Re: Some thoughts about enabling for OSGi

starting point for the discussions. Rick -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

Re: Some thoughts about enabling for OSGi

/apache/felix/karaf/gshell/itests/FeaturesTest.java There's also room for improvements here, but that's a good start. On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 20:37, Donald Woodsdwo...@apache.org wrote: Guillaume Nodet wrote: On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 17:43, Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com mailto:rick...@gmail.com

Fwd: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

: * Alasdair Nottingham (IBM) * Andrew Osborne (IBM) * Dan Kulp (Progress, ASF member) * David Bosschaert (Progress, ASF committer) * David Jencks (IBM, ASF member) * Eoghan Glynn (Progress, ASF committer) * Graham Charters (IBM) * Guillaume Nodet (Progress, ASF member) * Hiram

[DISCUSS] Release Geronimo components 2.2 (tx manager / connector)

status for this component is. I've seen djencks made some changes in the branch that are not available in trunk, but trunk also has some changes. Please advise what would be the best way to proceed here. -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geronimo components 2.2 (tx manager / connector)

I'd like this commit [1] to be releases somehow. I'll backport it to the 2.1 branch asap. [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=615758 On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 18:00, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: On Sep 3, 2009, at 1:20 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: A long time ago

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geronimo components 2.2 (tx manager / connector)

or [1] won't work. In the interests of my learning how to set this stuff up I just committed a bundleization of 2.1. Can you please check it? In particular, should the import of javax.resource in txmanager be optional? thanks david jencks On Sep 3, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote

Re: xbean pom parent genesis?

-- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geronimo components 2.2 (tx manager / connector)

:48 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I've slightly enhanced what you did. Mostly, I've added the following lines:     Import-Package!org.apache.geronimo.connector*,*/Import-Package     _versionpolicy[$(version;==;$(@)),$(version;+;$(@)))/_versionpolicy

[VOTE] Release Blueprint 1.0.0

, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Blueprint 1.0.0

this, before voting... If there's a desire to move this code to the new incubator project, I'm not sure why we'd be releasing out of Geronimo, now... Also, if we do decide to release, I wouldn't think that we'd want the code to be in sandbox. --kevan -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Blueprint 1.0.0

.  The files contain the OSGi copyright, but the NOTICES file only states that his contains software developed at the Apache Software Foundation.  There's no OSGi attribution. Rick -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Blueprint 1.0.0

/repositories/geronimo-staging-050/ Please review and vote:  [  ] +1 Release  [  ] -1 Do not release The vote will remain open for 72 hours. -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

[VOTE] Release Blueprint 1.0.0 (2nd try)

, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Blueprint 1.0.0

think that we'd want the code to be in sandbox. I'll move it into https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/ as suggested by David. --kevan -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Blueprint 1.0.0 (2nd try)

/ Please review and vote:  [  ] +1 Release  [  ] -1 Do not release The vote will remain open for 72 hours. -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet

[VOTE] Release Blueprint 1.0.0 (3thd try)

://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/blueprint/tags/blueprint-1.0.0/ Please review and vote: [ ] +1 Release [ ] -1 Do not release The vote will remain open for 72 hours. -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open

Re: [VOTE] Release Blueprint 1.0.0 (3thd try)

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 17:54, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 10, 2009, at 4:29 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I've uploaded a new 1.0.0 release of the blueprint project. I think I've addressed all the issues raised in the discussion thread. The staging repository

Re: [VOTE] Release Blueprint 1.0.0 (3thd try)

Just committed some changes. Please review and I'll upload a new release asap. On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 21:05, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 10, 2009, at 12:44 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 17:54, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 10

Re: [VOTE] Release Blueprint 1.0.0 (3thd try)

, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Just committed some changes. Please review and I'll upload a new release asap. On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 21:05, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 10, 2009, at 12:44 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 17:54, Kevan Miller kevan.mil

Re: [VOTE] Release Blueprint 1.0.0 (3thd try)

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 09:39, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: On Sep 11, 2009, at 12:19 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 23:35, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: I updated the NOTICE file generation to use the recommended remote-resources plugin

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec version 1.0.2

it [ ] 0 dunno [ ] -1 Don't release it Vote open for 72 hours thanks david jencks -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo TxManager component 2.1.3

open for 72 hours thanks david jencks -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

[VOTE] Release Blueprint 1.0.0 (4th try)

