Re: library-ization

2002-10-15 Thread Jacek Prucia
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 09:21:23AM -0700, David N. Welton wrote: [...] And I would like an HTTP tester library. I think that if done in this way, it would be versatile enough to replace ab, and it would also give people the freedom to experiment with other front ends. Like someting in Tk,

Re: public key authentication apache

2002-10-15 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Ian Holsman wrote: I was wondering if anyone knows of something (preferably using openSSH) which would allow Apache to authenticate via a SSH keypair. what i would like ideally is for the browser to use the passwords/pass-phrases of the ssh-agent running on the local

Re: Compiling Apache modules for windows

2002-10-15 Thread Igor Leturia
Hi all! Günter sent me a binary version of mod_replace. I started trying it and I couldn't get it to work. At last I found that there is an error in the example configuration file. Instead of being 'Replace colour color text/html', it should be 'Replace colour color text/html'. At least this

stable 2.0 trees

2002-10-15 Thread Jeff Trawick
After a million messages on related topics, I'm not sure that any two developers agree on all of the following topics: . how much to consider the needs of users relative to desires of developers . how hard to try not to break binary compatibility . how much to use 2.0 HEAD as a sandbox for

Re: public key authentication apache

2002-10-15 Thread Ben Hyde
The ssh tools don't export the operations (signing, checking signatures). I looked into teases them out out of the code, for example authfd.c has the signing code. One could create a command to bootstrap an authenticated session and then hand it off to the browser. Bridging auth to unlocked

RE: stable 2.0 trees

2002-10-15 Thread Bill Stoddard
After a million messages on related topics, I'm not sure that any two developers agree on all of the following topics: . how much to consider the needs of users relative to desires of developers . how hard to try not to break binary compatibility . how much to use 2.0 HEAD as a sandbox

RE: Compiling Apache modules for windows

2002-10-15 Thread Juan Rivera
Igor, You have to put the replace entries like this: Proxy /someloc Replace colour color text/html SetOutputFilter REPLACE /Proxy ProxyPass /someloc http://Server/someloc ProxyPassReverse /someloc http://Server/someloc Best

apache itself to seteuid

2002-10-15 Thread Benjamin Kuit
Is there currently a way to configure apache so that the server itself suid's to the owner of a page? ie Accessing http://hostname/~username will causes httpd to setuid to username while accessing files with ~username/public_html? This isn't the same as suexec, which only runs cgis as the

RE: stable 2.0 trees

2002-10-15 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 08:16 AM 10/15/2002, Bill Stoddard wrote: After a million messages on related topics, I'm not sure that any two developers agree on all of the following topics: . how much to consider the needs of users relative to desires of developers . how hard to try not to break binary

RE: stable 2.0 trees

2002-10-15 Thread Bill Stoddard
At 08:16 AM 10/15/2002, Bill Stoddard wrote: After a million messages on related topics, I'm not sure that any two developers agree on all of the following topics: . how much to consider the needs of users relative to desires of developers . how hard to try not to break binary

Re: stable 2.0 trees

2002-10-15 Thread Jim Jagielski
Bill Stoddard wrote: At the risk of racing too far ahead in this discussion, here is my suggestion... 2.0.43 becomes 2.1 and the MMN major does not change for subsequent 2.1 series releases (except for a compelling reason, eg a security fix -requires- a bump). Why 2.1? No technical

Re: apache itself to seteuid

2002-10-15 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Benjamin, the only way to accomplish this is with the perchild MPM for Apache 2.0, and only by calling out each and every user. Perhaps it would be good to add perchild options for mass-user hosting in the schema you suggest. Note that each 'user' then has an apache process running in the

ER: Compiling Apache modules for windows

2002-10-15 Thread Igor Leturia
Thanks very much, Juan! I tried it and it worked! -Jatorrizko mezua- Nondik: Juan Rivera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Bidalia: Asteartea, 2002.eko urriak 15 15:34 Nora: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Gaia: RE: Compiling Apache modules for windows Igor, You have to put the replace entries like

RE: stable 2.0 trees

2002-10-15 Thread Padwa, Daniel
At the risk of racing too far ahead in this discussion, here is my suggestion... 2.0.43 becomes 2.1 and the MMN major does not change for subsequent 2.1 series releases (except for a compelling reason, eg a security fix -requires- a bump). Why 2.1? No technical reason; purely a PR tactic to

