No. Those come by way of maven transitive dependencies.
I was able to build cxf from scratch now (on command line).
Cheers
Prasad
On 12/5/06, Apparao Kalimireddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having same problem outside the netbeans. To me it looks like there
there is some problem with CXF
+1.
Oh yeah, I agree. Let's give it a shot with all the best that we have.
Cheers
Prasad
On 12/5/06, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt, JEE5 is critical to the widespread adoption of Geronimo. We
can and should accomplish these milestones.
Best wishes,
Paul
On 12/4/06, Matt
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/testsuite/20061205/ejbcontainer-testsuite/test-ejbcontainer/surefire-report.html
Cheers
Prasad
On 12/5/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is as far down to the bottom as I could get of this NoClassDefFoundError
surefire-report-plugin
Check out all the reports we have generated at
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Maven+Generated+Documentation
Go to Project Reports link at the bottom of the left hand menu.
Cheers
Prasad
On 12/5/06, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/5/06
is:
http://rifers.org/paste/show/2612
The same error occurs everywhere there is a corba call in the server side.
Cheers
Prasad
On 12/5/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/testsuite/20061205/ejbcontainer-testsuite/test-ejbcontainer/surefire-report.html
If I'm getting the picture right, AH is just our solution to
building/testing G in an automated environment. Others are free to
continue to build G the same way they had always been building before.
Cheers
Prasad
On 12/4/06, John Sisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jason,
I had a quick look
Something in that artifact id doesn't seem right. There is a missing piece here
org.apache.geronimo.missing_piece.javamail:geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_provider:jar:1.0-SNAPSHOT
Can you please post the entire error message ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 12/1/06, Apparao Kalimireddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
-javamail_1.3.1_provider-1.0-20061031.223401-5.jar
Cheers
Prasad
On 12/4/06, Apparao Kalimireddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is the entire message:
[INFO]
[INFO]Building Geronimo :: Mail
[INFO] task-segment: [install]
[INFO
?
Cheers
Prasad
On 12/1/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The recommended and documented way to change the assembly is using
assemblyId, as in:
mvn -DassemblyId=tomcat
NOT -DdefaultAssemblyId as listed below. Also, while assemblyArchive
exists it is not recommended to use.
--jason
Thanx. I now have the ejbcontainer-testsuite included in the tests.
What's your take on the 5 errors and 2 failures ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 12/4/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 30, 2006, at 9:06 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Hi David,
This is a continuation of the discussion we
-http
cxf-tools
cxf-tools-common
I believe you will be missing quite a few of these.
Cheers
Prasad
On 12/4/06, Apparao Kalimireddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got latest code from trunk and tried to compile and getting compilation
errors in CXF module.
I had to install following dependencies
On 12/4/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 4, 2006, at 8:25 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Thinking more about this, why do we even have the defaultAssemblyId
param there ? Why not have set the default-value on the assemblyId
parameter to be jetty ?
Because, if you configure
Jason,
What say ye ?
Cheers
Prasad
-- Forwarded message --
From: Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Oct 24, 2006 8:35 AM
Subject: Re: selenium plugin?
To: Maven Users List users@maven.apache.org
Can you move this plugin in MOJO project?
Emmanuel
Prasad Kashyap a écrit
Seems more like netbeans settings to me.
Cheers
Prasad
On 12/4/06, Apparao Kalimireddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree, there must be something wrong in my settings. I got the code from
trunk and using maven to compile (from netbeans). Could it be maven
settings?? thanks for all your help
Thanx David for taking care of those.
The DummyTest.java didn't go into trunk. Can you please do the needful ?
Thanx
Prasad
On 12/4/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Made a couple extra fixes too and published new snapshots of the itests.
-David
On Dec 4, 2006, at 10:18 AM, David
to a NoClassDefFoundError yet the stacktrace
is not all that informative.
All the errors are coming from the CMRMapping tests.
One tiny fix someplace in each will fix them all.
Here are the logs
http://rifers.org/paste/show/2594
Cheers
Prasad
On 12/4/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanx David
-core-2.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar which is deployed
prior to running the tests.
Yet, we get this NoClassDefFoundError !
Cheers
Prasad
On 12/4/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
The .setup() and .teardown() still continue to show up withour their
testnames prepended. We'll have
is InstallerMojoSupport.java under geronimo-maven-plugins.