://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/blueprint/tags/blueprint-1.0.0/ Please review and vote: [ ] +1 Release [ ] -1 Do not release The vote will remain open for 72 hours. -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open

Re: [VOTE] Release Blueprint 1.0.0 (4th try)

+1 On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 18:38, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote: I've uploaded another 1.0.0 release of the blueprint project. I think I've addressed all the issues raised in the discussion thread. The staging repository is available at:  https://repository.apache.org/content

Re: [VOTE] txmanager 2.1.3 2nd try

managed connection. [ ] +1 release it [ ] 0 dunno [ ] -1 don't release Vote open for 72 hours thanks david jencks -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Blueprint 1.0.0 (4th try)

Added. On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 20:37, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: Guillaume, Your PGP key is missing from the Geronimo KEYS file -- https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS --kevan On Sep 11, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I've uploaded another 1.0.0

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Blueprint 1.0.0 (4th try)

Hi, The vote has passed with the following +1s: Guillaume Nodet, Kevan Miller, Rick McGuire, Donald Woods, Joe Bohn, Jarek Gawor, Alan Cabrera. And no other votes. Thx to everyone ! I will promote the artifacts to the central Maven repository. On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 18:38, Guillaume Nodet

Re: OSGI progress

or felix.  Hopefully this will be no harder than getting it running in embedded felix in maven. thanks david jencks -- Ivan -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

[VOTE] Donate blueprint to Aries podling

the blueprint implementation to Aries [ ] -1 Do not The vote will be opened for 72 hours. -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

Re: [VOTE] Donate blueprint to Aries podling

+1 On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 15:14, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote: The Aries podling has just been accepted (see http://incubator.apache.org/aries/) and would be a much better place for the blueprint implementation that has been developped in Geronimo. This vote is mainly for donating

[DISCUSS] Donate Blueprint implementation to Aries podling

the proposal at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AriesProposal. Aries would be a much more natural home for the blueprint code currently in Geronimo. Thoughts / questions / remarks ? -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open

Re: [DISCUSS] Donate Blueprint implementation to Aries podling

Right, and I'll make sure it's the case. Karaf includes Blueprint and might not want to include everything from Aries. On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:41, Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com wrote: Guillaume Nodet wrote: Some time ago, a few Geronimo committers have started an implementation

Re: [DISCUSS] Donate Blueprint implementation to Aries podling

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 14:58, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 23, 2009, at 11:20 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Some time ago, a few Geronimo committers have started an implementation of the OSGi Blueprint Services spec, which is basically an OSGi standardized version

Re: [DISCUSS] Donate Blueprint implementation to Aries podling

It seems there is a consensus to move Blueprint to Aries as long as it remains independanly consumable, which point I fully agree with. I'll restart the vote. On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 17:20, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote: Some time ago, a few Geronimo committers have started

[CANCEL][VOTE] Donate blueprint to Aries podling

I'm cancelling this vote and will restart another one now. On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 15:14, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote: The Aries podling has just been accepted (see http://incubator.apache.org/aries/) and would be a much better place for the blueprint implementation that has been

[VOTE] Donate blueprint to Aries podling (2nd try)

the blueprint implementation to Aries [ ] -1 Do not The vote will be opened for 72 hours. Here's my +1 -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

Re: [VOTE] Donate blueprint to Aries podling (2nd try)

Closing this vote with 10 +1s and no other votes. I will move the blueprint trunk to aries podling asap. On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 09:39, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote: The Aries podling has just been accepted (see http://incubator.apache.org/aries/) and would be a much better place

Re: BundleClassLoader in osgi-ified prototype.

going to need a class loader like this for doing an RFC 66 implementation, so it's either fix this one to be complete or write another version. Rick -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http

Re: osgi trunk

jpa2 stuff at least until we have the equivalent working under osgi. If you have any concerns about this please speak up! thanks david jencks -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA

Re: NoClassDefError problem with geronimo-transaction bundle.

this is not terribly difficult to do, since I think these are all just interfaces and exception classes. Rick -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

Re: svn commit: r828986 - /geronimo/server/trunk/framework/configs/karaf-framework/pom.xml

${felix.karaf.version}/version         /dependency         dependency             groupIdorg.apache.felix.karaf.shell/groupId -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

Re: Geronimo 3.0 build problem caused by a Karaf change?

