ove Harmony to the Attic
> > >>> [ 0] Don't care
> > >>> [-1] Don't move Harmony to the Attic.
> > >>>
> > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Tim
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
> > Publish your photos in seconds for FREE
> > TRY IM TOOLPACK at http://www.imtoolpack.com/default.aspx?rc=if4
> >
> >
> >
> Thanks
> --Melan
>
--
http://about.me/clraychen
Regards,
Ray Chen
l be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
--
http://about.me/clraychen
Regards,
Ray Chen
t; should be easy to change to fit into Harmony.
> > jpathwatch uses native libraries (implementing very thin wrappers around
> > native OS functions), these will have to be integrated as well, which I
> > think should also be quite trivial.
> >
> > Please let me know if there's interest in such a donation.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Uwe
> >
> > P.S.: Hope you don't mind the sneakemail address, I'm spam paranoid ;)
> >
>
> --
>
> Best Regards!
>
> Jimmy, Jing Lv
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
l writing fails.
> > The same issue is reported to Android at
> https://review.source.android.com/21459.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
/harmony/roadmap
>
> We should definitely make an effort to fix:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6419
>
> I will have less time to assist with the release this time around so it
> would be good to have a volunteer to be the release manager for these
> milestones.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
Hi Tim,
Sorry, I am very busy these days.
Currently, we still have some JDWP test failures.
Do they stop us to publish a new level?
If no, what process, we should follow?
Thanks!
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
> On 13/Dec/2010 15:49, Ray Chen wrote:
> > Hmmm...
Hi Tim,
I think I understand now, we should fix it before the code freeze.
Currently, let's just move the target out to a later date.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
> On 13/Dec/2010 15:49, Ray Chen wrote:
> > Hmmm... OK, let's deferring that to the nex
Hmmm... OK, let's deferring that to the next milestone.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Tim Ellison wrote:
> On 13/Dec/2010 15:40, Ray Chen wrote:
> > FYI.
> > This defect should be fixed in this milestone, see
> > http://s.apache.org/harmony/roadmap mentioned by Mar
Hi Tim,
FYI.
This defect should be fixed in this milestone, see
http://s.apache.org/harmony/roadmap mentioned by Mark
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Tim Ellison wrote:
> On 13/Dec/2010 08:23, Ray Chen wrote:
> > Hi Comitters,
> > I have reviewed https://issues.apache.org/jira
wse/HARMONY-6419
>
> I will have less time to assist with the release this time around so it
> would be good to have a volunteer to be the release manager for these
> milestones.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.InetAddressTest crashed
> >
> > After re-ran them independently, InetAddressTest can pass some time
> > but
> org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.InetAddressTest.test_isReachableLj
> > ava_net_NetworkInterfaceII
> > failed intermittently.
> > java.awt.event.MouseEventTest.testHarmony5215 throws NPE every time.
> >
> > I will give the java6 test results later.
> >
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
(UNIXProcess.java:164)
at java.lang.ProcessImpl.start(ProcessImpl.java:81)
at java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(ProcessBuilder.java:468)
... 15 more
[FINDBUGS] Skipping publisher since build result is FAILURE
Archiving artifacts
Recording test results
Recording fingerprints
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
Hi Tim,
For https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6419, I have applied it
and run the test, seems it works well and no regression.
I think it should be committed.
Any comments?
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Tim Ellison wrote:
> On 06/Dec/2010 15:31, Ray Chen wrote:
> >
OK.
Code Freeze 10th December
Publish 17th December
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Tim Ellison wrote:
> On 06/Dec/2010 15:31, Ray Chen wrote:
> > Sure, I propose the following dates:
> >
> > Feature Freeze Wed 15th December
> > Code Freeze Wed 22nd Decemb
review it?
Let's make new milstones for the coming New Year! :)
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Tim Ellison wrote:
> On 30/Nov/2010 13:55, Ray Chen wrote:
> > Hmmm... Ok, I think it will take some time to understand these for some
> time.