It's usage is as follows -
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/maven-plugins/geronimo-maven-plugin/usage/server.html
Cheers
Prasad
On 12/1/06, Krishnakumar B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi Prasad,
Thanks.
Another query. How to get
build. Simple things like server start time,
console start time etc may be useful. What say you ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 12/1/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would benice to automate the testing of the console functionality
to make sure we haven't broken anything and that we have broken
I don't see it. Where else is this configured ?
Cheers
prasad
On 12/1/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is this configured here an in the projects top-level pom?
I don't get it... why would we use more than one version?
What is the point of this property here, and why would
Removed
Thanx
prasad
On 12/1/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Bliss:~/ws/geronimo/server jason$ grep openejbVersion pom.xml
testsuite/ejbcontainer-testsuite/pom.xml
pom.xml:openejbVersion2.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT/openejbVersion
pom.xml:version
Hi Krishna,
I have seen this happen when I had a very old version of Firefox on my
machine. I upgraded to version 1.5.0.8 and now it works.
Cheers,
Prasad
On 11/30/06, Krishnakumar B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I tried running the testsuite following the instructions from cWiki.
The tests
with the
browser.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/30/06, Krishnakumar B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to understand how the test framework works and what kind
of integration test scenarios can be covered using the test suite. I
have some doubts that may sound stupid and they are listed below.
* Can
or provide your insight
into the items on the list below.
* security
* deployment
* clustering
* console
* plugin mechanism
* almost all specs in JEE 5
Cheers
Prasad
-
http://rifers.org/paste/show/2527
Please apply the patches in the above JIRAs.
You will notice that the names will show up in the logs as just
.setUp. This needs to be fixed too.
Thanx,
Prasad
test apps that you have to demonstrate common
problems should end up in the testsupport tree. That would be a place
to put it if can be used and reused by many suites. If not, the
deployment-suite is another place to put it too.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/29/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
+1
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/27/06, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/27/06, anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to change (at least) the target to 1.5 in the trunk.
comments?
+1 on changing the target to 1.5 in trunk. I think the branches
should stay at 1.4
to contact me if you need help in setting
up your testsuite.
Thanx in advance
Prasad
On 11/27/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 21, 2006, at 3:04 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
2) The tests fail with the following exception -
http://rifers.org/paste/show/2456
This looks like a problem with surefire. These test classes run fine
in the released version of surefire
How can I get the version of a dependency from dependencyManagement
section for variable substitution in the pom, to filter the resources
and other places ?
Thanx
Prasad
On 11/22/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are you not using the dependencyManagement features of mvn to
manage
I am not using it either for dependency versioning or plugin versioning.
It is being used in 2 places in the modules config param of a g-m-p
execution in this pom and in a plan in the resources dir.
Thanx
Prasad
On 11/22/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What other places in the pom
Verified and found that you actually were telling the truth. :-)
Changed reverted. Happy ?
Thanx Jason
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/22/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I said before, the g-m-p will pick up versions from
dependencyManagement, and Geronimo should use the latest version
David,
Can you please apply this patch as well.
* It reorders the execution of itests and modules.
* it configures the whole jar plugin to skip adding maven artifacts.
Thanx
prasad
On 11/20/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-305 is ready
Yes and no.
This is the integration-test framework for ALL of Geronimo.
The itests from OpenEJB will also be executed under this now. There
will soon be a ejbcontainer-testsuite.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/20/06, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/20/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL
Nevermind. That has since been changed. It now takes in a
-DinstallDirectory parameter.
I think I removed the example comment too. If not, I'll remove it now.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/21/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 21, 2006, at 1:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Ah.. I see what you mean. Any of the plugin's param can be passed
thro' the -D option, right ! Thanks for reminding me. Good catch.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/21/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the default... as in if you did not list installDirectory
at all, -DinstallDirectory
Removed ${installDirectory}. Now sleep peacefully :-)
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/21/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nevermind. That has since been changed. It now takes in a
-DinstallDirectory parameter.
I think I removed the example comment too. If not, I'll remove it now.
Cheers
I guess this is a relic that we have preserved from our maven 1 days.
We just need to ensure we don't have any hiccups during server runtime
too after we have removed this.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/20/06, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In several of the poms that invoke jspc-maven-plugin I
of Yahoo emoticons !
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/21/06, Marnie McCormack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I work on the Apache Incubator project Qpid. We are currently mid transition
to maven for build/release.
