Re: 2.0.25 Problem with SSI

2001-08-31 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Tonight's tree? Ugh. Send it at the list - I'm sure we are doing -one- too many steps with our security overhaul :( - Original Message - From: "Jerry Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 2:06 AM Subject: 2.0.25 Problem with SSI > I hav

2.0.25 Problem with SSI

2001-08-31 Thread Jerry Baker
I have a script that does this on Windows 2000: foreach (`tracert -h 20 $ip`) { chomp $_; print $_ . ""; } If I include this in an SSI with "include virtual" Apache inserts the HTTP headers into the SSI document as well.

Win32 (OS2) /cgi-bin/ exe and bat experiment and observations

2001-08-31 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
I was playing with the script-aliased container. I've removed two odder aspects of the server behavior. One, on Win32/OS2 mod_cgi would look for a file of the requested filename + '.exe' tacked on. That was (as the note said) somewhat bogus, and we have a feature to allow it, so I recently re

Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't

2001-08-31 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Friday 31 August 2001 19:31, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > From: "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 9:30 PM > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:02:32PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: > > >... > > > exports.c shouldn't be cleaned, correct, because it is a part of the > > > d

Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't

2001-08-31 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 9:30 PM > On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:02:32PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: > >... > > exports.c shouldn't be cleaned, correct, because it is a part of the > > distribution, or at least it should be if it isn't already. config.nice

Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't

2001-08-31 Thread Greg Stein
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:02:32PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: >... > exports.c shouldn't be cleaned, correct, because it is a part of the > distribution, or at least it should be if it isn't already. config.nice is > not a part of the distribution however, and should be removed by > make distclean.

Re: core dump when merging directory configs

2001-08-31 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Simpler example... Request /icons/ I'm debugging now. - Original Message - From: "Ian Holsman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 1:26 PM Subject: core dump when merging directory configs Ok. I narrowed this down abit. current CVS head with

Re: core dump when merging directory configs

2001-08-31 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
The problem is this ... sub_req (and perhaps redirect - I'm checking) don't set up the server/vhost per_dir_config so ap_location_walk starts with a NULL r->per_dir_config pointer. Since there _is_ a merge, and LHS is NULL, the request dies in the core default (fallback) dir_merge. I need to co

Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't

2001-08-31 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Friday 31 August 2001 10:47, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 10:38:39AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: > > On Friday 31 August 2001 10:31, Charles Randall wrote: > > > From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > >FWIW, we should not remove the config.nice files o

[PATCH] small 1.3.20 patch to allow computation of time_connected and bytes_per_second

2001-08-31 Thread Jason Burns/DHD
The developers at Danni's Hard Drive recently made some small additions to apache_1.3.20 in order to support a new server module we developed to do bandwidth limiting on a per user basis. The following patch is simply two small changes to the scoreboard that allow any apache module to calculate

Re: mod_rewrite & SCRIPT_URx envvars

2001-08-31 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: "Robert Simonson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 10:45 AM This doesn't seem right... RewriteEngine Off ... RewriteEngine On ... If I serve something from this directory container, the SCRIPT_URx environment variables are not set because the mai

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/experimental mod_cache.c

2001-08-31 Thread Ian Holsman
On Fri, 2001-08-31 at 14:17, Bill Stoddard wrote: > > > > > > > > My own opinion is that the cache should be the last content filter run. >Basically, > > > > it should probably be specified as the first HTTP_HEADER filter type. > > > > not necessarily. > > we have a situation where we need to un

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/experimental mod_cache.c

2001-08-31 Thread Bill Stoddard
> > > > > > My own opinion is that the cache should be the last content filter run. >Basically, > > > it should probably be specified as the first HTTP_HEADER filter type. > > not necessarily. > we have a situation where we need to uniquly modify outgoing HTML to > insert ads and tracking things

RE: Bandwidth control

2001-08-31 Thread Ian Holsman
On Fri, 2001-08-31 at 13:40, Jason Burns/DHD wrote: > > Once again, Danni's Hard Drive has implemented these features in apache > 1.3.x. > I sent in a patch to 1.3.20 but nobody has appeared to be interested in it. > I feel like this is the SGI 10x patch deal all over again. Would anyone > care

