[VOTE] JMS 2 API alpha-2

2015-02-12 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hello guys, As stated in the other thread here the vote for the geronimo-jms_2.0_spec module with the fixes from Martyn included. Here is the staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1013/ My key can be found as last time at

Active source location

2015-02-12 Thread Jay McHugh
Hey all, I'm trying to figure out whether the best place to find the source code is github or subversion. Or, should the actually be in sync? Thanks, Jay

[RESULT][VOTE] a few more geronimo-spec alpha-1 artifacts

2015-02-12 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
PS: just changing the topic for automated tools Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-02-12 21:39 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: Ok so here the counts: +1: 3 bindings, 1 non-binding

Re: [VOTE] a few more geronimo-spec alpha-1 artifacts

2015-02-12 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 (binding). Go on. It's just an -alpha release. We had that glitch already in the previous version. Just make sure it properly gets committed in time. If you don't have sufficient privileges to commit it yourself then just ping on the list for a review and apply. LieGrue, strub On

Re: [VOTE] a few more geronimo-spec alpha-1 artifacts

2015-02-12 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Ok so here the counts: +1: 3 bindings, 1 non-binding 0: no -1: 2 non-bindings Considering -1 were for an alpha we'll rerelease super fast this vote passes and I'll assume to rerun one for jms 2 api ASAP. Thanks you all guys to have reviewed it! Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau

Re: geronimo-specs review request.

2015-02-12 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
was in my todo list for alpha-1 but forgot so since I assume this error I'll take it for the alpha-2 I'll run this week end. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-02-12 13:53 GMT+01:00 Martyn Taylor

geronimo-specs review request.

2015-02-12 Thread Martyn Taylor
Hi all, Does anyone have time to review the following PR: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/3 Thanks in advance Martyn

Re: [VOTE] a few more geronimo-spec alpha-1 artifacts

2015-02-12 Thread Martyn Taylor
On 12/02/15 09:43, Mark Struberg wrote: +1 (binding). Go on. It's just an -alpha release. We had that glitch already in the previous version. Fair enough. I have managed a successful ActiveMQ6 build against the alpha-1, so the issues (for us at least) are non blocking. I'm happy to proceed