+1 thanks for rerolling it since most users will consume it
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn &
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
Sounds good
Le ven. 19 avr. 2024 à 23:02, Richard Zowalla a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> since the TCK challenge is resolved and we are passing the full Batch
> TCK and updated most of the dependencies of BatchEE, what do you think
> about doing a 2.0.0 release?
>
> Gruß
> Richard
>
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
+1 and thanks a lot François
side note for voters: knights can be broken on very recent graalvm (java
21+) due to a breaking change in svm sdk, we can move to the new one on
next (1.1?) -> TBD on the list probably but take it into consideration
during testing please.
Romain Manni-Bu
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17832633#comment-17832633
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on GERONIMO-6860:
--
+1 to add it back since it seems 1.5
+1, thanks François.
@rzo1 can you give it another try?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn &
elease should be
sufficient.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.
PS: ultimately we can also drop deltaspike since now we have secontainer.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc
We can use the last release I think
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin
t is long
and totally useless during the release.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://ww
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Romain Manni-Bucau reassigned GERONIMO-6859:
Assignee: Romain Manni-Bucau
> Enable to use .zip from graal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Romain Manni-Bucau resolved GERONIMO-6859.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Enable to use .zip from graal-ce for wind
Romain Manni-Bucau created GERONIMO-6859:
Summary: Enable to use .zip from graal-ce for windows
Key: GERONIMO-6859
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6859
Project: Geronimo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Romain Manni-Bucau resolved GERONIMO-6858.
--
Fix Version/s: Arthur-1.0.8
Assignee: Romain Manni-Bucau
Romain Manni-Bucau created GERONIMO-6858:
Summary: Ensure default options are compatible with last graalvm
release (new 21.x)
Key: GERONIMO-6858
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6858
+1
Le mar. 23 janv. 2024 à 10:26, fpapon a écrit :
> It seems like people need to be logged to Jira to see the release note
> so here the content of the release:
>
> Task
>
> [GERONIMO-6853] - Upgrade to Lombok 1.18.30 for using JDK21 to build
> [GERONIMO-6854] - Upgrade to
Overall +1, we should just check we don't have warnings with our default
conf with last releases otherwise it is always good to get fixes out.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibuca
+1
Le ven. 20 oct. 2023 à 11:26, fpapon a écrit :
> Hi everyone,
>
> I submit Apache Geronimo TXManager 4..0.0 release to your vote.
>
> Release Notes:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220=12352739
>
> Staging Maven repository:
>
r final and then patch version if there is a bug
> > > >
> > > > Le jeu. 19 oct. 2023, 21:08, Francois Papon
> > > > a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > > +1 for a final :)
> > > > > On 19/10/2023 19:44, Romain Manni-Bucau
so let's do a final would be my 2 cts ;)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.
Hi,
How far are we from a final?
I'm generally quite hesitant regarding alpha/beta/M if real work is not
planned and AFAIK we don't plan anything there so we can try to jump to the
final directly.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
+1
Le ven. 13 oct. 2023 à 16:04, fpapon a écrit :
> Hi everyone,
>
> I submit Apache XBean 4.24 release to your vote.
>
> This release mainly includes (other issue description is available on
> the release note):
>
> - ASM 9.6 update
>
>
> Release Notes:
>
>
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
Which makes 3 +1 (bindings) so this vote passes, thank you all guys!
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc
My own +1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/arthur/ (bundle
1.0.7, rev 63502)
Please vote +1 (I want it passes) or -1 (I'm against cause $xxx).
Vote is opened for 3 days or until we get enough binding votes as usual.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
ore the week-end
else on monday) it would be awesome, I updated the doc in the project with
the new version schemas.
Best,
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Romain Manni-Bucau updated GERONIMO-6850:
-
Description: Note: workaround is to explicit the download url but a
shorthand
Romain Manni-Bucau created GERONIMO-6850:
Summary: Support new graalvm ce and oracle (>= v17) download
repositories
Key: GERONIMO-6850
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
+1
Le jeu. 11 mai 2023 à 11:53, fpapon a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We have a request from a user to release XBean after the upgrade of ASM
> dependency.
>
> If there is no objection, I can start the process.
>
> regards,
>
> --
> --
> François
>
>
Agree, I also think we can drop all our extensions "components" since the
reusability was never reached (it is always faster and simpler to implement
your component) so let's keep only jbatch and UI/tools related modules
maybe?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.co
Ok checked out and github got me with its autoformatting, +1 from me
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc
this block all good (I assume if it was
commented it can be an issue and I would suspect the "else super.loadClass"
to not help more than the first if part).