RE: Bandwidth control

2001-08-31 Thread Jason Burns/DHD
Once again, Danni's Hard Drive has implemented these features in apache 1.3.x. I sent in a patch to 1.3.20 but nobody has appeared to be interested in it. I feel like this is the SGI 10x patch deal all over again. Would anyone care to look at the patch if I sent it in again? Jason

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/experimental mod_cache.c

2001-08-31 Thread Ian Holsman
On Fri, 2001-08-31 at 13:17, Bill Stoddard wrote: > > > On Friday 31 August 2001 11:48, Graham Leggett wrote: > > > Bill Stoddard wrote: > > > > How do you handle things like byterange requests if CACHE_IN is a network > > > > filter? The byterange filter will filter out all but the range request

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/experimental mod_cache.c

2001-08-31 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Friday 31 August 2001 13:17, Bill Stoddard wrote: > > On Friday 31 August 2001 11:48, Graham Leggett wrote: > > > Bill Stoddard wrote: > > > > How do you handle things like byterange requests if CACHE_IN is a > > > > network filter? The byterange filter will filter out all but the > > > > range

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/experimental mod_cache.c

2001-08-31 Thread Bill Stoddard
> On Friday 31 August 2001 11:48, Graham Leggett wrote: > > Bill Stoddard wrote: > > > How do you handle things like byterange requests if CACHE_IN is a network > > > filter? The byterange filter will filter out all but the range requested > > > so the CACHE_IN filter will never see the full resp

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/experimental mod_cache.c

2001-08-31 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Friday 31 August 2001 11:48, Graham Leggett wrote: > Bill Stoddard wrote: > > How do you handle things like byterange requests if CACHE_IN is a network > > filter? The byterange filter will filter out all but the range requested > > so the CACHE_IN filter will never see the full response. Ditt

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/experimental mod_cache.c

2001-08-31 Thread Graham Leggett
Bill Stoddard wrote: > How do you handle things like byterange requests if CACHE_IN is a network filter? The > byterange filter will filter out all but the range requested so the CACHE_IN filter >will > never see the full response. Ditto the output chunking filter. Also, there could be > variou

Re: core dump when merging directory configs

2001-08-31 Thread Cliff Woolley
On 31 Aug 2001, Ian Holsman wrote: > Ok. > I narrowed this down abit. > current CVS head > > with a config with a section in my httpd.conf like: > > > > (it can have stuff inside of the location directive) > > > If I do a GET /test/index.html it works > if I do a GET /test/ it core dumps > any

core dump when merging directory configs

2001-08-31 Thread Ian Holsman
Ok. I narrowed this down abit. current CVS head with a config with a section in my httpd.conf like: (it can have stuff inside of the location directive) If I do a GET /test/index.html it works if I do a GET /test/ it core dumps any ideas? --backtrace-- #0 0x08079721 in ap_merge_per_dir_c

Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't

2001-08-31 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Friday 31 August 2001 10:42, Cliff Woolley wrote: > On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Charles Randall wrote: > > From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > >FWIW, we should not remove the config.nice files or certain generated > > >files (exports.c seems to come to mind) under any circumstan

Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't

2001-08-31 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 10:38:39AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: > On Friday 31 August 2001 10:31, Charles Randall wrote: > > From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > >FWIW, we should not remove the config.nice files or certain generated > > >files (exports.c seems to come to mind) un

RE: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't

2001-08-31 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Charles Randall wrote: > From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >FWIW, we should not remove the config.nice files or certain generated > >files (exports.c seems to come to mind) under any circumstances. We > >also don't remove build.mk because it is like a Make

Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't

2001-08-31 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Friday 31 August 2001 10:31, Charles Randall wrote: > From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >FWIW, we should not remove the config.nice files or certain generated > >files (exports.c seems to come to mind) under any circumstances. We > >also don't remove build.mk because it is

RE: Bandwidth control

2001-08-31 Thread Ian Holsman
gogoOn Fri, 2001-08-31 at 10:26, Charles Randall wrote: > As you point out, that level of granularity isn't available with general > purpose traffic shaping tools. > > You may want to look at the Zeus server to understand the features that were > product-worthy as one example. It appears that the

