Text.rar
Description: Binary data
Hi All,
I am sorry I forgot to mention that this is a problem
only a server which built specifically for DMZ outside
of the company's intranet. The same Apache works fine
on other Solaris 8 server within the intranet.
These DMZ servers have a stripped down version of the
OS. So what I think is t
hehe you have it comeing buddy *this is a new comp and I only read the
lastest messages sorry about any insult carryed over to you* it would be
like if microsoft started work on apache some people would have a sort of
puzzled look on there faces.
- Original Message -
From: "Kean Johnston"
Kyle Hamilton wrote:
can someone remind me why we are
A: putting stuff up at of all places sco?
You're not. Someone mentioned the lack of availability for some
libraries that were a pre-requisite for SVN on some OSes, OpenServer
being one of them, and I intended to reply to him privately but th
can someone remind me why we are
A: putting stuff up at of all places sco?
B: Why are we moveing it?
-Kyle
www.kylehamilton.net
www.kylehamilton.com
- Original Message -
From: "Kean Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: [
Do we need to buy a license?
No but if you send us money we'll donate it to the End Sarcasm Campaign.
Kean
On March 16, 2004 09:10 pm, Kean Johnston wrote:
> You can get the latest from
>
> ftp://ftp.sco.com/pub/openserver5/opensrc
>
> Its one-stop shopping for most of the useful open
> source libraries.
Do we need to buy a license?
Cheers,
Geoff
--
Geoff Thorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.geof
Naga Bussa wrote:
I am trying to use Apache 2.0.43 on Solaris 8, the
installation is
successful and the Apache starts without any errors.
maybe try something more recent? there was an APR problem back in that
timeframe that neglected to link in -lpthread when using Sun cc... various
oddities w
By the way, for SCO OpenServer, I have a package called 'GWXLIBS' - it
My appologies ... I meant this to be a private reply but did not check
the address. For everyone who is not [EMAIL PROTECTED] please ignore.
Kean
are all configure related and the usual ones: QNX 4, FreeBSD 3.1 with
IPv6 patch and SCO openserver 5.0.x... but we are working through them
By the way, for SCO OpenServer, I have a package called 'GWXLIBS' - it
stands for Graphics, Web and X11 Libraries. It ships standard in SCO
OpenServer 5.0.7
Bixby, Mark (TCSD-MISL-Cupertino) wrote:
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED],
I'd like to get some MPE-related tweaks into the coming 1.3.30.
>Can somebody with patch commit authority please ack me if these are OK?
1) New MPE-specific platform doc web page (in attachment but omitted below).
no comment yet
2)
Hi,
I am trying to use Apache 2.0.43 on Solaris 8, the
installation is
successful and the Apache starts without any errors.
But when I try to connect to the server from a browser
I get the
following error in the error_log
[error](13)Permission denied: apr_accept: (client
socket)
I am running Ap
--On Wednesday, March 17, 2004 9:47 AM +1000 Brian Havard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, being on a dialup link I currently rsync the cvs repository to a
local machine & do all my checkout/update/diff/log etc operations from
there & only commit across the link. Can I do that with subversion or
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:39:48 -0600, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 12:02, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
>> Disadvantages of moving to subversion:
>> - Not as portable (?)
>
>(Subversion clients/servers run anywhere APR does. I think that's
>actually more portable than CVS, since I don'
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:41:12PM +0100, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
>
> On Mar 16, 2004, at 10:03 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> >>neon has been the most limiting dependency for a client, I am told.
> >
> >Mmm, such juicy tempting FUD. Your anonymous informant should report
> >portability bugs to [
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 22:19, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 09:52:49PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
> > Can we please move this discussion to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > A lot of the points discussed aren't about technical problems of httpd
> > moving over, but overall topics concern
--On Tuesday, March 16, 2004 8:19 PM + Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
c) You appear to be assuming daily snapshots maintained forever in your
story - if so, how do you deal with network problems and the like? How
can you tell a commit that didn't make it to the "secure" server because
On Mar 16, 2004, at 10:03 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
neon has been the most limiting dependency for a client, I am told.
Mmm, such juicy tempting FUD. Your anonymous informant should report
portability bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED], rather than spreading gossip,
since
Oh come on - migration is not trivial
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 09:52:49PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
> Can we please move this discussion to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> A lot of the points discussed aren't about technical problems of httpd
> moving over, but overall topics concerning our setup. Most of the
> concerns that have come up are
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
clar2004/03/16 08:57:02
Modified:support ab.c
Log:
added check on apr_pollset_create() return value to exit ab it case it fails.
On NetWare using a concurrency higher than 64 is segfaulting because of FD_SETSIZE
as a value of 64.
Index: ab.c
-
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 22:03, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:15:26PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
> > neon has been the most limiting dependency for a client, I am told.
>
> Mmm, such juicy tempting FUD. Your anonymous informant should report
> portability bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:15:26PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 20:39, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 12:02, Joshua Slive wrote:
> >
> > > Disadvantages of moving to subversion:
> > > - Not as portable (?)
> >
> > (Subversion clients/servers run anywh
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 21:20, Ben Laurie wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> > At 11:27 AM 3/16/2004, Ben Laurie wrote:
> >
> >>Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>--On Monday, March 15, 2004 10:52 AM + Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> It is? How? Unless the com
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 11:27 AM 3/16/2004, Ben Laurie wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Monday, March 15, 2004 10:52 AM + Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is? How? Unless the committer signs (which ISTR was rejected as an option
when I suggested it, so I'm assuming that
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Tuesday, March 16, 2004 5:27 PM + Ben Laurie
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't see how this defends against a malicious user that has owned the
server for long enough for his changes to have been rsynced to the
"secure"
server?
Because it'd be read-only? That
--On Tuesday, March 16, 2004 12:26 PM -0600 "William A. Rowe, Jr."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Same here
diff -u3 backup/source.c,v live/source.c,v
you mean to say there is an equally trivial way to compare two
repositories to do post-mortem with svn? If so please share!
This doesn't wo
At 11:27 AM 3/16/2004, Ben Laurie wrote:
>Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
>>--On Monday, March 15, 2004 10:52 AM + Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>It is? How? Unless the committer signs (which ISTR was rejected as an option
>>>when I suggested it, so I'm assuming that doesn't happen), th
--On Tuesday, March 16, 2004 5:27 PM + Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I don't see how this defends against a malicious user that has owned the
server for long enough for his changes to have been rsynced to the "secure"
server?
Because it'd be read-only? That is, the changes won't be o
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Monday, March 15, 2004 10:52 AM + Ben Laurie
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is? How? Unless the committer signs (which ISTR was rejected as an
option
when I suggested it, so I'm assuming that doesn't happen), then they
must be
signed by the server - a successfu
29 matches
Mail list logo