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net
Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.pac
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17703200#comment-17703200
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on GERONIMO-6536:
--
Think the 1.6 artifact has the fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17667736#comment-17667736
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on GERONIMO-6845:
--
+1 to not do it and just use apache
AFAIK it is mainly the provider loading which can load from OSGi registry
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc
Hi,
While there is an OSGi home for the spec (can move to karaf/smix/...) I'm
fine with that
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g
depending
graalvm version which is in the config too, I don't care much of the impl -
personally I would just switch I think but happy with any solution.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Ol
n the dark there ;).
That said I join you on the fact each subproject should get one or multiple
leads who can handle user requests in a reasonable amount of time to not
look too bad.
Any idea on adressing that?
Should we go on some automotion (on PR?)? Should we elect somebody per
subproject?
Romain M
@François Papon cause we are far behind and it looked
easier to use something already up to date (even if incomplete, smallrye
has a ton of SPI but overall, once implemented it works)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.met
>
>> That's right. The MicroProfile stuff is not much used these days anymore.
>> Which is actually sad, because it was a good initiative.
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>> Am 23.11.2022 um 11:11 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau > >:
>>
>>
ndle those jars...) and not their 'Jakarta spec
> license'.
> But that seems to be EPLv2 as far as I've looked through a bunch of spec
> api jars.
>
EPLv2 is "weak copyleft" so guess it is fine (
https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html)
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
&
n't update it anymore, not sure we would do any new
release.
So while it is ok to keep it there, we should also communicate clearly we
don't intend to do any new release if it is the case - same story than
geronimo server basically.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>
em do it if you want
to stop doing spec jars.
Just want we clearly document it for users on our website.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> Am 23.11.2022 um 09:01 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
>
> Hi,
>
> Well, I guess the OSGi stuff is still a good justification to roll our own
>
on
the projects and projects are living.
Since we are an umbrella projects, I - maybe naively - assume we have to GC
from time to time and these discussions are only about that, no strong will
to kill anything in any case from my window.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibu
mode.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
; LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> Am 18.11.2022 um 09:50 schrieb Francois Papon <
> francois.pa...@openobject.fr>:
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't have insights about how BatchEE is used today and how the jbatch
> specification is support by others.
>
> +1 for freeze.
>
&g
Hi all,
We discussed some time ago to drop batchee as an active subproject, wonder
where we are now on this?
Do we freeze it and document we don't maintain it anymore?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Ol
+1, thanks François!
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Romain Manni-Bucau resolved GERONIMO-6842.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Arthur can't find native libraries of java
Romain Manni-Bucau created GERONIMO-6842:
Summary: Arthur can't find native libraries of java 17
Key: GERONIMO-6842
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6842
Project: Geronimo
PS: 3.19 and 3.20 never got released so think it is ok to keep them hanging
even if it is unlikely we would release them.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com&g
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17602275#comment-17602275
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on GERONIMO-6841:
--
Hi,
this kind of request should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Romain Manni-Bucau resolved GERONIMO-6840.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Support GraalVM 22.2 reflection mo
Romain Manni-Bucau created GERONIMO-6840:
Summary: Support GraalVM 22.2 reflection model
Key: GERONIMO-6840
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6840
Project: Geronimo
Mea culpa, so let's write it for october on my side ;)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn &
at least await october for such a work
since it will be summer holidays then september rush but we should probably
plan to tackle that topic at that time - can be a board report point
thinking out loud.
Hope it makes sense.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
Hi all,
Just as a reference and without restating any thoughts, there was already
some disucssion about it in may (
https://apache.markmail.org/thread/7y7ujmcmvkzpv7gp and on private@ for
people with perms to read it) which can be good to read to get some more
insights on this topic.
Le dim. 10
AIK.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
d is does anyone mind if we develop separate
> Jakarta versions of the APIs on the TomEE side? It would be a little
> easier for us.
>
Strictly speaking you dont even need to ask so maybe ask once done and if
there would be any merge need if it eases work for you ;).
>
> -David
>
>
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
+1
Le jeu. 16 juin 2022 à 00:16, fpapon a écrit :
> +1 for a release
>
> Thanks!
>
> regards
> On 16/06/2022 00:11, Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> is there any issue if I do a release for BatchEE?
>
> I'd like to create a new TomEE mIlestone soon, but we are still using a
> SNAPSHOT.
>
No blocker from me (minor note being some are already on git so don't start
back from svn ;))
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g
akarta)
>> due to a lack of contributors / resources to ramp up updated versions
>> in Geronimo.
>>
>> I have no strong opinion about switching the project umbrella as it
>> wouldn't change anything regarding contributions, I guess.
