Hi Mark,
> I wrote an example sometime in July/Aug but didn't get around to porting
> it to 2.0. Here is what we have so far
> http://www.awe.com/mark/dev/mod_status_xml/
I've tested your module on Linux, NetWare and Win32, and used Mozilla 0.9.4 to diplay,
here's what I get:
- on Linux and
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 08:34:30PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:29 PM
>
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 01:24:25PM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> > > with current cvs all httpd-test ssl tests hang, stacktrace i
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 12:51:09AM -0400, MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
wrote:
> I'm running into all sorts of filter problems. The initial client request is
> itself not received completely.. For ex., the apr_bucket_read
> (ssl_engine_io.c:218) returns 20 bytes when the client has sen
I'm running into all sorts of filter problems. The initial client request is
itself not received completely.. For ex., the apr_bucket_read
(ssl_engine_io.c:218) returns 20 bytes when the client has sent 103 bytes.
The ssl_hook_process_connection (mod_ssl.c:360) returns with a error to read
more
On Tuesday 02 October 2001 06:03 pm, Rodrigo Parra Novo wrote:
> > >- server/mpm/ (adding a new MPM for AtheOS, which would resemble the
> > > a lot the Win32 MPM)
> >
> > You will need this, but I would look at mpmt_os2, which provides a
> > multi-process multi-threaded MPM
From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:29 PM
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 01:24:25PM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> > with current cvs all httpd-test ssl tests hang, stacktrace is same for
> > all...
>
> I bet it's related to the input filtering changes.
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 01:24:25PM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> with current cvs all httpd-test ssl tests hang, stacktrace is same for
> all...
I bet it's related to the input filtering changes.
I have no clue how the whole mod_ssl input filtering works, but I'll
try to take a look. My gue
> >- server/mpm/ (adding a new MPM for AtheOS, which would resemble the
> > a lot the Win32 MPM)
>
> You will need this, but I would look at mpmt_os2, which provides a multi-process
> multi-threaded MPM which should be basically portable. It may use a few
> native OS/2 API
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Greg Stein wrote:
> So now the question arises, who is using the Expat that is included with
> Apache 1.3? Was the goal of enabling XML usage successful?
I am using it in a few modules; just simple read/parsing of for
example jabber queries.
It works for me gov.
Dw
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Greg Stein wrote:
> When Expat was added to Apache a couple years ago, part of the impetus was
> to make XML parsing a standard feature for the web server -- modules could
> count on it being present for their use.
> So now the question arises, who is using the Expat that is i
Am I missing something here ?.. The configure script is supposed to verify
the version of OpenSSL that's specified, and if it's less than 0.9.6, it
doesn't allow you to go further..
-Madhu
-Original Message-
From: Jeroen Massar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 4
Boo,
First I'll twack myself for the fact that I didn't look at the openssl
version any sooner...
This is prolly at least one nice for the archives for other donkeys
hitting their heads against this brick...
I wanted a newer version than the 2.0.16 beta's to experiment some more
with Apache 2.0
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Mark J Cox wrote:
> What we ought to do is to first decide what the XML output is going to
> look like (it'll be a pain to change this later), then it doesn't really
> matter if it's a patch to mod_status or a new module.
> http://www.awe.com/mark/dev/mod_status_xml/example.
When Expat was added to Apache a couple years ago, part of the impetus was
to make XML parsing a standard feature for the web server -- modules could
count on it being present for their use.
So now the question arises, who is using the Expat that is included with
Apache 1.3? Was the goal of enabl
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
> Do you see the same error with worker mpm also ?.. Infact, I was debugging a
> simular problem that I faced today morning when running stress (with worker
> mpm).
i've only tested with prefork, but the problem doesn't look mpm
On Tuesday 02 October 2001 02:56 pm, Rodrigo Parra Novo wrote:
> necessary steps to to port Apache to a new architecture. Is there a
> document with the same function for Apache 2.0?
Not yet, but it looks like you have found them all already.
>
>Through a bit of searching/grepping, I've fou
According to Rodrigo Parra Novo:
> I'm sending the (rather simple) patch attached. It would be nice if
> someone from the Apache team could take a look at the patch, and tell me
> if anything is still missing. It would be also nice if (hopefully) this
> patch could be added to the current
Hi there,
I have ported Apache 1.3.20 to AtheOS (A new OS, described on
www.atheos.cx), following the rules described by the PORTING document,
which can be found in Apache's src/ directory.
I'm sending the (rather simple) patch attached. It would be nice if
someone from the Apache team
From: "Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 4:08 PM
> This is one of those 'light bulb comes on' posts.
>
> The mod_mime bug of not correctly handling unknown file name extensions essentially
> renders all the negotiable variants equivalent! mod_negotiation does th
I've yanked the following two items from 1.3's STATUS. Both are now
incorporated in 2.0.