> > Maybe we should put this mil
Hmmm... Ok, I think it will take some time to understand these for some time.
Maybe we should put this milestone off for serveral days before I
understand all the process.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Mark Hindess
wrote:
>
> In message ,
> Ray Chen writes:
>>
>> Hi
h one has problems
> when optimized but haven't had time to do this yet. For now I guess
> we should just disable optimization for the jdwp module.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
> In message ,
> Ray Chen writes:
>>
>> I have r
I have run test tests of trunk on linux platform:
I got 10 test failures and 2 test errors
failures:
java.awt.AccessibleAWTWindowTest.testGetAccessibleStateSet
javax.swing.JComponent_MultithreadedTest.testRequestFocusInWindowboolean
javax.swing.JComponent_MultithreadedTest.testRevalidate
javax.swi
We should definitely make an effort to fix:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6419
>
> I will have less time to assist with the release this time around so it
> would be good to have a volunteer to be the release manager for these
> milestones.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
to have sufficient oversight for
>> a release?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mark.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
th official oversight for the procedural, legal,
> release and community oversight. Regis has demonstrated his
> capabilities and alignment with the goals of the project over a
> sustained period of time.
>
> Please join me in congratulating Regis, and welcoming him on behalf of
> the PMC.
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
[Hello World]> but was:<[�]>
> at
> org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.MulticastSocketTest.test_joinGroupLjava_net_SocketAddressLjava_net_NetworkInterface(MulticastSocketTest.java:429)
>
> I think these are the best test results for any milestone I've had on my
> machine.
>
> Cath
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
t; Any comments or suggestions?
>
> [1]http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/japi/sun60-hydrlvm60.html
> --
>
> Best Regards!
>
> Jimmy, Jing Lv
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
nyJSSEtakes 0 ms
init services of HarmonyJSSEtakes 1 ms
init BCtakes 204 ms
init services of BCtakes 11 ms
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Regis wrote:
> On 2010-07-22 13:07, Ray Chen wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>> I found that our security implementation is much slower than RI'
s();
MessageDigest.getInstance("SHA-1");
System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis() - start);
}
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
On 07/15/2010 02:38 PM, Shi Jun Zhang (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shi Jun Zhang updated HARMONY-6584:
---
Attachment: HARMONY-6584.diff
The pa
On 06/10/2010 01:26 AM, Mark Hindess wrote:
In message<4c0fbf28.3000...@gmail.com>, Tim Ellison writes:
I've not benched it but this looks like a reasonable amount of code to
run each time the hostname is checked against this permission.
Maybe not too bad for getting these addresses from th
On 06/07/2010 11:17 AM, Regis wrote:
Sometimes, I only work with native code, check and compile java is not
necessary. But in new build structure, build-native, rebuild-native
and clean-native are not public target anymore, and I can't find any
equivalent targets can do this, anyone can tell
;>> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Jimmy,Jing Lv <
>> firep...@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> We are very close to publish Harmony5 M14 and Harmony6 M2,
>> what
>> >>>>>> great
>> >>>>>>>> achievements since we created Harmony project!
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Now we may think about something different, satisfy more
>> >>>>>> requirements.
>> >>>>>>>> Different application requirement need different JRE - it may
>> differ
>> >>>>>> very
>> >>>>>>>> much in class-lib modules, providers, and VMs. Harmony select,
>> say, a
>> >>>>>>>> smaller, more flexible harmony runtime, may be a good candidate in
>> such
>> >>>>>>>> environments. We may not follow Oracle/Sun exactly in this
>> runtime,
>> >>>>>> allow
>> >>>>>>>> more innovations, different modules selections, and different
>> >>>>>>>> functionalities to meet different requirements. We may also call
>> for
>> >>>>>> more
>> >>>>>>>> input from real Java applications, developers, especially hot
>> >>>>>> open-source
>> >>>>>>>> projects who are the potential customers of Harmony.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> We've already created an initial target in Harmony to build a
>> >>>>>> Select
>> >>>>>>>> binary. We remove some client-side related modules (like AWT,
>> swing etc)
>> >>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>> reduce the size while keep the main functionality for server side
>> >>>>>>>> applications. This is a startup, very far from the finial
>> versions.