/maven2) -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

Re: Mbeans for Blueprint

anythings behind the scenes from Karaf/Springsource that say why they seems not plan to design such mbeans? Any comments is appreciated. Regards -Rex -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http

Re: Mbeans for Blueprint

rick...@gmail.com wrote: Rex Wang wrote: 2009/10/30 Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com mailto:gno...@gmail.com    There are discussions about implementing rfc 139 inside the Aries    podling, so maybe it would make sense to discuss that in this context    too.    From a Karaf pov, I think

Re: Mbeans for Blueprint

behind the scenes from Karaf/Springsource that say why they seems not plan to design such mbeans? Any comments is appreciated. Regards -Rex -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

Re: Blueprint MBean progress

Siqi for his help, and any suggestion is appreciated! -Rex -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

Re: Blueprint MBean progress

for his help, and any suggestion is appreciated! -Rex -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

Re: Adding servicemix improvements to the geronimo spec bundles.

much to be gained from making that big of a change. Rick -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

Re: Adding OSGi support to Geronimo spec jars.

.  This is really is the interpretation used by the Servicemix code, but removes the conflicting usage. Rick -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

Re: svn commit: r915135 - /geronimo/server/trunk/framework/configs/karaf-framework/src/main/filtered-resources/etc/startup.properties

/bundles/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.ant/1.7.0_1/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.ant-1.7.0_1.jar=40  org/apache/geronimo/framework/geronimo-plugin/${pom.version}/geronimo-plugin-${pom.version}.jar=40 -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com

Re: osgi core/compendium from felix or osgi?

we switch?  I have the changes locally  but thought I should ask before applying them. thanks david jencks -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

Re: converting optional imports to dynamic imports

, the mejb part of the management spec would work just fine (without bundle refreshes or restarts). Jarek -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

Re: Are the specs ready to go up for a release vote?

released now. Are the components in any shape that release votes can be started? Here are the components we need to release: - geronimo-connector - geronmo-transaction - geronimo-jaspi This will need to be handled fairly soon too. Rick -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet

Re: Are the specs ready to go up for a release vote?

if the org.apache.geronimo.osgi.registry.api package is really optional ? Will the specs still be usable if this package is not present at all ? On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 20:46, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote: Have the specs jars been tested in both a non osgi environment and an osgi environment ? Also, i'd like to have

Re: Are the specs ready to go up for a release vote?

I'll update the specs wrt imported packages and version policy. Do you have a list of the specs that you intend to release ? On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 21:07, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote: I also think all the osgi imported packages should have a version range up to the next major

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.3.2

to update the build a little more such as using apache 7 parent pom and making the release plugin defaults work. Please vote +1 Promote staging repo as amq 5.3.2 -1 Drop staging repo and tag, try again (please provide specific comments) Many thanks david jencks -- Cheers, Guillaume

Re: error starting the karaf shell when starting the server or deploy script

) at org.apache.felix.framework.StartLevelImpl.run(StartLevelImpl.java:264) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:637) Aside from the error things seem to be mostly working. Joe -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http

Re: OSGi version for Geronimo packages

version of it) but I'm also ok with #2. Jarek -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 3.7 - second attempt

don't care [ ] -1 don't release this (please explain) Rick -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

Re: Runtime entity enhancement for OSGi applications

bundle. Thoughts? Jarek -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

Re: Runtime entity enhancement for OSGi applications

parts of the patch were applied to Felix but I guess I was wrong. Jarek On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote: FWIW, I would think #3 is a good option, but I don't think Felix has anything to support that (but I may be wrong). On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 04:41

Shared bundle repository

benefit for all OSGi-fied projects at Apache and also for the downstream users. Thoughts ? Btw, I'm just starting this thread because I've seen Rick is in the process of releasing some bundles in Geronimo ... -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com

Re: Shared bundle repository

being only partly maintained in an ad-hoc manner. Rather than have this as a sub-project of either SMX or Geronimo, why not create a new Apache project for this? Best, Ade. From: Guillaume Nodet [gno...@gmail.com] Sent: 13 July 2010 11:05 To: dev

Re: Use Truezip in Geronimo deployment

the zip file virtually, even the nested zip file. Project URL : https://truezip.dev.java.net/ Any comment ? thanks. -- Ivan -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo txmanager and connector components 2.2

repo is: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/tags/geronimo-txmanager-parent-2.2 Vote will be open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Rick -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http