We've encountered a few issues along the way (snapshots, directory
structures etc). I wondered
Issue #2 is now fixed. All the tests in console-testsuites and
deployment-testsuites now run and pass successfully. They continue to
use TestNG. So these testsuites will serve as a good example for
others wanting to use TestNG.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/20/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
by: org.tranql.ql.QueryException: Finder does not return the
right abstract schema type.
at
org.tranql.sql.EJBQLToPhysicalQuery.buildFinder(EJBQLToPhysicalQuery.java:137)
... 87 more
Thanx
Prasad
On 11/16/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 14, 2006, at 8:47 AM
Let's move to building the trunk's soure and target with 1.5 quickly
please. The testsuite is broken because the 'mvn' execution needs a
1.5 but the server it starts within it needs a 1.4 jdk.
The workaround is to first start the server using 1.4 and then run
testsuite using 1.5.
Cheers
Prasad
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2579?page=comments#action_12451175
]
Prasad Kashyap commented on GERONIMO-2579:
--
Thanx. With those imports I was able to get the test classes compiled and tests
run. But now I am back
it tries to run on jdk 1.5. So it fails.
Running the server separately with JAVA_HOME pointing to jdk1.4 works
fine. So that is a workaround.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/19/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I agree we should move to 1.5 for the entire tree... I don't
get what you think
Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: buildsystem
Affects Versions: 2.0
Reporter: Prasad Kashyap
Assigned To: Jason Dillon
Fix For: 2.0
Attachments: testng-jdk15.patch
The testng testcases broke soon after we moved to building G
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2579?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2579:
-
Attachment: testng-jdk15.patch
TestNG testcases in testsuite now broken due to 1.5 build
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2579?page=comments#action_12451110
]
Prasad Kashyap commented on GERONIMO-2579:
--
Sorry. Please disregard the above error msgs. Here are the actual errors msgs
as seen on the 2.0-SNAPSHOT
Thanks Ken.
Thanks and Congrats Matt for agreeing to shoulder this huge responsibility.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/16/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to offer some important news:
We have just had a changing of the guard for Geronimo.
[ANNOUNCE and THANK YOU]
Ken Coar has
it may be time to make a branch to allow the JavaEE 5 work to
continue while we finish up 1.2... I recommend we:
* svn cp trunk branches/1.2
* update trunk to 2.0-SNAPSHOT
* setup svk to facilitate merges from branches/1.2 to trunk
--jason
Cheers
Prasad
Wow ! Seeing dates and milestones has me really motivated.
I'm ready !!!
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/15/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been noodling over our Java EE 5.0 release of Geronimo and had
some ideas I wanted to share.
Given that the J2EE space is highly competitive I would
I saw this when building openejb, I think. I deleted openejb from my
local repo and rebuilt. Error gone.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/14/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone else hitting the following?
[INFO
Thanks for these comments, David.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-302#action_12448245
I'll create an ejbcontainer-testsuite now.
Thanx
Prasad
On 11/4/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
Can you please review and apply the patch here -
https://issues.apache.org
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/8/06, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 8, 2006, at 11:01 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
4) Change trunk to 2.0-SNAPSHOT and turn it into M1 as it stands.
No TCK required...incremental move towards Java EE 5.0 (due to
JPA), greater relevance to our users, and its a win
Good catch. OK. Will rename.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/7/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If getGoalName() is going to return a class name, then I suggest that
getGoalName() be removed or renamed... as these are no longer what I
would expect a call to getGoalName() to return.
--jason
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2513?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap resolved GERONIMO-2513.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Revision 471806
Can't deploy just a plan with geronimo-maven-plugin
David,
Can you please review and apply the patch here -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-302
Thanx
Prasad
On 11/3/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 2, 2006, at 6:30 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
OK. Sounds good. o.a.openejb it would be.
The reasons I want
+1
Used it to get openejb2 and specs code. I will miss that quick command now.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/3/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 2, 2006, at 2:21 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
I agree that bootstrap has served its purpose and can be eliminated.
Thanks for the work you did
components.xml with a new lifecycle for site
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/components.xml
When I used to run the 'mvn -e -X site' command on the test-deployment
pom (packaging integration-test), it used to fail with the following
exception
[DEBUG] Error looking up lifecycle mapping
phase.
This will help us achieve our goals. This will also help us move
smoothly to the maven-it-plugin once it comes out of the sandbox.
If I'm missing something else here, please enlighten me.