* Proposed API Changes:
- r->content_language is for backwards compatibility... with modules
that may not link any longer without some minor editing. The new
field is r->content_languages. Heck
From: "Roy T. Fielding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:43 PM
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 11:02:46AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> > Although I have no clue what the proper solution to this, I'm kind
> > of sure that if we are choosing based off file size, that is wrong
This is one of those 'light bulb comes on' posts.
The mod_mime bug of not correctly handling unknown file name extensions essentially
renders all the negotiable variants equivalent! mod_negotiation does the right thing
and
serves up the smallest of the equivalent variants!
Bill
> On Tue, Oct 0
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 09:52:16PM +0200, Mohamed Aly wrote:
> when i tried ti compile the apache on sol 5.8 i386 i started with ./configure and
>found this error i tried to touch the file name as he said but nothing happend i got
>the same message
> any help?
>
> "Creating Makefile
> Cr
Do you see the same error with worker mpm also ?.. Infact, I was debugging a
simular problem that I faced today morning when running stress (with worker
mpm).
-Madhu
-Original Message-
From: Doug MacEachern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PRO
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 11:02:46AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:01:54PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > IMHO, if we have unpredictable behavior due to directory -contents-,
> > then mod_negotiation is broken.
There was nothing unpredictable about it before.
with current cvs all httpd-test ssl tests hang, stacktrace is same for
all...
(gdb) where
#0 0x401c91de in __select () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x40047ab0 in __DTOR_END__ () from /home/dougm/ap/prefork/lib/libapr.so.0
#2 0x40039fa4 in apr_recv (sock=0x827902c, buf=0x8284638 "", len=0xbfffd1f4)
OK, I'm running into what seems to be a poorly documented quirk for
DocumentBuilder.
Using the document builder, I am parsing out and XML file, which is never
more than 1 element deep with attributes.
However, after I set all the attribute values, I need to create extra
elements and append them
when i tried ti compile the apache on sol 5.8
i386 i started with ./configure and found this error i tried to touch the
file name as he said but nothing happend i got the same message
any help?
"Creating MakefileCreating Configuration.apaci
in srcConfiguration.tmpl is more recent tha
> -Original Message-
> From: MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
> Thanks for the review comments. I agree that the comments are a
> bit more for
> a experienced user, and probably just right for a new-user. I can
> certainly
> reduce the details, and point the user to the docs. for
From: "Aaron Bannert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:38 PM
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 01:28:33PM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
> > > We don't need to list all of the possible alternatives either.
> > > Just the most sane one. And, some of those values *are* the
> > > default
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Pardon my ignorance, but why can't someone veto a release if they feel
> it is the wrong time to do so? -- justin
We have a mess of rules/traditions that act to prevent
obstructionism and push people toward constructive
argument and constructive actions. Releasing i
Cliff Woolley wrote:
>
> I can't remember if this has been fixed since 2.0.24 (whatever version is
> running on daedalus), but if you GET the URL
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/programs/httpd.html
>
> you'll see that the first few lines are duplicated (didn't count the exact
> number of c
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 01:28:33PM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
> > We don't need to list all of the possible alternatives either.
> > Just the most sane one. And, some of those values *are* the
> > default - no need to specify them in our example config.
>
> Bzzt ... no. Anything the user is lik
Thanks for the review comments. I agree that the comments are a bit more for
a experienced user, and probably just right for a new-user. I can certainly
reduce the details, and point the user to the docs. for more information.
(Can we point them to the existing documentation at www.modssl.org ?..)
If you will consider the language from README-WIN32.TXT;
Apache on Win32 should be considered initial-release quality code.
It has not been subjected to the same stresses on its stability and
security that the Unix releases have enjoyed, so there is a greater
possibility of undiscovered v
From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:20 PM
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 02:15:36PM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
> > In my opinion, there is way too much text in here. Why don't we start by
> > creating a good set of docs for mod_ssl (currently there are non
From: "Joshua Slive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:06 PM
> > From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> > The directory CONTENTS cannot be construed as a config error.
> >
> > If we can agree on some scheme to handle examples, such as the above,
> > then I
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 09:20:41PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> We should fix the configure script so that it automatically adds the LoadModule
> line, just like it did in 1.3.
This patch fixes the problem described in the STATUS file whereby modules
that are compiled-in by default would not be en
The web page "Using Apache With Novell NetWare 5"
(http://httpd.apache.org/docs/netware.html) currently classifies Apache for NetWare as
experimental. With the release of NetWare 6, Apache 1.3 installs by default as part
of the NetWare 6 configuration environment. This underlines Novell's co
From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:02 PM
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:01:54PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > IMHO, if we have unpredictable behavior due to directory -contents-,
> > then mod_negotiation is broken.
>
> +1 (me too).