>> >>>>>> However
>> >>>>>>>> I believe we can start some milestones with defined criterion like
>> >>>>>> standard
>> >>>>>>>> Harmony.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> For the first milestone of Harmony-Select, I suggest we'd
>> have
>> >>>>>>>> following criterion:
>> >>>>>>>> 1. build pass on both windows/linux platforms;
>> >>>>>>>> 2. pass all Harmony unit testcases in the selected module on these
>> >>>>>>>> platforms;
>> >>>>>>>> 3. Choose Apache Hadoop as a real Application test, pass its
>> common test
>> >>>>>> on
>> >>>>>>>> these platforms for the first milestone.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Wait for any kindly suggestions, opinions and comments.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Best Regards!
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Jimmy, Jing Lv
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Best Regards!
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Jimmy, Jing Lv
>> >>>>> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>> >>>>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best Regards!
>
> Jimmy, Jing Lv
> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
OK, thanks.
So +1 for me.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Mark Hindess
wrote:
>
> In message ,
> Ray Chen writes:
>>
>> Built and tested on Linux/x86, following test failed.
>>
>> org.apache.harmony.jpda.tests.jdwp.Events.ClassPrepareT
ill be
> made available on the download page, as usual.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
the
>> build
>> scripts. It seems it does no harm to any other normal build. After that,
>> we
>> can simply invoke:
>> \> ant build-select
>> to get a select build under deploy-select/
>>
>> Any comments/suggestions? I'll commit a patch to the build scripts if
>> there is objection.
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Regis.
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
Hi All,
Any comments about JIRA6375[1]?
[1]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6375
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
e artifacts will be
> made available on the download page.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
ary builds from these artifacts will be
> made available on the download page, as usual.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Ray Chen wrote:
> Hi,
> I see
> org.apache.harmony.auth.tests.javax.security.auth.kerberos.KerberosTicketTest
> org.apache.harmony.jpda.tests.jdwp.VirtualMachine.ReleaseEventsTest
> failed with timeout error
>
> org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.Multi
that the JDWP tests seem less stable[0] and the java6-only
> tests:
>
> UnixFileTest.test_get*Space
>
> are unstable on a busy machine (perhaps they should require less
> accuracy)?
>
>> Anyone else got any results?
>
> Anyone?
>
> Regards,
> Mark
>
> [0] I think the jdwp tests are less stable because of timing issues and
> the timing is worse (faster?) on the java6 branch.
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
/tests/javax/annotation/ResourcesTest.java (w
>> ith props)
>>
>> Added: harmony/enhanced/classlib/branches/java6/modules/annotation/src/main/j
>> ava/javax/annotation/Generated.java
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/harmony/enhanced/classlib/branches/java6/mo
>> dules/annotation/src/main/java/javax/annotation/Generated.java?rev=907559&vie
>> w=auto
>> =
> [SNIP]
>
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
dex: make/properties.xml
> =
> --- make/properties.xml
> +++ make/properties.xml
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
>
>
>
> +
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Regis.
>
Should this patch be committed? Or has been committed?
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
jdk6-harmony6.html#err_missing_javax_tools>
>> Seems that we did miss this package.
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu
>>
>>
>>
>> 2010/1/29 Ray Chen
>>
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > When I looked into javax.annotation
implement this package?
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
s,
>> Tim
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On 25/01/2010 13:15, Oliver Deakin wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Ray,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the information - from your results it seems that there
>>>> must be a difference in co
at javax.swing.BasicSwingTestCase.runBareImpl(BasicSwingTestCase.java:121)
>> at javax.swing.BasicSwingTestCase$1.run(BasicSwingTestCase.java:135)
>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:669)
>> These tests pass for me against M11.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
gt;>> I've created a source tar.gz for a potential 5.0M12a release by doing:
>>>
>>> svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/harmony/enhanced/tags/5.0m12a
>>> fed
>>> cd fed
>>> sun60 ant populate-src bundle-src
>>>
>>> and placed it at:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/5.0m12a/
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> -Mark.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Oliver Deakin
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
ssion.