Cheers
Prasad
Nevermind :-)
See
http://www.nabble.com/Removing-the-custom-packaging-%22integration-test%22-tf2564140.html
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/2/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
components.xml with a new lifecycle for site
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/components.xml
When I used to run
it and still
generate the surefire-reports.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/2/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 2, 2006, at 1:37 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I am going to remove the integration-test packaging that we
introduced for the testsuite framework. By having that custom
packaging, we
framework integrated
with the G build.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/1/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 31, 2006, at 10:07 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
On 10/30/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 30, 2006, at 7:51 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Thanx. Please see comments
Jason,
I still don't have svn karma. Can you please commit this for us ?
Thanx
Prasad
-- Forwarded message --
From: Prasad Kashyap (JIRA) dev@geronimo.apache.org
Date: Oct 23, 2006 4:01 PM
Subject: [jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2513) Can't deploy just a plan with
geronimo-maven
Thank you for that clarification, Jason. I misread that to mean change
the packaging definition. Now I see what you meant.
Thanx again
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/2/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did not say don't change the packaging, but do not remove the
components for the packaging
On 10/30/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 30, 2006, at 7:51 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Thanx. Please see comments inline -
Couple thoughts on the poms:
- the parent would lineage would be org.apache.openejb:itests -
org.apache.openejb:openejb
- the groupId would
Thanx. Please see comments inline -
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/27/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I took look through where you're going and here's a slightly
altered proposal.
We group the tests with the beans as such:
openejb-footests/src/main/# this is where the beans
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/ejb-modules.zip
You may remove the parent from the top level pom and adjust the
groupId appropriately to build this.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/25/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great, I'll be looking forward to it.
-David
On Oct 23, 2006, at 9:36 PM
Committer since Oct 9.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/27/06, Christopher M. Cardona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was invited to become a committer last week and I accepted it.
Thanks,
chris
Jeff Genender wrote:
I figured this will get some people's attention.
If you have recently become a committer
I haven't changed the test code at all. It is essentially the same as
it is in the openejb-itests module. Neverthless, here it is.
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/test-ejbcontainer.zip
I have simply moved it under
geronimo/testsuite/ejbcontainer-testsuite/test-ejbcontainer and have
ensured
Please try now. Sorry 'bout that.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/27/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 27, 2006, at 10:20 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I haven't changed the test code at all. It is essentially the same as
it is in the openejb-itests module. Neverthless, here it is.
http
, then let's say it upfront.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/20/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(he's right...)
Jeff Genender wrote:
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Thanks...I now officially dub thee Jeff Magnusson Jr. :)
I don't mean to be a stickler...but when I used that term (JEE5) on the
spec
Joe,
I still think the specs from javax are being picked up as a transitive
dependency. Our specs should be from o.a.g.specs groupId. Did you try
the exclusion mechanism at all ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/20/06, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
The applications
.*
Apart from this decision, other things that need to resolved before we
put this code in are
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-288
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@geronimo.apache.org/msg34995.html
Cheers
Prasad
Thanx David. I shall try to put it in a sandbox if I can, or else send
you a a patch.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/23/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 23, 2006, at 2:34 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I have migrated the openejb-itests module to m2 with the intention of
using it for G's
Thanx Jacek. I might take you up on that offer :-)
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/23/06, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/23/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have migrated the openejb-itests module to m2 with the intention of
using it for G's testsuite. The junit test code
use dependency exclusion to prevent picking spec
jars you don't need.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/20/06, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On my local image I added a new repo to the root pom.xml so that I could
pick up the Glassfish JSTL jar. What I discovered is that this resulted
in java.net
Here's another option. Depending on how much the spec has changed
between 1.1 and 1.2, we could fork jakarta and provide our own
implementation. Just a thought.
Then again, what are the pros and cons of picking up Glassfish ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/19/06, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
the plan and the log for your scrutiny.
Thanx
Prasad
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!--
Copyright 2004 The Apache Software Foundation
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the License);
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy
Congratulations Chris !
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/18/06, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congrats Chris!!
Paul
On 10/18/06, Gianny Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The Geronimo PMC is pleased to announce that Christopher M. Cardona
has recently accepted our invitation to become
Hey Vamsi,
Congrats !
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/18/06, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congrats Vamsi!