>>
>> Gruß
>> Richa
Hi all,
TomEE people didn't send much feedback and I know they are moving to
smallrye so can be great to know if we must continue this way or just
freeze the projects there?
Anyone able to comment?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Romain Manni-Bucau resolved GERONIMO-6836.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Avoid warnings about allow-incomplete-classp
Romain Manni-Bucau created GERONIMO-6836:
Summary: Avoid warnings about allow-incomplete-classpath and
enableAllSecurityServices
Key: GERONIMO-6836
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6836
Hi
Next step is likely to ask tomee since for now we just get the consensus
geronimo is a bad home for MP.
If ok for them, I'd just move the project to tomee since, as mentionned, we
didnt work much on these projects and tomee was driven last activity but
guess it can be discussed on tomee
Hi JL,
If you mean jakarta one, I don't think so and there are very few
adjustments to do from what I read on the expert group, else javax one is
in the build (for completeness).
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.ne
Hi,
Think it makes sense since most of contributors of the original projects
abandonned Microprofile due to the policy they apply to the project AFAIK
and there is not much interest there anymore AFAIK.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
Hi,
Did you try handling LITERAL+ capability (1)? I don't think we do as of
today.
(1)
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7888#:~:text=LITERAL%2B%20allows%20the%20alternate%20form%20of%20literals%20(called%20%22non%2D,are%204096%20bytes%20or%20less
.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <ht
+1 after the discussion in the other thread and points Richard raised
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc
Right, because the issue is not people having migrated but people migrating
when jakarta releases are available so think you are right, it covers
something like 0 user ;)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Ol
Hi
The small notes on that are:
- rare impl actually do (asf ones but also other vendors), it is always a
compromise between users/customers/consumers and specs
- there is always a blurry line on some defaults (trivial example is
default impl or provider impl even when defined in spec)
- another
the best it is but guess it is a 50-50
case in terms of actual points :s.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc
Hmm, before that the question is "are the TCK spec compliant", a lot have a
reference in the spec we maybe missed, do you have some pointers on them?
If we were wrong let's fix it, if the TCK are wrong then maybe ignore the
TCK?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.co
vor in regards of being aligned on the RI.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Romain Manni-Bucau resolved GERONIMO-6833.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Ensure proxy hierarchy is registered for native-im
Romain Manni-Bucau created GERONIMO-6833:
Summary: Ensure proxy hierarchy is registered for native-image
Key: GERONIMO-6833
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6833
Project
Hi,
We must run a release before that (at apache at least) AFAIK but +1
otherwise.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rm
Side note: referencing tag+hash + dist (dev) area (only thing we vote
against) would be neat for future votes since we dont vote on a staging
repo.
Anyway thanks for doing it, really great to see you back ;)
PS: dont forget jira and site updates, we missed it by the past and hurts
way later when
@Cesar maintenance is the last digit, no cheating ;)
Le mar. 17 mai 2022 à 07:24, fpapon a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Same feedback as Romain, I don't think we need a M1.
>
> regards,
>
> François
>
> On 14/05/2022 23:27, David Blevins wrote:
> > Hey All,
> >
> > If I was thinking ahead I'd have put
Hi
If we are confident to match javax/jakarta namespace change why not doing a
final? Errors/missing features could go in bugs.
Issue with milestones is the tooling support and proposed updates vs
version policies so if we can avoid it I would be for it but not sure if I
missed sthg.
Le dim. 15
Any reason it is a m1?
Le dim. 15 mai 2022 à 07:29, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a
écrit :
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 11:27 PM David Blevins
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey All,
> >
> > If I was thinking ahead I'd have put these both in the same staging repo
> and vote :)
> >
> >
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
it is what it means
concretely.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/
ave to go that way at some point anyway, ideas welcomed.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://w
+1, didnt test full OSGi support but think standalone one is already a good
move forward.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g
Which makes 4 +1 (enough bindings) and no other votes so this vote passes,
thank you guys!
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g
My own +1
will let some time to vote until tomorrow if some want to review before i
close the vote
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g
up?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
/
Tag:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geronimo-arthur.git;a=commit;h=4a339370bbd917bd515bee989cb6eaa02b64b3c0
My key is still the same.
Please vote:
[ ] +1 release it
[ ] -1 ${cause}
Vote will be opened for 3 days as usual.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibu
Hi everyone,
wonder what would you think about an arthur release next week
my main goal would be to upgrade openwebbeans to have the interceptor
support in our graalvm builds
any objection?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
1 - 100 of 1645 matches
Mail list logo