Thank you!
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
FileWriterCharSinkTester:sinkTestWriteLargeArray
java.nio.BufferOverflowException
My question is why JIRA6408 patch was not included ? I see the patch
was committed @r893377 and the m12a's revision number is 901646
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
+1
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Oliver Deakin
wrote:
> On 20/01/2010 11:18, Mark Hindess wrote:
>>
>> In message<4d9fb1a01001200154u780476d6k570d6bb3516ba...@mail.gmail.com>,
>> Ray
>> Chen writes:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi Mark,
>>>
>
t by a week really helps
> much and suggest that next time we do a milestone release for java5 we
> do a java6 release at the same time. (I'm not convinced this will work
> either but it can't really be worse so I think we should try it.)
>
> What do you think?
>
> -Mark.
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
these patches, the average method coverage rate for these modules
>> can reach 90% above. I also attached the reports of the baseline and the
>> result with patches.
>> java.io
>> java.lang
>> java.lang.instrument
>> java.lang.reflect
>> javax.print.*
>>
Hi All,
HttpURLConnectionTest.testUsingProxy2 not only failed on java6 bransh,
but also have some problems on trunk, created JIRA6416 to track this.
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
nly added a few classes in swing
module, the swing.jar is much bigger than trunk's (java6 5.11MB and
trunk 2.38MB on my machine).
I also found that java6's boot folder is much bigger than trunk's,
about 11MB bigger.
Did we really add "11MB" new features, or there is something wrong?
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
t found no difference.
Anyone can help looking at this? I guess some merge work missing.
For org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.MulticastSocketTest
This test passed on my machine every time.
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
gt;>>> > test-module:
>>>>>>> > [echo] Running luni Unit Test from luni_tests_api.jar
>>>>>>> > [echo] Tested jre: D:\workingcopy\branch6\deploy\jdk\jre/bin/java
>>>>>>> > [mkdir] Created dir: D:\workingcopy\branch6\build\test_report
>>>>>>> > [junit] Running org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.util.UtilTest
>>>>>>> > [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0 sec
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > BUILD FAILED
>>>>>>> > D:\workingcopy\branch6\build.xml:181: The following error occurred
>>>>>>> > while
>>>>>>> > executing this line:
>>>>>>> > D:\workingcopy\branch6\make\build-test.xml:54: The following error
>>>>>>> > occurred
>>>>>>> > while executing this line:
>>>>>>> > D:\workingcopy\branch6\make\properties.xml:529: The following error
>>>>>>> > occurred
>>>>>>> > while executing this line:
>>>>>>> > D:\workingcopy\branch6\make\properties.xml:541: The following error
>>>>>>> > occurred
>>>>>>> > while executing this line:
>>>>>>> > D:\workingcopy\branch6\modules\luni\build.xml:334: The following error
>>>>>>> > occurred while executing this line:
>>>>>>> > D:\workingcopy\branch6\deploy\build\test\luni\build.xml:36: The
>>>>>>> > following
>>>>>>> > error occurred while executing this line:
>>>>>>> > D:\workingcopy\branch6\make\properties.xml:732: Process fork failed.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > seems the java -version does not work, but I it works when I try it
>>>>>>> > manually,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Tony Wu
>>>>> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Tony Wu
>>>> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Tony Wu
>>> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Tony Wu
> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
cketTest.java:730)
> at java.lang.reflect.VMReflection.invokeMethod(VMReflection.java)
>
> --
> Tony Wu
> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
will check it out.
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 2:05 AM, Nathan Beyer wrote:
> 2009/12/22 Ray Chen :
>> Hi,
>> Following simple test case can reproduce the problem:
>>
>> import java.util.TimeZone;
>>
>> public class TimeZoneTest {
>> public static v
avings was set to 360.
So maybe this issue is not related to TZ database or sth.