Re: stable 2.0 trees

2002-10-15 Thread Thom May
* Jim Jagielski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : Bill Stoddard wrote: At the risk of racing too far ahead in this discussion, here is my suggestion... 2.0.43 becomes 2.1 and the MMN major does not change for subsequent 2.1 series releases (except for a compelling reason, eg a security fix

ability to restrict scope of require directive to a single module

2002-10-15 Thread Xavier MACHENAUD
Hi, I'm facing the following problem : I'm using 2 auth modules in authoritative mode (if one fail, try the other one). I have one authorization check (using a require directive) for the first module and another one for the other module. My problem is that the second directive as a syntax that

[PATCH] event driven read

2002-10-15 Thread Bill Stoddard
Something I've been hacking on (in the pejorative sense of the word 'hack'. Look at the patch and you will see what I mean :-). This should apply and serve pages on Linux, though the event_loop is clearly broken as it does not timeout keep-alive connections and will hang on the apr_poll() (and

Final patch for a long time.

2002-10-15 Thread rbb
The recent conversations on this list have made me finally realize that I have been here too long. I need a project that is not the Apache web server. So, this is my good-bye. I will be unsubscribing from the Apache web server development lists in the next day or two. I will still be

Re: Final patch for a long time.

2002-10-15 Thread Johannes Erdfelt
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The first project is the Perchild MPM. It basically works, but there are bugs. Can you give some more information? I'm interested in using the Perchild MPM myself, but haven't because of the reports that it's buggy. I'm

Re: stable 2.0 trees

2002-10-15 Thread Jeff Trawick
William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It seems that the 'maintainers', the stodgy 'old men' of the group, want everyone to row together on bug fixes. That isn't how OS works. The folks with no interest in tracking down obscure bugs just leave, or quietly bide their time. The

Re: stable 2.0 trees

2002-10-15 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
i'm responding to the head of this thread because i haven't read the rest of it yet.. so, as usual, my comments may be stale. Jeff Trawick wrote: . let 2.0 HEAD proceed as it seems to be going now : . let those who are interested (not more than a few would be needed to make it

RE: ability to restrict scope of require directive to a single module

2002-10-15 Thread John K. Sterling
-- Original Message -- Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 18:27:18 +0200 From: Xavier MACHENAUD [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ability to restrict scope of require directive to a single module Hi, I'm facing the following problem : I'm using 2 auth modules in

RE: stable 2.0 trees

2002-10-15 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Bill Stoddard wrote: Worth reading... http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/0,14179,2882203,00.html On October 2nd; *after* RedHat 8.0 was released he wrote And I doubt Red Hat will make 2.0 the default install until [...]. Really Impressive Predictions.

Counting of I/O bytes

2002-10-15 Thread Bojan Smojver
I have submitted the patch along those lines a few days back, which also includes an MMN bump. In the light of the latest discussions on the list, it seems that a patch like that is not being looked at favourably by many people :-( Do you want me to rework that patch so it uses a privata data

Re: Counting of I/O bytes

2002-10-15 Thread Brian Pane
On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 22:09, Bojan Smojver wrote: I have submitted the patch along those lines a few days back, which also includes an MMN bump. In the light of the latest discussions on the list, it seems that a patch like that is not being looked at favourably by many people :-( The MMN

Re: Counting of I/O bytes

2002-10-15 Thread Cliff Woolley
On 15 Oct 2002, Brian Pane wrote: major number. If the patch added fields in the middle of the struct, thus breaking binary compatibility, then it would be a problem. Even adding at the end can break binary compat, since sizeof(conn_rec) changes, so you might have 3rd party code that

Re: Counting of I/O bytes

2002-10-15 Thread Bojan Smojver
Quoting Brian Pane [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 22:09, Bojan Smojver wrote: I have submitted the patch along those lines a few days back, which also includes an MMN bump. In the light of the latest discussions on the list, it seems that a patch like that is not being looked

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/experimental cache_util.c

2002-10-15 Thread Brian Pane
On Sat, 2002-10-12 at 20:26, Paul J. Reder wrote: Okay, this takes care of item 4 from the list below. Thanks Brian, saves me from having to do the commit. :) What about the other 3? Should they be fixed by the change from apr_time_t to apr_int64_t? Apr_time_t is really apr_int64_t under

Re: stable 2.0 trees

2002-10-15 Thread Jeff Stuart
On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 10:46, Thom May wrote: * Jim Jagielski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : Bill Stoddard wrote: At the risk of racing too far ahead in this discussion, here is my suggestion... 2.0.43 becomes 2.1 and the MMN major does not change for subsequent 2.1 series releases