Specs jars in OSGi

an answer at. In which case, should we start pushing out from Geronimo non-j2ee specs like javax.scripting and others ... -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

Re: [Discussion] Upgrade org.eclipse.osgi from 3.5.1.v20090827 to 3.6.0

-5699 to track this upgrade problem, if upgrade is OK, i will upload a patch for it. Appreciate your response! -- viola -- Lei Wang (Rex) rwonly AT apache.org -- viola -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com

Re: [Discussion] Upgrade org.eclipse.osgi from 3.5.1.v20090827 to 3.6.0

-boot.jar which already under lib/ folder, no karaf-boot.jar. I also downloaded a apache-karaf-2.1.1.zip, i only found a karaf-jaas-boot.jar, no karaf-boot.jar:(. Where can i find karaf-boot.jar? Thanks in advance! On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote: We have

Re: svn commit: r1055251 - in /geronimo/sandbox/djencks/txmanager: ./ geronimo-transaction/ geronimo-transaction/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/transaction/ geronimo-transaction/src/main/java/org/a

    /build -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

Re: svn commit: r1055251 - in /geronimo/sandbox/djencks/txmanager: ./ geronimo-transaction/ geronimo-transaction/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/transaction/ geronimo-transaction/src/main/java/org/a

tried to introduce those a few years ago). david jencks On Jan 4, 2011, at 4:44 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Why not reusing the Aries one ? On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 01:28,  djen...@apache.org wrote: Author: djencks Date: Wed Jan  5 00:28:20 2011 New Revision: 1055251 URL: http

Re: svn commit: r1055251 - in /geronimo/sandbox/djencks/txmanager: ./ geronimo-transaction/ geronimo-transaction/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/transaction/ geronimo-transaction/src/main/java/org/a

of efforts, since the Servicemix community still work on the specs and that lots of specs we need aren't provided by the geronimo ones, so we can't really migrate anyway. thanks david jencks On Jan 4, 2011, at 5:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 02:00, David Jencks

Re: Geronimo Karaf OpenEJB

.328035.n3.nabble.com/Geronimo-Karaf-OpenEJB-tp3151146p3205873.html Sent from the Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com

Re: [VOTE] Release xbean 3.11.1

-source-release.zip The tag is: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.11.1/  Vote will be open for 72 hours.  [ ] +1  approve  [ ] +0  no opinion  [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why) -- Thanks! Regards, Forrest -- Guillaume Nodet

Re: [VOTE] Release xbean 3.11.1

no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Thanks! Regards, Forrest -- Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ FuseSource, Integration everywhere http://fusesource.com

[VOTE] Release XBean 3.12

not release -- Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ FuseSource, Integration everywhere http://fusesource.com

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 3.12

+1 On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote: I've staged a release of bean at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-088/ Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.12/ , revision 1393394 Release

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release XBean 3.12

Closing this vote with 3 binding +1s. I'll publish the artifacts asap. On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Ivan xhh...@gmail.com wrote: +1, thanks, Guilaume ;-) 2012/10/10 Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net +1 (non binding) Regards JB On 10/03/2012 01:47 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote

Re: [VOTE] (take 2) Release genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13

, strub -- Guillaume Nodet Red Hat, Open Source Integration Email: gno...@redhat.com Web: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

[VOTE] XBean 3.16 release

/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.16/ Please review and vote. -- --- Guillaume Nodet Red Hat, Open Source Integration Email: gno...@redhat.com Web: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.16 release

+1 2013/11/13 Guillaume Nodet gnodet.apa...@gmail.com I'm starting a vote for an xbean 3.16 release. The 3.15 of last week is unusable in OSGi due to some OSGi metadata problems. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-258 Binaries: https://repository.apache.org/content

[RESULT] [VOTE] XBean 3.16 release

Closing this vote with 6 +1s (4 bindings) and no other votes. I'll publish the binaries asap. Thx to everyone for voting. 2013/11/13 Guillaume Nodet gnodet.apa...@gmail.com I'm starting a vote for an xbean 3.16 release. The 3.15 of last week is unusable in OSGi due to some OSGi metadata

[VOTE] Release stax-api-1.2 spec v 1.2

I've uploaded a release at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-014/ to fix the following issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6509 Please review and vote, Cheers, Guillaume