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Regis wrote:
> On 2009-12-22 14:37, Ray Chen wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I think it's a very interesting problem. I did a google search and
>> found that
alse, TimeZone.SHORT,
>> Locale.CHINA));
>> this assertion failed, expected was "格林尼治标准时间+0800" but actually return
>> "CST".
>> while both testcases succeded in hamony's jdk.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
oke GetLocaleInfo() in turn.
You can find the details in windows/helpers.c, the cp is 936 on my
machine and got gb2312 in charsetmap.h.
So the question is change the vm GetSystemProperty, or our encoding mapping?
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Regis wrote:
> On 2009-12-21 19:40, Ray Chen
19 PM, Regis wrote:
> On 2009-12-21 15:54, Ray Chen (JIRA) wrote:
>>
>> [
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12793106#action_12793106
>> ]
>
,
&propVal);" ?
> And I think we should fix the test not to depends on local environment.
>
Yes, I do agree, however, this issue seems that there are really some
bugs in our classlib or DRLVM code, and for Chinese users, it should
use GBK or GB18030 for default encode instead of GB2312
> --
> Best Regards,
> Regis.
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Ray Chen wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I run the java6 test on windows platform, 27059 tests ran, and I see
> 18 failures and 15 errors
> Failures:
> *javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicScrollBarUITest.testGetThumbBounds
> ex
Hi Tony,
JIRA 6407 has been created for this issue.
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Tony Wu wrote:
> Hi, Ray
>
> would you pls raise a JIRA, thanks.
>
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Ray Chen wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I found that NetworkInterface of jav
ay be null.
Merge trunk to java6, or add a if(addresses != null) will solve the NPE error.
Shall I open a JIRA to track this or some committer just do that ?
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Ray Chen wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I run the java6 test on windows platform, 27059 tests ran, and
Exception
I think the test failures of network interface related to JIRA6369
which means there are bugs in our portlib code on windows platform.
And the test case start with"*" sucess when I ran it standalone.
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
java:118)
> at
> tests.support.resource.Support_Resources.copyFile(Support_Resources.java:98)
> at
> org.apache.harmony.archive.tests.java.util.jar.JarFileTest.testJarVerificationEmptyEntry(JarFileTest.java:647)
> at java.lang.reflect.VMReflection.invokeMethod(VMReflection.java)
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Regis.
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
MulticastSocketTest.test_joinGroupLjava_net_SocketAddressLjava_net_NetworkInterface
MulticastSocketTest.test_sendLjava_net_DatagramPacketB
MulticastSocketTest.test_setNetworkInterfaceLjava_net_NetworkInterface
Errors:
MulticastSocketTest.test_setLoopbackModeSendReceive
JarFileTest.testJarVerificationEmptyEntry
--
Regards,
Ray
failed.
However, besides these, I got many ClassNotFoundException error like
javax/accessibility/AccessibleBundle, javax/imageio/ImageIO,
javax/print/PrintService and so on.
I think I missed something important, can anyone give some help?
I will re-run the test if these errors resolved.
--
Regards
.fillbuf(BufferedInputStream.java:153)
> > at java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:319)
> > at java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:256)
> > at java.io.BufferedReader.fillbuf(BufferedReader.java:107)
> > at java.io.BufferedReader.read(BufferedReader.java:208)
> > at java.util.Properties.load(Properties.java:399)
> > at java.util.Properties.load(Properties.java:279)
> > at
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedDatabaseMetaData.PBloadQueryDescriptions(Unknown
> Source)
> > at org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedDatabaseMetaData.run(Unknown Source)
> > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:186)
> > at
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedDatabaseMetaData.loadQueryDescriptions(Unknown
> Source)
> > at
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedDatabaseMetaData.getQueryDescriptions(Unknown
> Source)
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
Hi Oliver,
I see same failure on my ubuntu 9.04, and it passes every time when I run it
standalone.
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
Sounds good for "use branching and freeze that code."
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
How about add wait(100) and nofity() in configureBlocking() method to break
the deadlock?
