Re: [Patch]: to get the Ldap code building

2002-02-07 Thread Ian Holsman
Hi Paul. I've applied the apr-util config change. I dont have access (never tried) to httpd-ldap so you'll need to pester the list again for these changes. ..Ian Paul J. Reder wrote: > I'm posting this as a a patch because I'm no config and build expert. Please > check to make sure I have done t

new httpd build running on daedalus

2002-02-07 Thread Greg Ames
...as of Wednesday, 06-Feb-2002 16:35:14 PST. This is 2.0.31+ with one new patch on server/protocol.c to prevent seg faults when the "request line" is \r\n followed by a bunch of garbage. Greg

Re: [PATCH] enable static support binaries at build-time

2002-02-07 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 02:12:42PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 01:23:08PM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote: > > This does _not_ add support for a static httpd, since that issue is > > not yet decided, but it should solve 7 of the 8 binaries that Ken was > > worried about. T

Re: [PATCH] enable static support binaries at build-time

2002-02-07 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 01:23:08PM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote: > This patch solves a release showstopper by allowing the support binaries > to be built statically against apr/apr-util/etc. It also adds static > support for the htdbm tool. > > This does _not_ add support for a static httpd, since

Re: [PATCH] enable static support binaries at build-time

2002-02-07 Thread Greg Ames
Aaron Bannert wrote: > > This patch solves a release showstopper by allowing the support binaries > to be built statically against apr/apr-util/etc. It also adds static > support for the htdbm tool. +1 Thanks! Greg

[PATCH] enable static support binaries at build-time

2002-02-07 Thread Aaron Bannert
This patch solves a release showstopper by allowing the support binaries to be built statically against apr/apr-util/etc. It also adds static support for the htdbm tool. This does _not_ add support for a static httpd, since that issue is not yet decided, but it should solve 7 of the 8 binaries th

[PATCH] new scoreboard creation logic, remove DEFAULT_SCOREBOARD from MPMs

2002-02-07 Thread Aaron Bannert
This is the patch I promised a couple weeks ago. It changes the way we create the scoreboard to be more friendly with 3rd party apps/processes that want access to the scoreboard while maintaining the ability to have an anonymous scoreboard. The logic was discussed on-list a week or two ago, but I'

[Patch]: to get the Ldap code building

2002-02-07 Thread Paul J. Reder
I'm posting this as a a patch because I'm no config and build expert. Please check to make sure I have done this correctly. This was required to get the apr-util code to configure properly on Linux using the latest open-ldap libs and the IBM ldap libs. The changes to httpd-ldap were required in

RE: DEFAULT_SCOREBOARD controlled by the MPMs

2002-02-07 Thread Ryan Bloom
> Why is this defined in the MPM? Shouldn't it exist outside of the > MPM? I'd like to let the MPM leave ap_scoreboard_fname as NULL if it > doesn't encounter a ScoreboardFile directive, so I can opt for anonymous > shared memory as was discussed on here a week or two ago, but I'll have to > chan

DEFAULT_SCOREBOARD controlled by the MPMs

2002-02-07 Thread Aaron Bannert
Why is this defined in the MPM? Shouldn't it exist outside of the MPM? I'd like to let the MPM leave ap_scoreboard_fname as NULL if it doesn't encounter a ScoreboardFile directive, so I can opt for anonymous shared memory as was discussed on here a week or two ago, but I'll have to change all the

Re: configure option to specify mmap/shm

2002-02-07 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 01:19:45PM -0500, MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote: > I wrote a small test program - attached is the program and the output.. This discussion has moved to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -aaron

RE: configure option to specify mmap/shm

2002-02-07 Thread MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
I wrote a small test program - attached is the program and the output.. -Madhu $ ./xx mmap: No such device $ $ $ ls -ld /dev/zero crw-rw-rw- 1 binsys 3 0x04 Jul 17 2001 /dev/zero #include #include #include int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { void *m; int tmp

Re: configure option to specify mmap/shm

2002-02-07 Thread Jim Jagielski
Aaron Bannert wrote: > > For anonymous shared memory, it prefers MMAP_ZERO over SHMGET_ANON. Which is good because then you don't have to worry so much about the shared mem segment sizes configured in the kernel. -- ===

Re: Insecure installations of cgi wrappers (RTFM people!)

2002-02-07 Thread Edward S. Marshall
On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 20:10, Nathan Neulinger wrote: > About the only way I can think of getting around this problem would be > to have some sort of web-server -> cgi-wrapper token passing taking > place with a shared secret compiled into the wrapper executable, > combined with non-readable wrappe

Re: configure option to specify mmap/shm

2002-02-07 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 09:21:20AM -0800, MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote: > Nope.. It does not work (for me).. That's the reason I need to change to to > use SHMGET_ANON.. I was thinking that there'a already a option available to > do such things.. > > BTW, is it not strange that

RE: configure option to specify mmap/shm

2002-02-07 Thread MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
Nope.. It does not work (for me).. That's the reason I need to change to to use SHMGET_ANON.. I was thinking that there'a already a option available to do such things.. BTW, is it not strange that it picks up APR_USE_SHMEM_SHMGET, but not APR_USE_SHMEM_SHMGET_ANON and rather decides to select APR

Re: configure option to specify mmap/shm

2002-02-07 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 09:06:40AM -0800, MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote: > Hi, > Question : > What option(s) should I pass to the configure to enable/disable the > various SHM options (MMAP, SHMGET)..(sorry if it's a dumb question) > > Problem : > On a HPUX 11i system (wor

configure option to specify mmap/shm

2002-02-07 Thread MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
Hi, Question : What option(s) should I pass to the configure to enable/disable the various SHM options (MMAP, SHMGET)..(sorry if it's a dumb question) Problem : On a HPUX 11i system (worker MPM, 2.0.31), I'm seeing the following in srclib/apr/include/apr.h : #define APR_USE_SHMEM_MMAP_TMP

Re: Releases, showstoppers, and vetos

2002-02-07 Thread Ben Hyde
I entirely agree with Bill and Roy here. The release manager owns the release short of using the big stick of a full fledged vote. It's a miserable job; bow down in sympathy. I have never worked on any project where that wasn't the case. But every project I've worked on people would grab one

Re: Current HEAD on Win32

2002-02-07 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: "Sebastian Bergmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 2:39 AM > "William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote: > > It's crufty and taking a while, might be a few hours before all is very > > well again. > > Yesterday's problems seem to be resolved, however I cannot stop or > resta

unexplained phenonmenon: hanging apache processes (fwd)

2002-02-07 Thread Zvi Har'El
Dear friends, Nadav, my son, sent the enclosed message to the Apache's users mailing list, and drew blank. I resend it here, hoping the top Apache gurus participating in the discussions here may give some insight. We are really puzzled by the described behavior. Best, Zvi. -- Dr. Zvi Har'El

Re: Current HEAD on Win32

2002-02-07 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote: > It's crufty and taking a while, might be a few hours before all is very > well again. Yesterday's problems seem to be resolved, however I cannot stop or restart the service: [Thu Feb 07 09:30:53 2002] [emerg] (22502)Das System kann die angegebene Datei ni