>
> Altho
From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:04 PM
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:07:46PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > It's bitten several folks. It's been written up on bugtraq as an outstanding
> > case. There are a dozen variations of cause and eff
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Prefer html shtml php jsp cgi
>
> > In the words of many administrators, "It shouldn't be this hard to
> > understand."
>
> In the words of many developers, too. -- justin
>
Come on folks. Is this all reall
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 02:15:36PM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
> >
> > Hi,
> > Here's a sample version of httpd-ssl-std.conf that may be added into
> > the CVS tree. It'd be great if somebody could pl. review and
> -Original Message-
> From: MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
>
> Hi,
> Here's a sample version of httpd-ssl-std.conf that may be added into
> the CVS tree. It'd be great if somebody could pl. review and commit it.
>
The config file is not the documentation!
In my opinion
Looks good to me in concept (I know virtually nothing about SSL
configuration). I have a couple comments though:
- make sure your lines are <79 chars, and preferably <~70 (so people can
put comments in there and we have some extra room for error).
- make sure your comment above the lockfile read
> -Original Message-
> From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> The directory CONTENTS cannot be construed as a config error.
>
> If we can agree on some scheme to handle examples, such as the above,
> then I could begin to have some confidence. If we can't -clearly-
> d
Hi,
Here's a sample version of httpd-ssl-std.conf that may be added into
the CVS tree. It'd be great if somebody could pl. review and commit it.
Thx
-Madhu
Listen @@Port@@
Listen 443
AddType application/x-x509-ca-cert .crt
AddType application/x-pkcs7-crl.crl
# Pass Phrase Dial
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:07:46PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> It's bitten several folks. It's been written up on bugtraq as an outstanding
> case. There are a dozen variations of cause and effect. But whatever, you are
> the RM, and nobody can veto a release.
Pardon my ignorance, bu
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:01:54PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> IMHO, if we have unpredictable behavior due to directory -contents-,
> then mod_negotiation is broken.
+1 (me too).
Although I have no clue what the proper solution to this, I'm kind
of sure that if we are choosing based of
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: .asis handler isn't driven
From: "Greg Ames" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:44 AM
> "William A. Rowe, Jr." wro
When I was fixing mod_usertrack in 2.0, I was referring back to the
1.3 behavior and discovered two bits;
1. we waste a ton of time expanding dates that don't need expanding
2. there is still the 'millenial hack' that should be unneccessary now
Any opinions on committing this patch for 1.3.21's
From: "Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:03 PM
> This is looking more and more like config funkiness as opposed to a serious
> code defect. Unless I see something to change my mind, I am not inclined to
> attempt to fix this in the 1.3 code base.
Whatever.
From: "Greg Ames" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:44 AM
> "William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
> >
> > Better yet...
> >
> > DirectoryIndex index.html
> >
> > index.html.cgi
> > index.html.ssi
> >
> > where cgi is set via AddHandler, ssi is set via AddFilter.
> >
> > That is
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Greg Ames wrote:
> > index.html.cgi
> > index.html.ssi
>
> A lot of these just sound like configuration errors. I don't think we
> should write a lot of code to deal with them. If we serve an arbitrary
> file, fine; if we produce an error message, also fine, as long as our
>
"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
>
> Better yet...
>
> DirectoryIndex index.html
>
> index.html.cgi
> index.html.ssi
>
> where cgi is set via AddHandler, ssi is set via AddFilter.
>
> That is a really good demonstration. Neither .cgi nor .ssi offers any
> hint to mod_negotiation of what it augh
Title: RE: best source - please reply.
Thanks very much Jeff.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: best source - please reply.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
You definitely don't want to leave the impression with a user that configuring a secure
server is 'easy'. It's not. The most simplistic and common case is probably insecure.
Bill
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 09:06:09PM -0400, MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
wrote:
> > Oh !!.. that's right
>
> Include conf/httpd-ssl.conf
>
>
> Bill
Definitely +1 on the above.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:56 PM
> Subject: RE: SSL configuration file
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Guys,
>
> What is the best way to track down error messages in error and access logs?
> What is the best forum for general Apache administrator questions. I
> inadvertantly joined the developer's list that while interesting is not
> really my perspective - I have set
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 11:33:23PM +0200, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> sorry to be pendantic, but current CVS of apache-1.3 is broken for
> Cygwin platform, since Martin missed to commit first hunk of the patch
> for src/Configure:
Yep, and now I can see why:
> |Please commit to CVS.
> |
> |diff -urN apac
> I had a patch which added a '?xml' option
> to mod_status.
> It's a large (>400 lines) patch, but most of it is puts.
> does anyone have any objections to it?
At the last ApacheCon I mentioned to a few people that I had written some
patches to 1.3 mod_status for XML output but not cleaned them
61 matches
Mail list logo