RE: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't

2001-08-31 Thread Charles Randall
From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >FWIW, we should not remove the config.nice files or certain generated >files (exports.c seems to come to mind) under any circumstances. We >also don't remove build.mk because it is like a Makefile (which we >don't seem to remove). Hmm. Am I th

RE: Bandwidth control

2001-08-31 Thread Charles Randall
As you point out, that level of granularity isn't available with general purpose traffic shaping tools. You may want to look at the Zeus server to understand the features that were product-worthy as one example. It appears that they've only implemented this at the virtual server level. As you're

RE: 2.0.26?

2001-08-31 Thread Gonyou, Austin
I'm going to have 2.0.26 up tonight somtime. I'd like to test out SSL on this one. If someone could supply a patch for httpd.conf I'd greatly appreciate it. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > Fr

mod_rewrite & SCRIPT_URx envvars

2001-08-31 Thread Robert Simonson
This doesn't seem right... RewriteEngine Off ... RewriteEngine On ... If I serve something from this directory container, the SCRIPT_URx environment variables are not set because the main server config has the engine off. Is this right? It seems like we should be settin

Re: [patch] -- add mod_core.h to 'installed' header files

2001-08-31 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Thursday 30 August 2001 11:40, Ian Holsman wrote: Committed. Ryan > mod_proxy refers to this file. > > > Index: Makefile.in > === > RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/Makefile.in,v > retrieving revision 1.80 > diff -u -u -r1.80 Makef

Re: ./configure failing (mod_auth_dbm)

2001-08-31 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Friday 31 August 2001 02:40, Stas Bekman wrote: use --enable-module=most, and configuration errors are non-fatal. Ryan > ./configure --prefix=$HOME/httpd-2.0 \ > --enable-so \ > --enable-module=all \ > --enable-mods-shared=all > > ... > > checking for library containing dbm_open... no > chec

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/experimental mod_cache.c

2001-08-31 Thread Bill Stoddard
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Make CACHE_IN and CACHE_CONDITIONAL AP_FTYPE_CONTENT filters. Comtemplating > > making a new filter type, AP_FTYPE_CACHE. We need to run CACHE_IN immediately > > after the handlers are done and before we run the content through any filters. > > In the orig

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/filters mod_include.c

2001-08-31 Thread Bill Stoddard
> On Thu, 2001-08-30 at 18:12, Greg Ames wrote: > > Marc Slemko wrote: > > > > > > On 22 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > gregames01/08/22 16:12:24 > > > > > > > > Modified:modules/filters mod_include.c > > > > Log: > > > > get rid of nuisance log messages due to su

./configure failing (mod_auth_dbm)

2001-08-31 Thread Stas Bekman
./configure --prefix=$HOME/httpd-2.0 \ --enable-so \ --enable-module=all \ --enable-mods-shared=all ... checking for library containing dbm_open... no checking whether to enable mod_auth_dbm... configure: error: mod_auth_dbm has been requested but can not be built due to prerequisite failures ma

Re: 2.0.26?

2001-08-31 Thread Stas Bekman
I'm running HEAD with: ./configure --prefix=$HOME/httpd-2.0 \ --enable-so \ --enable-vhost-alias \ --enable-info \ (enabled just enough to verify your report), > What's with this? > > Failed Test Status Wstat Total Fail Failed List of failed > ---

Re: 2.0.25 on FreeBSD 4.2-R -- 404 returns text/plain error page

2001-08-31 Thread Roman Neuhauser
At 00:41 8/30/2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote the following: -- >From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 5:24 PM >Subject: Re: 2.0.25 on FreeBSD 4.2-R -- 404 returns text/

Re: Bandwidth control

2001-08-31 Thread Günter Knauf
> Alex Stewart wrote: >> I've already got a basic model for limit calculations working, and have >> a good idea how to go about most of the rest of it, I think, but >> suggestions are welcome.. > An output filter in Apache v2.0 would be ideal for this. > However I would question why you would w