In my experience if more than 16% of the code is changed it's better to
rewrite it. While true, it has gotten me into MORE trouble...
> Just a footnote to that thought. We have a *ton* of internal, private
> entry points and data declarations in mod_ssl.h. IMHO - we should
> be simplifying mod_
At 12:06 AM 3/13/2003, MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
>- Regarding the SSL-C version, I've tried using with both 2.1 and 2.3 (I
>definitely prefer 2.3). The reason I put 2.1 is to enable all those users
>with 2.1 to get mod_ssl to work. If you think it's a waste of time, I'd be
>ha
--On Wednesday, March 12, 2003 9:30 PM -0500 "MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN
(HP-Cupertino,ex1)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Okay.. I've added some little checks to get SSL-C to be recognized. Here's a
patch (relative to Geoff's patch) that does some checking.. I've added the
complete patch as attachment (
At 12:06 AM 3/13/2003, MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
>- Move the inclusion of openssl headers to ssl_toolkit_compat.h, and change
>to include headers of type "openssl/ssl.h" instad of "ssl.h". That is what
>is followed by the openssl sources also, and I believe mod_ssl should also
Hi Bill,
[sorry for not providing complete details]
Here's what the patch does :
- Replace the old APACHE_CHECK_SSL_TOOLKIT method with a re-written one
(Geoff's patch)
This essentially does all the same checks that was being done earlier, but
in a more cleaner fashion (using the
Madhu, I really like the gist of this patch.
I'm trying to get rolling 2.0.45 out the door, so I haven't had time to
watch your conversation. I have my own toolkit patch for SSL-C 2.3
that probably breaks earlier SSL-C flavors. This is why I haven't had
time to investigate/respond - spending too
APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2003/03/07 20:24:07 $]
Release [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]:
2.1.0 : in development
Please consult the following STATUS files for information
on related proj
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2003/02/04 19:08:59 $]
Release:
1.3.28-dev: In development
1.3.27: Tagged September 30, 2002. Announced Oct 3, 2002.
1.3.26: Tagged June 18, 2002.
1.3.25: Tagged June 17, 2002. Not re
Okay.. I've added some little checks to get SSL-C to be recognized. Here's a
patch (relative to Geoff's patch) that does some checking.. I've added the
complete patch as attachment (also). If nobody has any objections, I'd like
to commit this.
Thanks
-Madhu
105,106c107,112
< +dnl FIXME: we
I get these 3 files installed together with other httpd-2/apr files on linux:
~/httpd/prefork/modules/httpd.exp
~/httpd/prefork/lib/apr.exp
~/httpd/prefork/lib/aprutil.exp
Won't it make sense to not install them on OSes where they have no use? Or are
there compilers on linux that need the *.exp f
Hi Madhu,
Thanks for giving the latest incarnation a review.
* MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> I tried the patch, and it seemed to work fine for me (and it's more cleaner
> than what we have today).
>
> - I don't know how SSL-C will be broken with this pa
I tried the patch, and it seemed to work fine for me (and it's more cleaner
than what we have today).
- I don't know how SSL-C will be broken with this patch
- Anybody out there using SSL-C ?
- I have a patch to get SSL-C to work with mod_ssl.. I'll have to dust it
out, before posting the patch.
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> Anyone have any first hand experience with kerberos authentication in
> the server?
.. well - we have ripped code out of telnet(d) from KTH-their Heimdal's on
*BSD to do this for a finance customer - who had some (silly but golden)
policy which made k
On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, at 12:51 PM, Oden Eriksson wrote:
Anyway..., despite this enormous disregard or what it is called,
mandrake
Linux will be the first distribution shipping apache2 (my packaging),
_plus_
a whole bunch of other server like stuff I have packed.
Um, hasn't RH8.0 been shi
Just ran across this and it looks kinda interesting:
http://meta.cesnet.cz/software/heimdal/negotiate.en.html
Anyone have any first hand experience with kerberos authentication in
the server?
Bill
Wednesday 12 March 2003 19.44 skrev Ian Holsman:
> I care.
> I actually used your packaging to base our internal ones on. I do belive
> that apache needs a .spec file, but have been too busy to go through the
> hassle of doing it (not that a spec file is hard, its arguing about the
> layout and wha
Thanks for the help Graham.
I'm wondering if I should see mod_ldap in the
static listing of the modules I compiled in?
I don;t see mod_ldap but a few others such as mod_auth_ldap.c
and util_ldap.c. Am I missing something?
eskimo [16] ./apachectl -l
Compiled in modules:
core.c
mod_access.c
At 12:41 PM 3/12/2003, Oden Eriksson wrote:
>Sorry for bothering you, but I really would like to know how to unsunbscribe
>from this cvs list.
Oden, what's with the cross-posting, a parting gift?
Anyways, you need to look at your message headers;
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
list-unsubscri
Wednesday 12 March 2003 19.25 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> trawick 2003/03/12 10:25:39
>
> Modified:.CHANGES
> Log:
> reflect a fix merged to 2.0.45-dev
Hi.
Sorry for bothering you, but I really would like to know how to unsunbscribe
from this cvs list.
I have done my part i
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Manni Wood wrote:
> OK, so almost a month ago, Cliff Woolley, Sander Holthaus, John K.
> Sterling, and Jeff Trawick all encouraged me to change the mod_usertrack
> patch I submitted so that instead of relying on a regexp to correctly
> find the cookie in the cookie header (why
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I have seen one report of the "new" thread library not honoring an unlock
causing a deadlock. We actually traced it and saw an call to unlock
yet all subsequent calls to lock failed, because it wasn't released.
2 main points: this was with the Sol9 thread libs on Sol8 (as sugge
Hi all,
I´d like to know how is the process I have to follow
for my filter. I need to modify the html content.
Is the same as in mod_acrono..?
Thanx :)
__
Yahoo! Cellulari: loghi, suonerie, picture message per il tuo telef
I have seen one report of the "new" thread library not honoring an unlock
causing a deadlock. We actually traced it and saw an call to unlock
yet all subsequent calls to lock failed, because it wasn't released.
2 main points: this was with the Sol9 thread libs on Sol8 (as suggested
by Sun), and (2
Hi there!
I'm not on the mailing list yet, so you will need to mail me directly if
you want to reply to this suggested update.
I'm running SuSE Linux 8.1 (professional) with apache 1.3.26 .
I do like the new style for the Apache 1.3.26 documentation - It's alot
easier to comprehend, having se
Trevor Hurst wrote:
Syntax error on line 1073 of /usr/local/apache2/conf/httpd.conf:
Invalid command 'LDAPTrustedCA', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a
module not included in the server configuration
This is a very new addition - the cert handling was tidied up recently
and I think is only avai
25 matches
Mail list logo