And should the timeout be shorter to avoid impacting the performance?
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
Hi Mark,
Sorry for the "getPort()", and I have updated the testcase to version 2, the
"getPort()" has been erased from my memory too now :) .
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Mark Hindess
wrote:
>
> In message <55080442.1258095819685.javamail.j...@brutus&g
Shall we store the return value of out.position()-1 to avoid invoking it
twice?
If it is too tiny for performace improvement, current patch seems good for
me.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Regis wrote:
> Ray Chen wrote:
>
>> Hi Regis,
>>
>> Maybe add the z/OS newline
job to make sure you get data at the end
>> of a line. (or not, if so configured, but if someone has configured
>> their terminal that way, that's their decision, they should expect
>> programs' behavior to change, and we certainly shouldn't go around
>> reconfiguring the terminal.)
>>
>> by contrast, if you run this (where my program above has been built as
>> "read") like this:
>>
>> echo -e "hello\nworld\n" | ./read
>>
>> you see:
>>
>> hello
>>>
>> world
>>
>> i.e. both lines arrive as a single chunk of data.
>>
>> (you didn't say exactly _how_ the test fails, so i'm just guessing
>> it's related to this.)
>>
>> --elliott
>>
>> Still need to look at the available natives too since elliott suggested
>>> that we should replace the 3*seek with a single ioctl for all cases
>>> (though this might not be as portable).
>>>
>>> -Mark.
>>>
>>> Regis, can you explain a little more about why the check is needed
>>>>>> in the available call? And why the available check is needed in the
>>>>>> FileInputStream read method?
>>>>>>
>>>>> After I removed the check, everything is fine, except following test is
>>>>> failed:
>>>>>
>>>>> public static void main(String args[])
>>>>> {
>>>>>BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new
>>>>> InputStreamReader(System.in));
>>>>>String line = null;
>>>>>try {
>>>>> line = reader.readLine();
>>>>>} catch (IOException e) {
>>>>> e.printStackTrace();
>>>>>}
>>>>>System.out.println(line);
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> In each case, is it really stdin that is special or any file
>>>>>> descriptor
>>>>>> representing a tty?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like to understand this as there are a whole bunch of ttyRead with
>>>>>> a similar check that only affects stdin not any tty descriptor.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> in the meantime, i wondered also whether it's worth swapping the two
>>>>>>> conjuncts in the if, since the latter is essentially free while the
>>>>>>> former is expensive. (i've no idea how often the cheap conjunct is
>>>>>>> false, though.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I thought about this but held of doing it for the same reason.
>>>>>> However,
>>>>>> I guess it is almost certainly a win.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Mark.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Regis.
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
.
>
> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/NewCommitter
>
>
> The Apache Harmony PMC
>
>
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Ray Chen
gt; + src[i].put(buffer);
>>
>> some VMs will pin the java heap memory accessed in JNI
>> (GetByteArrayElements), so if you can get hold of the ByteBuffer#array()
>> you can pass a set of pointers to the backing arrays and maybe send the
>> data directly.
>>
>> Looking forward to seeing the readv impl too ;-)
>>
>
> Sure, it's on my TODO list :)
>
>
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Regis.
>
--
Best Regards,
Ray Chen
download page, as usual.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
> [0] drlvm/trunk and the java6 branches of classlib and jdktools will
>remain frozen until we test and vote on 6.0M1
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Ray Chen
MSN:clrayc...@hotmail.com
Email:claryc...@gmail.com
-6324
> > Project: Harmony
> > Issue Type: Bug
> > Components: Classlib
> >Affects Versions: 5.0M11
> > Environment: all platform
> >Reporter: Ray Chen
> >Assignee: Mark Hindess
> >
+1
know if there
>> are any objections/comments to this contribution! I'll give it a few days
>> and then start a vote.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Oliver
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6187
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Oliver Deakin
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
> PO6 3AU
>
>
--
Ray Chen
MSN:clrayc...@hotmail.com
Email:claryc...@gmail.com
80 matches
Mail list logo