Re: [VOTE] Release stax-api-1.2 spec v 1.2

+1 I think we're still a bit short of binding votes ... 2013/11/27 Guillaume Nodet gnodet.apa...@gmail.com I've uploaded a release at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-014/ to fix the following issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release stax-api-1.2 spec v 1.2

Closing this vote with 6 +1 votes (3 bindings). Thx to the reviewers, I'll promote this release now. Cheers, Guillaume 2013/11/27 Guillaume Nodet gnodet.apa...@gmail.com I've uploaded a release at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-014/ to fix

Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.17

+1 2014-03-31 21:54 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: Hi, I'm starting a vote for an xbean 3.17 release. The main change is the removing of asm3 and 4 shades and the replacement with asm5 one to be able to be compatible with java 8. Binaries:

Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.18

+1 2014-05-20 22:56 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: Hi, I'm starting a vote for xbean 3.18 release. The main changes are: 1) removing asm5 from xbean-reflect 2) more consistent for descriptor in AnnotationFinder (to let guy extending it get more consistent

Re: [VOTE] Release Transaction Manager 3.1.2

I'll close the vote on monday, I was in vacation for the whole week... 2015-04-22 21:51 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de: Do you like to close this VOTE, Guillaume? LieGrue, strub Am 17.04.2015 um 13:24 schrieb Guillaume Nodet gno...@apache.org: I've uploaded a 3.1.2 release

Re: [VOTE] Release Transaction Manager 3.1.2

+1 2015-04-17 13:24 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Nodet gno...@apache.org: I've uploaded a 3.1.2 release of the transaction manager component at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1018 This fixes the following issues: * GERONIMO-6541: NPE during XAResource

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Transaction Manager 3.1.2

Closing this vote with 5 +1s (4 bindings). I'll publish the repository asap. Thx for voting ! Guillaume Nodet 2015-04-17 13:24 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Nodet gno...@apache.org: I've uploaded a 3.1.2 release of the transaction manager component at https://repository.apache.org/content

[VOTE] Release Transaction Manager 3.1.2

in-progress transactions, XidFactoryImpl needs to be smarter with matching * GERONIMO-6373: Expose HOWL flushPartialBuffer config via HOWLLog - useful under low concurrency Please review and vote ! Cheers, Guillaume Nodet

[DISCUSS] Release Transaction manager 3.1.2

I've fixed a small bug in the transaction manager this week, and there are one or two others fixed in the current trunk, so I was wondering about releasing this component. Any objection ? Cheers, Guillaume Nodet

[VOTE] Reease Transaction Manager 3.1.3

Please review and vote ! Cheers, Guillaume Nodet

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean-4.3

+1 2015-05-31 10:54 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de: Hi! Please VOTE for the release of Apache XBean-4.3. Here is the staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1019/ The source distribution can be found here:

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Transaction Manager 3.1.3

Closing this vote with 5 +1s. Thx to all ! Cheers, Guillaume Nodet 2015-06-13 8:31 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de: +1 LieGrue, strub Am 09.06.2015 um 09:24 schrieb Guillaume Nodet gno...@apache.org: I've uploaded a 3.1.3 release of the transaction manager component

Re: [VOTE] Reease Transaction Manager 3.1.3

+1 2015-06-09 9:24 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Nodet gno...@apache.org: I've uploaded a 3.1.3 release of the transaction manager component at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1020 This fixes the following issues: - GERONIMO-6543: Aries/Geronimo XA

Re: [VOTE] XBean 4.5 release

+1 2015-11-23 11:51 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > Hi, > > Please VOTE for the release of Apache XBean-4.5. > > Here is the staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1025 > > The source distribution can be found here: >

[VOTE] Release transaction manager 3.1.4

, -- Guillaume Nodet Red Hat, Open Source Integration Email: gno...@redhat.com Web: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-validation 1.0 of the 1.1 spec version

b > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > -- Guillaume Nodet Red Hat, Open Source Integration Email: gno...@redhat.com Web: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

Re: [VOTE] Release transaction manager 3.1.4

+1 2016-11-10 11:29 GMT+01:00 Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org>: > The release is staged at > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapachegeronimo-1028 > > The only change is the fix for GERONIMO-4576: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/brows

Re: [VOTE] Release transaction manager 3.1.4

> > > Am 22.11.2016 um 12:25 schrieb Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>: > > > > folks, we still need another VOTE! > > > > txs and LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > >> Am 10.11.2016 um 11:29 schrieb Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org>

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >