Installed eclipse 3.2, installed JST (J2EE Standard Tools and its
dependencies), pointed it to an existing geronimo installation and
created a J2EE project. I haven't had the time to read eclipse
tutorials on using the JST, so didn't build anything.
Have you thought about using a tool like
Thanks for your feedback, agree on all points.On Jul 18, 2006, at 10:00 AM, John Sisson wrote:Installed eclipse 3.2, installed JST (J2EE Standard Tools and its dependencies), pointed it to an existing geronimo installation and created a J2EE project. I haven't had the time to read eclipse
Folks, its been almost a week and I still have 0 binding votes. Please vote.On Jul 11, 2006, at 4:33 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:On Jul 11, 2006, at 4:09 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:FYI the current vote is on.. (breaking the all time software record on the number of release candidate drivers in one
+1
Sachin Patel wrote:
Folks, its been almost a week and I still have 0 binding votes. Please
vote.
On Jul 11, 2006, at 4:33 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jul 11, 2006, at 4:09 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:
FYI the current vote is on.. (breaking the all time software record
on the number of
My non-binding +1--jasonOn Jul 15, 2006, at 8:09 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:Folks, its been almost a week and I still have 0 binding votes. Please vote.On Jul 11, 2006, at 4:33 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:On Jul 11, 2006, at 4:09 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:FYI the current vote is on.. (breaking the all time
Downloaded and installed.
+1
Sachin Patel wrote:
Folks, its been almost a week and I still have 0 binding votes. Please
vote.
On Jul 11, 2006, at 4:33 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jul 11, 2006, at 4:09 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:
FYI the current vote is on.. (breaking the all time software
-
From: Sachin Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sachin Patel
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 4:10 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Vote] Geronimo Eclipse Plugin v1.1.0
FYI the current vote is on.. (breaking the all time software record on the
number of release candidate drivers
As I mentioned earlier the test environment mode is not feature complete and it only works in the one scenario I mentioned.On Jul 10, 2006, at 11:28 PM, Lin Sun wrote:I started to have problems in deploying my second application which I had itrunning with v1.0's plugin. It is a simple
On Jul 10, 2006, at 11:29 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:Sachin,At a minimum, you need to add:OpenEJB, MX4J, and XStream to the root LICENSE fileWhich root license file I you referring to? Do I just append each license to this?MX4J, and XMLBeans to the root NOTICE fileAgain which root?Did you investigate
As far as Hessian, I found the following note and appears the source files are incorrect...http://www.caucho.com/support/hessian-interest/0606/0002.htmlSo does this mean that I should add a copy of the Apache 1.1 license?On Jul 10, 2006, at 11:29 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:Sachin,At a minimum, you
On Jul 11, 2006, at 8:41 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:On Jul 10, 2006, at 11:29 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:Sachin,At a minimum, you need to add:OpenEJB, MX4J, and XStream to the root LICENSE fileWhich root license file I you referring to? Do I just append each license to this?By root, I meant the notice and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ok ignore rc6On Jul 11, 2006, at 9:59 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:On Jul 11, 2006, at 8:41 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:On Jul 10, 2006, at 11:29 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:Sachin,At a minimum, you need to add:OpenEJB, MX4J, and XStream to the root LICENSE fileWhich root license file I you
: dev@geronimo.apache.orgSubject: Re: [Vote] Geronimo Eclipse Plugin v1.1.0 As I mentioned earlier the test environment mode is not feature complete and it only works in the one scenario I mentioned. On Jul 10, 2006, at 11:28 PM, Lin Sun wrote:I started to have problems in deploying my second
@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Vote] Geronimo
Eclipse Plugin v1.1.0
Ok one last time hopefully...
http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-plugin-1.1-deployable-RC7.zip
On Jul 11, 2006, at 10:03 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ok ignore rc6
On Jul 11, 2006, at 4:09 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:FYI the current vote is on.. (breaking the all time software record on the number of release candidate drivers in one day)http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-plugin-1.1-deployable-RC10.zipSachin, All the license/notices
On 7/10/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No critical reason, just a time frame on when I'll upload the driver to the
distribution size if no -1's have been casted.
That's interesting...would that mean that if Geronimo 1.2 is about to
release only 72 hours matters or 3+ votes?
The
On Jul 10, 2006, at 5:16 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:On 7/10/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No critical reason, just a time frame on when I'll upload the driver to thedistribution size if no -1's have been casted. That's interesting...would that mean that if Geronimo 1.2 is about
On Jul 10, 2006, at 9:07 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:On Jul 10, 2006, at 5:16 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:On 7/10/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No critical reason, just a time frame on when I'll upload the driver to thedistribution size if no -1's have been casted. That's interesting...would
Ok thanks for the correction. So what classifies a veto?On Jul 10, 2006, at 9:54 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:On Jul 10, 2006, at 9:07 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:On Jul 10, 2006, at 5:16 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:On 7/10/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No critical reason, just a time frame on
On Jul 10, 2006, at 10:03 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:Ok thanks for the correction. So what classifies a veto?IIUC, only code (i.e. a commit) can be vetoed. If any license/legal-type issues are uncovered in the release, then that's probably a stop-release problem (effectively a veto). I think our goal
Sachin,
I'm afraid I don't see either a NOTICE or LICENSE files in the plugin
zip file, itself, nor any of the embedded jar files. They all must
contain both LICENSE and NOTICE files. Afraid this is a hard
requirement. And you'll need to create new binaries... See http://
Ok thanks, but a license is not needed for the update site zip as this is handled by the update manager. As far as the deployable plugin the licenses only need to be packaged within the features and not each individual plugin.On Jul 10, 2006, at 8:21 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:Sachin,I'm afraid I
Forget what I said... I'll add them.On Jul 10, 2006, at 9:41 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:Ok thanks, but a license is not needed for the update site zip as this is handled by the update manager. As far as the deployable plugin the licenses only need to be packaged within the features and not each
Fixed. Re-vote.http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-plugin-1.1-deployable-RC5.ziphttp://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-plugin-1.1-updatesite-RC5.zip (still uploading available shortly)On Jul 10, 2006, at 8:21 PM, Kevan Miller
I started to have problems in deploying my second application which I had it
running with v1.0's plugin. It is a simple ClassViewer application that
has a jsp and a servlet. The jsp calls the servlet when user clicks on the
submit button to get the class description.
Upon deployment of the
Sachin,At a minimum, you need to add:OpenEJB, MX4J, and XStream to the root LICENSE fileMX4J, and XMLBeans to the root NOTICE fileDid you investigate Hessian licensing? I didn't find any licensing info (at first). So, took a look at the source. The first source file I looked at contained the
On 7/9/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following distributions of the Geronimo Eclipse plugin are ready
to be voted on for final release. Since binding votes are needed,
each PMC member if possible, please cast your vote within 72 hours.
Why has the 72-hour vote period been set?
On Jul 9, 2006, at 6:12 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:On 7/9/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The following distributions of the Geronimo Eclipse plugin are readyto be voted on for final release. Since binding votes are needed,each PMC member if possible, please cast your vote within 72
28 matches
Mail list logo
