EEG, Geronimo administration, and current Geronimo
features/enhancements.
--kevan
On Apr 21, 2009, at 6:39 AM, rahul.soa wrote:
Hello Everyone,
My gsoc application for the WS-Security support for JAX-WS Web
Services project has been accepted. Thanks to everyone for their
support in making my application robust. Jarek Gawor will be
mentoring me for this project. Of
On Apr 20, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
I have just went trough the necessary steps to make Geronimo 2.1 as
one of the available options to perform a Eclipse run on server
with a given webapp, but when I try to run using Geronimo 2.1 server,
I get a FileNotFound xxx-.zip.
Any ideas
This never made it over to our dev list. What are the communities
thoughts? Seems like a great opportunity to me. There's been a
followup email, which I'll forward in a sec. Looks like the response
date is now Thursday the 23rd.
--kevan
On Apr 14, 2009, at 9:28 PM, ApacheCon 2009 US
FYI.
On Apr 20, 2009, at 4:10 PM, ApacheCon 2009 US Planners Team wrote:
To all ASF PMCs;
just your friendly reminder to please respond to the Planners by this
coming Thursday (the 23rd) if your project would like to be
highlighted,
and to help organize its own content for this coming
On Apr 13, 2009, at 6:38 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've integrated the Activator / ConversionService from the other
branch and moved mine into
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/blueprint
The package is still org.apache.felix.blueprint. We may want to
change that, though I
On Apr 15, 2009, at 11:29 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Apr 15, 2009, at 8:23 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Should we try reverting trunk (2.2) to use the same levels of
OpenEJB and Axis as in the recent 2.1.4 release, to see how close
we would be to a release that passes the TCK? That way,
All,
I've updated our Wiki with information for our April board report.
It's due Monday. Sorry for just getting to it -- I had a good holiday,
though... ;-) Please update with anything I may have missed.
Thanks.
--kevan
On Apr 13, 2009, at 12:55 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
I've updated our Wiki with information for our April board report.
It's due Monday. Sorry for just getting to it -- I had a good
holiday, though... ;-) Please update with anything I may have missed.
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence
On Apr 9, 2009, at 11:26 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
Hi Joe,
We recently found some problems in some primitive servlets, so the
tomcat version is not really ready for contribution.
As to how to package it into daytrader code base, rough idea is to
create a sub module in daytrader root, and
On Apr 6, 2009, at 3:25 AM, rahul.soa wrote:
Hello David,
It did not work for independent build as well. I tried to build the
plug-ins and got the same memory allocation error :( I ordered my RAM
already.
Try building without tests:
mvn -Dtest=false
--kevan
On Mar 31, 2009, at 12:21 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
The Apache Geronimo project is pleased to announce the available of
Apache Geronimo v2.1.4 server. This is primarily a maintenance
release.
Among the updates and fixes included in the release are several
security fixes for vulnerabilities
On Mar 26, 2009, at 7:23 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote:
snip
I will try to create a test that has a similarly complicated entity
relationship but uses only JPA standard links.
Sounds good.
If that works - how should we handle it? If the assembly passes TCK,
and the problem is only related to
+1
--kevan
On Mar 26, 2009, at 6:20 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
All,
I've prepared a second release candidate (RC2) of Geronimo Server
2.1.4 for your review and vote.
The only differences from rc1 are:
- addition of a missing license header in plugins/console/console-
On Mar 27, 2009, at 12:27 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Jeremy provided a patch in GERONIMO-4410 which upgraded the -
Apache Geronimo JSR-317 JPA 2.0 EARLY ACCESS Spec API
to the Proposed Final Draft that was released yesterday.
The updated artifacts use version=1.0-EA2-SNAPSHOT and have been
Joe,
Everything looks good, with one exception -- plugins/console/console-
filter/src/main/resources/XSRF.js is missing a license header. Once
that is fixed, I'll be +1.
I built from source, reviewed source, started servers, and looked at
generated artifacts.
--kevan
On Mar 25, 2009, at
Student applications are starting today. We should get projects listed
on http://wiki.apache.org/general/SummerOfCode2009
Student applications are starting today. So, if you're able to mentor
a project, please got your project description posted.
--kevan
FYI. Let's finalize some ideas and get them recorded on the Project
Ideas page..
--kevan
On Mar 19, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
Dear PMC,
It's now official, Google has announced that The Apache Software
Foundation was selected as one of the participating organization in
the
All,
the ASF is enrolling as a mentoring organization for the Google Summer
of Code. Is there interest in the Geronimo community for mentoring a
student(s), this year? This would be a good place to discuss potential
project ideas.
See http://wiki.apache.org/general/SummerOfCode2009 for
On Mar 17, 2009, at 8:58 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Folks,
Any interest in support for RFC 124, A Component Model for OSGi?
http://www.osgi.org/download/osgi-4.2-early-draft.pdf
This is in addition to typical J2EE artifacts that we already support.
Yes. You'll find discussion about this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-4558.
--
Resolution: Fixed
tranql db2-xa 1.3 driver has been released
Update to latest TranQL DB2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12680225#action_12680225
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-4558:
Right. branches/2.1 is currently using
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12680268#action_12680268
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-4558:
David,
I'm sure that Matt would
On Mar 6, 2009, at 8:52 AM, Juergen Weber wrote:
I as user see Geronimo not as GBeans nor as OSGI server, I see it as
JEE
server.
So my requirements are to have a server
- that runs standard JEE applications
- without changes necessary
- on an Apache licensed server
Therefore the change
On Mar 6, 2009, at 12:06 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
I would like to welcome Ivan aboard, as he recently accepted the
Geronimo PMC invitation to become a committer. His account was just
created this morning (xuhaihong), so you should start seeing some
commits from him soon.
Congrats Ivan!
We've spoken about this, in the past. I'm certainly in favor of
exploring this...
On Mar 4, 2009, at 7:56 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Geronimo has been around for a while and despite the many good
features gbeans and the geronimo kernel are not catching on big
time. I think we want to
On Mar 4, 2009, at 11:50 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Mar 4, 2009, at 8:39 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Forrest, Thanks for finding this problem and raising the issue.
IMO this is a critical issue that breaks backward compatibility.
I had validated that our 2.1.2 samples installed and worked in
Add a [RESULT] to the subject -- makes it simpler to find vote
results...
--kevan
On Mar 3, 2009, at 9:14 AM, Lin Sun wrote:
The vote passes with 7 +1 votes (all from PMC members) and no others.
I'll push the binaries and site out today.
Thanks!
Lin
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Lin
+1
Source and binaries look good. Builds fine.
--kevan
On Feb 25, 2009, at 3:47 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
Hi,
This is a vote for the geronimo txmanager version 2.1.2 release.
The following changes are included for the txmanager 2.1.2 release:
GERONIMO-4393 - Duplicate Xid with multiple JVMs on
1101 - 1200 of 3005 matches
Mail list logo