Paul
On 10/18/06, Alan Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Geronimo PMC is pleased to announce that Vamsavardhana Reddy has
recently accepted our invitation to become an Apache
Just FYI -
This issue has now been resolved. I did a build with a fully clean
repo and source again. That fixed it. The NPE bug around like 693 of
the current TranqlCmpSchemaBuilder.java still exists. Where do I
open the JIRA and submit the patch ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/12/06, Prasad Kashyap
the previously
mentioned error with the plan (wrong ns and xsd).
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/12/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 12, 2006, at 1:27 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
My efforts in deploying the openejb-itests.jar with the attached plan
is failing b'coz of some errors in the plan
, clustering etc.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/11/06, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/11/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
Thanks for that write-up on the openejb itests. It helped me
understand the structure better.
All the client code (in src/itests) have a dependency
comments and/or concerns.
I still have to fix a few plans to work with our version 1.2.
Thanx
Prasad
On 10/6/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't know if I have the best answers, but I'll i'll try my best...
On Oct 5, 2006, at 8:21 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Can someone please shed some
where it it
is being called from.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/6/06, anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The *-builder modules are copying schemaorg_apache_xmlbeans classes to
target/clover/classes. I was trying to import *-builder in eclipse. Eclipse
is not handing these classes properly and I am
Here is an excerpt from the log file of a maven build. Hope this helps.
The dir-list.txt gives the contents of the itests/target dir after the
ejb archives are created but before the geronimo binary is unpacked.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/5/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking
archives. The
rest are either included in that big openejb-itests archive or simply
needed to support the junit tests in src/itests. Now why is it
structured this way ? Why weren't they moved to the src/itests dir
where they are needed ?
Thanx in advance
Cheers
Prasad
Whoooh Jason
Congrats !
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/2/06, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations Jason!
Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
The Geronimo PMC is pleased to welcome Jason Dillon as the newest
member of the Geronimo PMC. We're very happy to have Jason joining us
to help
Congrats Hiram !
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/2/06, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations Hiram!
Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
The Geronimo PMC is pleased to welcome Hiram Chirino as the newest
member of the Geronimo PMC. We're very happy to have Hiram joining us
to help with the oversight
some real tests now. I'll start working on one so that it
could serve as an example for others to write their own.
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/28/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 27, 2006, at 8:40 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Build flow (for a given *-testsuite), probably ends up something like
/${pom.version}/car
condition=SystemUtils.IS_JAVA_1_5 and SystemUtils.JAVA_VENDOR == 'sun'/
But definitely a good idea with benefits.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/2/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all... I was chatting with David Jencks in IRC today about GShell
and when server/trunk might
A good compromise. Also, good for a start. Let's do this.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/2/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about we split them into j2ee 1.4, j2ee 1.5 and independent
modules for the non j2ee specs? This will prevent the flux from the
1.5 development from causing lots
separate poms.
Does anybody have any prefs about where this gets setup under
testsupport ? Should this replace the existing ejb packagings under
testsupport or should it be another testsupport packaging ?
Comments, thoughts, suggestions will be truly appreciated.
Cheers
Prasad
Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: buildsystem
Affects Versions: 1.2
Reporter: Prasad Kashyap
Assigned To: Jason Dillon
Fix For: 1.2
Creating a new packaging for the geronimo-packaging-plugin.
The new package name will be called integration
I had to use the following line in configs/client pom.xml to get it to build
For the openejb-core dependency -
version2.2-incubating-SNAPSHOT/version
Do I have something screwed up ?
Cheers
Prasad.
On 9/28/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can publish the G bits once I get
In fact, I had to use that version to all configs that depended on openejb-*.
version2.2-incubating-SNAPSHOT/version
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/28/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had to use the following line in configs/client pom.xml to get it to build
For the openejb-core dependency
and
stop-server be also executed ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/28/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 27, 2006, at 8:40 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Custom packaging or lifecycle phase bindings
-
The geronimo-maven-plugin (g-m-p
] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1,800.63
sec FAILURE!
[INFO] Running org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.deployment.Ear14Test
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/28/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like its going to timeout hitting the war pages...
--jason
On Sep 28
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: deployment
Affects Versions: 1.1.x, 1.2
Reporter: Prasad Kashyap
Assigned To: Aaron Mulder
Fix For: 1.2
After an undeploy, it's entry is left behind in the config.xml with a
load=false
, we have to write a goal that will handle the TestNG
test exceptions for other reporters too.
I'd appreciate your comments.
Cheers
Prasad
1001 - 1100 of 1643 matches
Mail list logo
